An integrated shipment planning and storage capacity decision under uncertainty A simulation study

Purpose – In transportation and distribution systems, the shipment decisions, fleet capacity, and storage capacity are interrelated in a complex way, especially when the authors take into account uncertainty of the demand rate and shipment lead time. While shipment planning is tactical or operationa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of physical distribution & logistics management Vol. 45; no. 9/10; pp. 913 - 937
Main Authors Pujawan, Nyoman, Arief, Mansur Maturidi, Tjahjono, Benny, Kritchanchai, Duangpun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose – In transportation and distribution systems, the shipment decisions, fleet capacity, and storage capacity are interrelated in a complex way, especially when the authors take into account uncertainty of the demand rate and shipment lead time. While shipment planning is tactical or operational in nature, increasing storage capacity often requires top management’s authority. The purpose of this paper is to present a new method to integrate both operational and strategic decision parameters, namely shipment planning and storage capacity decision under uncertainty. The ultimate goal is to provide a near optimal solution that leads to a striking balance between the total logistics costs and product availability, critical in maritime logistics of bulk shipment of commodity items. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use simulation as research method. The authors develop a simulation model to investigate the effects of various factors on costs and service levels of a distribution system. The model mimics the transportation and distribution problems of bulk cement in a major cement company in Indonesia consisting of a silo at the port of origin, two silos at two ports of destination, and a number of ships that transport the bulk cement. The authors develop a number of “what-if” scenarios by varying the storage capacity at the port of origin as well as at the ports of destinations, number of ships operated, operating hours of ports, and dispatching rules for the ships. Each scenario is evaluated in terms of costs and service level. A full factorial experiment has been conducted and analysis of variance has been used to analyze the results. Findings – The results suggest that the number of ships deployed, silo capacity, working hours of ports, and the dispatching rules of ships significantly affect both total costs and service level. Interestingly, operating fewer ships enables the company to achieve almost the same service level and gaining substantial cost savings if constraints in other part of the system are alleviated, i.e., storage capacities and working hours of ports are extended. Practical implications – Cost is a competitive factor for bulk items like cement, and thus the proposed scenarios could be implemented by the company to substantially reduce the transportation and distribution costs. Alleviating storage capacity constraint is obviously an idea that needs to be considered when optimizing shipment planning alone could not give significant improvements. Originality/value – Existing research has so far focussed on the optimization of shipment planning/scheduling, and considers shipment planning/scheduling as the objective function while treating the storage capacity as constraints. The simulation model enables “what-if” analyses to be performed and has overcome the difficulties and impracticalities of analytical methods especially when the system incorporates stochastic variables exhibited in the case example. The use of efficient frontier analysis for analyzing the simulation results is a novel idea which has been proven to be effective in screening non-dominated solutions. This has provided the authors with near optimal solutions to trade-off logistics costs and service levels (availability), with minimal experimentation times.
AbstractList Purpose – In transportation and distribution systems, the shipment decisions, fleet capacity, and storage capacity are interrelated in a complex way, especially when the authors take into account uncertainty of the demand rate and shipment lead time. While shipment planning is tactical or operational in nature, increasing storage capacity often requires top management’s authority. The purpose of this paper is to present a new method to integrate both operational and strategic decision parameters, namely shipment planning and storage capacity decision under uncertainty. The ultimate goal is to provide a near optimal solution that leads to a striking balance between the total logistics costs and product availability, critical in maritime logistics of bulk shipment of commodity items. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use simulation as research method. The authors develop a simulation model to investigate the effects of various factors on costs and service levels of a distribution system. The model mimics the transportation and distribution problems of bulk cement in a major cement company in Indonesia consisting of a silo at the port of origin, two silos at two ports of destination, and a number of ships that transport the bulk cement. The authors develop a number of “what-if” scenarios by varying the storage capacity at the port of origin as well as at the ports of destinations, number of ships operated, operating hours of ports, and dispatching rules for the ships. Each scenario is evaluated in terms of costs and service level. A full factorial experiment has been conducted and analysis of variance has been used to analyze the results. Findings – The results suggest that the number of ships deployed, silo capacity, working hours of ports, and the dispatching rules of ships significantly affect both total costs and service level. Interestingly, operating fewer ships enables the company to achieve almost the same service level and gaining substantial cost savings if constraints in other part of the system are alleviated, i.e., storage capacities and working hours of ports are extended. Practical implications – Cost is a competitive factor for bulk items like cement, and thus the proposed scenarios could be implemented by the company to substantially reduce the transportation and distribution costs. Alleviating storage capacity constraint is obviously an idea that needs to be considered when optimizing shipment planning alone could not give significant improvements. Originality/value – Existing research has so far focussed on the optimization of shipment planning/scheduling, and considers shipment planning/scheduling as the objective function while treating the storage capacity as constraints. The simulation model enables “what-if” analyses to be performed and has overcome the difficulties and impracticalities of analytical methods especially when the system incorporates stochastic variables exhibited in the case example. The use of efficient frontier analysis for analyzing the simulation results is a novel idea which has been proven to be effective in screening non-dominated solutions. This has provided the authors with near optimal solutions to trade-off logistics costs and service levels (availability), with minimal experimentation times.
Purpose - In transportation and distribution systems, the shipment decisions, fleet capacity, and storage capacity are interrelated in a complex way, especially when the authors take into account uncertainty of the demand rate and shipment lead time. While shipment planning is tactical or operational in nature, increasing storage capacity often requires top management's authority. The purpose of this paper is to present a new method to integrate both operational and strategic decision parameters, namely shipment planning and storage capacity decision under uncertainty. The ultimate goal is to provide a near optimal solution that leads to a striking balance between the total logistics costs and product availability, critical in maritime logistics of bulk shipment of commodity items. Design/methodology/approach - The authors use simulation as research method. The authors develop a simulation model to investigate the effects of various factors on costs and service levels of a distribution system. The model mimics the transportation and distribution problems of bulk cement in a major cement company in Indonesia consisting of a silo at the port of origin, two silos at two ports of destination, and a number of ships that transport the bulk cement. The authors develop a number of "what-if" scenarios by varying the storage capacity at the port of origin as well as at the ports of destinations, number of ships operated, operating hours of ports, and dispatching rules for the ships. Each scenario is evaluated in terms of costs and service level. A full factorial experiment has been conducted and analysis of variance has been used to analyze the results. Findings - The results suggest that the number of ships deployed, silo capacity, working hours of ports, and the dispatching rules of ships significantly affect both total costs and service level. Interestingly, operating fewer ships enables the company to achieve almost the same service level and gaining substantial cost savings if constraints in other part of the system are alleviated, i.e., storage capacities and working hours of ports are extended. Practical implications - Cost is a competitive factor for bulk items like cement, and thus the proposed scenarios could be implemented by the company to substantially reduce the transportation and distribution costs. Alleviating storage capacity constraint is obviously an idea that needs to be considered when optimizing shipment planning alone could not give significant improvements. Originality/value - Existing research has so far focussed on the optimization of shipment planning/scheduling, and considers shipment planning/scheduling as the objective function while treating the storage capacity as constraints. The simulation model enables "what-if" analyses to be performed and has overcome the difficulties and impracticalities of analytical methods especially when the system incorporates stochastic variables exhibited in the case example. The use of efficient frontier analysis for analyzing the simulation results is a novel idea which has been proven to be effective in screening non-dominated solutions. This has provided the authors with near optimal solutions to trade-off logistics costs and service levels (availability), with minimal experimentation times.
Author Pujawan, Nyoman
Kritchanchai, Duangpun
Arief, Mansur Maturidi
Tjahjono, Benny
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nyoman
  surname: Pujawan
  fullname: Pujawan, Nyoman
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mansur Maturidi
  surname: Arief
  fullname: Arief, Mansur Maturidi
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Benny
  surname: Tjahjono
  fullname: Tjahjono, Benny
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Duangpun
  surname: Kritchanchai
  fullname: Kritchanchai, Duangpun
BookMark eNotkDtPAzEQhF0EiQT4BTQuaQ7W5_hxZRReQUGhgNpa-faCUeI7bKfIv-ei0MyORqPR6puxSewjMXYr4F4IsA-rt4_H9XsFtqpBzCsQjZ2wKTQaKgCpLtks5x-AMZf1lG0WkYdYaJuwUMvzdxj2FAsfdhhjiFuOcUxLn3BL3OOAPpQjb8mHHPrID7GlNKqnVHDcOV6ziw53mW7-7xX7en76XL5W683LarlYV77WslTaWpSdhQ6VaoVCj40SslakQVqBRnvbeEMGQei6FqptpWk8oJF-LgWCvGJ3590h9b8HysXtQ_a0G9-m_pCdMLoGY-agx6o8V33qc07UuSGFPaajE-BOyNwZmRvdCZk7IZN_b7RjdA
Cites_doi 10.1057/jos.2012.20
10.1007/s10479-010-0794-y
10.1287/trsc.33.1.3
10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.047
10.1080/002077200412122
10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.014
10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3
10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.058
10.1108/09600031011018046
10.1016/j.cie.2010.06.011
10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00048-6
10.1108/IJLM-05-2013-0052
10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.003
10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.011
10.1108/09600031211219663
10.1108/09600030810882807
10.1016/j.cor.2011.12.020
10.1080/21693277.2014.882804
10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.028
10.1080/00207540210134489
10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.008
10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601264
10.1108/09600030110394914
10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.002
10.1287/msom.1050.0083
10.1504/IJSOM.2014.065670
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.023
10.1108/09600030210437951
10.1108/09600030610661804
10.1016/0377-2217(94)00016-6
10.1016/j.cor.2010.10.031
10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100147
10.1016/j.compind.2012.03.004
10.1287/trsc.1100.0317
10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00104-0
10.1080/030888300286563
10.1287/inte.1060.0276
10.1108/09600030710763396
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7TA
8FD
JG9
DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2014-0198
DatabaseName CrossRef
Materials Business File
Technology Research Database
Materials Research Database
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Materials Research Database
Technology Research Database
Materials Business File
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
Materials Research Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Business
Editor Shong-lee Ivan Su, Dr
Editor_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dr
  surname: Shong-lee Ivan Su
  fullname: Shong-lee Ivan Su, Dr
EndPage 937
ExternalDocumentID 10_1108_IJPDLM_08_2014_0198
GroupedDBID -~X
.WW
0R~
1WG
29J
3FY
3V.
4.4
5GY
5VS
70U
7WY
7X5
8FE
8FG
8R4
8R5
9E0
9F-
AAGBP
AAKOT
AAMCF
AAPSD
AAUDR
AAYXX
ABEAN
ABIJV
ABJCF
ABJNI
ABSDC
ACBMB
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIWK
ACTSA
ADFRT
ADOMW
ADQHX
AEBZA
AEDOK
AEFVF
AEGYS
AEMMR
AETHF
AFKRA
AFNZV
AFZLO
AGZLY
AIAFM
AJEBP
AJFKA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AODMV
APPLU
ATGMP
AUCOK
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
BGLVJ
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DWQXO
EBS
ECCUG
EJD
EOXHF
FNNZZ
GEA
GEB
GEC
GEI
GMM
GMN
GMX
GNUQQ
GQ.
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
GUQSH
H13
HCIFZ
HZ~
IAO
IGG
IJT
IMI
IOF
IPNFZ
J1Y
JI-
JL0
K6~
KBGRL
L6V
LXL
LXN
M0C
M1Q
M2O
M42
M7S
MS~
N95
O9-
P2P
PQBIZ
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PTHSS
Q2X
RIG
RXW
SCAQC
SDURG
SLOBJ
TEM
TET
TFE
TGG
TMD
TMF
TMI
TMK
TMT
Z11
Z12
Z21
ZYZAG
7TA
8FD
JG9
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-688a3f80fa55d15aca951325e60381a76c89c7e7a0162215dd379c0a73c431a03
IEDL.DBID ZYZAG
ISSN 0960-0035
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 02:10:34 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 12 18:39:09 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9/10
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c263t-688a3f80fa55d15aca951325e60381a76c89c7e7a0162215dd379c0a73c431a03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1762077406
PQPubID 23500
PageCount 25
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1762077406
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJPDLM_08_2014_0198
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle International journal of physical distribution & logistics management
PublicationYear 2015
References key2020122021595776500_b1
key2020122021595776500_frd1
key2020122021595776500_b41
key2020122021595776500_frd3
key2020122021595776500_frd2
key2020122021595776500_b5
key2020122021595776500_b21
key2020122021595776500_b43
key2020122021595776500_b20
key2020122021595776500_b42
key2020122021595776500_b3
key2020122021595776500_b23
key2020122021595776500_b45
key2020122021595776500_b2
key2020122021595776500_b22
key2020122021595776500_b44
key2020122021595776500_b9
key2020122021595776500_b25
key2020122021595776500_b8
key2020122021595776500_b24
key2020122021595776500_b46
key2020122021595776500_b7
key2020122021595776500_b27
key2020122021595776500_b26
key2020122021595776500_b18
key2020122021595776500_b39
key2020122021595776500_b30
key2020122021595776500_b10
key2020122021595776500_b32
key2020122021595776500_b34
key2020122021595776500_b11
key2020122021595776500_b33
key2020122021595776500_b14
key2020122021595776500_b36
key2020122021595776500_b13
key2020122021595776500_b35
key2020122021595776500_b16
key2020122021595776500_b38
key2020122021595776500_b15
key2020122021595776500_b37
key2020122021595776500_b29
key2020122021595776500_b28
key2020122021595776500_b202
key2020122021595776500_b201
References_xml – ident: key2020122021595776500_b36
  doi: 10.1057/jos.2012.20
– ident: key2020122021595776500_frd3
  doi: 10.1007/s10479-010-0794-y
– ident: key2020122021595776500_frd1
  doi: 10.1287/trsc.33.1.3
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b25
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b23
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.047
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b46
  doi: 10.1080/002077200412122
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b38
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b16
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.014
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b15
  doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b28
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.058
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b33
  doi: 10.1108/09600031011018046
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b39
  doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2010.06.011
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b18
  doi: 10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00048-6
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b20
  doi: 10.1108/IJLM-05-2013-0052
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b14
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.003
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b24
  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.011
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b26
  doi: 10.1108/09600031211219663
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b32
  doi: 10.1108/09600030810882807
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b9
  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.12.020
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b2
  doi: 10.1080/21693277.2014.882804
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b13
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.028
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b21
  doi: 10.1080/00207540210134489
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b29
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.008
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b34
  doi: 10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601264
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b8
  doi: 10.1108/09600030110394914
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b7
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.002
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b37
  doi: 10.1287/msom.1050.0083
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b30
  doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2014.065670
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b5
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.023
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b3
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b44
  doi: 10.1108/09600030210437951
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b45
  doi: 10.1108/09600030610661804
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b22
  doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00016-6
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b201
  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2010.10.031
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b10
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b27
  doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100147
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b35
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b42
  doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2012.03.004
– ident: key2020122021595776500_frd2
  doi: 10.1287/trsc.1100.0317
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b43
  doi: 10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00104-0
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b202
  doi: 10.1080/030888300286563
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b11
  doi: 10.1287/inte.1060.0276
– ident: key2020122021595776500_b41
  doi: 10.1108/09600030710763396
SSID ssj0001932
Score 2.2302847
Snippet Purpose – In transportation and distribution systems, the shipment decisions, fleet capacity, and storage capacity are interrelated in a complex way,...
Purpose - In transportation and distribution systems, the shipment decisions, fleet capacity, and storage capacity are interrelated in a complex way,...
SourceID proquest
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
StartPage 913
SubjectTerms Cements
Costs
Mathematical models
Optimization
Ports
Shipments
Ships
Storage capacity
Subtitle A simulation study
Title An integrated shipment planning and storage capacity decision under uncertainty
URI https://search.proquest.com/docview/1762077406
Volume 45
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8NAEB7UgujBt1gfZQWPxibdZLPxVh_1gZYqCuolbCcbLNpU2vSgv97ZPIoKggcvIYRlSXY3M9_MfvsNwJ7jK1eRo7eEjIXlaowtmubAki4S3nBjiTpj-bbF-b17-eA9TMFNeRYmo1Xm6ZjMTveSkQlS64a4TVZ4IjhgqtdcXHZOrq5Ngo-8mOFSBLJuktb157T_Og0VQtuc4rHK0-NT82xing1iyQT4hDlSzb1CiuiXDr-7q-_WOnNBrUUYli-fM09eDsZp9wA_fug6_uvXLcFCAVhZM19hyzClkxWYLfnyKzD_RdFwFbCZsIkCRcQMFcykH9lbURuJqYSeUpxPZowhOWqkKIBFRaEfZk60DemKOVEhfT9kTTbq9YsaYywTw12D-9bp3fG5VdRxsLAheErLQCoeSztWnhc5nkJFsI43PC3MNqXyBcoAfe0rgp8NgiBRxP0AbeVzJHijbL4OM8kg0RvAtCsJ7zkeBo7ZMvYVakcL5MpvuHGEThX2y-kK33K5jjALc2wZ5gMa0p0Z0NAMaBV2yykN6bcyeyUq0YPxKHTISdgEjW2x-Yc2WzBHfXp5amYbZtLhWO8QWEm7NZiWrbMaVI5O253bWrEYPwHHB-hc
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,21737,27955,27956,33407,33778
linkProvider Emerald
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+integrated+shipment+planning+and+storage+capacity+decision+under+uncertainty%3A+A+simulation+study&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+physical+distribution+%26+logistics+management&rft.au=Pujawan%2C+Nyoman&rft.au=Arief%2C+Mansur+Maturidi&rft.au=Tjahjono%2C+Benny&rft.au=Kritchanchai%2C+Duangpun&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.issn=0960-0035&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=937&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FIJPDLM-08-2014-0198&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-0035&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-0035&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-0035&client=summon