The influence of socioeconomic disadvantage on short‐ and long‐term outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer: an Australian multicentre study

Background Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short‐term...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inANZ journal of surgery Vol. 94; no. 10; pp. 1723 - 1731
Main Authors Park, Jin‐soo, Polikarpova, Aleksandra, Leibman, Steven, Laurence, Jerome M., Smith, Garett, Falk, Gregory L., Sandroussi, Charbel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.10.2024
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short‐term perioperative morbidity, long‐term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease‐free survival. Results The study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease‐free survival between groups. Conclusion Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease‐free survival. The impact of socioeconomic status on oesophagectomy outcomes has not been studied in an Australian cohort. We examined 462 patients that underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three institutions in New South Wales. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease‐free survival.
AbstractList Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short-term perioperative morbidity, long-term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia. A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease-free survival. The study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between groups. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease-free survival.
Background Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short‐term perioperative morbidity, long‐term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease‐free survival. Results The study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease‐free survival between groups. Conclusion Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease‐free survival. The impact of socioeconomic status on oesophagectomy outcomes has not been studied in an Australian cohort. We examined 462 patients that underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three institutions in New South Wales. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease‐free survival.
Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short-term perioperative morbidity, long-term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia.BACKGROUNDSocioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short-term perioperative morbidity, long-term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia.A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease-free survival.METHODSA retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease-free survival.The study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between groups.RESULTSThe study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between groups.Lower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease-free survival.CONCLUSIONLower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease-free survival.
BackgroundSocioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes following oesophagectomy for cancer. This study assessed whether SES was associated with short‐term perioperative morbidity, long‐term survival, and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy across three tertiary oesophageal cancer centres in Australia.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed comprising all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer across three Australian centres. Patients were stratified into SES groups using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Outcomes measured included perioperative complication rates, overall survival, and disease‐free survival.ResultsThe study cohort was 462 patients, 205 in the lower SES and 257 in the higher SES groups. The lower SES group presented with more advanced oesophageal cancer stage, a higher rate of T3 (52.6% versus 42.7%, P = 0.038) and N2 disease (19.6% versus 10.5%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of readmission within 30 days (11.2% versus 5.4%, P = 0.023). There was no difference in overall survival or disease‐free survival between groups.ConclusionLower socioeconomic status was associated with more advanced stage and increased risk of early, unplanned readmission following oesophagectomy, but was not associated with a difference in overall or disease‐free survival.
Author Park, Jin‐soo
Polikarpova, Aleksandra
Falk, Gregory L.
Leibman, Steven
Smith, Garett
Laurence, Jerome M.
Sandroussi, Charbel
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jin‐soo
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0888-1204
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Jin‐soo
  email: jinsoopark91@gmail.com
  organization: Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe)
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Aleksandra
  orcidid: 0009-0008-5043-3273
  surname: Polikarpova
  fullname: Polikarpova, Aleksandra
  organization: Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Steven
  surname: Leibman
  fullname: Leibman, Steven
  organization: Royal North Shore Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jerome M.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1123-0122
  surname: Laurence
  fullname: Laurence, Jerome M.
  organization: Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe)
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Garett
  surname: Smith
  fullname: Smith, Garett
  organization: Royal North Shore Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Gregory L.
  surname: Falk
  fullname: Falk, Gregory L.
  organization: Concord Repatriation General Hospital
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Charbel
  surname: Sandroussi
  fullname: Sandroussi, Charbel
  organization: Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe)
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39041601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1u1DAUhS1URH9gwQsgS2xgMa0dJ3bCblTxJ1WwoKwtx7nuuEp8B_8UzY5HgFfkSXCZgQUS3vhc-TvnWjqn5ChgAEKecnbO67kwIZ3zgavmATnhbdutGj6oo4PmrRDH5DSlW8a4lEP3iByLgbVcMn5CflxvgPrg5gLBAkVHE1qPYDHg4i2dfDLTnQnZ3NTXQNMGY_757Ts1YaIzhpuqM8SFYskWF0jUuDpThITbTTXZjMuOOozUmrohvqpOui4pRzP7KpcyZ28h5Ag05TLtHpOHzswJnhzuM_L5zevry3erq49v31-ur1a2UX2zmhoLoxSmH4a-E6DUOJpxckp2rTUjk0M7wdj3QoxMGbBWMcdFB4wzqZw1TpyRF_vcbcQvBVLWi08W5tkEwJK0YL2QPe9UW9Hn_6C3WGKov9OC84H1TMp76uWeshFTiuD0NvrFxJ3mTN_3pGtP-ndPlX12SCzjAtNf8k8xFbjYA1_9DLv_J-n1h0_7yF_IiaNT
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.049
10.1097/00005650-200201001-00003
10.3322/caac.21660
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603374
10.1371/journal.pone.0193135
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1
10.4103/jcar.JCar_4_17
10.1016/j.ejso.2023.04.004
10.1056/NEJMoa1112088
10.5694/mja13.11134
10.1186/s12967-015-0579-9
10.1056/NEJMoa055531
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.028
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01312.x
10.1186/s12885-016-2065-z
10.1001/jama.279.21.1703
10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.001
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.015
10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.070
10.1186/s12939-017-0676-x
10.3390/ijerph19095483
10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00507.x
10.1002/cncr.23567
10.3390/cancers15102827
10.1371/journal.pone.0186350
10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824e8ff8
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.085
10.1007/s10552-008-9210-1
10.1002/bjs.11318
10.1111/ans.16519
10.3390/jpm12040595
10.1016/j.canep.2020.101803
10.1111/ans.17675
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
2024 The Author(s). ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
– notice: 2024 The Author(s). ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
– notice: 2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
WIN
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1111/ans.19172
DatabaseName Wiley Open Access
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1445-2197
EndPage 1731
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_ans_19172
39041601
ANS19172
Genre researchArticle
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Australia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Australia
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
23M
24P
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
J5H
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZGI
ZXP
~IA
~WT
AAMNL
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
ACRPL
ACYXJ
CITATION
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2782-d2ceb63a899853e77bbabdf7654cab0694deb8833b07aecc70f135e01067fcaf3
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISSN 1445-1433
1445-2197
IngestDate Thu Dec 05 20:16:15 EST 2024
Tue Nov 19 04:14:05 EST 2024
Fri Dec 06 07:03:45 EST 2024
Thu Nov 28 21:35:42 EST 2024
Tue Oct 22 09:52:55 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords complications
surgical outcomes
oesophagectomy
socioeconomic status
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2024 The Author(s). ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2782-d2ceb63a899853e77bbabdf7654cab0694deb8833b07aecc70f135e01067fcaf3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0888-1204
0000-0002-1123-0122
0009-0008-5043-3273
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fans.19172
PMID 39041601
PQID 3119080664
PQPubID 25531
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3083681574
proquest_journals_3119080664
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_19172
pubmed_primary_39041601
wiley_primary_10_1111_ans_19172_ANS19172
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2024
2024-10-00
20241001
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2024
  text: October 2024
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Melbourne
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Melbourne
– name: Australia
– name: East Melbourne
PublicationTitle ANZ journal of surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate ANZ J Surg
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References 2010; 34
2015; 13
2009; 68
2012; 366
2006; 95
2022; 92
2023; 15
2008; 19
2020; 107
1998; 279
2019; 228
2021; 71
2016; 16
2021; 91
2022; 114
2006; 355
2023
2023; 49
2017; 16
2002; 40
2017; 12
2022; 12
2023; 116
2020; 69
2008; 113
2019; 393
2012; 25
2012; 46
2024; 28
2017; 104
2014; 200
2022; 19
2018; 13
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_32_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_33_1
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_29_1
References_xml – volume: 393
  start-page: 1948
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1957
  article-title: Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro‐oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 16
  start-page: 3
  year: 2017
  article-title: The impact of gender, race, socioeconomic status, and treatment on outcomes in esophageal cancer: a population‐based analysis
  publication-title: J. Carcinog.
– volume: 28
  start-page: 805
  year: 2024
  end-page: 812
  article-title: Sarcopenia impacts perioperative and survival outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter study
  publication-title: J. Gastrointest. Surg.
– volume: 46
  start-page: 833
  year: 2012
  end-page: 839
  article-title: The effect of socioeconomic status on staging and treatment decisions in esophageal cancer
  publication-title: J. Clin. Gastroenterol.
– volume: 12
  year: 2017
  article-title: Effects of socioeconomic status on esophageal adenocarcinoma stage at diagnosis, receipt of treatment, and survival: a population‐based cohort study
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 104
  start-page: 234
  year: 2017
  end-page: 244
  article-title: Socioeconomic status, not race, is associated with reduced survival in esophagectomy patients
  publication-title: Ann. Thorac. Surg.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 200
  year: 2010
  end-page: 205
  article-title: Socio‐economic status and survival from breast cancer for young, Australian, urban women
  publication-title: Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health
– volume: 279
  start-page: 1703
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1708
  article-title: Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 69
  year: 2020
  article-title: Impact of area‐level socioeconomic status and accessibility to treatment on life expectancy after a cancer diagnosis in Queensland, Australia
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol.
– volume: 366
  start-page: 2074
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2084
  article-title: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer
  publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med.
– volume: 355
  start-page: 11
  year: 2006
  end-page: 20
  article-title: Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for Resectable gastroesophageal cancer
  publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med.
– volume: 116
  start-page: 246
  year: 2023
  end-page: 253
  article-title: Food deserts increase readmission after esophagectomy for cancer: a multi‐institutional study
  publication-title: Ann. Thorac. Surg.
– volume: 228
  start-page: 276
  year: 2019
  end-page: 298
  article-title: Disparities in surgical access: a systematic literature review, conceptual model, and evidence map
  publication-title: J. Am. Coll. Surg.
– volume: 71
  start-page: 209
  year: 2021
  end-page: 249
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin.
– volume: 91
  start-page: E14
  year: 2021
  end-page: E19
  article-title: Does age affect oesophagectomy survival: a cohort study
  publication-title: ANZ J. Surg.
– volume: 200
  start-page: 586
  year: 2014
  end-page: 590
  article-title: Geographic variation in prostate cancer survival in New South Wales
  publication-title: Med. J. Austr.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 241
  year: 2015
  article-title: The effect of socioeconomic status on health‐care delay and treatment of esophageal cancer
  publication-title: J. Transl. Med.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 182
  year: 2017
  article-title: Understanding the effects of socioeconomic status along the breast cancer continuum in Australian women: a systematic review of evidence
  publication-title: Int. J. Equity Health
– volume: 16
  start-page: 48
  year: 2016
  article-title: Cancer survival in New South Wales, Australia: socioeconomic disparities remain despite overall improvements
  publication-title: BMC Cancer
– volume: 49
  year: 2023
  article-title: Time trends in mortality of oesophageal cancer in Finland over 30 years
  publication-title: Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.
– volume: 113
  start-page: 582
  year: 2008
  end-page: 591
  article-title: The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 68
  start-page: 290
  year: 2009
  end-page: 297
  article-title: The effect of socioeconomic status on survival from colorectal cancer in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study
  publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med.
– volume: 13
  year: 2018
  article-title: Inequalities in esophageal cancer mortality in Brazil: temporal trends and projections
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1383
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1390
  article-title: Assessing the impact of socio‐economic status on cancer survival in New South Wales, Australia 1996–2001
  publication-title: Cancer Causes Control
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1118
  year: 2022
  end-page: 1126
  article-title: Improved clinical and survival outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer over 25 years
  publication-title: Ann. Thorac. Surg.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 723
  year: 2012
  end-page: 730
  article-title: Influence of socioeconomic environment on survival in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer: a population‐based study
  publication-title: Dis. Esophagus
– year: 2023
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1180
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1185
  article-title: The role of socio‐economic status in the decision making on diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal cancer in The Netherlands
  publication-title: Br. J. Cancer
– volume: 40
  start-page: I14
  year: 2002
  end-page: I26
  article-title: Race, treatment, and survival of veterans with cancer of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia
  publication-title: Med. Care
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1026
  year: 2022
  end-page: 1032
  article-title: Disparities in surgical outcomes for low socioeconomic status patients in Australia
  publication-title: ANZ J. Surg.
– volume: 107
  start-page: 103
  year: 2020
  end-page: 112
  article-title: Impact of postoperative complications on disease recurrence and long‐term survival following oesophagogastric cancer resection
  publication-title: Br. J. Surg.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 5483
  year: 2022
  article-title: Association of Esophageal Cancer Mortality with municipal socioeconomic deprivation level in Japan, 2013–2017: an ecological study using nationwide data
  publication-title: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2827
  year: 2023
  article-title: Socioeconomic deprivation is not associated with outcomes after esophagectomy at a German high‐volume center
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 12
  start-page: 595
  year: 2022
  article-title: The influence of socioeconomic status on esophageal cancer in Taiwan: a population‐based study
  publication-title: J. Personal. Med.
– ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.049
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.1097/00005650-200201001-00003
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603374
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193135
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.4103/jcar.JCar_4_17
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.04.004
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.5694/mja13.11134
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0579-9
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.028
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01312.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2065-z
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.279.21.1703
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.001
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.015
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.070
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0676-x
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095483
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00507.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.23567
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.3390/cancers15102827
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186350
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824e8ff8
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.085
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9210-1
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.11318
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1111/ans.16519
– ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  doi: 10.3390/jpm12040595
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101803
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/ans.17675
SSID ssj0016695
Score 2.4405215
Snippet Background Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role...
Socioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of...
BackgroundSocioeconomic status (SES) affects outcomes following surgery for various cancers. There are currently no Australian studies that examine the role of...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1723
SubjectTerms Aged
Australia - epidemiology
Cancer
complications
Disease-Free Survival
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy
Female
Health care facilities
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Neoplasm Staging
oesophagectomy
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Social Class
Socioeconomic Disparities in Health
Socioeconomic Factors
Socioeconomic status
Socioeconomics
surgical outcomes
Survival
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Title The influence of socioeconomic disadvantage on short‐ and long‐term outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer: an Australian multicentre study
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fans.19172
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39041601
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3119080664
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3083681574
Volume 94
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1JS8UwEA6iFy-iuD03RvHgpdA2bdOnJ3FBBEVcwFtJ0lQFbeS17-DNn6B_0V_iTLqoiOClBJpQmi8z8yWZhbFtZZB0hEnsKREVXlRQsLIZao-nqQlkWviGU4Dz2XlychOd3sa3E2yvi4Vp8kP0B24kGU5fk4BLVX0TctLktNlA_TuFtCah8gVhdNFfISSJK7mCG4bYQ1LA27RC5MbTD_1pjH4xzJ-E1Vmc41k201JF2G-wnWMTppxn74grPHSVRcAWQNNrTRtfDPlD5a71a9QTYEuo7pFff7y-gSxzeLTlHbZJG4Md1_jHpgJXJRysoXoGOEjX9ukFkMqCpgUx2sWR8HUiAs4D0bl0GnC5aRfYzfHR9cGJ15ZV8HSIfMDLQ21UwiXttGJuhFBKqrwQSRxpqSgQNjeKahArX0hEWPhFwGPjks0VWhZ8kU2WtjTLDDQZeGQw4VCnUcSFVEPEF02e0nmeazFgW938Zs9N9oys23UgCJkDYcDWupnPWgGqMh4gU0mRD0UDttm_xqVP9xmyNHaMfSizdhrEAvssNYj1X-FDH6mmHwzYjoPw789n--dXrrHy_66rbDpEctM49a2xyXo0NutITmq14RYhPg8vw08yyeV1
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,1375,11562,27924,27925,46052,46294,46476,46718
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6tygEuLYhHtxSYIg5cUiVxEmcRlwpYLaXdA7RSLyiyHaetoHHVzR7gxE-Av8gvYcZ5QEFIVW-RYsuO5-HPzsw3AM-0JdARZ2mgZVIFScXJynZiApHnNlJ5FVrBCc7782x2mOwepUcjeNnnwrT8EMOFG1uG99ds4Hwh_YeVsyvn0wY54Btk7hEHdL1-P5BHRVnma67QiSENCBWIjleI43iGrpd3o38g5mXE6rec6Rp87CfbRpp82l42ett8_YvH8bpfcxtWOyyKO63y3IGRre_CD1IcPO1Ll6CrkOXnbJfAjOXpwscNNOSI0NW4OCEA__Pbd1R1iZ9dfUzP7O7RLRuahF2gL0OOznLBBOpkGnf2BQkro2GNu3hBPfH3lQv6EEcfM2rRk9_eg8Ppm4NXs6Cr2xCYmABHUMbG6kwoPsqlwkqptdJlJbM0MUpzpm1pNRc51qFUpEIyrCKRWs9mVxlVifuwUrvargMaRhAEkeKJyZNESKUnpEC0p2pTlqWRY3jay684b-k5iv5YQyta-BUdw2Yv2aKz0EUhIoJCOQGuZAxbw2uyLf5homrrltSGqbvzKJXU5kGrEcMoYhISlg2jMTz3cv3_8MXO_IN_2Lh60ydwc3awv1fsvZ2_ewi3YkJSbQThJqw0F0v7iJBQox97hf8FTVUIyg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9UwEB5VRUJcWMT2oMCAOHBJlcRJnAenivJUticEVOoBKfIKFRBXfXkHOPET4C_yS5hxFigICXGLFFt2PIs_OzPfANzVjkBHXpWJloVPCs_Jym5uElHXLlO1T53gBOfny2pvv3hyUB5swIMxF6bnh5gu3Ngyor9mAz-y_hcjZ0_Ohw3yv6eKKp8zcf7uy4k7KquqWHKFDgxlQqBADLRCHMYzdT25Gf2BME8C1rjjLM7Bm3GufaDJ--11p7fN599oHP_zY87D2QGJ4k6vOhdgw7UX4RupDR6OhUsweGTpBTekL6M9XMWogY7cEIYWV-8Ivn__8hVVa_FDaN_SMzt7DOuO5uBWGIuQY3BcLoE6mS58_ISElNGwvh3fp57488IFY4BjjBh1GKlvL8H-4tHrh3vJULUhMTnBjcTmxulKKD7IlcJJqbXS1suqLIzSnGdrneYSxzqVihRIpj4TpYtcdt4oLy7DZhtadxXQMH6oWbimLgohlZ6T-tCOqo211sgZ3BnF1xz15BzNeKihFW3iis5gaxRsM9jnqhEZAaGa4FYxg9vTa7Is_l2iWhfW1IaJu-uslNTmSq8Q0yhinhKSTbMZ3Iti_fvwzc7yVXy49u9Nb8HpF7uL5tnj5dPrcCYnGNWHD27BZne8djcIBnX6ZlT3H0CsB3k
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+influence+of+socioeconomic+disadvantage+on+short-+and+long-term+outcomes+after+oesophagectomy+for+cancer%3A+an+Australian+multicentre+study&rft.jtitle=ANZ+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Park%2C+Jin-Soo&rft.au=Polikarpova%2C+Aleksandra&rft.au=Leibman%2C+Steven&rft.au=Laurence%2C+Jerome+M&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fans.19172&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39041601&rft.externalDocID=39041601
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1445-1433&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1445-1433&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1445-1433&client=summon