Commitment to and connection with green brands: perspectives of consumer social responsibility and terror management theory

Purpose This study aims to investigate specific green-brand affect in terms of commitment and connection through the morality–mortality determinants of consumer social responsibility and the assumptions of terror management theory in the proposed three-layered framework. Religiosity serves as a mode...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of product & brand management Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 314 - 329
Main Authors Rahimah, Anni, Do, Ben-Roy, Le, Angelina Nhat Hanh, Cheng, Julian Ming Sung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Santa Barbara Emerald Publishing Limited 10.04.2024
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose This study aims to investigate specific green-brand affect in terms of commitment and connection through the morality–mortality determinants of consumer social responsibility and the assumptions of terror management theory in the proposed three-layered framework. Religiosity serves as a moderator within the framework. Design/methodology/approach Data are collected in Taipei, Taiwan, while quota sampling is applied, and 420 valid questionnaires are collected. The partial least squares technique is applied for data analysis. Findings With the contingent role of religiosity, consumer social responsibility influences socially conscious consumption, which in turn drives the commitment and connection of green-brand affect. The death anxiety and self-esteem outlined in terror management theory influence materialism, which then drives green-brand commitment; however, contrary to expectations, they do not drive green-brand connection. Originality/value By considering green brands beyond their cognitive aspects and into their affective counterparts, morality–mortality drivers of green-brand commitment and green-grand connection are explored to provide unique contributions so as to better understand socially responsible consumption.
ISSN:1061-0421
2054-1643
1061-0421
DOI:10.1108/JPBM-11-2022-4214