Validity of the total body centre of gravity during gait using a markerless motion capture system
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS). Materials and methods: Thirty young healthy subjec...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of medical engineering & technology Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 175 - 181 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Taylor & Francis
03.04.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS).
Materials and methods: Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.
Results: The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor.
Conclusion: In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS).PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS).Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.MATERIALS AND METHODSThirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients.The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor.RESULTSThe COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor.In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction.CONCLUSIONIn the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS). Materials and methods: Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor. Conclusion: In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS) on the basis of values acquired with a marker-based motion capture system (MBS). Thirty young healthy subjects walked on a flat surface as coordinate data from their bodies were acquired using the Kinect v2 (as a MLS) and Vicon systems (as a MBS). COG was calculated using coordinate data of the total body. Comparisons of COG ensemble curves in the mediolateral and vertical directions were performed between MLS and MBS throughout the gait cycle. The relative consistency between these systems was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. The COG trajectory made by using MLS data followed the trend of the COG trajectory with MBS in the mediolateral direction. In the vertical direction, however, the COG trajectories did not match between two systems. High correlation coefficients (r > 0.79) were observed from 30% to 80% of the gait cycle. The greatest difference of COG between MLS and MBS in the mediolateral direction was 1.1 mm. Differences in the vertical direction appeared to be proportional to the distance between the participant and the Kinect v2 sensor. In the mediolateral direction, COG calculated with MLS data during gait was validated with COG calculated on the basis of a MBS. Further correction of systematic error is necessary to improve the validity of COG calculations in the vertical direction. |
Author | Kubota, Takuya Higashi, Ariaki Tanaka, Ryo Yamasaki, Takahiro |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ryo surname: Tanaka fullname: Tanaka, Ryo email: ryotana@hiroshima-u.ac.jp organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University – sequence: 2 givenname: Takuya surname: Kubota fullname: Kubota, Takuya organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University – sequence: 3 givenname: Takahiro surname: Yamasaki fullname: Yamasaki, Takahiro organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University – sequence: 4 givenname: Ariaki surname: Higashi fullname: Higashi, Ariaki organization: Systemfriend Inc |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1U1G5LfwKVj1yyjB1nE6sXUMWXVIkLIG7WrD8WUydebKco_55Eu3vpoVw8lvw8Y828l-RsiIMl5DWDNYMO3kINkkngaw6sWzMhpAT5gqyY2Iiq4fznGVktTLVAF-Qy598AwAWHc3LBZSc2DNiK4A8M3vgy0eho-WVpiQUD3UYzUW2HkuzysEv4uDBmTH7Y0R36Qse8XJH2mB5sCjZn2sfi40A17ss4i3nKxfavyEuHIdvrY70i3z9--Hb3ubr_-unL3fv7SvOOlao2NXPblhtw4BqYT5TOdZo1rWG1bLjAVujGtKKVsNmCaY3oWFNzJySC1PUVeXPou0_xz2hzUb3P2oaAg41jVhxEyzvRbOoZvTmi47a3Ru2Tn6eY1GktM3B7AHSKOSfrlPYFl-FKQh8UA7WEoE4hqCUEdQxhtpsn9umD_3nvDp4fXEw9_o0pGFVwCjG5hIP2WdXPt_gH9AedUg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2021_3096433 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58050620 crossref_primary_10_47529_2223_2524_2023_1_9 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_2481686 crossref_primary_10_3390_s22239425 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2020_109929 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.015 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90328-9 10.1007/BF02443876 10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0150 10.1177/1941738117726323 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.005 10.2106/00004623-198264090-00008 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.008 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.01.005 10.3951/sobim.27.29 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.796 10.1089/g4h.2014.0047 10.1177/1545968308326425 10.1519/00139143-200831020-00003 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.012 10.1002/9780470549148 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378 10.1159/000362549 10.1093/ageing/26.1.15 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591950 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320257 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.022 10.1007/s00776-007-1178-2 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1080/03091902.2018.1449909 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Engineering |
EISSN | 1464-522X |
EndPage | 181 |
ExternalDocumentID | 29846101 10_1080_03091902_2018_1449909 1449909 |
Genre | Article Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Systemfriend Inc |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .4S .DC 00X 03L 0BK 0R~ 29L 36B 4.4 5GY 5RE AALUX AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL ABBKH ABDBF ABEIZ ABJNI ABLIJ ABLKL ABUPF ABXYU ACENM ACGEJ ACGFS ACIEZ ACUHS ADCVX ADRBQ ADXPE AECIN AEOZL AFKVX AGDLA AGFJD AGRBW AGYJP AIJEM AIRBT AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU ALYBC AMDAE ARCSS BABNJ BLEHA BOHLJ CCCUG CS3 DKSSO DU5 EAP EBC EBD EBS EBX ECS EDO EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPL EST ESX F5P H13 HZ~ I-F KRBQP KSSTO KWAYT KYCEM M4Z O9- P2P RNANH RVRKI SV3 TBQAZ TDBHL TERGH TFDNU TFL TFW TUROJ TUS UEQFS V1S ~1N AAGDL AAYXX ABWVI ADMLS ADYSH AFRVT AMPGV CITATION NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3d31fb72d0f0f500f0a9ff8c157d139524a74c5d747906b0d7d481532f49a09c3 |
ISSN | 0309-1902 1464-522X |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:28:29 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:46 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:47:50 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:09:07 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | total body centre of mass Kinect v2 Centre of gravity Vicon validity |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c281t-3d31fb72d0f0f500f0a9ff8c157d139524a74c5d747906b0d7d481532f49a09c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 29846101 |
PQID | 2047284563 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1080_03091902_2018_1449909 proquest_miscellaneous_2047284563 pubmed_primary_29846101 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_03091902_2018_1449909 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_03091902_2018_1449909 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-04-03 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-04-03 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2018 text: 2018-04-03 day: 03 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of medical engineering & technology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Med Eng Technol |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis |
References | CIT0010 CIT0012 CIT0011 Helmuth H. (CIT0005) 1985; 43 CIT0014 CIT0013 CIT0016 CIT0015 CIT0018 Dettmann MA (CIT0001) 1987; 66 CIT0017 CIT0019 Moriwaki N (CIT0020) 2013; 43 CIT0021 CIT0023 CIT0022 CIT0003 CIT0025 CIT0002 CIT0024 CIT0027 CIT0004 CIT0026 CIT0007 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.015 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90328-9 – ident: CIT0019 doi: 10.1007/BF02443876 – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0150 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1177/1941738117726323 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.005 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.2106/00004623-198264090-00008 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.008 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.01.005 – volume: 66 start-page: 77 year: 1987 ident: CIT0001 publication-title: Am J Phys Med – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.3951/sobim.27.29 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.796 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1089/g4h.2014.0047 – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1177/1545968308326425 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1519/00139143-200831020-00003 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.012 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1002/9780470549148 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378 – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.1159/000362549 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.1.15 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591950 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320257 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.022 – volume: 43 start-page: 69 year: 2013 ident: CIT0020 publication-title: J Japan Statist Soc – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1007/s00776-007-1178-2 – volume: 43 start-page: 1 year: 1985 ident: CIT0005 publication-title: Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht Uber Die Biologisch-Anthropologische Literatur |
SSID | ssj0002420 |
Score | 2.142022 |
Snippet | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture... The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of total body centre of gravity (COG) measurement during gait with markerless motion capture system (MLS)... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 175 |
SubjectTerms | Centre of gravity Kinect v2 total body centre of mass validity Vicon |
Title | Validity of the total body centre of gravity during gait using a markerless motion capture system |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03091902.2018.1449909 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846101 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2047284563 |
Volume | 42 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1ba9swFBZZCmN7GFt3y25osLfgYl18e2y3lTDontLRPRnJlruQJi6t85D9m_7TniPJjktausuLCJZlBX-fj450boR8KqTiacF0IDWvAqmkCdLUpEHBZSJkEWkhMFD46Hs8OZbfTqKTweCq57W0avRe8fvWuJJ_QRWuAa4YJfsXyHYPhQvwG_CFFhCG9o8w_gFKdOl9KlCBbGoMbdR1uR5bp0t7HoAFhvAeH5B4qmbNeGVPCNR4gc45aG7HkjiWCYU6tzYFl-H5DtV14a07ZpPM0FKo2Tqnn6qlmjv9dF1vzEa6dkrrVM1X625h-KkW6lK5OtrQo37NLroxk9kpln2yogze7HzWP65gqfVyER3BpluVQ3oCD609oKA46WycQJaxhM2yLbneSWzJe8wUPfHLXBUWv5IzVwxma5HwXpUwG06G7n0p2rhhXc42q2Lnq-h7HpAdDjsRPiQ7-wdfDg675R50nLA1VeHz2jAxTOB-2xQ3FKAb6XHv3uRYZWf6lDzxUNN9R7lnZGCWu-RxL3flLnl45L0ynhPV8pDWFQUeUstDijykjofY4XlIHQ8p8pBaHlJFNzykjofU85A6Hr4gx4dfp58ngS_dAR95yppAlIJVOuFlWIVVFEKrsqoCoRAlJew5Ii5VApKghM1sFsY6LJMSswYJXslMhVkhXpLhsl6a14TGKiuFYTEvJGj7Eo8IoooxnRSl0aE2IyLb95kXPq89llc5y1mb_tbDkCMMuYdhRPa6Yecusct9A7I-WHljmVw5EufinrEfW2RzEN9ok1NLU68u4S6ZgIYYxWJEXjnIu7_DsxSrIbA3_zHzW_Jo8xW-I8PmYmXegxrd6A-eyNd3y8H7 |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity+of+the+total+body+centre+of+gravity+during+gait+using+a+markerless+motion+capture+system&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+engineering+%26+technology&rft.au=Tanaka%2C+Ryo&rft.au=Kubota%2C+Takuya&rft.au=Yamasaki%2C+Takahiro&rft.au=Higashi%2C+Ariaki&rft.date=2018-04-03&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=0309-1902&rft.eissn=1464-522X&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F03091902.2018.1449909&rft.externalDocID=1449909 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0309-1902&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0309-1902&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0309-1902&client=summon |