Design and implementation of a fractal microstrip patch array for vehicle-to-vehicle communication using meta-heuristic techniques

A new novel designed 1 × 2 patch array antenna, which is fractal geometry based, is optimized using the genetic ant colony optimization (GACO) hybrid evolutionary algorithm for better V2V communication. Portions of a genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony optimization (ACO), and GACO optimization focus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of computational electronics Vol. 24; no. 4; p. 110
Main Authors Karanam, Raghavendra, Kakkar, Deepti
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.08.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1569-8025
1572-8137
DOI10.1007/s10825-025-02355-w

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A new novel designed 1 × 2 patch array antenna, which is fractal geometry based, is optimized using the genetic ant colony optimization (GACO) hybrid evolutionary algorithm for better V2V communication. Portions of a genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony optimization (ACO), and GACO optimization focus on a fitness evaluation process, where GACO determines the most optimal antenna dimensions. First, one patch antenna is designed with an estimated gain of 13 dB and a bandwidth of 4500 MHz. Then, an array factor is estimated with the wave number as 2π/λ and φ = 0, followed by the development of a uniformly spaced 1 × 2 patch array. The array configuration brings about a higher gain of 14 dB and a greater bandwidth of 5200 MHz, thus providing high signal reliability for V2V communications. The results claim supporting evidence for the effectiveness of GACO in antenna parameter optimization and suggest using GACO in high-performance antenna for next-generation wireless communication systems. After simulating and testing, it was noticed that the GACO method provided better dimension optimizations, thereby enhancing the antenna's characteristics in terms of S11 and gain with a faster convergence rate compared with GA and ACO.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1569-8025
1572-8137
DOI:10.1007/s10825-025-02355-w