The Ancestral Conifer Cone: What Did It Look Like? A Modern Trait-Evolution Approach
Premise of research. Seed conifer cones and their fossil record have been the subject of intensive study over the past century. In those studies, however, the interpretation of fossil cones differs substantially. Additionally, despite the rich fossil record, the last common ancestor of modern conife...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of plant sciences Vol. 181; no. 9; pp. 871 - 886 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chicago
The University of Chicago Press
01.11.2020
University of Chicago, acting through its Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1058-5893 1537-5315 |
DOI | 10.1086/710489 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Premise of research. Seed conifer cones and their fossil record have been the subject of intensive study over the past century. In those studies, however, the interpretation of fossil cones differs substantially. Additionally, despite the rich fossil record, the last common ancestor of modern conifers remains enigmatic. In this study, we endeavor to reconstruct the original and ancestral character traits of the seed conifer cone.
Methodology. We reconstructed the phylogeny of conifers by using Bayesian inference and a large-scale molecular data set of four marker regions (18S, matK, phyP, rbcL). We also reconstructed the ancestral character states of seed cones using a broad set of morphological data and a model-based approach. In addition, we compared the cone traits with fossil ovulate cones from the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic.
Pivotal results. According to our reconstruction, the micropyle of the last common ancestor of modern conifers points toward the cone axis during pollination and seed dispersal. Furthermore, the ancestral cone features an axillar structure that supports the ovule, and it develops before the ontogenetic phase. The presence of a predeveloped structure coincides with a change of orientation of the ovule during development. Comparison with fossil cones shows that a micropyle facing toward the cone axis is a common character trait of late Paleozoic conifers.
Conclusions. Analyzing conifers by means of ancestral state reconstruction sheds novel light on the trait evolution of this group. For the first time, we could infer characters of ancient conifers that are usually unobtainable from fossils, for example, developmental characters. From them, we conclude that the original purpose of the predeveloped structure was to turn the ovule during development. Ultimately, we advocate for a wider use of ancestral state reconstructions among conifers. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Premise of research. Seed conifer cones and their fossil record have been the subject of intensive study over the past century. In those studies, however, the interpretation of fossil cones differs substantially. Additionally, despite the rich fossil record, the last common ancestor of modern conifers remains enigmatic. In this study, we endeavor to reconstruct the original and ancestral character traits of the seed conifer cone.Methodology. We reconstructed the phylogeny of conifers by using Bayesian inference and a large-scale molecular data set of four marker regions (18S, matK, phyP, rbcL). We also reconstructed the ancestral character states of seed cones using a broad set of morphological data and a model-based approach. In addition, we compared the cone traits with fossil ovulate cones from the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic.Pivotal results. According to our reconstruction, the micropyle of the last common ancestor of modern conifers points toward the cone axis during pollination and seed dispersal. Furthermore, the ancestral cone features an axillar structure that supports the ovule, and it develops before the ontogenetic phase. The presence of a predeveloped structure coincides with a change of orientation of the ovule during development. Comparison with fossil cones shows that a micropyle facing toward the cone axis is a common character trait of late Paleozoic conifers.Conclusions. Analyzing conifers by means of ancestral state reconstruction sheds novel light on the trait evolution of this group. For the first time, we could infer characters of ancient conifers that are usually unobtainable from fossils, for example, developmental characters. From them, we conclude that the original purpose of the predeveloped structure was to turn the ovule during development. Ultimately, we advocate for a wider use of ancestral state reconstructions among conifers. Premise of research. Seed conifer cones and their fossil record have been the subject of intensive study over the past century. In those studies, however, the interpretation of fossil cones differs substantially. Additionally, despite the rich fossil record, the last common ancestor of modern conifers remains enigmatic. In this study, we endeavor to reconstruct the original and ancestral character traits of the seed conifer cone. Methodology. We reconstructed the phylogeny of conifers by using Bayesian inference and a large-scale molecular data set of four marker regions (18S, matK, phyP, rbcL). We also reconstructed the ancestral character states of seed cones using a broad set of morphological data and a model-based approach. In addition, we compared the cone traits with fossil ovulate cones from the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic. Pivotal results. According to our reconstruction, the micropyle of the last common ancestor of modern conifers points toward the cone axis during pollination and seed dispersal. Furthermore, the ancestral cone features an axillar structure that supports the ovule, and it develops before the ontogenetic phase. The presence of a predeveloped structure coincides with a change of orientation of the ovule during development. Comparison with fossil cones shows that a micropyle facing toward the cone axis is a common character trait of late Paleozoic conifers. Conclusions. Analyzing conifers by means of ancestral state reconstruction sheds novel light on the trait evolution of this group. For the first time, we could infer characters of ancient conifers that are usually unobtainable from fossils, for example, developmental characters. From them, we conclude that the original purpose of the predeveloped structure was to turn the ovule during development. Ultimately, we advocate for a wider use of ancestral state reconstructions among conifers. |
Author | Herting, Julian Stützel, Thomas Klaus, Kristina V. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Julian surname: Herting fullname: Herting, Julian email: julian.herting@rub.de organization: Department of Evolution and Biodiversity of Plants, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: Thomas surname: Stützel fullname: Stützel, Thomas organization: Department of Evolution and Biodiversity of Plants, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: Kristina V. surname: Klaus fullname: Klaus, Kristina V. organization: Department of Evolution and Biodiversity of Plants, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany |
BookMark | eNplkE9LwzAYxoNMcJv6GQKKJ6tJ06SJFylz6qDipeKxZGlqs9VmJq3gtzejgqCn5z38eJ8_MzDpbKcBOMXoCiPOrlOMEi4OwBRTkkaUYDoJN6I8olyQIzDzfoMQEjQWU1AUjYZZp7TvnWzhwnam1m6v-ga-NrKHd6aCqx7m1m5hbrb6FmbwyVbadbBw0vTR8tO2Q29sB7PdzlmpmmNwWMvW65MfnYOX-2WxeIzy54fVIssjFXPUR6piFVGK15oiweo4lSEVUXytRLKuaC0wF2gdq4pIxpMkxoxjnXCkUybTWjIyB2fj32D7MYQK5cYOrguWZZxQwjBmSRyoy5FSznrvdF0q08t94FDZtCVG5X63ctwt4Bd_8J0z79J9_QfPR3BQjVHyze6c9v43wg_2De0EeA4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13162196 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12223903 crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcab113 crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcac097 crossref_primary_10_1093_aob_mcab154 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2022_1058746 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2020_151719 |
Cites_doi | 10.1086/676973 10.1126/science.aau4061 10.1098/rspb.2011.0559 10.1666/10049.1 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb13620.x 10.1007/BF02860718 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.03.011 10.1093/sysbio/syy032 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb15204.x 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 10.1111/nph.15563 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15236.x 10.1016/j.ode.2004.01.002 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb11421.x 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026290 10.1016/0034-6667(84)90043-5 10.1093/sysbio/syz034 10.1139/B08-062 10.1086/605874 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 10.1371/journal.pone.0080870 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb11364.x 10.1002/fedr.201400035 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1989.tb00400.x 10.1086/297248 10.1086/297081 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00182.x 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.11.004 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1954.tb01515.x 10.1086/605115 10.1371/journal.pone.0226779 10.1073/pnas.1114319109 10.1073/pnas.1213621109 10.1006/mpev.2001.1004 10.1007/BF02874305 10.1016/0034-6667(87)90016-9 10.1016/S0034-6667(96)00046-2 10.1139/b69-148 10.1016/0034-6667(87)90066-2 10.1093/molbev/msq170 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.05.003 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1987.tb08734.x 10.1093/sysbio/syq085 10.1086/503444 10.1086/314114 10.3732/ajb.91.3.361 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00467.x 10.1139/b02-112 10.1073/pnas.1323926111 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1992.tb00256.x 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.011 10.1093/molbev/mss075 10.3732/ajb.90.1.8 10.1086/297285 10.2307/25065430 10.1086/297407 10.1080/10635150490522232 10.1078/0367-2530-00088 10.1016/j.ode.2006.03.001 10.1038/ncomms16047 10.1155/2012/292857 10.1086/704944 10.3732/ajb.89.12.1991 10.1086/373981 10.3732/ajb.1100568 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1991.tb00198.x 10.1002/ajb2.1143 10.1086/589887 10.1086/590472 10.1006/anbo.2001.1426 10.1086/321920 10.1139/b74-037 10.3159/1095-5674(2006)133[169:SFATOO]2.0.CO;2 10.1086/683060 10.2307/2446083 10.2307/2446539 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Nov 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. – notice: Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Nov 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7ST 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 SOI |
DOI | 10.1086/710489 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | Genetics Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Botany |
EISSN | 1537-5315 |
EndPage | 886 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1086_710489 710489 |
GroupedDBID | -DZ 0R~ 4.4 5.N 5GY 9EF 9EJ A8Z AAHKG AAKGQ AAXPP ABDBF ABPLY ABPPZ ABPTK ABTLG ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACNCT ACPRK ACSTJ ADALM ADTZG AEGXH AENEX AFAZZ AFRAH AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BKOMP CS3 D0L DU5 EAU EBD EBS ESX F5P HQ2 HZ~ I-F JBS JEB JLS JST L7B O9- P2P PQEST PQQKQ RCP RXW TAE TN5 TUS UFCQG UHB UMP WH7 YR2 ZCA ~02 ~KM AAEDO AAISJ AAYXX ABABT ABPEO ACUHS CBGCD CITATION CUYZI DGPHC EZTEY 7SN 7ST 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 SOI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-cd6d3cc8fe5096f27a0093c8bc94bd5f91890b2cd3a684421681e480e76a7fa63 |
ISSN | 1058-5893 |
IngestDate | Mon Jun 30 08:53:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:40:25 EDT 2025 Tue Apr 25 18:47:22 EDT 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | trait evolution seed cone conifers ancestral state reconstruction BayesTraits |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c280t-cd6d3cc8fe5096f27a0093c8bc94bd5f91890b2cd3a684421681e480e76a7fa63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
PQID | 2453611642 |
PQPubID | 41473 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1086_710489 uchicagopress_journals_710489 proquest_journals_2453611642 crossref_citationtrail_10_1086_710489 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20201101 2020-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 20201101 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Chicago |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chicago |
PublicationTitle | International journal of plant sciences |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | The University of Chicago Press University of Chicago, acting through its Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: The University of Chicago Press – name: University of Chicago, acting through its Press |
References | rf5 rf45 Schweitzer J (rf77) 1963; 113 rf89 rf4 rf88 rf7 rf46 rf41 rf85 rf8 rf40 rf84 rf43 rf42 rf86 rf49 rf48 rf81 rf80 rf83 rf82 rf78 rf36 Jagel A (rf35) 2015; 4 rf30 rf74 rf73 rf76 rf31 rf75 rf38 rf37 Clement-Westerhof A (rf9) rf39 Axsmith BJ (rf2) 2006; 62 Townrow A (rf94) 1967; 101 rf70 Eckenwalder (rf14) rf72 Jagel A (rf34) 2015; 4 rf23 Liu J (rf44) 1999; 130 rf67 rf22 rf66 Taylor TN (rf87) rf25 rf69 rf63 rf62 rf21 rf65 Norén O (rf60) 1908; 2 rf64 rf100 rf101 rf27 rf26 rf29 rf28 Nylander (rf61) Sporne (rf79) Chumley TW (rf6) 2008 rf12 rf56 rf11 rf55 rf58 rf13 Harris (rf24) rf52 rf96 rf51 rf95 rf10 rf54 rf98 rf97 Yang Y (rf99) 2001; 43 rf16 rf15 rf59 rf18 Jagel A (rf33) 2014; 3 Farjon A (rf17) Meyen V (rf53) rf92 rf91 rf50 rf93 rf1 rf3 rf90 |
References_xml | – ident: rf45 doi: 10.1086/676973 – ident: rf4 doi: 10.1126/science.aau4061 – ident: rf3 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0559 – volume-title: Koninklijke Brill NV ident: rf17 – ident: rf41 doi: 10.1666/10049.1 – volume-title: Pages 298–337 in CB Beck, ed. Origin and evolution of gymnosperms ident: rf9 – ident: rf84 doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb13620.x – ident: rf55 doi: 10.1007/BF02860718 – volume-title: Trustees of the British Museum ident: rf24 – ident: rf78 doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.03.011 – ident: rf69 doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy032 – volume-title: Evolutionary Biology Centre ident: rf61 – volume: 113 start-page: 1 year: 1963 ident: rf77 publication-title: Palaeontogr Abt B – ident: rf85 doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb15204.x – ident: rf37 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 – ident: rf46 doi: 10.1111/nph.15563 – ident: rf92 doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15236.x – ident: rf58 doi: 10.1016/j.ode.2004.01.002 – ident: rf89 doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb11421.x – ident: rf59 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026290 – ident: rf7 doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(84)90043-5 – ident: rf38 doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz034 – ident: rf67 doi: 10.1139/B08-062 – ident: rf29 doi: 10.1086/605874 – ident: rf40 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 – ident: rf97 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080870 – volume: 43 start-page: 1011 year: 2001 ident: rf99 publication-title: Acta Bot Sin – volume-title: the complete reference ident: rf14 – ident: rf83 doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb11364.x – volume: 4 start-page: 51 year: 2015 ident: rf34 publication-title: II. Cupressoideae. Bull Cupressus Conserv Proj – ident: rf10 doi: 10.1002/fedr.201400035 – ident: rf93 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1989.tb00400.x – volume-title: LA Raubeson 2008 Gne-deep: exploring Gnetalean affinities in seed plant phylogeny with 83 plastid genes. Paper presented at Botany year: 2008 ident: rf6 – ident: rf63 doi: 10.1086/297248 – ident: rf88 doi: 10.1086/297081 – ident: rf95 doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00182.x – ident: rf73 doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.11.004 – ident: rf21 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1954.tb01515.x – ident: rf25 doi: 10.1086/605115 – ident: rf31 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226779 – ident: rf50 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114319109 – ident: rf43 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213621109 – ident: rf23 doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1004 – ident: rf52 doi: 10.1007/BF02874305 – ident: rf1 doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(87)90016-9 – volume: 4 start-page: 91 year: 2015 ident: rf35 publication-title: III. Callitroideae. Bull Cupressus Conserv Proj – volume-title: M Krings 2009 Paleobotany: the biology and evolution of fossil plants ident: rf87 – volume: 3 start-page: 117 year: 2014 ident: rf33 publication-title: Bull Cupressus Conserv Proj – ident: rf54 doi: 10.1016/S0034-6667(96)00046-2 – ident: rf62 doi: 10.1139/b69-148 – ident: rf8 doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(87)90066-2 – ident: rf101 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq170 – ident: rf26 doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.05.003 – ident: rf51 doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1987.tb08734.x – ident: rf98 doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq085 – ident: rf65 doi: 10.1086/503444 – ident: rf49 doi: 10.1086/314114 – ident: rf100 doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.3.361 – ident: rf16 doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00467.x – ident: rf91 doi: 10.1139/b02-112 – ident: rf96 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323926111 – ident: rf86 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1992.tb00256.x – ident: rf70 doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.011 – ident: rf13 doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss075 – volume-title: the structure and evolution of primitive seed-plants ident: rf79 – ident: rf18 doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.1.8 – ident: rf82 doi: 10.1086/297285 – volume-title: Pages 338–381 in CB Beck, ed. Origin and evolution of gymnosperms ident: rf53 – volume: 62 start-page: 82 year: 2006 ident: rf2 publication-title: Mus North Ariz Bull – ident: rf72 doi: 10.2307/25065430 – ident: rf15 doi: 10.1086/297407 – ident: rf66 doi: 10.1080/10635150490522232 – ident: rf75 doi: 10.1078/0367-2530-00088 – ident: rf76 doi: 10.1016/j.ode.2006.03.001 – volume: 2 start-page: 101 year: 1908 ident: rf60 publication-title: Sven Bot Tidskr – ident: rf74 doi: 10.1038/ncomms16047 – ident: rf5 doi: 10.1155/2012/292857 – ident: rf36 doi: 10.1086/704944 – ident: rf48 doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.12.1991 – ident: rf28 doi: 10.1086/373981 – ident: rf39 doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100568 – volume: 101 start-page: 103 year: 1967 ident: rf94 publication-title: Pap Proc R Soc Tasman – ident: rf81 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1991.tb00198.x – ident: rf42 doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1143 – ident: rf12 doi: 10.1086/589887 – ident: rf22 doi: 10.1086/590472 – ident: rf56 doi: 10.1006/anbo.2001.1426 – ident: rf27 doi: 10.1086/321920 – ident: rf64 doi: 10.1139/b74-037 – volume: 130 start-page: 267 year: 1999 ident: rf44 publication-title: Bot J Linn Soc – ident: rf11 doi: 10.3159/1095-5674(2006)133[169:SFATOO]2.0.CO;2 – ident: rf30 doi: 10.1086/683060 – ident: rf90 doi: 10.2307/2446083 – ident: rf80 doi: 10.2307/2446539 |
SSID | ssj0009529 |
Score | 2.3194861 |
Snippet | Premise of research. Seed conifer cones and their fossil record have been the subject of intensive study over the past century. In those studies, however, the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref uchicagopress |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 871 |
SubjectTerms | Bayesian analysis Cones Conifers Evolution Fossils Mesozoic Ontogeny Paleozoic Phylogeny Pollination Reconstruction Seed dispersal Statistical inference Supports |
Title | The Ancestral Conifer Cone: What Did It Look Like? A Modern Trait-Evolution Approach |
URI | https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/710489 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2453611642 |
Volume | 181 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Lb9MwGLdKx4HLxFPsBT7AqXKVOLHjcEHtWNWhwYUO7RY5TiJNq8rE0mnbX8_3xU7qbEg8LkmV2k3q75fv5e9ByDstZR4nRjOdG8HiSkumeaFYlCoB1kNV8MYP-eWrnJ_Gn8_E2WBw40Utret8bO5-m1fyP1SFa0BXzJL9B8p2PwoX4DPQF45AYTj-NY0nGAeN7gpM3sM4FTw3CedYlRtYWjE6rkcnmNJwcn4BX8yAF7gOaCCozmt2dO0eElXSJsHK11j7LkOv0MTlEogychK008znGKftonzXSw9732rck58e1nc2LsCLTEJ-v9Trqw3TWenR97HvkADrM-wcEpaHBgKTuWzjw3HZ8tWEwesu-ow39BCWemxU2bYsrUS2xbIfMPug2XsCFSm2XYj61bTvSbku9rDZdVcys_MekS0OBkYwJFuT6afpzCvY3HS46_6M15fKzuwrMhvrpN_ExlNWFk_JtrMy6MRC5hkZlKvn5PH0B1gCty_IAnBDO9xQhxs8lx8oooYCauhxTRE1FFHzkU6oxQy9hxnaYuYlOZ0dLQ7nzHXXYIaroGamkEVkjKpKrABU8USjd8uo3KRxXogqDVUa5NwUkZYqjnkoVVjGKigTqRN4p6NXZLiCB3tNKAepKYwqeMXRPA_ziKdBkuuKiypKBN8h79ulyowrPY8dUJZZnxg75G037tIWW3kwYr9d6cwh_irjsYhkCHY_3Oigt_qbMXb67h9vsEeebDC9T4b1z3V5AGpnnb9xCPkFTVh_lg |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Ancestral+Conifer+Cone%3A+What+Did+It+Look+Like%3F+A+Modern+Trait-Evolution+Approach&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+plant+sciences&rft.au=Herting%2C+Julian&rft.au=St%C3%BCtzel%2C+Thomas&rft.au=Klaus%2C+Kristina+V.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.issn=1058-5893&rft.eissn=1537-5315&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=886&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086%2F710489&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1086_710489 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1058-5893&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1058-5893&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1058-5893&client=summon |