Leveraging Mechanomyography Signal for Quantitative Muscle Spasticity Assessment of Upper Limb in Neurological Disorders Using Machine Learning

• Published in: International journal of advanced computer science & applications Vol. 15; no. 8
• Main Authors: Daud, Muhamad Aliff Imran, Puzi, Asmarani Ahmad, Sidek, Shahrul Na’im, Zainuddin, Ahmad Anwar, Khairuddin, Ismail Mohd, Mutalib, Mohd Azri Abdul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: West Yorkshire Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited 2024
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Data analysis; Data collection; Decision trees; Discriminant analysis; Feature extraction; Forearm; Head injuries; Injury analysis; Machine learning; Muscles; Neurological diseases; Rehabilitation; Spasticity; Spinal cord injuries; Support vector machines
• ISSN: 2158-107X; 2156-5570
• DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150898

Upper motor neuron syndrome is characterised by spasticity, which represents a neurological disability that can be found in several disorders such as cerebral palsy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Muscle spasticity is always assessed by therapists using conventional methods involving passive movement and assigning spasticity grades to the relevant joints based on the degree of muscle resistance which leads to inconsistency in assessment and could affect the efficiency of the rehabilitation process. To address this problem, the study proposed to develop a muscle spasticity model using Mechanomyography (MMG) signals from the forearm muscles. The muscle spasticity model leveraged based on the Modified Ashworth Scale and focus on flexion and extension movements of the forearm. Thirty subjects who satisfied the requirements and provided consent were recruited to participate in the data collection. The data underwent a pre-processing stage and was subsequently analysed prior to the extraction of features. The dataset consists of forty-eight extracted features from the three-direction x, y, z axes (for both biceps and triceps muscle), corresponding to the longitudinal, lateral, and transverse orientations relative to the muscle fibers. Significant features selection was conducted to analyse if overall significant difference showed in the combined set of these features across the different spasticity levels. The test results determined the selection of twenty-five features from a total of forty-eight which be used to train an optimum classifier algorithm for the purpose of quantifying the level of muscle spasticity. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Decision Trees (DTs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) algorithms have been employed to achieve better accuracy in quantifying the muscle spasticity level. The KNN-based classifier achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 91.29% with k=15, surpassing the accuracy of other classifiers. This leads to consistency in spasticity evaluation, hence offering optimum rehabilitation strategies.