Validity of the total body centre of gravity during gait using a markerless motion capture system

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS). Materials and methods: Thirty young healthy subjec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical engineering & technology Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 175 - 181
Main Authors Tanaka, Ryo, Kubota, Takuya, Yamasaki, Takahiro, Higashi, Ariaki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 03.04.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS). Materials and methods: Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r  > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor. Conclusion: In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction.
AbstractList The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS).PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS).Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.MATERIALS AND METHODSThirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r  > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor.RESULTSThe COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r  > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor.In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction.CONCLUSIONIn the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS). Materials and methods: Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r  > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor. Conclusion: In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction.
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS). Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r  > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor. In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction.
Author Kubota, Takuya
Higashi, Ariaki
Tanaka, Ryo
Yamasaki, Takahiro
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ryo
  surname: Tanaka
  fullname: Tanaka, Ryo
  email: ryotana@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
  organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Takuya
  surname: Kubota
  fullname: Kubota, Takuya
  organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Takahiro
  surname: Yamasaki
  fullname: Yamasaki, Takahiro
  organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ariaki
  surname: Higashi
  fullname: Higashi, Ariaki
  organization: Systemfriend Inc
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1U1G5LfwKVj1yyjB1nE6sXUMWXVIkLIG7WrD8WUydebKco_55Eu3vpoVw8lvw8Y828l-RsiIMl5DWDNYMO3kINkkngaw6sWzMhpAT5gqyY2Iiq4fznGVktTLVAF-Qy598AwAWHc3LBZSc2DNiK4A8M3vgy0eho-WVpiQUD3UYzUW2HkuzysEv4uDBmTH7Y0R36Qse8XJH2mB5sCjZn2sfi40A17ss4i3nKxfavyEuHIdvrY70i3z9--Hb3ubr_-unL3fv7SvOOlao2NXPblhtw4BqYT5TOdZo1rWG1bLjAVujGtKKVsNmCaY3oWFNzJySC1PUVeXPou0_xz2hzUb3P2oaAg41jVhxEyzvRbOoZvTmi47a3Ru2Tn6eY1GktM3B7AHSKOSfrlPYFl-FKQh8UA7WEoE4hqCUEdQxhtpsn9umD_3nvDp4fXEw9_o0pGFVwCjG5hIP2WdXPt_gH9AedUg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2021_3096433
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58050620
crossref_primary_10_47529_2223_2524_2023_1_9
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_2481686
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22239425
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2020_109929
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.015
10.1016/0021-9290(87)90328-9
10.1007/BF02443876
10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0150
10.1177/1941738117726323
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.005
10.2106/00004623-198264090-00008
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.008
10.1016/j.apergo.2015.01.005
10.3951/sobim.27.29
10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.796
10.1089/g4h.2014.0047
10.1177/1545968308326425
10.1519/00139143-200831020-00003
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.012
10.1002/9780470549148
10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378
10.1159/000362549
10.1093/ageing/26.1.15
10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591950
10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320257
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033
10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.022
10.1007/s00776-007-1178-2
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/03091902.2018.1449909
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
EISSN 1464-522X
EndPage 181
ExternalDocumentID 29846101
10_1080_03091902_2018_1449909
1449909
Genre Article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Systemfriend Inc
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.4S
.DC
00X
03L
0BK
0R~
29L
36B
4.4
5GY
5RE
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAWTL
ABBKH
ABDBF
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABLKL
ABUPF
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIEZ
ACUHS
ADCVX
ADRBQ
ADXPE
AECIN
AEOZL
AFKVX
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
ARCSS
BABNJ
BLEHA
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CS3
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBX
ECS
EDO
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
EST
ESX
F5P
H13
HZ~
I-F
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
M4Z
O9-
P2P
RNANH
RVRKI
SV3
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
TUROJ
TUS
UEQFS
V1S
~1N
AAGDL
AAYXX
ABWVI
ADMLS
ADYSH
AFRVT
AMPGV
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3d31fb72d0f0f500f0a9ff8c157d139524a74c5d747906b0d7d481532f49a09c3
ISSN 0309-1902
1464-522X
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:28:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:15 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:46 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:47:50 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:09:07 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords total body centre of mass
Kinect v2
Centre of gravity
Vicon
validity
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c281t-3d31fb72d0f0f500f0a9ff8c157d139524a74c5d747906b0d7d481532f49a09c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 29846101
PQID 2047284563
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1080_03091902_2018_1449909
proquest_miscellaneous_2047284563
pubmed_primary_29846101
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_03091902_2018_1449909
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_03091902_2018_1449909
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-04-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-04-03
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-04-03
  day: 03
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of medical engineering & technology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Med Eng Technol
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
References CIT0010
CIT0012
CIT0011
Helmuth H. (CIT0005) 1985; 43
CIT0014
CIT0013
CIT0016
CIT0015
CIT0018
Dettmann MA (CIT0001) 1987; 66
CIT0017
CIT0019
Moriwaki N (CIT0020) 2013; 43
CIT0021
CIT0023
CIT0022
CIT0003
CIT0025
CIT0002
CIT0024
CIT0027
CIT0004
CIT0026
CIT0007
CIT0006
CIT0009
CIT0008
References_xml – ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.015
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90328-9
– ident: CIT0019
  doi: 10.1007/BF02443876
– ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0150
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1177/1941738117726323
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.005
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-198264090-00008
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.008
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.01.005
– volume: 66
  start-page: 77
  year: 1987
  ident: CIT0001
  publication-title: Am J Phys Med
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.3951/sobim.27.29
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.796
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1089/g4h.2014.0047
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1177/1545968308326425
– ident: CIT0025
  doi: 10.1519/00139143-200831020-00003
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.012
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1002/9780470549148
– ident: CIT0027
  doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.1159/000362549
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.1.15
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591950
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320257
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.022
– volume: 43
  start-page: 69
  year: 2013
  ident: CIT0020
  publication-title: J Japan Statist Soc
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1007/s00776-007-1178-2
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1
  year: 1985
  ident: CIT0005
  publication-title: Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht Uber Die Biologisch-Anthropologische Literatur
SSID ssj0002420
Score 2.142022
Snippet Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture...
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS)...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 175
SubjectTerms Centre of gravity
Kinect v2
total body centre of mass
validity
Vicon
Title Validity of the total body centre of gravity during gait using a markerless motion capture system
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03091902.2018.1449909
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846101
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2047284563
Volume 42
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1ba9swFBZZCmN7GFt3y25osLfgYl18e2y3lTDontLRPRnJlruQJi6t85D9m_7TniPJjktausuLCJZlBX-fj450boR8KqTiacF0IDWvAqmkCdLUpEHBZSJkEWkhMFD46Hs8OZbfTqKTweCq57W0avRe8fvWuJJ_QRWuAa4YJfsXyHYPhQvwG_CFFhCG9o8w_gFKdOl9KlCBbGoMbdR1uR5bp0t7HoAFhvAeH5B4qmbNeGVPCNR4gc45aG7HkjiWCYU6tzYFl-H5DtV14a07ZpPM0FKo2Tqnn6qlmjv9dF1vzEa6dkrrVM1X625h-KkW6lK5OtrQo37NLroxk9kpln2yogze7HzWP65gqfVyER3BpluVQ3oCD609oKA46WycQJaxhM2yLbneSWzJe8wUPfHLXBUWv5IzVwxma5HwXpUwG06G7n0p2rhhXc42q2Lnq-h7HpAdDjsRPiQ7-wdfDg675R50nLA1VeHz2jAxTOB-2xQ3FKAb6XHv3uRYZWf6lDzxUNN9R7lnZGCWu-RxL3flLnl45L0ynhPV8pDWFQUeUstDijykjofY4XlIHQ8p8pBaHlJFNzykjofU85A6Hr4gx4dfp58ngS_dAR95yppAlIJVOuFlWIVVFEKrsqoCoRAlJew5Ii5VApKghM1sFsY6LJMSswYJXslMhVkhXpLhsl6a14TGKiuFYTEvJGj7Eo8IoooxnRSl0aE2IyLb95kXPq89llc5y1mb_tbDkCMMuYdhRPa6Yecusct9A7I-WHljmVw5EufinrEfW2RzEN9ok1NLU68u4S6ZgIYYxWJEXjnIu7_DsxSrIbA3_zHzW_Jo8xW-I8PmYmXegxrd6A-eyNd3y8H7
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity+of+the+total+body+centre+of+gravity+during+gait+using+a+markerless+motion+capture+system&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+engineering+%26+technology&rft.au=Tanaka%2C+Ryo&rft.au=Kubota%2C+Takuya&rft.au=Yamasaki%2C+Takahiro&rft.au=Higashi%2C+Ariaki&rft.date=2018-04-03&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=0309-1902&rft.eissn=1464-522X&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F03091902.2018.1449909&rft.externalDocID=1449909
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0309-1902&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0309-1902&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0309-1902&client=summon