Dashboard charting for online compliance monitoring of heavy metals in school-meal chicken and pork in Taiwan
The use of dashboard monitoring is increasingly desirable for modern food safety management. Therefore, a customized dashboard was developed with three components: Traceable timing chart, Violation Table, and Statistical Table. Raw and cooked chicken (n = 84) and pork samples (n = 96) were taken fro...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of food composition and analysis Vol. 115; p. 104900 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
01.01.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The use of dashboard monitoring is increasingly desirable for modern food safety management. Therefore, a customized dashboard was developed with three components: Traceable timing chart, Violation Table, and Statistical Table. Raw and cooked chicken (n = 84) and pork samples (n = 96) were taken from a major school-meal supplier in central Taiwan for ten months. The concentrations of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), total mercury (tHg) and total arsenic (tAs) were analyzed. Pb and tAs were detected in 12 – 46% and 73 – 76 % of samples, respectively, while Cd and tHg were detected at levels of minor concern. For the geometric mean, Pb, Cd, Hg and tAs were detected at 17.6, < LOD, 5.5 and 27.6 μg/kg in raw chicken, respectively, and at 12.1, 7.0, 5.9 and 13.3 μg/kg in raw pork, respectively. Fried and grilled samples had higher detection rates and concentrations than their uncooked samples. Pb was close to that reported in literature. Total arsenic was detected at a noticeably higher amount than the geometric mean (3 μg/kg) reported in the United States. The monitoring results of raw samples were in compliance with the regulations. Of all the samples, only two cooked chicken samples exceeded the regulatory standard of Pb (100 μg/kg).
•A dashboard of monitoring of Pb, Cd, tHg and tAs in chicken and pork was built.•Cd and tHg were generally detected at levels of minor concern.•Pb and tAs were detected in 12 – 46 % and 73 –76 % of samples, respectively.•Only two cooked chicken samples exceeded the regulatory standard of Pb (100 μg/kg). |
---|---|
AbstractList | The use of dashboard monitoring is increasingly desirable for modern food safety management. Therefore, a customized dashboard was developed with three components: Traceable timing chart, Violation Table, and Statistical Table. Raw and cooked chicken (n = 84) and pork samples (n = 96) were taken from a major school-meal supplier in central Taiwan for ten months. The concentrations of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), total mercury (tHg) and total arsenic (tAs) were analyzed. Pb and tAs were detected in 12 – 46% and 73 – 76 % of samples, respectively, while Cd and tHg were detected at levels of minor concern. For the geometric mean, Pb, Cd, Hg and tAs were detected at 17.6, < LOD, 5.5 and 27.6 μg/kg in raw chicken, respectively, and at 12.1, 7.0, 5.9 and 13.3 μg/kg in raw pork, respectively. Fried and grilled samples had higher detection rates and concentrations than their uncooked samples. Pb was close to that reported in literature. Total arsenic was detected at a noticeably higher amount than the geometric mean (3 μg/kg) reported in the United States. The monitoring results of raw samples were in compliance with the regulations. Of all the samples, only two cooked chicken samples exceeded the regulatory standard of Pb (100 μg/kg). The use of dashboard monitoring is increasingly desirable for modern food safety management. Therefore, a customized dashboard was developed with three components: Traceable timing chart, Violation Table, and Statistical Table. Raw and cooked chicken (n = 84) and pork samples (n = 96) were taken from a major school-meal supplier in central Taiwan for ten months. The concentrations of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), total mercury (tHg) and total arsenic (tAs) were analyzed. Pb and tAs were detected in 12 – 46% and 73 – 76 % of samples, respectively, while Cd and tHg were detected at levels of minor concern. For the geometric mean, Pb, Cd, Hg and tAs were detected at 17.6, < LOD, 5.5 and 27.6 μg/kg in raw chicken, respectively, and at 12.1, 7.0, 5.9 and 13.3 μg/kg in raw pork, respectively. Fried and grilled samples had higher detection rates and concentrations than their uncooked samples. Pb was close to that reported in literature. Total arsenic was detected at a noticeably higher amount than the geometric mean (3 μg/kg) reported in the United States. The monitoring results of raw samples were in compliance with the regulations. Of all the samples, only two cooked chicken samples exceeded the regulatory standard of Pb (100 μg/kg). •A dashboard of monitoring of Pb, Cd, tHg and tAs in chicken and pork was built.•Cd and tHg were generally detected at levels of minor concern.•Pb and tAs were detected in 12 – 46 % and 73 –76 % of samples, respectively.•Only two cooked chicken samples exceeded the regulatory standard of Pb (100 μg/kg). |
ArticleNumber | 104900 |
Author | Lin, Yo-Yu Lin, Hsin-Tang Yen, Gow-Chin |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yo-Yu surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Yo-Yu organization: Graduate Institute of Food Safety, National Chung Hsing University, No. 145, Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung City 40227, Taiwan – sequence: 2 givenname: Gow-Chin surname: Yen fullname: Yen, Gow-Chin organization: Graduate Institute of Food Safety, National Chung Hsing University, No. 145, Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung City 40227, Taiwan – sequence: 3 givenname: Hsin-Tang surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Hsin-Tang email: linhs@dragon.nchu.edu.tw organization: Graduate Institute of Food Safety, National Chung Hsing University, No. 145, Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung City 40227, Taiwan |
BookMark | eNp9kD1v2zAQhokgBeKk_QOdOHaRc6QpkQa6FOlHCgTIkszE-XSq6UikSzIp8u8rwZ06ZDrg7n1e4J5LcR5TZCE-KlgrUN31YX0YCNcatJ4XZgtwJlYKtl0DxqlzsQLnto1qbXshLks5AECrjVuJ6SuW_S5h7iXtMdcQf8khZZniGCJLStNxDBiJ5ZRiqCkvgTTIPePLq5y44lhkiLLQPqWxmRjHuSjQE0eJsZfHlJ-W-wOGPxjfi3fDDPCHf_NKPH7_9nBz29zd__h58-WuId1tajOYdqM73lpjySjqOjTOmZ0zVuOArbG9JRq4HQB3DhT1pGGnbAu9JmNtu7kSn069x5x-P3OpfgqFeBwxcnouXlu9UQAWzBx1pyjlVErmwVOoWEOKNWMYvQK_GPYHvxj2i2F_Mjyj-j_0mMOE-fVt6PMJ4vn_l8DZFwo8C-5DZqq-T-Et_C-PA5dd |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2023_105876 crossref_primary_10_1080_19440049_2023_2220413 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.02.008 10.1080/19440049.2010.496794 10.4137/EHI.S4717 10.1289/ehp.1206245 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000516 10.1021/jf802411q 10.1080/19440049.2018.1515501 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.086 10.1038/s43016-020-0077-y 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.006 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 Elsevier Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 Elsevier Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics Chemistry Diet & Clinical Nutrition |
EISSN | 1096-0481 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_jfca_2022_104900 S088915752200518X |
GeographicLocations | Taiwan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Taiwan |
GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29K 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JN AABVA AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AARLI AATLK AAXUO ABFRF ABGRD ABJNI ABMAC ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACNNM ACRLP ADBBV ADECG ADEZE ADFGL ADHUB ADMUD ADQTV AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEQOU AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AFZHZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJSZI ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC CAG CBWCG COF CS3 D-I DM4 DU5 EBS EFBJH EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FLBIZ FNPLU FYGXN G-Q G8K GBLVA HLV HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LG5 LW8 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG RNS ROL RPZ SAB SCB SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPC SPCBC SSA SSK SSZ T5K UHS UNMZH WUQ XPP ZMT ZU3 ~G- ~KM AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABDPE ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP BNPGV CITATION SSH 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-f45326e9747c41c66a4884b8472afa547d7ccfe5f0ab801cdc20b1750d2c47753 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0889-1575 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 19:35:36 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:51:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:26 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:38:57 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Chicken School-meal Dashboard-monitoring Pork Heavy metal |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c263t-f45326e9747c41c66a4884b8472afa547d7ccfe5f0ab801cdc20b1750d2c47753 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 2723100704 |
PQPubID | 24069 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2723100704 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jfca_2022_104900 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2022_104900 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jfca_2022_104900 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | January 2023 2023-01-00 20230101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2023 text: January 2023 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Journal of food composition and analysis |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | FSANZ, 2011. The 23rd Australian total diet survey. FEHD, 2012. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic Arsenic. Millour, Noël, Kadar, Chekri, Vastel, Sirot, Leblanc, Guérin (bib14) 2011; 126 Chiang, Hsu, Hung, Yang, Chen (bib1) 2008; 35 Fanzo, Haddad, McLaren, Marshall, Davis, Herforth, Jones, Beal, Tschirley, Bellows, Miachon, Gu, Bloem, Kapuria (bib3) 2020; 1 Lukáčová, Binkowski, Golian (bib13) 2014; 3 TADPAP, 2020. Taiwan Premium Agricultural Products Portal Site. Retrieved March 12, 2022 from Kassa, Silverman, Baroudi (bib12) 2010; 4 . Hu, Zhang, Chen, Cheng, Tao (bib10) 2018; 234 Tsai, Yu, Chen, Chou, Ni, Chang, Chiang (bib22) 2016; 35 FAO and WHO, 2019. Codex Alimentarius Commission – Procedural Manual 27 edition. Rome. 254 pp. Rose, Baxter, Brereton, Baskaran (bib18) 2010; 27 TFDA (bib20) 2014 Jacxsens, Luning, Marcelis, van Boekel, Rovira, Oses, Kousta, Drosinos, Jasson, Uyttendaele (bib11) 2011; 22 TFDA (bib21) 2019 Perello, Marti-Cid, Llobet, Domingo (bib17) 2008; 56 Nachman, Baron, Raber, Francesconi, Navas-Acien, Love (bib15) 2013; 121 Chiang, C.F., Hsu, K.C., Ling, M.P., Chou, T.C., 2015. Computerized Taiwan dietary exposure evaluation model. Poster session presented at International Workshop on Total Diet Studies, Seoul, Korean. FEHD, 2013. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic Contaminants. FAO and WHO, 2009. Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), Environmental Health Criteria 240. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241572408. Harris, Hawkins, Nguyen, Nsoesie, Tuli, Mansour, Brownstein (bib9) 2017; 23 NCC, 2012. Arsenic & chicken? No need to worry. Retrieved March 12, 2022 from TFDA (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib20) 2014 Fanzo (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib3) 2020; 1 Rose (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib18) 2010; 27 Chiang (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib1) 2008; 35 Jacxsens (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib11) 2011; 22 Lukáčová (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib13) 2014; 3 Kassa (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib12) 2010; 4 Tsai (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib22) 2016; 35 Harris (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib9) 2017; 23 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib7 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib6 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib5 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib4 Millour (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib14) 2011; 126 Perello (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib17) 2008; 56 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib8 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib16 Nachman (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib15) 2013; 121 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib19 TFDA (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib21) 2019 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib2 Hu (10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib10) 2018; 234 |
References_xml | – volume: 35 start-page: 487 year: 2016 end-page: 497 ident: bib22 article-title: Developments and applications of a computerized system for Taiwan diet exposure assessment model: demonstrated for organophosphate pesticides residues in food matrices publication-title: Taiwan J. Public Health – volume: 4 year: 2010 ident: bib12 article-title: Effect of a manager training and certification program on food safety and hygiene in food service operations publication-title: Environ. Health Insights – volume: 121 start-page: 818 year: 2013 end-page: 824 ident: bib15 article-title: Roxarsone, inorganic arsenic, and other arsenic species in chicken: a US-based market basket sample publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect. – reference: FEHD, 2012. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic Arsenic. – year: 2019 ident: bib21 article-title: Basic Guidelines Governing the Quality System of Testing Institutions and Laboratories, Appendix 2: Guidelines for the Validation of Chemical Methods in Food – reference: . – reference: FSANZ, 2011. The 23rd Australian total diet survey. – volume: 27 start-page: 1380 year: 2010 end-page: 1404 ident: bib18 article-title: Dietary exposure to metals and other elements in the 2006 UK Total Diet Study and some trends over the last 30 years publication-title: Food Addit. Contam. – reference: FEHD, 2013. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic Contaminants. – volume: 126 start-page: 1787 year: 2011 end-page: 1799 ident: bib14 article-title: Pb, Hg, Cd, As, Sb and Al levels in foodstuffs from the 2nd French total diet study publication-title: Food Chem. – volume: 23 start-page: 577 year: 2017 end-page: 580 ident: bib9 article-title: Research brief report: using twitter to identify and respond to food poisoning: the food safety stl project publication-title: J. Public Health Manag. Pract. – reference: Chiang, C.F., Hsu, K.C., Ling, M.P., Chou, T.C., 2015. Computerized Taiwan dietary exposure evaluation model. Poster session presented at International Workshop on Total Diet Studies, Seoul, Korean. – reference: FAO and WHO, 2019. Codex Alimentarius Commission – Procedural Manual 27 edition. Rome. 254 pp. – volume: 35 start-page: 2088 year: 2008 end-page: 2098 ident: bib1 article-title: Core food model of the Taiwan food supply for total diet study publication-title: Food Addit. Contam.: Part A – volume: 3 start-page: 31 year: 2014 end-page: 33 ident: bib13 article-title: Comparision of mercury concentration in meat products of different origin publication-title: J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. – volume: 56 start-page: 11262 year: 2008 end-page: 11269 ident: bib17 article-title: Effects of various cooking processes on the concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead in foods publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem. – volume: 234 start-page: 667 year: 2018 end-page: 676 ident: bib10 article-title: Public health risk of trace metals in fresh chicken meat products on the food markets of a major production region in southern China publication-title: Environ. Pollut. – year: 2014 ident: bib20 article-title: General Method of Test for Heavy Metals – reference: NCC, 2012. Arsenic & chicken? No need to worry. Retrieved March 12, 2022 from: – reference: TADPAP, 2020. Taiwan Premium Agricultural Products Portal Site. Retrieved March 12, 2022 from: – volume: 1 start-page: 243 year: 2020 end-page: 246 ident: bib3 article-title: The Food Systems Dashboard is a new tool to inform better food policy publication-title: Nat. Food – reference: FAO and WHO, 2009. Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), Environmental Health Criteria 240. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241572408. – volume: 22 start-page: S80 year: 2011 end-page: S89 ident: bib11 article-title: Tools for the performance assessment and improvement of food safety management systems publication-title: Trends Food Sci. Technol. – volume: 22 start-page: S80 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib11 article-title: Tools for the performance assessment and improvement of food safety management systems publication-title: Trends Food Sci. Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.02.008 – volume: 27 start-page: 1380 issue: 10 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib18 article-title: Dietary exposure to metals and other elements in the 2006 UK Total Diet Study and some trends over the last 30 years publication-title: Food Addit. Contam. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2010.496794 – volume: 4 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib12 article-title: Effect of a manager training and certification program on food safety and hygiene in food service operations publication-title: Environ. Health Insights doi: 10.4137/EHI.S4717 – volume: 3 start-page: 31 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib13 article-title: Comparision of mercury concentration in meat products of different origin publication-title: J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. – volume: 121 start-page: 818 issue: 7 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib15 article-title: Roxarsone, inorganic arsenic, and other arsenic species in chicken: a US-based market basket sample publication-title: Environ. Health Perspect. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206245 – volume: 23 start-page: 577 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib9 article-title: Research brief report: using twitter to identify and respond to food poisoning: the food safety stl project publication-title: J. Public Health Manag. Pract. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000516 – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib5 – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib4 – volume: 56 start-page: 11262 issue: 23 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib17 article-title: Effects of various cooking processes on the concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead in foods publication-title: J. Agric. Food Chem. doi: 10.1021/jf802411q – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib19 – volume: 35 start-page: 2088 issue: 11 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib1 article-title: Core food model of the Taiwan food supply for total diet study publication-title: Food Addit. Contam.: Part A doi: 10.1080/19440049.2018.1515501 – volume: 35 start-page: 487 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib22 article-title: Developments and applications of a computerized system for Taiwan diet exposure assessment model: demonstrated for organophosphate pesticides residues in food matrices publication-title: Taiwan J. Public Health – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib2 – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib6 – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib16 – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib7 – ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib8 – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib21 – volume: 126 start-page: 1787 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib14 article-title: Pb, Hg, Cd, As, Sb and Al levels in foodstuffs from the 2nd French total diet study publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.086 – volume: 1 start-page: 243 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib3 article-title: The Food Systems Dashboard is a new tool to inform better food policy publication-title: Nat. Food doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0077-y – volume: 234 start-page: 667 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib10 article-title: Public health risk of trace metals in fresh chicken meat products on the food markets of a major production region in southern China publication-title: Environ. Pollut. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.006 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900_bib20 |
SSID | ssj0005248 |
Score | 2.3750203 |
Snippet | The use of dashboard monitoring is increasingly desirable for modern food safety management. Therefore, a customized dashboard was developed with three... |
SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 104900 |
SubjectTerms | arsenic cadmium Chicken chickens compliance cooked foods Dashboard-monitoring food composition food safety Heavy metal lead mercury Pork raw chicken meat School-meal Taiwan |
Title | Dashboard charting for online compliance monitoring of heavy metals in school-meal chicken and pork in Taiwan |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104900 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2723100704 |
Volume | 115 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8QwEA6iB72IT1xfjCBepO42mzb2KKuyvhbxAXsLaZpgV7crdlW8-Nud6UNUxIOnQpuW0pl-8yX5ZoaxbSExTLso8sLQRJ4QLvIibnCy4juJ0CCRQ1Du8EUv7N6K037Qn2CdOheGZJUV9peYXqB1daZZfc3mY5o2r0mg4yPb4LQw4u_3KYNdSPLyvfevMo-ig1ah5qHRVeJMqfEaOEO1hzinrc6Istx-D04_YLqIPcdzbLYijXBQvtc8m7DZApvu1L3aFljjMLVj2IGqyucD9Ooi-ziuzj3OF9nwUOd38Qi9AijdiiTPgKwVynoZUOrLyQ9gWPzrtOgHIweI2C9vMLTI1HNIM8iL2p3eEFkmUDOVe5uBzhJAMn9P1290-qqzJXZ7fHTT6XpVwwXP8LA99pwIkM1ZmmIY4Zsw1Ph7ixgDGNdOB0Im0hhnA9fSMUY2kxjeInu2Em6ExInPMpvMRpldYaB1lPjSaNuOEqETHnM_kbZlkS21EV9lg_n1l1amqkZOTTEeVC07GyiyjiLrqNI6Dbb7ec9jWYvjz9FBbUD1zaMUBos_79uqra3QirR_ojM7es4Vl0SGESPF6j-fvcZmqF19uYSzzibHT892A0nNON4svHaTTR10rs4v6Xhy1u19AK1-9og |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1RT9swED6x8sBeEDAQZYzdpGkvU9TGdeLlEZWhMqAvK1LfLMexRYCmiJRN-_e7S5xpQ4iHvSZ2FPns7z7b390BfJSK3LTPsihNbRZJ6bMoE5Y2K7FXBA2KOATHDl9O08mV_DZP5msw7mJhWFYZsL_F9Aatw5NBGM3BfVkOvrNAJya2IfhgJP4yfwXrnJ0q6cH68dn5ZPqX0qMpotUIerhDiJ1pZV433nL6ISH4tjPjQLfn_dMTpG7cz-kWbAbeiMftr23Dmqt2YGPclWvbgf5J6Vb4CUOizzucdnn2qV0Xfly_gcWJqa_zJU0M5IgrVj0jEVdsU2ZgKzHnqYCLZrnzuR8uPRJo__iFC0dkvcaywrpJ3xktiGgi11O5dRWaqkDi87f8fmbKn6bahavTr7PxJAo1FyIr0tEq8jIhQud4l2FlbNPU0AqXOfkwYbyh4S2Utd4lfmhycm62sGLIJh0WwkpFe5896FXLyu0DGpMVsbLGjbJCmkLkIi6UGzoiTCOCWNWHuBtpbUNCcq6Lcac75dmNZutoto5urdOHz3_63LfpOF5snXQG1P9MKk3-4sV-Hzpra7IiX6GYyi0fay0U82GCSXnwn99-DxuT2eWFvjibnr-F11y9vj3ROYTe6uHRvSOOs8qPwhz-DWcw96Q |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dashboard+charting+for+online+compliance+monitoring+of+heavy+metals+in+school-meal+chicken+and+pork+in+Taiwan&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+food+composition+and+analysis&rft.au=Lin%2C+Yo-Yu&rft.au=Yen%2C+Gow-Chin&rft.au=Lin%2C+Hsin-Tang&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.issn=0889-1575&rft.volume=115&rft.spage=104900&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jfca.2022.104900&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_jfca_2022_104900 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0889-1575&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0889-1575&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0889-1575&client=summon |