Effects of Two Different Cold Application Methods After Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

• Published in: Plastic and aesthetic nursing (Philadelphia, Pa. : Print) Vol. 44; no. 1; p. 53
• Main Authors: Ilce, Arzu, Soysal, Ganime Esra, Koybasi Sanal, Serap
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Angioedema - etiology; Angioedema - therapy; Cryotherapy - methods; Facial Pain - etiology; Facial Pain - therapy; Humans; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Postoperative Complications - therapy; Prospective Studies; Rhinoplasty - adverse effects
• ISSN: 2770-3517
• DOI: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000536

The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of two methods of cold application on eye ecchymosis, periorbital edema, pain around the eyes and face, and patient comfort in postoperative rhinoplasty patients. Patients were randomly divided and evaluated in two groups: an ice in disposable latex gloves (IDLG) group and a cooling gel eye mask (CGEM) group. We used the CONSORT checklist to report the study. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, preoperative blood pressure, respiration, fever status, oxygen saturation, or postoperative vital signs. Patients in the IDLG group had significantly higher scores for pain around the eyes, facial pain, and periorbital edema on the first postoperative day, and significantly higher facial edema scores during the first postoperative hour (p ≤ .05). Patients in the CGEM group reported that they slept more comfortably (p ≤ .05). The results of our study showed that CGEMs reduce pain, periorbital edema, and facial edema after rhinoplasty.