Advances in imaging for pre-surgical planning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Accurate preoperative templating is essential for the success of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). While digital radiograph is currently considered the gold standard, stereoradiograph and CT converted 3D methods have shown promising results. However, there is no consensus in the literature regardi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research Vol. 110; no. 6; p. 103908
Main Authors Chai, Yuan, Boudali, A. Mounir, Jenkins, Evan, Maes, Vincent, Walter, William L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published France Elsevier Masson SAS 01.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Accurate preoperative templating is essential for the success of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). While digital radiograph is currently considered the gold standard, stereoradiograph and CT converted 3D methods have shown promising results. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the preferred modality for HRA templating, and angular measurements are often overlooked. Thus, this study aimed to: (1) compare the performances of different modality in implant sizing and angle measurements, (2) evaluate the measurement reproducibility, (3) assess the impact of severe osteoarthritis on femoral head sizing, and (4) based on the analysis above, explore the optimal imaging and planning strategy for HRA. An optimal imaging modality exists for HRA planning regarding implant sizing and angular measurements. Preoperative imaging data from seventy-seven HRA surgeries were collected. Three raters performed templating using digital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and CT converted 3D models. Measurements for femoral head size, neck-shaft angle, and calcar-shaft angle were obtained. The femoral head sizing was compared to the intraoperative clinical decision. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations were examined between sizing disagreement and osteoarthritis grade (Tonnis Classification). Digital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and 3D techniques predicted one size off target in 27/77 (35%), 49/70 (70%), and 75/77 (97%) of cases, respectively, corresponding to 1.8±1.6 (0 to 5.67), 0.9±0.7 (0 to 2.67), and 0.4±0.4 (0 to 1.67) sizes off target, indicating statistically significant differences among all three modalities, with p-values all below 0.01. There were no statistically significant differences among the different modalities for angular measurements. Measurements showed moderate to excellent reproducibility (ICC=0.628–0.955). High-grade osteoarthritis did not impact image sizing in any modality (r=0.08–0.22, all p>0.05). CT converted 3D models were more accurate for implant sizing in HRA, but did not significantly outperform other modalities in angular measurements. Given the high costs and increased radiation exposure associated with CT, the study recommended using CT scans selectively, particularly for precise femoral head sizing, while alternative imaging methods can be effectively used for angular measurements. III; retrospective comparative diagnostic study.
AbstractList Accurate preoperative templating is essential for the success of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). While digital radiograph is currently considered the gold standard, stereoradiograph and CT converted 3D methods have shown promising results. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the preferred modality for HRA templating, and angular measurements are often overlooked. Thus, this study aimed to: (1) compare the performances of different modality in implant sizing and angle measurements, (2) evaluate the measurement reproducibility, (3) assess the impact of severe osteoarthritis on femoral head sizing, and (4) based on the analysis above, explore the optimal imaging and planning strategy for HRA. An optimal imaging modality exists for HRA planning regarding implant sizing and angular measurements. Preoperative imaging data from seventy-seven HRA surgeries were collected. Three raters performed templating using digital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and CT converted 3D models. Measurements for femoral head size, neck-shaft angle, and calcar-shaft angle were obtained. The femoral head sizing was compared to the intraoperative clinical decision. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations were examined between sizing disagreement and osteoarthritis grade (Tonnis Classification). Digital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and 3D techniques predicted one size off target in 27/77 (35%), 49/70 (70%), and 75/77 (97%) of cases, respectively, corresponding to 1.8±1.6 (0 to 5.67), 0.9±0.7 (0 to 2.67), and 0.4±0.4 (0 to 1.67) sizes off target, indicating statistically significant differences among all three modalities, with p-values all below 0.01. There were no statistically significant differences among the different modalities for angular measurements. Measurements showed moderate to excellent reproducibility (ICC=0.628–0.955). High-grade osteoarthritis did not impact image sizing in any modality (r=0.08–0.22, all p>0.05). CT converted 3D models were more accurate for implant sizing in HRA, but did not significantly outperform other modalities in angular measurements. Given the high costs and increased radiation exposure associated with CT, the study recommended using CT scans selectively, particularly for precise femoral head sizing, while alternative imaging methods can be effectively used for angular measurements. III; retrospective comparative diagnostic study.
Accurate preoperative templating is essential for the success of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). While digital radiograph is currently considered the gold standard, stereoradiograph and CT converted 3D methods have shown promising results. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the preferred modality for HRA templating, and angular measurements are often overlooked. Thus, this study aimed to: (1) compare the performances of different modality in implant sizing and angle measurements, (2) evaluate the measurement reproducibility, (3) assess the impact of severe osteoarthritis on femoral head sizing, and (4) based on the analysis above, explore the optimal imaging and planning strategy for HRA.BACKGROUNDAccurate preoperative templating is essential for the success of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). While digital radiograph is currently considered the gold standard, stereoradiograph and CT converted 3D methods have shown promising results. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the preferred modality for HRA templating, and angular measurements are often overlooked. Thus, this study aimed to: (1) compare the performances of different modality in implant sizing and angle measurements, (2) evaluate the measurement reproducibility, (3) assess the impact of severe osteoarthritis on femoral head sizing, and (4) based on the analysis above, explore the optimal imaging and planning strategy for HRA.An optimal imaging modality exists for HRA planning regarding implant sizing and angular measurements.HYPOTHESISAn optimal imaging modality exists for HRA planning regarding implant sizing and angular measurements.Preoperative imaging data from seventy-seven HRA surgeries were collected. Three raters performed templating using digital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and CT converted 3D models. Measurements for femoral head size, neck-shaft angle, and calcar-shaft angle were obtained. The femoral head sizing was compared to the intraoperative clinical decision. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations were examined between sizing disagreement and osteoarthritis grade (Tonnis Classification).MATERIALS AND METHODSPreoperative imaging data from seventy-seven HRA surgeries were collected. Three raters performed templating using digital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and CT converted 3D models. Measurements for femoral head size, neck-shaft angle, and calcar-shaft angle were obtained. The femoral head sizing was compared to the intraoperative clinical decision. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations were examined between sizing disagreement and osteoarthritis grade (Tonnis Classification).Digital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and 3D techniques predicted one size off target in 27/77 (35%), 49/70 (70%), and 75/77 (97%) of cases, respectively, corresponding to 1.8±1.6 (0 to 5.67), 0.9±0.7 (0 to 2.67), and 0.4±0.4 (0 to 1.67) sizes off target, indicating statistically significant differences among all three modalities, with p-values all below 0.01. There were no statistically significant differences among the different modalities for angular measurements. Measurements showed moderate to excellent reproducibility (ICC=0.628-0.955). High-grade osteoarthritis did not impact image sizing in any modality (r=0.08-0.22, all p>0.05).RESULTSDigital radiograph, stereoradiograph, and 3D techniques predicted one size off target in 27/77 (35%), 49/70 (70%), and 75/77 (97%) of cases, respectively, corresponding to 1.8±1.6 (0 to 5.67), 0.9±0.7 (0 to 2.67), and 0.4±0.4 (0 to 1.67) sizes off target, indicating statistically significant differences among all three modalities, with p-values all below 0.01. There were no statistically significant differences among the different modalities for angular measurements. Measurements showed moderate to excellent reproducibility (ICC=0.628-0.955). High-grade osteoarthritis did not impact image sizing in any modality (r=0.08-0.22, all p>0.05).CT converted 3D models were more accurate for implant sizing in HRA, but did not significantly outperform other modalities in angular measurements. Given the high costs and increased radiation exposure associated with CT, the study recommended using CT scans selectively, particularly for precise femoral head sizing, while alternative imaging methods can be effectively used for angular measurements.DISCUSSIONCT converted 3D models were more accurate for implant sizing in HRA, but did not significantly outperform other modalities in angular measurements. Given the high costs and increased radiation exposure associated with CT, the study recommended using CT scans selectively, particularly for precise femoral head sizing, while alternative imaging methods can be effectively used for angular measurements.III; retrospective comparative diagnostic study.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEIII; retrospective comparative diagnostic study.
ArticleNumber 103908
Author Walter, William L.
Chai, Yuan
Boudali, A. Mounir
Jenkins, Evan
Maes, Vincent
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yuan
  surname: Chai
  fullname: Chai, Yuan
  email: yuanchai95@gmail.com
  organization: The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health and The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Level 10, 10 Westbourne St, St. Leonards, NSW, 2064, Australia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A. Mounir
  surname: Boudali
  fullname: Boudali, A. Mounir
  organization: The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health and The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Level 10, 10 Westbourne St, St. Leonards, NSW, 2064, Australia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Evan
  surname: Jenkins
  fullname: Jenkins, Evan
  organization: Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 10 Westbourne St, St. Leonards, NSW, 2064, Australia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Vincent
  surname: Maes
  fullname: Maes, Vincent
  organization: Tom Reeve Academic Surgical Clinic, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, 10 Westbourne St, St. Leonards, NSW, 2064, Australia
– sequence: 5
  givenname: William L.
  surname: Walter
  fullname: Walter, William L.
  organization: The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health and The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Level 10, 10 Westbourne St, St. Leonards, NSW, 2064, Australia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38768810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kD1PwzAQhi1URGnhDzCgjCwp_khiW2KpKr6kIhaYLce5tK7SJNhJpf57HKUgJiZbd8-9untmaFI3NSB0Q_CCYJLd7xZN592CYpqEApNYnKFLIjiPcZqJyZ__FM2832GcZYTRCzRlgmdCEHyJ3pbFQdcGfGTryO71xtabqGxc1DqIfe821ugqaitd10MnQFvbRg5Cq9RmKGnXbV0TCN8dr9B5qSsP16d3jj6fHj9WL_H6_fl1tVzHhgrSxYlJQNKcaZ5LoQE0lBnPQTJGmJCQZDQXKTfEyETThGOgheSUJTjJgVIJbI7uxtzWNV89-E7trTdQhTWh6b1iOOWZpClOA0pH1LjGewelal240x0VwWrQqHZq0KgGjWrUGIZuT_l9vofid-THWwAeRgDClQcLTnljIXgsrAPTqaKx_-V_A6Fqhcs
Cites_doi 10.3390/app10248941
10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26429
10.1007/BF00415854
10.3390/bioengineering10080939
10.21037/aoj.2019.12.05
10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.023
10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.0800382
10.2106/JBJS.L.00989
10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0
10.1302/2058-5241.5.200046
10.1007/s00256-015-2236-z
10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103744
10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.001
10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.022
10.3390/jcm13051394
10.1177/15563316221136128
10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.024
10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.24194
10.1155/2019/1932191
10.1186/s10195-022-00634-x
10.1089/3dp.2021.0121
10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14338
10.21037/aoj.2019.12.11
10.1186/s41205-020-00077-2
10.1177/112070001002000102
10.1097/OI9.0000000000000213
10.1259/bjr/29690721
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Authors
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Authors
– notice: Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1877-0568
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_otsr_2024_103908
38768810
S187705682400152X
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
0SF
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
457
4G.
5VS
6I.
7-5
71M
8P~
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAXKI
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABVKL
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEKER
AEVXI
AEXQZ
AFCTW
AFJKZ
AFKWA
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
AXJTR
BAWUL
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
DIK
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IXB
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
NCXOZ
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF0
OK1
OR.
OZT
P-8
P-9
PC.
Q38
RIG
ROL
SDF
SEM
SES
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
Z5R
~G-
NPM
AAYXX
ACRPL
ADNMO
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-4c4e92b3a7b98aeeaef67be9331389e462b857c1c94a2470e2d9723404be229e3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1877-0568
IngestDate Thu Dec 05 20:56:12 EST 2024
Fri Dec 06 08:00:24 EST 2024
Sat Nov 02 12:29:18 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 16:00:39 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Hip resurfacing arthroplasty
Templating accuracy
Imaging strategy
Surgical planning
Imaging analysis
Modality comparisons
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c281t-4c4e92b3a7b98aeeaef67be9331389e462b857c1c94a2470e2d9723404be229e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705682400152X
PMID 38768810
PQID 3057692505
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3057692505
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2024_103908
pubmed_primary_38768810
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_otsr_2024_103908
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2024
2024-Oct
2024-10-00
20241001
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2024
  text: October 2024
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace France
PublicationPlace_xml – name: France
PublicationTitle Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research
PublicationTitleAlternate Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Elsevier Masson SAS
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Masson SAS
References Boese, Dargel, Oppermann, Eysel, Scheyerer, Bredow (bib0295) 2016; 45
Konan, Rayan, Meermans, Geurts, Haddad (bib0165) 2010; 20
Choi, Geller, Wang, Nyce, Macaulay (bib0185) 2011; 26
Moralidou, Di Laura, Henckel, Hothi, Hart (bib0195) 2020; 5
Albano, Loria, Fanciullo, Bruno, Messina, del Vecchio (bib0310) 2020; 10
Escott, Ravi, Weathermon, Acharya, Gordon, Babyn (bib0210) 2013; 95
de Villiers, Richards, Tuke, Collins (bib0225) 2020; 5
Reinbacher, Smolle, Friesenbichler, Draschl, Leithner, Maurer-Ertl (bib0260) 2022; 23
Sariali, Mauprivez, Khiami, Pascal-Mousselard, Catonné (bib0280) 2012; 98
Kishida, Sugano, Nishii, Miki, Yamaguchi, Yoshikawa (bib0160) 2004; 86
Chai, Chen, Estoque, Birbilis, Qin, Ward (bib0220) 2023; 10
Koo, Li (bib0245) 2016; 15
Haddad, Thakrar, Hart, Skinner, Nargol, Nolan (bib0170) 2011; 93
Di Laura, Henckel, Hothi, Hart (bib0255) 2020; 6
Busse, Gasteiger, Tönnis (bib0235) 1972; 72
Grammatopoulos, Pandit, Glyn-Jones, McLardy-Smith, Gundle, Whitwell (bib0230) 2010; 92
McLawhorn, Nam, McArthur, Cross, Su (bib0180) 2012; 41
Knafo, Houfani, Zaharia, Egrise, Clerc-Urmès, Mainard (bib0250) 2019; 2019
Mainard, Barbier, Knafo, Belleville, Mainard-Simard, Gross (bib0275) 2017; 103
Olsen, Gamble, Chiu, Tumia, Boyle, Schemitsch (bib0200) 2010; 25
Pansard, Vigan, Bauer (bib0265) 2024; 110
Multani, Cunningham, Walter (bib0175) 2020; 5
Wilson, Eardley, Odak, Jennings (bib0300) 2011; 84
Melhem, Assi, El Rachkidi, Ghanem (bib0215) 2016; 10
Alagha, Logishetty, O’Hanlon, Liddle, Cobb (bib0290) 2023; 10
Chai, Maes, Boudali, Rackel, Walter (bib0190) 2024; 13
Chai, Boudali, Walter (bib0285) 2023; 19
Chai, Simic, Smith, Valter, Limaye, Li (bib0240) 2022; 5
Osman, Raafat, Faizo, Ahmed, Alamri, Alghamdi (bib0305) 2021; 14
Eggli, Pisan, Müller (bib0270) 1998; 80
Bracey, Seyler, Shields, Leng, Jinnah, Lang (bib0205) 2014; 43
Knafo (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0250) 2019; 2019
Boese (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0295) 2016; 45
Moralidou (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0195) 2020; 5
Choi (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0185) 2011; 26
Chai (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0240) 2022; 5
Haddad (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0170) 2011; 93
Osman (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0305) 2021; 14
Multani (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0175) 2020; 5
Bracey (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0205) 2014; 43
Busse (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0235) 1972; 72
McLawhorn (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0180) 2012; 41
Escott (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0210) 2013; 95
Konan (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0165) 2010; 20
Alagha (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0290) 2023; 10
Albano (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0310) 2020; 10
Chai (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0190) 2024; 13
Mainard (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0275) 2017; 103
Sariali (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0280) 2012; 98
Chai (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0220) 2023; 10
Melhem (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0215) 2016; 10
Pansard (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0265) 2024; 110
Eggli (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0270) 1998; 80
Reinbacher (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0260) 2022; 23
Di Laura (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0255) 2020; 6
Chai (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0285) 2023; 19
Olsen (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0200) 2010; 25
Grammatopoulos (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0230) 2010; 92
de Villiers (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0225) 2020; 5
Wilson (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0300) 2011; 84
Kishida (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0160) 2004; 86
Koo (10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0245) 2016; 15
References_xml – volume: 10
  start-page: 8941
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0310
  article-title: Diagnostic performance and radiation dose of the EOS system to image enchondromatosis: a phantom study
  publication-title: Appl Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: del Vecchio
– volume: 93
  start-page: 572
  year: 2011
  end-page: 579
  ident: bib0170
  article-title: Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  contributor:
    fullname: Nolan
– volume: 20
  start-page: 14
  year: 2010
  end-page: 17
  ident: bib0165
  article-title: Preoperative digital templating of Birmingham hip resurfacing
  publication-title: Hip Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Haddad
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1394
  year: 2024
  ident: bib0190
  article-title: Inadequate annotation and its impact on pelvic tilt measurement in clinical practice
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Walter
– volume: 5
  start-page: 12
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0225
  article-title: Ceramic resurfacing: the future and challenges
  publication-title: Ann Joint
  contributor:
    fullname: Collins
– volume: 10
  start-page: 939
  year: 2023
  ident: bib0290
  article-title: Three-dimensional preoperative planning software for hip resurfacing arthroplasty
  publication-title: Bioengineering (Basel)
  contributor:
    fullname: Cobb
– volume: 15
  start-page: 155
  year: 2016
  end-page: 163
  ident: bib0245
  article-title: A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research
  publication-title: J Chiropr Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Li
– volume: 86
  start-page: 185
  year: 2004
  end-page: 189
  ident: bib0160
  article-title: Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  contributor:
    fullname: Yoshikawa
– volume: 110
  start-page: 103744
  year: 2024
  ident: bib0265
  article-title: Do the sizes of total hip arthroplasty implants match between 3D planning software and 2D templating?
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Bauer
– volume: 43
  start-page: e19
  year: 2014
  end-page: e24
  ident: bib0205
  article-title: A comparison of acetate and digital templating for hip resurfacing
  publication-title: Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)
  contributor:
    fullname: Lang
– volume: 10
  start-page: 984
  year: 2023
  end-page: 991
  ident: bib0220
  article-title: A novel approach of customized pelvic implant design based on symmetrical analysis and 3D printing
  publication-title: 3D Print Addit Manuf
  contributor:
    fullname: Ward
– volume: 23
  start-page: 16
  year: 2022
  ident: bib0260
  article-title: Preoperative templating in THA using a short stem system: precision and accuracy of 2D versus 3D planning method
  publication-title: J Orthop Traumatol
  contributor:
    fullname: Maurer-Ertl
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1072
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1078
  ident: bib0230
  article-title: Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  contributor:
    fullname: Whitwell
– volume: 25
  start-page: 445
  year: 2010
  end-page: 449
  ident: bib0200
  article-title: Assessment of accuracy and reliability in preoperative templating for hip resurfacing arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  contributor:
    fullname: Schemitsch
– volume: 19
  start-page: 187
  year: 2023
  end-page: 192
  ident: bib0285
  article-title: Correlations analysis of different pelvic tilt definitions: a preliminary study
  publication-title: HSS J
  contributor:
    fullname: Walter
– volume: 5
  start-page: e213
  year: 2022
  ident: bib0240
  article-title: Comparison of 2 open-sourced 3-dimensional modeling techniques for orthopaedic application
  publication-title: OTA Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Li
– volume: 103
  start-page: 531
  year: 2017
  end-page: 536
  ident: bib0275
  article-title: Accuracy and reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional planning for total hip arthroplasty using biplanar low-dose radiographs: a pilot study
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Gross
– volume: 41
  start-page: E157
  year: 2012
  end-page: E162
  ident: bib0180
  article-title: Preoperative templating and its intraoperative applications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty
  publication-title: Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)
  contributor:
    fullname: Su
– volume: 5
  start-page: 14
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0175
  article-title: My current indications for hip resurfacing
  publication-title: Ann Joint
  contributor:
    fullname: Walter
– volume: 5
  start-page: 845
  year: 2020
  end-page: 855
  ident: bib0195
  article-title: Three-dimensional preoperative planning of primary hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review
  publication-title: Efort Open Rev
  contributor:
    fullname: Hart
– volume: 95
  start-page: e1831
  year: 2013
  end-page: e1837
  ident: bib0210
  article-title: EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  contributor:
    fullname: Babyn
– volume: 72
  start-page: 1
  year: 1972
  end-page: 9
  ident: bib0235
  article-title: A new method for roentgenologic evaluation of the hip joint – the hip factor
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Unfallchir
  contributor:
    fullname: Tönnis
– volume: 45
  start-page: 19
  year: 2016
  end-page: 28
  ident: bib0295
  article-title: The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review
  publication-title: Skeletal Radiol
  contributor:
    fullname: Bredow
– volume: 80
  start-page: 382
  year: 1998
  end-page: 390
  ident: bib0270
  article-title: The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  contributor:
    fullname: Müller
– volume: 26
  start-page: 765
  year: 2011
  end-page: 770
  ident: bib0185
  article-title: The accuracy and reliability of preoperative templating for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  contributor:
    fullname: Macaulay
– volume: 2019
  start-page: 1932191
  year: 2019
  ident: bib0250
  article-title: Value of 3D preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on biplanar weightbearing radiographs
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Mainard
– volume: 98
  start-page: 151
  year: 2012
  end-page: 158
  ident: bib0280
  article-title: Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  contributor:
    fullname: Catonné
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 14
  ident: bib0215
  article-title: EOS® biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations
  publication-title: J Child Orthop
  contributor:
    fullname: Ghanem
– volume: 84
  start-page: 375
  year: 2011
  end-page: 379
  ident: bib0300
  article-title: To what degree is digital imaging reliable? Validation of femoral neck shaft angle measurement in the era of picture archiving and communication systems
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  contributor:
    fullname: Jennings
– volume: 6
  start-page: 25
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0255
  article-title: Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
  publication-title: 3D Print Med
  contributor:
    fullname: Hart
– volume: 14
  start-page: 449
  year: 2021
  end-page: 455
  ident: bib0305
  article-title: Exposure levels of CT and conventional X-ray procedures for radiosensitive pelvic organ in Saudi Arabia
  publication-title: J Radiat Res Appl Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: Alghamdi
– volume: 10
  start-page: 8941
  issue: 24
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0310
  article-title: Diagnostic performance and radiation dose of the EOS system to image enchondromatosis: a phantom study
  publication-title: Appl Sci
  doi: 10.3390/app10248941
  contributor:
    fullname: Albano
– volume: 93
  start-page: 572
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0170
  article-title: Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26429
  contributor:
    fullname: Haddad
– volume: 72
  start-page: 1
  year: 1972
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0235
  article-title: A new method for roentgenologic evaluation of the hip joint – the hip factor
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Unfallchir
  doi: 10.1007/BF00415854
  contributor:
    fullname: Busse
– volume: 10
  start-page: 939
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0290
  article-title: Three-dimensional preoperative planning software for hip resurfacing arthroplasty
  publication-title: Bioengineering (Basel)
  doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080939
  contributor:
    fullname: Alagha
– volume: 5
  start-page: 14
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0175
  article-title: My current indications for hip resurfacing
  publication-title: Ann Joint
  doi: 10.21037/aoj.2019.12.05
  contributor:
    fullname: Multani
– volume: 15
  start-page: 155
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0245
  article-title: A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research
  publication-title: J Chiropr Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  contributor:
    fullname: Koo
– volume: 98
  start-page: 151
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0280
  article-title: Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.023
  contributor:
    fullname: Sariali
– volume: 80
  start-page: 382
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0270
  article-title: The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.0800382
  contributor:
    fullname: Eggli
– volume: 95
  start-page: e1831
  issue: 23
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0210
  article-title: EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00989
  contributor:
    fullname: Escott
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0215
  article-title: EOS® biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations
  publication-title: J Child Orthop
  doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Melhem
– volume: 5
  start-page: 845
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0195
  article-title: Three-dimensional preoperative planning of primary hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review
  publication-title: Efort Open Rev
  doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200046
  contributor:
    fullname: Moralidou
– volume: 45
  start-page: 19
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0295
  article-title: The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review
  publication-title: Skeletal Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2236-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Boese
– volume: 110
  start-page: 103744
  year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0265
  article-title: Do the sizes of total hip arthroplasty implants match between 3D planning software and 2D templating?
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103744
  contributor:
    fullname: Pansard
– volume: 103
  start-page: 531
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0275
  article-title: Accuracy and reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional planning for total hip arthroplasty using biplanar low-dose radiographs: a pilot study
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.001
  contributor:
    fullname: Mainard
– volume: 25
  start-page: 445
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0200
  article-title: Assessment of accuracy and reliability in preoperative templating for hip resurfacing arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.022
  contributor:
    fullname: Olsen
– volume: 41
  start-page: E157
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0180
  article-title: Preoperative templating and its intraoperative applications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty
  publication-title: Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)
  contributor:
    fullname: McLawhorn
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1394
  year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0190
  article-title: Inadequate annotation and its impact on pelvic tilt measurement in clinical practice
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/jcm13051394
  contributor:
    fullname: Chai
– volume: 19
  start-page: 187
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0285
  article-title: Correlations analysis of different pelvic tilt definitions: a preliminary study
  publication-title: HSS J
  doi: 10.1177/15563316221136128
  contributor:
    fullname: Chai
– volume: 43
  start-page: e19
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0205
  article-title: A comparison of acetate and digital templating for hip resurfacing
  publication-title: Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)
  contributor:
    fullname: Bracey
– volume: 26
  start-page: 765
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0185
  article-title: The accuracy and reliability of preoperative templating for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.024
  contributor:
    fullname: Choi
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1072
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0230
  article-title: Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.24194
  contributor:
    fullname: Grammatopoulos
– volume: 2019
  start-page: 1932191
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0250
  article-title: Value of 3D preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty based on biplanar weightbearing radiographs
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
  doi: 10.1155/2019/1932191
  contributor:
    fullname: Knafo
– volume: 23
  start-page: 16
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0260
  article-title: Preoperative templating in THA using a short stem system: precision and accuracy of 2D versus 3D planning method
  publication-title: J Orthop Traumatol
  doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00634-x
  contributor:
    fullname: Reinbacher
– volume: 14
  start-page: 449
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0305
  article-title: Exposure levels of CT and conventional X-ray procedures for radiosensitive pelvic organ in Saudi Arabia
  publication-title: J Radiat Res Appl Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: Osman
– volume: 10
  start-page: 984
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0220
  article-title: A novel approach of customized pelvic implant design based on symmetrical analysis and 3D printing
  publication-title: 3D Print Addit Manuf
  doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0121
  contributor:
    fullname: Chai
– volume: 86
  start-page: 185
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0160
  article-title: Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14338
  contributor:
    fullname: Kishida
– volume: 5
  start-page: 12
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0225
  article-title: Ceramic resurfacing: the future and challenges
  publication-title: Ann Joint
  doi: 10.21037/aoj.2019.12.11
  contributor:
    fullname: de Villiers
– volume: 6
  start-page: 25
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0255
  article-title: Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study
  publication-title: 3D Print Med
  doi: 10.1186/s41205-020-00077-2
  contributor:
    fullname: Di Laura
– volume: 20
  start-page: 14
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0165
  article-title: Preoperative digital templating of Birmingham hip resurfacing
  publication-title: Hip Int
  doi: 10.1177/112070001002000102
  contributor:
    fullname: Konan
– volume: 5
  start-page: e213
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0240
  article-title: Comparison of 2 open-sourced 3-dimensional modeling techniques for orthopaedic application
  publication-title: OTA Int
  doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000213
  contributor:
    fullname: Chai
– volume: 84
  start-page: 375
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908_bib0300
  article-title: To what degree is digital imaging reliable? Validation of femoral neck shaft angle measurement in the era of picture archiving and communication systems
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/29690721
  contributor:
    fullname: Wilson
SSID ssj0066132
Score 2.4064012
Snippet Accurate preoperative templating is essential for the success of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). While digital radiograph is currently considered the gold...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 103908
SubjectTerms Hip resurfacing arthroplasty
Imaging analysis
Imaging strategy
Modality comparisons
Surgical planning
Templating accuracy
Title Advances in imaging for pre-surgical planning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103908
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38768810
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3057692505
Volume 110
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8QwEA6LXryI4mt9LBW8Sd02TdvkuCwu62sRdWFvoUmnWMFu2bYHL_52M30sCOrBU9uQ0HQSvpky3-Qj5EJooJqK2I5BMdugJNgRdz1z54DrJ9RVcU2QnQXTObtd-IseGXe1MEirbLG_wfQarduWYWvNYZ6mw2eXh6Fx3xxZkMYLLbCC3XdQxeDqc03zMO6nFinDzjb2bgtnGo7XsizwTFDKsPZcoMTkz87pt-CzdkKTHbLdRo_WqJngLulBtkceRk0ev7DSzErfa9khy8SiFjI8impVY5uVt-pE2Ok1zS3zm12tkkhjk_lgVEswgXT5sU_mk-uX8dRuVRJsTblb2kwzEFR5UagEjwAiSIJQgfA8zEECC6jifqhdLVhEWegAjVFpjDlMAaUCvAOykS0zOCIWZ7EbCz8JEp4wpsxoLwhiGpsojvlaO31y2ZlH5s1hGLJjib1JNKZEY8rGmH3idxaU35ZUGrT-c9x5Z25p9jomMKIMllUhDTaFgcCgrU8Om3VYz8MzsM656xz_860nZAufGp7eKdkoVxWcmXijVIN6Qw3I5mj8dP-I15u76ewLr2fVww
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,4502,24116,27924,27925,45585,45679
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV27TsMwFLWgDLAgEK_yDBIbCk0cJ7FHVFGV50IrdbNi50YEibRq04GFb-fePJCQgIEtcmzFvrbOPZGPfRi7UBa45Sp1UzDCRZQEN5F-gE8e-GHGfZNWAtmnaDgWd5NwssL67VkYklU22F9jeoXWTUmviWZvlue9Z1_GMaZvSSpIzEKTVbYmQmS_uKivPr50Hph_Kpcyqu1S9ebkTC3ympYLuhSUCzp8rshj8ufs9Bv7rLLQYIttNvTRua57uM1WoNhhj9f1Rv7CyQsnf6t8hxwkow5JPBbLeQVuzqyxJ6JKL_nMwf_s5TxLLBXhiMkuAZl0-b7LxoObUX_oNjYJruXSL11hBShugiQ2SiYACWRRbEAFAW1Cgoi4kWFsfatEwkXsAU_Jakx4wgDnCoI91immBRwwR4rUT1WYRZnMhDDYOoiilKdI40Rorddll2149Ky-DUO3MrFXTcHUFExdB7PLwjaC-tucaoTrP9udt-HWuNhpByMpYLpcaASnOFLE2rpsv56Hr34EiOtS-t7hP796xtaHo8cH_XD7dH_ENuhNLdo7Zp1yvoQTJB-lOa0W1ycudtXL
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advances+in+imaging+for+pre-surgical+planning+in+hip+resurfacing+arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics+%26+traumatology%2C+surgery+%26+research&rft.au=Chai%2C+Yuan&rft.au=Boudali%2C+A.+Mounir&rft.au=Jenkins%2C+Evan&rft.au=Maes%2C+Vincent&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=103908&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.otsr.2024.103908&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_otsr_2024_103908
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1877-0568&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1877-0568&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1877-0568&client=summon