Use of evidence and expertise in UK climate governance: the case of the Cumbrian Coal Mine
There is an overall scientific consensus that no new coal mines can be developed, if the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rises is to be met. Yet in December 2022, following a lengthy Public Inquiry, the UK Government approved the development of Woodhouse Colliery in Cumbria. In doing so,...
Saved in:
Published in | UCL Open environment Vol. 6; no. 1; p. e068 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
UCL Press
06.02.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | There is an overall scientific consensus that no new coal mines can be developed, if the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rises is to be met. Yet in December 2022, following a lengthy Public Inquiry, the UK Government approved the development of Woodhouse Colliery in Cumbria. In doing so, it accepted the claim that the coal mine would be 'zero carbon' and could even result in lower global emissions overall. As this paper demonstrates, there is no independent evidence to support these claims, whilst a large body of independent evidence comes to the opposite conclusion. This paper uses the example of Woodhouse Colliery to examine the use of evidence and expertise in climate governance processes. It finds that the nature of expertise and evidence is not properly considered, and that there is ambiguity and confusion surrounding the implementation of the UK's climate legislation, particularly the Climate Change Act. It also finds that the ways in which the decision-making process solicited and assessed evidence was flawed, promoting a 'false balance'. This ambiguity and false balance provide scope for developers to argue the case for destructive developments, even while claiming adherence to climate ambitions. The paper concludes by suggesting reforms to governance processes, to provide a more transparent and credible implementation of policies to achieve the UK's net zero target. Suggested reforms include clearer rules governing fossil fuel phase-out; greater transparency and better handling of conflicts of interest in decision-making; and devolution of climate responsibilities to local areas. |
---|---|
AbstractList | There is an overall scientific consensus that no new coal mines can be developed, if the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rises is to be met. Yet in December 2022, following a lengthy Public Inquiry, the UK Government approved the development of Woodhouse Colliery in Cumbria. In doing so, it accepted the claim that the coal mine would be ‘zero carbon’ and could even result in lower global emissions overall. As this paper demonstrates, there is no independent evidence to support these claims, whilst a large body of independent evidence comes to the opposite conclusion. This paper uses the example of Woodhouse Colliery to examine the use of evidence and expertise in climate governance processes. It finds that the nature of expertise and evidence is not properly considered, and that there is ambiguity and confusion surrounding the implementation of the UK’s climate legislation, particularly the Climate Change Act. It also finds that the ways in which the decision-making process solicited and assessed evidence was flawed, promoting a ‘false balance’. This ambiguity and false balance provide scope for developers to argue the case for destructive developments, even while claiming adherence to climate ambitions. The paper concludes by suggesting reforms to governance processes, to provide a more transparent and credible implementation of policies to achieve the UK’s net zero target. Suggested reforms include clearer rules governing fossil fuel phase-out; greater transparency and better handling of conflicts of interest in decision-making; and devolution of climate responsibilities to local areas. There is a clear scientific consensus that no new coal mines can be developed, if the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rises is to be met. Yet in December 2022, following a lengthy Public Inquiry, the UK Government approved the development of Woodhouse Colliery in Cumbria. In doing so, it accepted the claim that the coal mine would be ‘zero carbon’, and could even result in lower global emissions overall. As this paper demonstrates, there is no independent evidence to support these claims, whilst a large body of independent evidence comes to the opposite conclusion. This paper uses the example of Woodhouse Colliery to examine the use of evidence and expertise in climate governance processes. It finds that the nature of expertise and evidence is not properly considered, and that there is ambiguity and confusion surrounding the implementation of the UK’s climate legislation, particularly the Climate Change Act. It also finds that the ways in which the decision-making process solicited and assessed evidence was flawed, promoting a ‘false balance’. This ambiguity and false balance provide scope for developers to argue the case for destructive developments, even while claiming adherence to climate ambitions. The paper concludes by suggesting reforms to governance processes, to provide a more transparent and credible implementation of policies to achieve the UK’s net zero target. Suggested reforms include clearer rules governing fossil fuel phase-out; greater transparency and better handling of conflicts of interest in decision-making; and devolution of climate responsibilities to local areas. |
Author | Willis, Rebecca |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rebecca orcidid: 0000-0001-9551-7608 surname: Willis fullname: Willis, Rebecca organization: Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38332983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVkU1vFDEMhiNURD_oTwDlyGW3-d4MF4RWtFS06oW9cIk8iadNNZssmZkK_j3pTqnaXGLFr187fo7JQcoJCfnA2ZIrKdQZ53yplDqbfJ9xyeox9g05EkaKBbPWHLyID8npMNxXibArYS1_Rw6llVI0Vh6RX5sBae4oPsSAySOFFCj-2WEZY83ERDc_qO_jFkakt_kBS4Iq-0zHO6Qe5uLHeD1t2xIh0XWGnl7HhO_J2w76AU-f7hOyOf_2c_19cXVzcbn-erXwYsXtghvBZWi8XwXNgtdWQieF5y2IhredVLI1AbTiTWtaxdugLGAwXHTQaGaVPCGXs2_IcO92pc5a_roM0e0fcrl1UH_je3SdhcZoq0SwWjEFNogWG65A6dBoo6vXl9lrN7VbDB7TWKB_Zfo6k-Kdq2txnFnNV8xUh09PDiX_nnAY3TYOHvseEuZpcKIRmtXtS1alepb6koehYPfchzO35-wqZ1c5uz1nN3OudR9fDvlc9Z-q_AebcaWb |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.rset.2022.100030 10.1037/xap0000073 10.1088/1748-9326/AC6228 10.1080/09644016.2021.2018854 10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995 10.1080/14693062.2013.788858 10.1186/s40309-021-00186-z 10.1038/s41558-018-0337-0 10.1038/nature14016 10.3389/fclim.2019.00004 10.1007/s10484-016-1770-6 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.015 10.1038/s41586-021-03821-8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 The Authors. 2024 The Authors. 2024 The Authors. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Authors. – notice: 2024 The Authors. 2024 The Authors. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000068 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2632-0886 |
EndPage | e068 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f8a965842d85404a8d2be914a45d9565 10_14324_111_444_ucloe_000068 38332983 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: UKRI grantid: MR / TO22884/1 |
GroupedDBID | AAFWJ AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS GROUPED_DOAJ M~E NPM PGMZT RPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2718-16213d9cc7d50dc583af32c1ba291bf343b6da5419b6b41bd48aed612fa950843 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2632-0886 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 04 21:11:04 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:29:59 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 17 02:43:12 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 00:46:24 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 27 13:45:51 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | planning steel evidence Cumbria UK Climate Change Act coal climate expertise |
Language | English |
License | 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2718-16213d9cc7d50dc583af32c1ba291bf343b6da5419b6b41bd48aed612fa950843 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9551-7608 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10851706/ |
PMID | 38332983 |
PQID | 2925033230 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f8a965842d85404a8d2be914a45d9565 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10851706 proquest_miscellaneous_2925033230 crossref_primary_10_14324_111_444_ucloe_000068 pubmed_primary_38332983 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20240206 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-02-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 2 year: 2024 text: 20240206 day: 6 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: UK |
PublicationTitle | UCL Open environment |
PublicationTitleAlternate | UCL Open Environ |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | UCL Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: UCL Press |
References | (keyref_r16) 2023 (keyref_r26) 2023 keyref_r3 (keyref_r7) 2021 (keyref_r24) 2022 keyref_r4 keyref_r28 MarkussonNMcLarenDSzerszynskiBTyfieldDWillisR (keyref_r23) 2022; 10 keyref_r40 keyref_r21 McLarenDPTyfieldDBWillisRSzerszynskiBMarkussonNO (keyref_r22) 2019 OreskesNConwayEM (keyref_r31) 2012 AndersonKPetersG (keyref_r6) 2016; 182 KuriakoseJJonesCAndersonKMcLachlanCBroderickJ (keyref_r41) 2022; 2 (keyref_r18) 2022 KirbyD (keyref_r27) 2021 DunlapREMcCrightAMYaroshJH (keyref_r33) 2016; 58 keyref_r8 FahyD (keyref_r30) 2017 WelsbyDPriceJPyeSEkinsP (keyref_r10) 2021; 597 (keyref_r13) 2021 keyref_r14 keyref_r36 WillisRMitchellCHoggettRBrittonJPoulterHPownallT (keyref_r12) 2019 (keyref_r25) 2022 (keyref_r1) 2022 (keyref_r2) 2015 EricksonPLazarusMPiggotG (keyref_r20) 2018; 8 SkidmoreC (keyref_r39) 2023 (keyref_r15) 2023 keyref_r32 keyref_r11 FiorinoD (keyref_r34) 2022; 31 KoehlerD (keyref_r29) 2016; 22 BarrettJPetersGWiedmannTScottKLenzenMRoelichK (keyref_r19) 2013; 13 (keyref_r37) 2021 RosenowJ (keyref_r38) 2022; 6 LambWFMattioliGLeviSTimmons RobertsJCapstickSCreutzigF (keyref_r35) 2020 (keyref_r42) 2021 McGladeCEkinsP (keyref_r9) 2015; 517 (keyref_r17) 2023 TroutKMuttittGLafleurDVan de GraafTMendelevitchRMeiL (keyref_r5) 2022; 17 |
References_xml | – volume-title: National Planning Policy Framework ident: keyref_r14 – volume-title: Net zero by 2050: a roadmap for the global energy sector. [Online] year: 2021 ident: keyref_r7 – volume-title: WCM Statement of Case year: 2022 ident: keyref_r24 – volume: 2 year: 2022 ident: keyref_r41 article-title: What does the Paris climate change agreement mean for local policy? Downscaling the remaining global carbon budget to sub-national areas publication-title: Renew Sust Energ Trans doi: 10.1016/j.rset.2022.100030 contributor: fullname: KuriakoseJJonesCAndersonKMcLachlanCBroderickJ – volume-title: Carbon footprint for the UK and England to 2019. [Online] year: 2022 ident: keyref_r18 – volume-title: Zero carbon Cumbria programme. [Online] year: 2023 ident: keyref_r17 – volume: 22 start-page: 24 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: keyref_r29 article-title: Can journalistic ‘false balance’ distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion? publication-title: J Exp Psychol Appl doi: 10.1037/xap0000073 contributor: fullname: KoehlerD – volume: 17 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: keyref_r5 article-title: Existing fossil fuel extraction would warm the world beyond 1.5°C publication-title: Environ Res Lett doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/AC6228 contributor: fullname: TroutKMuttittGLafleurDVan de GraafTMendelevitchRMeiL – ident: keyref_r28 – volume-title: Paris agreement. [Online] year: 2015 ident: keyref_r2 – ident: keyref_r3 – volume-title: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’s nationally determined contribution year: 2022 ident: keyref_r1 – volume: 31 start-page: 801 issue: 5 year: 2022 ident: keyref_r34 article-title: Climate change and right-wing populism in the United States publication-title: Environ Politics doi: 10.1080/09644016.2021.2018854 contributor: fullname: FiorinoD – ident: keyref_r11 – volume-title: The sixth carbon budget: the UK’s path to net zero. [Online] year: 2021 ident: keyref_r13 – volume-title: Decision letter and Inspector’s Report for a called-in decision year: 2022 ident: keyref_r25 – volume: 58 start-page: 4 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: keyref_r33 article-title: The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the U.S publication-title: Environment doi: 10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995 contributor: fullname: DunlapREMcCrightAMYaroshJH – volume: 13 start-page: 451 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: keyref_r19 article-title: Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study publication-title: Climate Policy doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.788858 contributor: fullname: BarrettJPetersGWiedmannTScottKLenzenMRoelichK – volume-title: Global sustainability year: 2020 ident: keyref_r35 contributor: fullname: LambWFMattioliGLeviSTimmons RobertsJCapstickSCreutzigF – ident: keyref_r32 – volume: 10 start-page: 2 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: keyref_r23 article-title: Life in the hole: practices and emotions in the cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence publication-title: Eur J Futures Res doi: 10.1186/s40309-021-00186-z contributor: fullname: MarkussonNMcLarenDSzerszynskiBTyfieldDWillisR – volume-title: ‘World’s first net-zero coal mine’ planned for Cumbria is condemned by the carbon offsetters it hopes to use. [Online] year: 2021 ident: keyref_r27 contributor: fullname: KirbyD – ident: keyref_r36 – volume: 8 start-page: 1037 issue: 12 year: 2018 ident: keyref_r20 article-title: Limiting fossil fuel production as the next big step in climate policy publication-title: Nat Clim Change doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0337-0 contributor: fullname: EricksonPLazarusMPiggotG – volume-title: Getting energy governance right: lessons from IGov. [Online] year: 2019 ident: keyref_r12 contributor: fullname: WillisRMitchellCHoggettRBrittonJPoulterHPownallT – volume-title: Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming year: 2012 ident: keyref_r31 contributor: fullname: OreskesNConwayEM – volume: 517 start-page: 187 issue: 7533 year: 2015 ident: keyref_r9 article-title: The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature14016 contributor: fullname: McGladeCEkinsP – start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: keyref_r22 article-title: Beyond ‘Net-Zero’: a case for separate targets for emissions reduction and negative emissions publication-title: Front Clim doi: 10.3389/fclim.2019.00004 contributor: fullname: McLarenDPTyfieldDBWillisRSzerszynskiBMarkussonNO – ident: keyref_r21 – volume-title: Objectivity, false balance, and advocacy in news coverage of climate change year: 2017 ident: keyref_r30 contributor: fullname: FahyD – volume-title: Mission zero – independent review of net zero year: 2023 ident: keyref_r39 contributor: fullname: SkidmoreC – ident: keyref_r40 – volume: 182 year: 2016 ident: keyref_r6 article-title: The trouble with negative emissions publication-title: Insights/Perspectives doi: 10.1007/s10484-016-1770-6 contributor: fullname: AndersonKPetersG – volume-title: Deep coal mining in the UK: letter from Lord Deben to Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP, Secretary of State. [Online] year: 2021 ident: keyref_r42 – volume: 6 start-page: 2225 issue: 10 year: 2022 ident: keyref_r38 article-title: Is heating homes with hydrogen all but a pipe dream? An evidence review publication-title: Joule doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.015 contributor: fullname: RosenowJ – volume-title: Zero carbon Manchester. [Online] year: 2023 ident: keyref_r15 – volume-title: Our commitment to fly net zero by 2050. [Online] year: 2021 ident: keyref_r37 – ident: keyref_r4 – year: 2023 ident: keyref_r16 article-title: Greater London Authority publication-title: Zero carbon London. [Online] – ident: keyref_r8 – volume: 597 start-page: 230 issue: 7875 year: 2021 ident: keyref_r10 article-title: Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5°C world publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03821-8 contributor: fullname: WelsbyDPriceJPyeSEkinsP – volume-title: R (on the application of Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) (Appellant) v Surrey County Council and others (Respondents). Case ID: 2022/0064. [Online] year: 2023 ident: keyref_r26 |
SSID | ssj0002872881 |
Score | 2.2887065 |
Snippet | There is an overall scientific consensus that no new coal mines can be developed, if the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rises is to be met. Yet in... There is a clear scientific consensus that no new coal mines can be developed, if the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rises is to be met. Yet in... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | e068 |
SubjectTerms | climate Climate Change Act coal evidence expertise steel |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Na9wwEBUhp15CS5vWbVpU6NXZSBp55d7aJSG0JKcuhF7E6MPNlmCXJvv_MyM7YTcEcsnVH0i8J3neWNIbIb5Yi6igU7Xq4rwGjU0dKK7UgCEfJchGZ17RPTtvTpfw48JebJT64j1hoz3wCNysc8j-JKCTI3EB6JIOuVWAYBNp-9G9VNmNZOpv-WU0186p6cgOu87NaFIfAsBsHa-GXGwL2V51IxgVz_7HhObD_ZIbAejkpdiblKP8Nvb4ldjJ_Wvxe3md5dDJPBUHldgnWVz7uciyXPVy-VPGqxXp0iz_lLq6TPNXScNDRhxfJg0oF2s-u4W9XAzUyBlpzzdieXL8a3FaT-US6qgpwtSq0cqkNsZ5skcpWmewMzqqgLpVoTNgQpPQgmpDE0CFBA5zIoXTIZeCBbMvdvuhz--EjDqDjUhizLQUvQLGAB0poQSBvnChrcThHW7-3-iK4TmbYKA5p_AEtC9A-xHoSnxndO8fZlPrcoGo9hPV_imqK_H5jhtPk4BXNrDPw_ra61bzciylU5V4O3J13xSl4Ea3zlTCbbG41ZftO_3qshht88kMthd6_xy9_yBeaBJEZcd3cyB2b_6v80cSNDfhUxm7t8r08SA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Use of evidence and expertise in UK climate governance: the case of the Cumbrian Coal Mine |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38332983 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2925033230 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10851706 https://doaj.org/article/f8a965842d85404a8d2be914a45d9565 |
Volume | 6 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELXanrggEF-htDIS12xqe5x1uJUVVQVaxIGVKi6Rv1IWbZ2q7f5_Zpyk2kWcuEVJLFszdua9ePyGsQ9aWyugE6Xo_LwEaevSYVwpwbp4FiAqGWlHd_mtvlzBlyt9dcDq6SxMTtr3bj1Lm5tZWv_KuZW3N76a8sSq78sFZcyT7Et1yA7nSu1w9N_5d9FcGiPG4zqkOFfhgp4BQLX1mz5myUKSVt0JRFmv_18g8-9cyZ3gc_GMPR1RIz8fRvecHcT0gv1c3UfedzyOhUG5TYFnxX4qsMzXia--cr9ZIyaN_DrX1CUXf-SI-bi3Q2O6Xmzp3JZNfNFjJ0vEnS_Z6uLzj8VlOZZKKL3E6FKKWgoVGu_nQZ8Fr42ynZJeOCsb4ToFytXBahCNqx0IF8DYGBDddJbKwIJ6xY5Sn-Ibxr2MoL1FIKYajFzOegcdoqAADr9urinYbLJbezsoYrTEJMjQxCdaNHSbDd0Ohi7YJ7Lu48skaJ1v9HfX7ejWtjOWZGhABoMYEqwJ0sVGgAUdkMLpgr2ffNPiAqBdDZtiv71vZSNpKxapVMFeD7567Arpt5KNUQUze17cG8v-E5xzWWR7mmNv_7_pMXsiEQLlHO_6HTt6uNvGE4QwD-40U__TPG__ABuS8jY |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,27957,27958,53827,53829 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKOcClgHilvIzENUltj7MJN1hRLbRbceiKiovlV8rCNqnazYVfz9hJqt2KC9yiOJaTfJ7MN_H4G0LeSak1g5qlrLaTFLguUoN-JQVt_IEDL7gPK7rzk2K2gC9n8myHFONemJi0b80ya1YXWbP8EXMrLy9sPuaJ5V_n05AxH2Rf8jvkLhosn2xE6T_jD6MJL0s2bNgJmnM5mnQGAHlnV62PooVBXHXDFUXF_r_RzNvZkhvu5_AB-TbeeJ918ivr1iazv29pOv77kz0kewMjpR_69kdkxzePyffFtadtTf1QdJTqxtFYDSAUb6bLhi6OqF0tke96eh7r9Ybp854in6RW953D8bQLe8J0Q6ctDjJHTvuELA4_nU5n6VCGIbUcPVfKCs6Eq6ydOHngrCyFrgW3zGheMVMLEKZwWgKrTGGAGQel9g6ZU61DiVkQT8lu0zb-OaGWe5BWI8kTFXpFo62BGhmWA4NfTlMlJBsRUZe92oYKUUqAMMQqCiFUEULVQ5iQjwG3m4uDWHY80V6dq-HFqrrUQeIGuCuRn4IuHTe-YqBBOgwPZULejqgrNK6wYqIb33bXilc8LPNimJaQZ_0suBkKQ3vBq1IkpNyaH1v3st2CqEcB7xHl_f_v-obcm53Oj9Xx55OjF-Q-R6oVc8mLl2R3fdX5V0iV1uZ1tIs_HXkTdQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagSIhLAfFoeBqJa5LanmQTbrCwKpStemClCg6WXylLt86qu7nw6xk72Wq34tRblNhyks-T-SYef0PI-6JQikHDUtaYUQpclalGv5KC0u7QghPchRXd6Ul5NINvZ8XZkFW5GtIqvdHzzC8uMz__HXMrl5cm3-SJ5afTcciYD7Iv-dI2-V1yD42W11uR-p_402jEq4oNm3aC7lyOZp0BQN6ZReuicGEQWN1yR1G1_39U82bG5JYLmjwkvzY332eeXGTdWmfm7w1dx9s93SOyPzBT-rFv85jccf4J-TlbOdo21A3FR6nylsaqAKGIM517OjumZjFH3uvoeazbG6bRB4q8khrVdw7H4y7sDVOejlscZIrc9imZTb78GB-lQzmG1HD0YCkrORO2NmZki0NrikqoRnDDtOI1040AoUurCmC1LjUwbaFSziKDalQoNQviGdnzrXcHhBruoDAKyZ6o0TtqZTQ0yLQsaPyC6joh2QYVuexVN2SIVgKMIWaRCKOMMMoexoR8CthdNw6i2fFEe3Uuh5crm0oFqRvgtkKeCqqyXLuagYLCYphYJOTdBnmJRhZWTpR3bbeSvOZhuRfDtYQ872fC9VAY4gteVyIh1c4c2bmX3SuIfBTy3iD94vZd35L7p58n8vvXk-OX5AFHxhVTystXZG991bnXyJjW-k00jX_GORX1 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use+of+evidence+and+expertise+in+UK+climate+governance%3A+The+case+of+the+Cumbrian+Coal+Mine&rft.jtitle=UCL+Open+environment&rft.au=Willis%2C+Rebecca&rft.date=2024-02-06&rft.issn=2632-0886&rft.eissn=2632-0886&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.14324%2F111.444%2Fucloe.000068&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_14324_111_444_ucloe_000068 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2632-0886&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2632-0886&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2632-0886&client=summon |