Analyzing larger sample sets with rapid methods: Incomplete-block designs with free-sorting and free-linking tasks
As rapid, holistic methods for similarity and description—such as sorting and projective mapping—have grown in popularity, a limiting factor is the number of samples that can be presented to subjects: more than 25 food samples decreases the quality and stability of results. While incomplete-block de...
Saved in:
| Published in | Food quality and preference Vol. 113; p. 105083 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
01.04.2024
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0950-3293 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083 |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | As rapid, holistic methods for similarity and description—such as sorting and projective mapping—have grown in popularity, a limiting factor is the number of samples that can be presented to subjects: more than 25 food samples decreases the quality and stability of results. While incomplete-block designs could address this, their use has not been developed for these holistic methods. In this paper we present an empirical investigation into the use of incomplete-block designs with free sorting and the newer free linking. We compare these two methods because while their results are comparable, the cognitive tasks are different, and thus their suitability for incomplete-block designs may differ. We evaluated the effects of incomplete-block designs in two studies. In Study 1, 20 subjects evaluated 6/10 chocolate bars by free linking in an incomplete-block design, with each subject completing 2 blocks; results were compared to a complete-block evaluation of the 10 bars by free sorting and free linking. In Study 2, a total of 90 subjects evaluated 62 terms from a chocolate flavor-wheel in 3 conditions (between subjects): free sorting with complete blocks (N = 30, all 62 terms) and free sorting (N = 30) or free linking (N = 30) with 3 incomplete blocks of 16/62 terms. We introduce a novel method to evaluate stability for the incomplete-block designs that we call “pairwise simulation.” From Study 1, we find that pairwise simulation provides adequate stability estimates and that, with sufficient pairwise cooccurrences, free linking with incomplete blocks produces results that are comparable to free sorting or linking with complete blocks. From Study 2, we demonstrate that free linking with incomplete blocks can produce high quality results from a large sample set, maintaining the increased discrimination capacity that marks free linking in general, and that with incomplete blocks, free linking is likely to be more stable than free sorting. This research demonstrates that incomplete-block designs can be used with free linking, and also provides a new, effective method through pairwise simulation for evaluating stability with incomplete-block designs, which cannot be resampled using standard bootstrapping approaches. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | As rapid, holistic methods for similarity and description—such as sorting and projective mapping—have grown in popularity, a limiting factor is the number of samples that can be presented to subjects: more than 25 food samples decreases the quality and stability of results. While incomplete-block designs could address this, their use has not been developed for these holistic methods. In this paper we present an empirical investigation into the use of incomplete-block designs with free sorting and the newer free linking. We compare these two methods because while their results are comparable, the cognitive tasks are different, and thus their suitability for incomplete-block designs may differ. We evaluated the effects of incomplete-block designs in two studies. In Study 1, 20 subjects evaluated 6/10 chocolate bars by free linking in an incomplete-block design, with each subject completing 2 blocks; results were compared to a complete-block evaluation of the 10 bars by free sorting and free linking. In Study 2, a total of 90 subjects evaluated 62 terms from a chocolate flavor-wheel in 3 conditions (between subjects): free sorting with complete blocks (N = 30, all 62 terms) and free sorting (N = 30) or free linking (N = 30) with 3 incomplete blocks of 16/62 terms. We introduce a novel method to evaluate stability for the incomplete-block designs that we call “pairwise simulation.” From Study 1, we find that pairwise simulation provides adequate stability estimates and that, with sufficient pairwise cooccurrences, free linking with incomplete blocks produces results that are comparable to free sorting or linking with complete blocks. From Study 2, we demonstrate that free linking with incomplete blocks can produce high quality results from a large sample set, maintaining the increased discrimination capacity that marks free linking in general, and that with incomplete blocks, free linking is likely to be more stable than free sorting. This research demonstrates that incomplete-block designs can be used with free linking, and also provides a new, effective method through pairwise simulation for evaluating stability with incomplete-block designs, which cannot be resampled using standard bootstrapping approaches. |
| ArticleNumber | 105083 |
| Author | Tejedor-Romero, Marino Ac-Pangan, Marlon Orden, David Swatko, Kyra Lahne, Jacob |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Marlon surname: Ac-Pangan fullname: Ac-Pangan, Marlon – sequence: 2 givenname: Marino surname: Tejedor-Romero fullname: Tejedor-Romero, Marino – sequence: 3 givenname: Kyra surname: Swatko fullname: Swatko, Kyra – sequence: 4 givenname: David surname: Orden fullname: Orden, David – sequence: 5 givenname: Jacob orcidid: 0000-0002-2344-1816 surname: Lahne fullname: Lahne, Jacob |
| BookMark | eNo1kDtvwjAURj1QqUD7FyqPXUL9SELcDaE-kCp1aWfLsa8h4NjBDqrory9R6HSlc4--4czQxAcPCD1QsqCElk_7hQ3BHE_KLRhh_AILUvEJmhJRkIwzwW_RLKU9IXRJKJuiuPLKnX8bv8VOxS1EnFTbOcAJ-oR_mn6Ho-oag1vod8GkZ7zxOgxGD1ntgj5gA6nZ-qtsI0CWQuyHReXNCFzjDwPoVTqkO3RjlUtwf71z9P368rV-zz4-3zbr1UemWcX7rLRQ2QLqiix1CaKmfJkzxTWlOStsJQgHYbSgtNa6ytnlzU1uFdTCVLnhJZ-jx3G3i-F4gtTLtkkanFMewilJTgtOhRCEXtRyVHUMKUWwsotNq-JZUiKHsHIv_8PKIawcw_I_7dF1CA |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103889 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.09.005 10.1016/0049-089X(76)90002-8 10.1177/1525822X03015002001 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00266.x 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104137 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.10.005 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x 10.1201/b16132 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.05.005 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104355 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513 10.1002/wics.198 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.009 10.1007/978-3-662-10619-8_3 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103923 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103870 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.06.010 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.04.001 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.09.003 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.004 10.1111/1750-3841.13301 10.1007/s00180-018-0830-y 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.008 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.005 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Diet & Clinical Nutrition |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_foodqual_2023_105083 |
| GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29H 3EH 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AAEDT AAEDW AAHBH AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATLK AATTM AAXKI AAXLA AAXUO AAYWO AAYXX ABFNM ABFRF ABGRD ABIVO ABJNI ABMAC ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIUM ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADQTV AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEQOU AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGRNS AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CITATION CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HLV HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM LW9 M41 MO0 MOBAO N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAB SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSA SSH SSN SSZ T5K UHS UNMZH WH7 WUQ Y6R ~G- ~KM 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-6fe8f5eb807c6e9b13742a3c11425f8903e9dc911bcc8421373d4faeb9d84d363 |
| ISSN | 0950-3293 |
| IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 17:42:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:05:12 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c283t-6fe8f5eb807c6e9b13742a3c11425f8903e9dc911bcc8421373d4faeb9d84d363 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2344-1816 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/117346 |
| PQID | 3153199901 |
| PQPubID | 24069 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3153199901 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2023_105083 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-04-00 20240401 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2024 text: 2024-04-00 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Food quality and preference |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| References | Kolaczyk (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0160) 2014 Burton (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0040) 2003; 15 Kuehl (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0165) 2000 Burton (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0045) 1976; 5 Chartrand (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0050) 2014 Lahne (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0170) 2020 Kessinger (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0145) 2020 Qannari (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0235) 2014; 32 Gaillard (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0120) 2011; 32 Cocoa of Excellence Technical Committee (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0065) 2021 Moussaoui (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0205) 2010; 21 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0230 Abdi (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0020) 2012; 4 Dehlholm (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0090) 2015 Abdi (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0005) 1990; 84 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0190 Coxon (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0080) 1999; Vol. 127 Mir (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0200) 2013; 241 Hamilton (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0130) 2020 Courcoux (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0075) 2012; 23 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0105 Koenig (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0150) 2021; 89 Blancher (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0035) 2012; 23 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0220 Valentin (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0255) 2012; 47 Yu (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0270) 2019; 34 Efron (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0100) 1994 Heymann (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0140) 2014 Orden (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0215) 2019; 72 Mervis (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0195) 1981; 32 (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0265) 2014 Abdi (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0015) 2007; 18 Berry (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0030) 2021 Valentin (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0260) 2018 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0250 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0175 Gacula (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0115) 2009 Paradis (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0225) 2019; 35 Hastie (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0135) 2009 Abdi (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0010) 2009; 45 Koenig (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0155) 2020; 83 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0125 (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0095) 2023 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0245 Chollet (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0055) 2011; 22 Courcoux (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0070) 2023 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0085 Lahne (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0180) 2022; 95 Nestrud (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0210) 2010; 25 Chollet (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0060) 2014 Faye (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0110) 2004; 15 Lawless (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0185) 2010 Arney (10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0025) 2013 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0240 |
| References_xml | – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0260 article-title: Projective mapping and sorting tasks – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0100 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0115 – volume: 35 start-page: 526 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0225 article-title: ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R publication-title: Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0135 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0130 article-title: Assessment of instructions on panelist cognitive framework and free sorting task results: A case study of cold brew coffee publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103889 – volume: 72 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0215 article-title: Testing SensoGraph, a geometric approach for fast sensory evaluation publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.09.005 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0105 – year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0065 article-title: Cocoa of Excellence Flavour Wheel [Whitepaper] publication-title: Bioversity – volume: 5 start-page: 247 issue: 3 year: 1976 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0045 article-title: Balanced designs for triads tests: Two examples from English publication-title: Social Science Research doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(76)90002-8 – volume: 15 start-page: 115 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0040 article-title: Too many questions? The uses of incomplete cyclic designs for paired comparisons publication-title: Field Methods doi: 10.1177/1525822X03015002001 – volume: 25 start-page: 390 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0210 article-title: Perceptual mapping of apples and cheeses using projective mapping and sorting: projective mapping publication-title: Journal of Sensory Studies doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00266.x – year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0030 – volume: 89 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0150 article-title: Additive trees for the categorization of a large number of objects, with bootstrapping strategy for stability assessment. Application to the free sorting of wine odor terms publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104137 – volume: 241 start-page: 125 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0200 article-title: A new balance index for phylogenetic trees publication-title: Mathematical Biosciences doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.10.005 – volume: 47 start-page: 1563 issue: 8 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0255 article-title: Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science publication-title: International Journal of Food Science & Technology doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0125 doi: 10.1201/b16132 – start-page: 9 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0140 article-title: Classical descriptive analysis – year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0095 – volume: 32 start-page: 93 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0235 article-title: Significance test of the adjusted Rand index. Application to the free sorting task publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.05.005 – volume: 95 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0180 article-title: The free-linking task: A graph-inspired method for generating non-disjoint similarity data with food products publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104355 – volume: Vol. 127 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0080 – volume: 32 start-page: 31 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0120 article-title: Effects of task and category membership on representation stability publication-title: Psicológica – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0165 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0250 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0240 – start-page: 207 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0060 article-title: Free Sorting Task – start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0145 article-title: Exploring perceptions and categorization of virginia hard ciders through the application of sorting tasks publication-title: Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0025 article-title: Network science for graph theorists – volume: 32 start-page: 89 issue: 1 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0195 article-title: Categorization of natural objects publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513 – volume: 4 start-page: 124 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0020 article-title: STATIS and DISTATIS: Optimum multitable principal component analysis and three way metric multidimensional scaling: STATIS and DISTATIS publication-title: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics doi: 10.1002/wics.198 – volume: 15 start-page: 781 issue: 7–8 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0110 article-title: Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: An alternative to descriptive mappings publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.009 – volume: 84 start-page: 43 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0005 article-title: Additive-tree representations publication-title: Lecture Notes in Biomathematics doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-10619-8_3 – start-page: 187 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0090 article-title: Free multiple sorting as a sensory profiling technique – year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0070 article-title: Free sorting as a sensory profiling technique for product development – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0050 article-title: Distance in graphs – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0160 – volume: 83 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0155 article-title: Influence of expertise on semantic categorization of wine odors publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103923 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0170 article-title: Sorting Backbone Analysis: A network-based method of extracting key actionable information from free-sorting task results publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103870 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0220 – volume: 23 start-page: 36 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0035 article-title: A method to investigate the stability of a sorting map publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.06.010 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0245 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0265 – volume: 23 start-page: 30 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0075 article-title: Taxonomic free sorting publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.04.001 – volume: 18 start-page: 627 issue: 4 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0015 article-title: Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.09.003 – volume: 22 start-page: 507 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0055 article-title: Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.004 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0085 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0175 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13301 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0230 – volume: 34 start-page: 349 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0270 article-title: Bootstrapping estimates of stability for clusters, observations and model selection publication-title: Computational Statistics doi: 10.1007/s00180-018-0830-y – volume: 45 start-page: 89 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0010 article-title: How to compute reliability estimates and display confidence and tolerance intervals for pattern classifiers using the Bootstrap and 3-way multidimensional scaling (DISTATIS) publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.008 – ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0190 – volume: 21 start-page: 1088 issue: 8 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0205 article-title: Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis publication-title: Food Quality and Preference doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.005 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105083_b0185 |
| SSID | ssj0017012 |
| Score | 2.4050813 |
| Snippet | As rapid, holistic methods for similarity and description—such as sorting and projective mapping—have grown in popularity, a limiting factor is the number of... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 105083 |
| SubjectTerms | chocolate cognition food quality |
| Title | Analyzing larger sample sets with rapid methods: Incomplete-block designs with free-sorting and free-linking tasks |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153199901 |
| Volume | 113 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ji9RAFC7a8eJFXLHdKEG8NIlZKpnEm6jDoMwo0gNzC5XKK-nFZEjSyMzB_-A_9tWWTo-DOF5CqCRFUu_L2-othLwUDPI44KEnGa88Fkr8pYKIezJL0XRLE8j1ju7RcXp4wj6eJqeTya9R1NKmL31xcWVeyf9QFceQripL9hqUHSbFATxH-uIRKYzHf6KxrihyoYz9tQrobmcdV8V-Zx24rLWWny0q2yZaB78hP1BB5KgqeyXKsdWs0iEc9nbZAnhd0_YudVEP2P4Ks553q26szR6oksgmLfPcVRyw-YMDkIT3hdffjJv1iLfr7bb_HJaqz4n3tfkOJtsGry_qZnD6_OD9So9_Om8H6fG5dZxyiMa3TotoHOvivI_I_iPTHHFgxGE8YqWo-AWmx80fXN44HJa-xK9UH-mrHvD-9oHdstqXxN0QhOji25aFm6dQ8xRmnhvkZoSWh2qK4f8cooZU9frIlG807z9KOr_6fXb1nV1xr3WY-R1y2xof9K1B0l0ygfoemb5fQE9fUVshdk2PXYOG-6QdEEYNwqhBGFUIowoyVCOMWoS9oZfxRS2-zM1jfFEEDB3ji2p8PSAnBx_m7w4926XDE6ia9l4qIZMJlFmwL1LIyzDeZxGPhUrSTmSWBzHklUCZWgqRsQgvxxWTHMq8ylgVp_FDslc3NTwiNAOWgGBpKKBkQY4sJEGLNq14JnHlQUzJa7eWxZkpxlL8nYpT8sIteYF8U22G8RqaTVfEoZI-alf48bVnfUJubUH9lOz17QaeoW7al881Wn4DYVqU2g |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing+larger+sample+sets+with+rapid+methods%3A+Incomplete-block+designs+with+free-sorting+and+free-linking+tasks&rft.jtitle=Food+quality+and+preference&rft.au=Ac-Pangan%2C+Marlon&rft.au=Tejedor-Romero%2C+Marino&rft.au=Swatko%2C+Kyra&rft.au=Orden%2C+David&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.issn=0950-3293&rft.volume=113&rft.spage=105083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.foodqual.2023.105083&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_foodqual_2023_105083 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0950-3293&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0950-3293&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0950-3293&client=summon |