How to conduct an integrative mixed methods meta-analysis: A tutorial for the systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence

This article is a guide on how to conduct mixed methods meta-analyses (sometimes called mixed methods systematic reviews, integrative meta-analyses, or integrative meta-syntheses), using an integrative approach. These aggregative methods allow researchers to synthesize qualitative and quantitative f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychological methods
Main Author Levitt, Heidi M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 03.10.2024
Online AccessGet more information
ISSN1939-1463
DOI10.1037/met0000675

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This article is a guide on how to conduct mixed methods meta-analyses (sometimes called mixed methods systematic reviews, integrative meta-analyses, or integrative meta-syntheses), using an integrative approach. These aggregative methods allow researchers to synthesize qualitative and quantitative findings from a research literature in order to benefit from the strengths of both forms of analysis. The article articulates distinctions in how qualitative and quantitative methodologies work with variation to develop a coherent theoretical basis for their integration. In advancing this methodological approach to integrative mixed methods meta-analysis (IMMMA), I provide rationales for procedural decisions that support methodological integrity and address prior misconceptions that may explain why these methods have not been as commonly used as might be expected. Features of questions and subject matters that lead them to be amenable to this research approach are considered. The steps to conducting an IMMMA then are described, with illustrative examples, and in a manner open to the use of a range of qualitative and quantitative meta-analytic approaches. These steps include the development of research aims, the selection of primary research articles, the generation of units for analysis, and the development of themes and findings. The tutorial provides guidance on how to develop IMMMA findings that have methodological integrity and are based upon the appreciation of the distinctive approaches to modeling variation in quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The article concludes with guidance for report writing and developing principles for practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
AbstractList This article is a guide on how to conduct mixed methods meta-analyses (sometimes called mixed methods systematic reviews, integrative meta-analyses, or integrative meta-syntheses), using an integrative approach. These aggregative methods allow researchers to synthesize qualitative and quantitative findings from a research literature in order to benefit from the strengths of both forms of analysis. The article articulates distinctions in how qualitative and quantitative methodologies work with variation to develop a coherent theoretical basis for their integration. In advancing this methodological approach to integrative mixed methods meta-analysis (IMMMA), I provide rationales for procedural decisions that support methodological integrity and address prior misconceptions that may explain why these methods have not been as commonly used as might be expected. Features of questions and subject matters that lead them to be amenable to this research approach are considered. The steps to conducting an IMMMA then are described, with illustrative examples, and in a manner open to the use of a range of qualitative and quantitative meta-analytic approaches. These steps include the development of research aims, the selection of primary research articles, the generation of units for analysis, and the development of themes and findings. The tutorial provides guidance on how to develop IMMMA findings that have methodological integrity and are based upon the appreciation of the distinctive approaches to modeling variation in quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The article concludes with guidance for report writing and developing principles for practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Author Levitt, Heidi M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Heidi M
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9447-1484
  surname: Levitt
  fullname: Levitt, Heidi M
  organization: Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39361406$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kMtOwzAQRS0Eog_Y8AHIPxDwK3bDrqqAIlViA-tqEk-oUWKX2GnpH_DZBJXezdGMZs7iTsi5Dx4JueHsjjNp7ltMbIg2-RkZ80IWGVdajsgkxk_GuJIzdUlGspCaK6bH5GcZ9jQFWgVv-ypR8NT5hB8dJLdD2rpvtHSQboKNf4QMPDSH6OIDndPUp9A5aGgdOpo2SOMhJmyH34p2uHO4p6GmXz345NLRCN7-LZrTPFxZ9BVekYsamojX_5yS96fHt8UyW70-vyzmq6wSRqXMqAqNBrBlAVbMZmVeW15yJgzXmucVV6pWuTFCakA0KFAxUYhSSBCFhJmYktujd9uXLdr1tnMtdIf1qRLxC1HnZVI
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
DOI 10.1037/met0000675
DatabaseName PubMed
DatabaseTitle PubMed
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 1939-1463
ExternalDocumentID 39361406
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-~X
0R~
123
29P
354
5VS
7RZ
ABIVO
ABNCP
ABVOZ
ACHQT
ACPQG
AEHFB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AWKKM
AZXWR
CGNQK
CS3
EPA
F5P
FTD
HVGLF
HZ~
ISO
LW5
NPM
O9-
OPA
OVD
P2P
PHGZT
ROL
SES
SPA
TEORI
TN5
YNT
ZPI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-74ce76aadb9ad288b5fd1b102716615c144f4577236aee7e2e40292b23a293a82
IngestDate Fri May 02 01:40:20 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c274t-74ce76aadb9ad288b5fd1b102716615c144f4577236aee7e2e40292b23a293a82
ORCID 0000-0001-9447-1484
PMID 39361406
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_39361406
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-10-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-10-03
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-10-03
  day: 03
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Psychological methods
PublicationTitleAlternate Psychol Methods
PublicationYear 2024
SSID ssj0014384
Score 2.4477673
Snippet This article is a guide on how to conduct mixed methods meta-analyses (sometimes called mixed methods systematic reviews, integrative meta-analyses, or...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
Title How to conduct an integrative mixed methods meta-analysis: A tutorial for the systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39361406
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3JTsMwEIYtFgn1gth3NAduKEBjZzG3CoEqJDi1Um-VnThSD02KCAh4Ah6b8ZImrYpYLmkbt3E7X-PMOJ5_CDljYRIi2cQLRKg8ljCtAckDT0QUr75a8S3T85APj2G3z-4HwaCq4e6yS0p5kXwszCv5D1Xch1x1luwfyE4PijvwOfLFLRLG7a8Ym3pwhV45rlVbz0U-VX_Q64HGozf0Jm2J6Gf9KDzhJEhsPnqp9QtGNoPROKDzss4mpeXpReQmE00fU0-z2zxM-1q5oqRNH3d2THX91wt_Xt39KK2wNXKTsW7awWdmAZsdipQdKjnlHo6zdOFAbFP5sQt7QQyab8LfOBkbJJRTdA-M5MAPrXOi2FXTMlnG8EDXO9WTNO7mEaMxq5RoaXRZf4kWWas-OBdFGG-it0HWXRgAHct0kyypfIu0ppZ73yafCBfKAhxcEDk04IKBC864MAP3GjpQoQVEC4gWarRg0UKRQRMtdpBCAy1UaHdI_-62d9P1XNkML_EjVnoRS1QUCpFKLlI_jmWQpW2JjiSGxui_JhhCZyxAs9FQKBUpX7Ern_vSpwJ9PxH7u2QlL3K1TyBKBdpKxSFVikmRccmZTHjMtKRPO4wOyJ614nBitVGGlX0Pv205Iq36_3RMVjM8GdUJenalPDUcvwAupVPu
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+to+conduct+an+integrative+mixed+methods+meta-analysis%3A+A+tutorial+for+the+systematic+review+of+quantitative+and+qualitative+evidence&rft.jtitle=Psychological+methods&rft.au=Levitt%2C+Heidi+M&rft.date=2024-10-03&rft.eissn=1939-1463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fmet0000675&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39361406&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39361406&rft.externalDocID=39361406