The Safety Paradox of Self-driving Cars

Self-driving cars are undergoing extensive road tests and should enter the market within the decade, but consumers continue to worry about the safety of autonomous vehicles—even though most traffic accidents are caused by human errors that are avoidable with automation technology. Four experiments i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAsia Marketing Journal (Online) Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Lee, Yeh Jun, Park, Jongwon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 한국마케팅학회AMJ 2022
Korean Marketing Association
한국마케팅학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Self-driving cars are undergoing extensive road tests and should enter the market within the decade, but consumers continue to worry about the safety of autonomous vehicles—even though most traffic accidents are caused by human errors that are avoidable with automation technology. Four experiments investigated how a vehicle’s automation level affects its perceived safety, why excessive safety concerns prevail, and how they can be mitigated. In all experiments, participants read descriptions of full-automation (Level 5) and high-automation (Level 4) self-driving cars: Participants consistently perceived Level 5 (vs. Level 4) vehicles as less safe. The effect persisted when objective safety information was available. A mediation analysis and a mediation-by-moderation approach suggest that the negative effect of the automation level on perceived safety is driven by the perceived lack of control over driving. Finally, the effect disappeared when participants imagined themselves as passengers rather than drivers, offering a practical implication for managers.
Bibliography:https://amj.kma.re.kr/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1579&context=journal
ISSN:1598-7868
2765-6500
2765-6500
DOI:10.53728/2765-6500.1579