Ethical analysis of informed consent methods in longitudinal cohort studies: A Chinese perspective

In longitudinal cohort studies involving large populations over extended periods, informed consent entails numerous urgent challenges. This paper explores challenges regarding informed consent in long‐term, large‐scale longitudinal cohort studies based on the longitudinal and dynamic nature of such...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDeveloping world bioethics Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 129 - 135
Main Authors Li, Kun, Huang, Mingtao, Zhai, Xiaomei, Wang, Chen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-8731
1471-8847
1471-8847
DOI10.1111/dewb.12460

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In longitudinal cohort studies involving large populations over extended periods, informed consent entails numerous urgent challenges. This paper explores challenges regarding informed consent in long‐term, large‐scale longitudinal cohort studies based on the longitudinal and dynamic nature of such research. It analyzes and evaluates widely recognized broad consent and dynamic consent methods, highlighting limitations concerning their ability to adapt to evolving research objectives and participant perspectives. This paper discusses trust‐based informed consent and emphasizes the needs to establish and maintain trust with research participants and to balance information disclosure with respect for participants' autonomy. Informed consent in long‐term studies is an evolving process that must adapt to changing research environments. Based on participant trust, researchers should observe and assess potential research risks. Finally, the paper recommends enhancing institutional credibility, implementing reconsent procedures, and ensuring robust ethical oversight to safeguard participants' rights despite the complexity of modern biomedical research.
AbstractList In longitudinal cohort studies involving large populations over extended periods, informed consent entails numerous urgent challenges. This paper explores challenges regarding informed consent in long-term, large-scale longitudinal cohort studies based on the longitudinal and dynamic nature of such research. It analyzes and evaluates widely recognized broad consent and dynamic consent methods, highlighting limitations concerning their ability to adapt to evolving research objectives and participant perspectives. This paper discusses trust-based informed consent and emphasizes the needs to establish and maintain trust with research participants and to balance information disclosure with respect for participants' autonomy. Informed consent in long-term studies is an evolving process that must adapt to changing research environments. Based on participant trust, researchers should observe and assess potential research risks. Finally, the paper recommends enhancing institutional credibility, implementing reconsent procedures, and ensuring robust ethical oversight to safeguard participants' rights despite the complexity of modern biomedical research.
In longitudinal cohort studies involving large populations over extended periods, informed consent entails numerous urgent challenges. This paper explores challenges regarding informed consent in long-term, large-scale longitudinal cohort studies based on the longitudinal and dynamic nature of such research. It analyzes and evaluates widely recognized broad consent and dynamic consent methods, highlighting limitations concerning their ability to adapt to evolving research objectives and participant perspectives. This paper discusses trust-based informed consent and emphasizes the needs to establish and maintain trust with research participants and to balance information disclosure with respect for participants' autonomy. Informed consent in long-term studies is an evolving process that must adapt to changing research environments. Based on participant trust, researchers should observe and assess potential research risks. Finally, the paper recommends enhancing institutional credibility, implementing reconsent procedures, and ensuring robust ethical oversight to safeguard participants' rights despite the complexity of modern biomedical research.In longitudinal cohort studies involving large populations over extended periods, informed consent entails numerous urgent challenges. This paper explores challenges regarding informed consent in long-term, large-scale longitudinal cohort studies based on the longitudinal and dynamic nature of such research. It analyzes and evaluates widely recognized broad consent and dynamic consent methods, highlighting limitations concerning their ability to adapt to evolving research objectives and participant perspectives. This paper discusses trust-based informed consent and emphasizes the needs to establish and maintain trust with research participants and to balance information disclosure with respect for participants' autonomy. Informed consent in long-term studies is an evolving process that must adapt to changing research environments. Based on participant trust, researchers should observe and assess potential research risks. Finally, the paper recommends enhancing institutional credibility, implementing reconsent procedures, and ensuring robust ethical oversight to safeguard participants' rights despite the complexity of modern biomedical research.
Author Li, Kun
Huang, Mingtao
Wang, Chen
Zhai, Xiaomei
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kun
  orcidid: 0009-0001-6800-445X
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Kun
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mingtao
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0609-3351
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Mingtao
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xiaomei
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0784-3559
  surname: Zhai
  fullname: Zhai, Xiaomei
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Chen
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7857-5435
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Chen
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39268885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpd0U1LAzEQBuAgiv3Qiz9AAl5EaE2y2WzqrZT6AQUvel426cSmbJOa7Cr992Zt68FckmEeAjPvAJ067wChK0rGNJ37JXyrMWVckBPUp7ygIyl5cXp8FxntoUGMa0Ko4FSco142YUJKmfeRmjcrq6saV66qd9FG7A22zviwgSXW3kVwDd5As_LLmBq49u7DNu3SJp_6Kx8aHLsa4gOe4tnKOoiAtxDiFnRjv-ACnZmqjnB5uIfo_XH-NnseLV6fXmbTxUizgjcjIZSSilaaqMoUuRYqZ4IxSjLCDWgBOacFGC2JUjkIAYwZxlmRmYnOQbFsiG73_26D_2whNuXGRg11XTnwbSwzSnjO5CTr6M0_uvZtSBMlxRLJKZeduj6oVqVtlNtgN1XYlcftJXC3Bzr4GAOYP0JJ2UVTdtGUv9FkP_0_gSg
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TQ
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
7X8
DOI 10.1111/dewb.12460
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
PAIS Index
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
PAIS International (Ovid)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
Philosophy
EISSN 1471-8847
EndPage 135
ExternalDocumentID 39268885
10_1111_dewb_12460
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
-ET
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
186
1OC
29F
31~
33P
36B
4.4
44B
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A04
AABCJ
AABNI
AAESR
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYXX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABSOO
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACHQT
ACJZB
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AETEA
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AHBTC
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ASTYK
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BQESF
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
CITATION
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-C
D-D
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSSH
DU5
EAD
EAP
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F00
F01
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
G50
GODZA
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC4
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSSH
MVM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSSH
N04
N06
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2Y
P2Z
P4B
P4C
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TN5
TUS
UB1
UPT
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WII
WIJ
WMRSR
WOHZO
WQZ
WSUWO
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XJT
XSW
ZCG
~IA
~WP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TQ
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-66bb8b1ac0baf75c6b5262210304fec6e5417efc80bb5e66e22f24273f9c5eb23
ISSN 1471-8731
1471-8847
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 13:59:41 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 13:17:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 22 01:42:05 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 08:15:41 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords trust
informed consent
cohort studies
Language English
License 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c274t-66bb8b1ac0baf75c6b5262210304fec6e5417efc80bb5e66e22f24273f9c5eb23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0609-3351
0000-0001-7857-5435
0000-0002-0784-3559
0009-0001-6800-445X
PMID 39268885
PQID 3228951482
PQPubID 1096394
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3104528932
proquest_journals_3228951482
pubmed_primary_39268885
crossref_primary_10_1111_dewb_12460
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Developing world bioethics
PublicationTitleAlternate Dev World Bioeth
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
SSID ssj0016416
Score 2.3396537
Snippet In longitudinal cohort studies involving large populations over extended periods, informed consent entails numerous urgent challenges. This paper explores...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 129
SubjectTerms Autonomy
Biomedical Research - ethics
China
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Disclosure
Ethical Analysis
Ethics
Ethics, Research
Humans
Informed consent
Informed Consent - ethics
Longitudinal Studies
Medical research
Personal Autonomy
Population studies
Research Subjects
Trust
Title Ethical analysis of informed consent methods in longitudinal cohort studies: A Chinese perspective
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39268885
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3228951482
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3104528932
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fa9RAEF60otyLaNX2tJUVfZMcyd7uJufb0VqKWBFp4d5CdjOLBzYpbQ6pf72zv5IUPFBfwpHdu8B-3-3OTGbmI-RdWtSFqdI84UqZhNeIBcIsEtAiN0IV1SK1xclnX-TpBf-0Eqshf95Vl3Rqpn_9sa7kf1DFe4irrZL9B2T7H8Ub-BnxxSsijNe_wtglq7ti_6GziO-ECrZYzYaNu6AR7dJef7RWnWhTOyUsK4173bn-smufGLd0atpwA7aZ8bgEM1qvx0OFleu0-l6tW7iTMP_ZJwdsmoEuISB9ZlP1q3YUqHZTV-uqvYT1ENf3s4--hxK1EJBgYkicmoHfRPHAS4rCd9KMu6wvbw5sYqMtM_MRjy1beQ0_1QxtEC86MML06tKBiuadRCdeDMdZn2QYh-6TBwx9CKvrcfyt7y2GbmImQ79am9o1PGhCHsWv3jVWtnggzhI5f0IeBxeCLj0fnpJ70OySh15U9HaXTL5GdYrbZ0QFitBIEdoaGilCA0VooAgO0DFFqKcIDRT5QJc0EISOCPKcXJx8PD86TYKsRqJZzrtESqUKlVU6VZXJhZZKMMmY1ZvjBrQEwbMcjC5SpQRICYwZNOTyuVloAYrNX5Cdpm1gn1Am51lV5zpfGMN1ZlQlNfqnIGC-MGD4lLyN61de-e4pZfQ67YKXbsGn5CAubRn-XTclHjQFWv-8YFPyph_Gvc--0KoaaDc4J7OCAGhx45w9D0n_mAjhy60jr8hkoO8B2emuN3CIFmanXjum_AYRaoA_
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethical+analysis+of+informed+consent+methods+in+longitudinal+cohort+studies%3A+A+Chinese+perspective&rft.jtitle=Developing+world+bioethics&rft.au=Li%2C+Kun&rft.au=Huang%2C+Mingtao&rft.au=Zhai%2C+Xiaomei&rft.au=Wang%2C+Chen&rft.date=2025-06-01&rft.eissn=1471-8847&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fdewb.12460&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39268885&rft.externalDocID=39268885
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-8731&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-8731&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-8731&client=summon