A Boolean model for conflict-freeness in argumentation frameworks

The Boolean models of argumentation semantics have been established in various ways. These models commonly translate the conditions of extension-based semantics into some constraints of the models. The goal of this work is to explore a simple method to build Boolean models for argumentation. In this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIMS mathematics Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 3913 - 3919
Main Author Wu, Jiachao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published AIMS Press 01.01.2023
Subjects
argumentation framework
boolean algebra
boolean model
conflict-free sets
t-norms
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2473-6988
2473-6988
DOI10.3934/math.2023195

Cover

Abstract The Boolean models of argumentation semantics have been established in various ways. These models commonly translate the conditions of extension-based semantics into some constraints of the models. The goal of this work is to explore a simple method to build Boolean models for argumentation. In this paper, the attack relation is treated as an operator, and its value is calculated by the values of its target and source arguments. By examining the values of the attacks, a Boolean model of conflict-free sets is introduced. This novel method simplifies the existing ways by eliminating the various constraints. The conflict-free sets can be calculated by simply checking the values of the attacks.
AbstractList The Boolean models of argumentation semantics have been established in various ways. These models commonly translate the conditions of extension-based semantics into some constraints of the models. The goal of this work is to explore a simple method to build Boolean models for argumentation. In this paper, the attack relation is treated as an operator, and its value is calculated by the values of its target and source arguments. By examining the values of the attacks, a Boolean model of conflict-free sets is introduced. This novel method simplifies the existing ways by eliminating the various constraints. The conflict-free sets can be calculated by simply checking the values of the attacks.
Author Wu, Jiachao
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jiachao
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Jiachao
BookMark eNpN0M1KAzEUhuEgFay1Oy8gF-DU_E2SWdbiT6HgRtfhmDmpU2cSSUbEu7faIq7O4Vs8i_ecTGKKSMglZwvZSHU9wPi6EExI3tQnZCqUkZVurJ38-8_IvJQdY0xwoYRRU7Jc0puUeoRIh9RiT0PK1KcY-s6PVciIEUuhXaSQtx8DxhHGLkUaMgz4mfJbuSCnAfqC8-Odkee726fVQ7V5vF-vlpvKC12PlVHIAqIPXmvrJW89NFLrGhkEw_ejkg2YoLmyLYpahhqktdwaKSEI0HJG1ge3TbBz77kbIH-5BJ37HVLeOshj53t0TGplrGGNCWrPchAezIvwwtSgNLK9dXWwfE6lZAx_Hmfup6b7qemONeU3sN9pDQ
Cites_doi 10.24963/ijcai.2021/282
10.1007/11853886_11
10.3934/math.2021454
10.1016/j.automatica.2019.01.031
10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
10.1109/TCYB.2020.3044003
10.1109/TSMC.2020.2964172
10.1016/j.ins.2017.05.014
10.1109/TAC.2021.3063227
10.3934/math.2022625
10.1587/transinf.2016EDP7313
10.1007/s00521-020-05623-x
10.1016/j.artint.2021.103607
10.1613/jair.1.12394
10.1007/s00500-020-05235-6
10.1109/TCSI.2021.3119065
10.1016/j.artint.2011.03.006
10.1007/s00500-022-06860-z
10.3233/AAC-200543
10.3934/math.2020260
10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.005
10.3233/FI-2017-1459
10.1016/j.artint.2014.08.004
10.3233/AAC-200901
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.3934/math.2023195
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Mathematics
EISSN 2473-6988
EndPage 3919
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_0364787097f44391a2ca7b2c275a46e0
10_3934_math_2023195
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMVHM
BCNDV
CITATION
EBS
FRJ
GROUPED_DOAJ
IAO
ITC
M~E
OK1
RAN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-74e0feecfc668c31dca93665e0af71c66439a7f6148de253f5a38818733af2a63
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2473-6988
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:32 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:56:58 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c265t-74e0feecfc668c31dca93665e0af71c66439a7f6148de253f5a38818733af2a63
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/0364787097f44391a2ca7b2c275a46e0
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0364787097f44391a2ca7b2c275a46e0
crossref_primary_10_3934_math_2023195
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle AIMS mathematics
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher AIMS Press
Publisher_xml – name: AIMS Press
References key-10.3934/math.2023195-17
key-10.3934/math.2023195-18
key-10.3934/math.2023195-19
key-10.3934/math.2023195-13
key-10.3934/math.2023195-14
key-10.3934/math.2023195-15
key-10.3934/math.2023195-16
key-10.3934/math.2023195-20
key-10.3934/math.2023195-21
key-10.3934/math.2023195-22
key-10.3934/math.2023195-23
key-10.3934/math.2023195-1
key-10.3934/math.2023195-3
key-10.3934/math.2023195-24
key-10.3934/math.2023195-2
key-10.3934/math.2023195-25
key-10.3934/math.2023195-5
key-10.3934/math.2023195-26
key-10.3934/math.2023195-4
key-10.3934/math.2023195-7
key-10.3934/math.2023195-6
key-10.3934/math.2023195-9
key-10.3934/math.2023195-8
key-10.3934/math.2023195-10
key-10.3934/math.2023195-11
key-10.3934/math.2023195-12
References_xml – ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-18
  doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2021/282
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-2
  doi: 10.1007/11853886_11
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-6
  doi: 10.3934/math.2021454
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-9
  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2019.01.031
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-1
  doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-13
  doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3044003
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-5
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-14
  doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2020.2964172
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-8
  doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.05.014
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-25
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-12
  doi: 10.1109/TAC.2021.3063227
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-21
  doi: 10.3934/math.2022625
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-4
  doi: 10.1587/transinf.2016EDP7313
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-7
  doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05623-x
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-22
  doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103607
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-19
  doi: 10.1613/jair.1.12394
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-24
  doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05235-6
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-10
  doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3119065
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-3
  doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2011.03.006
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-26
  doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-06860-z
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-15
  doi: 10.3233/AAC-200543
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-20
  doi: 10.3934/math.2020260
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-23
  doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.005
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-16
  doi: 10.3233/FI-2017-1459
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-11
  doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2014.08.004
– ident: key-10.3934/math.2023195-17
  doi: 10.3233/AAC-200901
SSID ssj0002124274
Score 2.2135358
Snippet The Boolean models of argumentation semantics have been established in various ways. These models commonly translate the conditions of extension-based...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
StartPage 3913
SubjectTerms argumentation framework
boolean algebra
boolean model
conflict-free sets
t-norms
Title A Boolean model for conflict-freeness in argumentation frameworks
URI https://doaj.org/article/0364787097f44391a2ca7b2c275a46e0
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA7Skx7EJ9YXOegxdDfJJs2xFUsR6slCb8skmxFBt1Lb_-9kd1t68-I1hBC-SeaRzHzD2INVUJFdMQLBRqFlZQQYq0QesfKKxOIxvXfMXs10rl8WxWKv1VfKCWvpgVvgBumfLB0qZ1GnKlGQAayXQdoCtIlNtJ65bC-YSjqYFLKmeKvNdFdO6QH5f-nvgdyZ1EpizwbtUfU3NmVywo47Z5CP2k2csoNYn7Gj2Y5J9eecjUZ8vFx-Rqh507SGk5PJQ1fLITBlzZCu4h81h9X75qurJKo5bpOufi7YfPL89jQVXdsDEaQp1sLqmGGMAYMxw6DyKoBTxhQxA7Q5DRIMYDExeFZRFgoLUEOyu1YpQAlGXbJevazjFeMys8Gj01hIp40KfljlDlxe0T30ymOfPW6BKL9bdouSooIEWJkAKzvA-mycUNrNSZzUzQBJquwkVf4lqev_WOSGHaY9tY8gt6y3Xm3iHbkFa3_fnIBfbY60EQ
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Boolean+model+for+conflict-freeness+in+argumentation+frameworks&rft.jtitle=AIMS+mathematics&rft.au=Wu%2C+Jiachao&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.issn=2473-6988&rft.eissn=2473-6988&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=3913&rft.epage=3919&rft_id=info:doi/10.3934%2Fmath.2023195&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3934_math_2023195
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2473-6988&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2473-6988&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2473-6988&client=summon