Trends in Utilization of Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients: A Nationwide Study Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Database

Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data.Methods: Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea’s Health Insurance Review and Assessment servi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean journal of ophthalmology Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 114 - 122
Main Authors Kim, Seongmi, Jung, Jung Yoon, Cho, Geon Sik, Lee, Jong Young, Lee, Hye Jin, Jeong, Jinho, Ha, Ahnul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Ophthalmological Society 01.04.2022
대한안과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1011-8942
2092-9382
2092-9382
DOI10.3341/kjo.2021.0108

Cover

Abstract Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data.Methods: Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea’s Health Insurance Review and Assessment service, were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucoma in other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medication prescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codes E6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes in visual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis.Results: From 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the total number decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from 1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinations per patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010).Conclusions: Between 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patient significantly decreased.
AbstractList To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data.PURPOSETo analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data.Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment service, were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucoma in other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medication prescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codes E6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes in visual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis.METHODSHealth claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment service, were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucoma in other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medication prescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codes E6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes in visual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis.From 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the total number decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from 1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinations per patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010).RESULTSFrom 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the total number decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from 1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinations per patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010).Between 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patient significantly decreased.CONCLUSIONSBetween 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patient significantly decreased.
To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data. Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment service, were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucoma in other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medication prescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codes E6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes in visual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis. From 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the total number decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from 1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinations per patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010). Between 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patient significantly decreased.
Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients usingthe Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data. Methods: Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea’s Health Insurance Review and Assessment service,were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucomain other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medicationprescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codesE6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes invisual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis. Results: From 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the totalnumber decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinationsper patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Between 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patientsignificantly decreased. KCI Citation Count: 0
Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data.Methods: Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea’s Health Insurance Review and Assessment service, were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucoma in other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medication prescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codes E6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes in visual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis.Results: From 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the total number decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from 1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinations per patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010).Conclusions: Between 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patient significantly decreased.
Author Lee, Hye Jin
Ha, Ahnul
Jung, Jung Yoon
Lee, Jong Young
Kim, Seongmi
Jeong, Jinho
Cho, Geon Sik
AuthorAffiliation 2 Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
– name: 2 Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Seongmi
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Seongmi
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jung Yoon
  surname: Jung
  fullname: Jung, Jung Yoon
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Geon Sik
  surname: Cho
  fullname: Cho, Geon Sik
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jong Young
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Jong Young
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hye Jin
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Hye Jin
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jinho
  surname: Jeong
  fullname: Jeong, Jinho
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Ahnul
  surname: Ha
  fullname: Ha, Ahnul
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002828954$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1kk9v1DAQxS1URLeFI1fkIxyy-E-cTTggrQptV1SASsrVmnUmXXcTu7WTVuWD8Hnx7pYKkDiNLP_em9HMOyB7zjsk5CVnUylz_nZ95aeCCT5lnJVPyESwSmSVLMUemXDGeVZWudgnBzFeMVZwyWbPyL7MS5HUckJ-1gFdE6l19GKwnf0Bg_WO-pZ-t3GEjh5b7BpaYxwibX2gJx2MxvdAvyYS3RDf0Tn9vFXd2Qbpt2Fs7ulFtO6SDiukn3xAcPQUoRtWdOHiGMAZpOd4a_GOgmvoPEaMsU9m9AMMsISIz8nTFrqILx7qIamPP9ZHp9nZl5PF0fwsM6IoyqyRhVoqlK3KZ6JpVcnAMKiMLIEt23zGRYmgGoZcyUIYDmljkB6FSl2qQh6SNztbF1q9NlZ7sNt66fU66Pl5vdBVlVdCzRL7fsdej8seG5PGDdDp62B7CPdb5d8_zq6Sz62uGJdK8WTw-sEg-JsxLVT3NhrsOnDox6hFwXLGCzUrE_rqz16PTX7fLQHZDjDBxxiwfUQ405tc6JQLvcmF3uQi8fIf3thhe7Q0qu3-o_oF-lK9jw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2023_03_018
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_46765
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2022_11_009
Cites_doi 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31469-1
10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.12.002
10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.002
10.22608/APO.201902
10.1001/archopht.1980.01020041015002
10.1136/bjo.2007.135012
10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770205.x
10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760303.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.034
10.3341/jkos.2013.54.12.1907
10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.051
10.3109/08820538.2010.518898
10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30173-0
10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.718
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1396
10.1136/bjo.86.5.560
10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760408.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.027
10.3341/jkos.2010.51.1.49
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.3341/kjo.2021.0108
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2092-9382
EndPage 122
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9949257
PMC9013551
34823343
10_3341_kjo_2021_0108
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
29L
2WC
5-W
5GY
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ACYCR
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EF.
EJD
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M48
O5R
O5S
OK1
P5Y
P6G
PGMZT
RPM
TR2
53G
ADRAZ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
HZB
MZR
M~E
NPM
ZZE
7X8
85H
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2668-d365b5e3f5472df580ac0a9c38a0bf47128ea5d0e15362c1a341ae1565aba963
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1011-8942
2092-9382
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:40:12 EST 2023
Thu Aug 21 14:14:22 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 22:37:09 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:56:04 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:57:33 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:44 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Glaucoma
Visual field tests
Ocular hypertension
Language English
License This is an Open Access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2668-d365b5e3f5472df580ac0a9c38a0bf47128ea5d0e15362c1a341ae1565aba963
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3341/kjo.2021.0108
PMID 34823343
PQID 2604016578
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9949257
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9013551
proquest_miscellaneous_2604016578
pubmed_primary_34823343
crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2021_0108
crossref_citationtrail_10_3341_kjo_2021_0108
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-Apr
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-Apr
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Korean journal of ophthalmology
PublicationTitleAlternate Korean J Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Korean Ophthalmological Society
대한안과학회
Publisher_xml – name: Korean Ophthalmological Society
– name: 대한안과학회
References ref13
Park (ref9) 2003
ref23
ref15
ref14
ref20
Jampel (ref6) 2011
Kivikunnas (ref10)
ref11
ref22
ref21
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref8
ref7
ref4
ref3
ref5
(ref12) 1994
References_xml – ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31469-1
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.12.002
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.002
– start-page: 1445
  volume-title: 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability
  year: 1994
  ident: ref12
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.22608/APO.201902
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020041015002
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.135012
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770205.x
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760303.x
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.034
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.3341/jkos.2013.54.12.1907
– start-page: 986
  volume-title: Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
  year: 2011
  ident: ref6
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.051
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.3109/08820538.2010.518898
– start-page: 17
  year: 2003
  ident: ref9
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30173-0
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.718
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1396
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.5.560
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760408.x
– start-page: 395
  volume-title: Overview of process trend analysis methods and applications
  ident: ref10
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.027
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.3341/jkos.2010.51.1.49
SSID ssj0061307
Score 2.2325644
Snippet Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance...
To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients using the Korean Health Insurance Review and...
Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients usingthe Korean Health Insurance Review...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 114
SubjectTerms Adult
Glaucoma - diagnosis
Glaucoma - epidemiology
Humans
Insurance, Health
Intraocular Pressure
Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis
Original
Vision Disorders - diagnosis
Visual Field Tests - methods
Visual Fields
안과학
Title Trends in Utilization of Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients: A Nationwide Study Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Database
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823343
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2604016578
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9013551
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002828954
Volume 36
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022, 36(2), , pp.114-122
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfokKa9IL5XBtWBEE9kJI6dDyQ0VYOygYp4aGFvlpM4EFo5rGkE-0f4e7lL0kBhvPAURbFjyWf7fue7-x1jj5NEBFynsWM8cjOmgefECIscHWVRSHxs0tB9x_RdcDIXb87k2S9KoW4Cq0tNO6onNV8tD7-fXxzhhn9BFicews8WXyiLj3uHaFtEA3YVlVJAdthU9A4FQslNnRW6EYxiwVu6zb-777FdonvBD_6WphrYVX4ZCP0zlvI35TS5zq51qBLG7TK4wa4Ye5PtTju_-S32ow19hcLCfF0su9xLKHP4UFQ19pxQIBvMcMwKEMbC66WucS1qeN_yrlbPYQwth_a3IjNA4YcX0MQbAEJIeFsi-LTQJjXBqa1qKthhoHU9gLYZjHsOUHip15rU5202m7yaHZ84XUUGJ0VFHjmZH8hEGj-XIuRZLiNXp66OUz_SbpKjnuOR0TJzDZ6jAU89jfOr8SWQ-Ffc6nfYji2t2WfgBqlvTIhwKeEil0bnHlo-gueIt4SOxZA93Uy-Sju2ciqasVRotZDYFIpNkdgUiW3InvTNv7Y0Hf9q-AglqRZpoYhYm56fSrVYKTQfTlUcE1djOGQPN4JWuNvIhaKtKetKofUnKAEsxB_dbQXfj7dZN0MWbi2JvgENuP3FFp8bRm8EZYj7vHv_3fOA7XHKy2hCiu6znfWqNg8QLa2TERtI5-OouWsYNXviJ-WPFaI
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends+in+Utilization+of+Visual+Field+Tests+for+Glaucoma+Patients%3A+A+Nationwide+Study+Using+the+Korean+Health+Insurance+Review+and+Assessment+Database&rft.jtitle=Korean+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=Kim%2C+Seongmi&rft.au=Jung%2C+Jung+Yoon&rft.au=Cho%2C+Geon+Sik&rft.au=Lee%2C+Jong+Young&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.pub=Korean+Ophthalmological+Society&rft.issn=1011-8942&rft.eissn=2092-9382&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=122&rft_id=info:doi/10.3341%2Fkjo.2021.0108&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34823343&rft.externalDocID=PMC9013551
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon