A Comparative Study of Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Registered and Unregistered Antenatal Cases in a Tertiary Care Center
Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or "unregistered" p...
Saved in:
Published in | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 16; no. 8; p. e66066 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Cureus Inc
03.08.2024
Cureus |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or "unregistered" pregnancies. This study aims to investigate the impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, considering various demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding the factors influencing registration status and its implications on maternal and fetal health outcomes is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve prenatal care access and enhance overall pregnancy outcomes. Objective To see the difference in obstetrical complications along with feto-maternal outcomes in both registered and unregistered antenatal cases and to determine the correlation of maternal and fetal outcomes with antenatal care. Materials and methods This two-year observational study at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College's Obstetrics and Gynecology IPD in Pimpri, Pune, examined maternal and fetal outcomes in registered and unregistered pregnancies. Consent was obtained, and patients were categorized as registered and unregistered based on the number of antenatal visits. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Data on socioeconomic factors like income and education were analyzed to assess their association with registration status. Maternal outcomes included preterm delivery and complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, premature rupture of membranes, anemia, and postpartum complications. Fetal outcomes included birth weight and NICU admissions. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression, were used to examine relationships between variables and registration status. Results This study analyzed 502 cases, comprising 251 registered and 251 unregistered pregnancies, to investigate the impact of antenatal registration on maternal and fetal outcomes. Significant associations were observed between socioeconomic factors, such as lower income and education levels in unregistered pregnancies. Specifically, 46 (18.3%) unregistered cases were in the lowest income bracket, while 103 (41.0%) were in the lower-middle bracket, and the majority (132, 52.2%) had only completed secondary education. Unregistered pregnancies were linked to a higher prevalence of adverse outcomes, including preterm delivery (101, 40.23%), anemia (178, 70.9%), hypertensive disorders (30, 11.9%), gestational diabetes mellitus (16, 6.37%), fetal growth restriction (39, 15.3%), low birth weight (181, 72.1%), and NICU admissions (112, 44.6%), compared to registered pregnancies. Conclusion In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to improve prenatal care access and to promote maternal and neonatal health equity. By addressing socioeconomic barriers and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can strive toward ensuring optimal pregnancy outcomes for all expectant mothers. This is done by ensuring that all antenatal patients are registered for prenatal care by involving a combination of strategies focused on support, education, and accessibility. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundAntenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or “unregistered” pregnancies. This study aims to investigate the impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, considering various demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding the factors influencing registration status and its implications on maternal and fetal health outcomes is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve prenatal care access and enhance overall pregnancy outcomes.ObjectiveTo see the difference in obstetrical complications along with feto-maternal outcomes in both registered and unregistered antenatal cases and to determine the correlation of maternal and fetal outcomes with antenatal care.Materials and methodsThis two-year observational study at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College's Obstetrics and Gynecology IPD in Pimpri, Pune, examined maternal and fetal outcomes in registered and unregistered pregnancies. Consent was obtained, and patients were categorized as registered and unregistered based on the number of antenatal visits. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Data on socioeconomic factors like income and education were analyzed to assess their association with registration status. Maternal outcomes included preterm delivery and complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, premature rupture of membranes, anemia, and postpartum complications. Fetal outcomes included birth weight and NICU admissions. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression, were used to examine relationships between variables and registration status.ResultsThis study analyzed 502 cases, comprising 251 registered and 251 unregistered pregnancies, to investigate the impact of antenatal registration on maternal and fetal outcomes. Significant associations were observed between socioeconomic factors, such as lower income and education levels in unregistered pregnancies. Specifically, 46 (18.3%) unregistered cases were in the lowest income bracket, while 103 (41.0%) were in the lower-middle bracket, and the majority (132, 52.2%) had only completed secondary education. Unregistered pregnancies were linked to a higher prevalence of adverse outcomes, including preterm delivery (101, 40.23%), anemia (178, 70.9%), hypertensive disorders (30, 11.9%), gestational diabetes mellitus (16, 6.37%), fetal growth restriction (39, 15.3%), low birth weight (181, 72.1%), and NICU admissions (112, 44.6%), compared to registered pregnancies.ConclusionIn conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to improve prenatal care access and to promote maternal and neonatal health equity. By addressing socioeconomic barriers and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can strive toward ensuring optimal pregnancy outcomes for all expectant mothers. This is done by ensuring that all antenatal patients are registered for prenatal care by involving a combination of strategies focused on support, education, and accessibility. Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or "unregistered" pregnancies. This study aims to investigate the impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, considering various demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding the factors influencing registration status and its implications on maternal and fetal health outcomes is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve prenatal care access and enhance overall pregnancy outcomes. Objective To see the difference in obstetrical complications along with feto-maternal outcomes in both registered and unregistered antenatal cases and to determine the correlation of maternal and fetal outcomes with antenatal care. Materials and methods This two-year observational study at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College's Obstetrics and Gynecology IPD in Pimpri, Pune, examined maternal and fetal outcomes in registered and unregistered pregnancies. Consent was obtained, and patients were categorized as registered and unregistered based on the number of antenatal visits. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Data on socioeconomic factors like income and education were analyzed to assess their association with registration status. Maternal outcomes included preterm delivery and complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, premature rupture of membranes, anemia, and postpartum complications. Fetal outcomes included birth weight and NICU admissions. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression, were used to examine relationships between variables and registration status. Results This study analyzed 502 cases, comprising 251 registered and 251 unregistered pregnancies, to investigate the impact of antenatal registration on maternal and fetal outcomes. Significant associations were observed between socioeconomic factors, such as lower income and education levels in unregistered pregnancies. Specifically, 46 (18.3%) unregistered cases were in the lowest income bracket, while 103 (41.0%) were in the lower-middle bracket, and the majority (132, 52.2%) had only completed secondary education. Unregistered pregnancies were linked to a higher prevalence of adverse outcomes, including preterm delivery (101, 40.23%), anemia (178, 70.9%), hypertensive disorders (30, 11.9%), gestational diabetes mellitus (16, 6.37%), fetal growth restriction (39, 15.3%), low birth weight (181, 72.1%), and NICU admissions (112, 44.6%), compared to registered pregnancies. Conclusion In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to improve prenatal care access and to promote maternal and neonatal health equity. By addressing socioeconomic barriers and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can strive toward ensuring optimal pregnancy outcomes for all expectant mothers. This is done by ensuring that all antenatal patients are registered for prenatal care by involving a combination of strategies focused on support, education, and accessibility. Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or "unregistered" pregnancies. This study aims to investigate the impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, considering various demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding the factors influencing registration status and its implications on maternal and fetal health outcomes is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve prenatal care access and enhance overall pregnancy outcomes. Objective To see the difference in obstetrical complications along with feto-maternal outcomes in both registered and unregistered antenatal cases and to determine the correlation of maternal and fetal outcomes with antenatal care. Materials and methods This two-year observational study at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College's Obstetrics and Gynecology IPD in Pimpri, Pune, examined maternal and fetal outcomes in registered and unregistered pregnancies. Consent was obtained, and patients were categorized as registered and unregistered based on the number of antenatal visits. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Data on socioeconomic factors like income and education were analyzed to assess their association with registration status. Maternal outcomes included preterm delivery and complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, premature rupture of membranes, anemia, and postpartum complications. Fetal outcomes included birth weight and NICU admissions. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression, were used to examine relationships between variables and registration status. Results This study analyzed 502 cases, comprising 251 registered and 251 unregistered pregnancies, to investigate the impact of antenatal registration on maternal and fetal outcomes. Significant associations were observed between socioeconomic factors, such as lower income and education levels in unregistered pregnancies. Specifically, 46 (18.3%) unregistered cases were in the lowest income bracket, while 103 (41.0%) were in the lower-middle bracket, and the majority (132, 52.2%) had only completed secondary education. Unregistered pregnancies were linked to a higher prevalence of adverse outcomes, including preterm delivery (101, 40.23%), anemia (178, 70.9%), hypertensive disorders (30, 11.9%), gestational diabetes mellitus (16, 6.37%), fetal growth restriction (39, 15.3%), low birth weight (181, 72.1%), and NICU admissions (112, 44.6%), compared to registered pregnancies. Conclusion In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to improve prenatal care access and to promote maternal and neonatal health equity. By addressing socioeconomic barriers and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can strive toward ensuring optimal pregnancy outcomes for all expectant mothers. This is done by ensuring that all antenatal patients are registered for prenatal care by involving a combination of strategies focused on support, education, and accessibility.Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or "unregistered" pregnancies. This study aims to investigate the impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, considering various demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding the factors influencing registration status and its implications on maternal and fetal health outcomes is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve prenatal care access and enhance overall pregnancy outcomes. Objective To see the difference in obstetrical complications along with feto-maternal outcomes in both registered and unregistered antenatal cases and to determine the correlation of maternal and fetal outcomes with antenatal care. Materials and methods This two-year observational study at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College's Obstetrics and Gynecology IPD in Pimpri, Pune, examined maternal and fetal outcomes in registered and unregistered pregnancies. Consent was obtained, and patients were categorized as registered and unregistered based on the number of antenatal visits. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Data on socioeconomic factors like income and education were analyzed to assess their association with registration status. Maternal outcomes included preterm delivery and complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, premature rupture of membranes, anemia, and postpartum complications. Fetal outcomes included birth weight and NICU admissions. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression, were used to examine relationships between variables and registration status. Results This study analyzed 502 cases, comprising 251 registered and 251 unregistered pregnancies, to investigate the impact of antenatal registration on maternal and fetal outcomes. Significant associations were observed between socioeconomic factors, such as lower income and education levels in unregistered pregnancies. Specifically, 46 (18.3%) unregistered cases were in the lowest income bracket, while 103 (41.0%) were in the lower-middle bracket, and the majority (132, 52.2%) had only completed secondary education. Unregistered pregnancies were linked to a higher prevalence of adverse outcomes, including preterm delivery (101, 40.23%), anemia (178, 70.9%), hypertensive disorders (30, 11.9%), gestational diabetes mellitus (16, 6.37%), fetal growth restriction (39, 15.3%), low birth weight (181, 72.1%), and NICU admissions (112, 44.6%), compared to registered pregnancies. Conclusion In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to improve prenatal care access and to promote maternal and neonatal health equity. By addressing socioeconomic barriers and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can strive toward ensuring optimal pregnancy outcomes for all expectant mothers. This is done by ensuring that all antenatal patients are registered for prenatal care by involving a combination of strategies focused on support, education, and accessibility. Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or “unregistered” pregnancies. This study aims to investigate the impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, considering various demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding the factors influencing registration status and its implications on maternal and fetal health outcomes is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve prenatal care access and enhance overall pregnancy outcomes. Objective To see the difference in obstetrical complications along with feto-maternal outcomes in both registered and unregistered antenatal cases and to determine the correlation of maternal and fetal outcomes with antenatal care. Materials and methods This two-year observational study at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College's Obstetrics and Gynecology IPD in Pimpri, Pune, examined maternal and fetal outcomes in registered and unregistered pregnancies. Consent was obtained, and patients were categorized as registered and unregistered based on the number of antenatal visits. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Data on socioeconomic factors like income and education were analyzed to assess their association with registration status. Maternal outcomes included preterm delivery and complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, premature rupture of membranes, anemia, and postpartum complications. Fetal outcomes included birth weight and NICU admissions. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression, were used to examine relationships between variables and registration status. Results This study analyzed 502 cases, comprising 251 registered and 251 unregistered pregnancies, to investigate the impact of antenatal registration on maternal and fetal outcomes. Significant associations were observed between socioeconomic factors, such as lower income and education levels in unregistered pregnancies. Specifically, 46 (18.3%) unregistered cases were in the lowest income bracket, while 103 (41.0%) were in the lower-middle bracket, and the majority (132, 52.2%) had only completed secondary education. Unregistered pregnancies were linked to a higher prevalence of adverse outcomes, including preterm delivery (101, 40.23%), anemia (178, 70.9%), hypertensive disorders (30, 11.9%), gestational diabetes mellitus (16, 6.37%), fetal growth restriction (39, 15.3%), low birth weight (181, 72.1%), and NICU admissions (112, 44.6%), compared to registered pregnancies. Conclusion In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to improve prenatal care access and to promote maternal and neonatal health equity. By addressing socioeconomic barriers and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can strive toward ensuring optimal pregnancy outcomes for all expectant mothers. This is done by ensuring that all antenatal patients are registered for prenatal care by involving a combination of strategies focused on support, education, and accessibility. |
Author | Bhadoriya, Ayushi Gaikwad, Vidya Gaikwad, Suhas |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, IND |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, IND |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Vidya surname: Gaikwad fullname: Gaikwad, Vidya organization: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, IND – sequence: 2 givenname: Ayushi surname: Bhadoriya fullname: Bhadoriya, Ayushi organization: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, IND – sequence: 3 givenname: Suhas surname: Gaikwad fullname: Gaikwad, Suhas organization: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, IND |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39224735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkUtPJCEUhYnRqOO4m7UhcePCbnlUAb0ynYrOmGhMHF0TirrllKmCFigT45-Xtnt8rYDDx7mXe36gTecdIPSLkqmU5ezEjgHGOBWCCLGBdhkVaqKoKjY_7XfQfowPhBBKJCOSbKMdPmOskLzcRS9zXPlhYYJJ3RPgv2lsnrFv8Tkk02PjGnxlEgSXD9djsn6AiDuHb-C-i1mH5o25c-FDmLsEziyfVyaucINvIaTOhOesBcAVZCb8RFut6SPsr9c9dHd-dlv9mVxe_76o5pcTywRLE2trBoRSpmqmClXKUhrR2kYSKbm0hhtWQCGaZlYrKQTnUNetLfNEZsBZW_M9dLryXYz1AI3NxYPp9SJ0Q-5Ie9Pprzeu-6fv_ZOmlAtFGM0OR2uH4B9HiEkPXbTQ98aBH6PmlBAmC0V5Rg-_oQ9-XM5vSWVDyUkpMnW8omzwMQZo37uhRC-T1atk9VuyGT_4_IN3-H-O_BWA7aKC |
Cites_doi | 10.2147/IJWH.S138329 10.1093/heapol/11.1.1 10.1186/s12884-022-04742-1 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.357 10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_45_18 10. 52403/ijrr.20210610 10.4314/eamj.v86i6.54136 10.1155/2015/914713 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61372-0 10.1007/s00404-020-05759-0 10.1186/s12905-018-0679-9 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103855 10.7759/cureus.31020 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 10.1089/jwh.2020.8854 10.22038/jmrh.2019.32291.1350 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071165 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233487. 10.33545/gynae.2020.v4.i4b.629 10.1007/978-981-19-3417-9 10.1186/s12889-018-5285-0 10.4314/jcmphc.v34i2.8 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2418_21 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2024, Gaikwad et al. Copyright © 2024, Gaikwad et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Copyright © 2024, Gaikwad et al. 2024 Gaikwad et al. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2024, Gaikwad et al. – notice: Copyright © 2024, Gaikwad et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Copyright © 2024, Gaikwad et al. 2024 Gaikwad et al. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.7759/cureus.66066 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2168-8184 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_7759_cureus_66066 39224735 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | India |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: India |
GroupedDBID | 3V. 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ ABUWG ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE KQ8 M48 NPM OK1 PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RPM UKHRP AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-ccb2e01128b28485757a6fcd707737ca3a24e46dd9b876633ebbfc50669e32fb3 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2168-8184 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 03 05:26:37 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 04:07:06 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 17 16:55:02 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 04:17:43 EDT 2024 Sat Nov 02 12:19:53 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Keywords | maternal and child health fetomaternal outcome maternal health antenatal care general obstetrics |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2024, Gaikwad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c262t-ccb2e01128b28485757a6fcd707737ca3a24e46dd9b876633ebbfc50669e32fb3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368021/ |
PMID | 39224735 |
PQID | 3111373056 |
PQPubID | 2045583 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11368021 proquest_miscellaneous_3100274813 proquest_journals_3111373056 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_66066 pubmed_primary_39224735 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-08-03 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-08-03 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2024 text: 2024-08-03 day: 03 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Palo Alto – name: Palo Alto (CA) |
PublicationTitle | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cureus |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Cureus Inc Cureus |
Publisher_xml | – name: Cureus Inc – name: Cureus |
References | de Paula Fiod Costa H (ref30) 2022 Zaki N (ref21) 2019; 9 Chigbu B (ref39) 2009; 86 Gonied AS (ref28) 2011; 7 Saxena P (ref1) 2010; 33 PrabhuDas M (ref7) 2021; 30 ref10 Onyeajam DJ (ref23) 2018; 18 ref32 Radhakrishnan M (ref18) 2023; 10 ref17 Oraekwe OI (ref38) 2018; 7 Acup W (ref22) 2023; 13 Naderi T (ref14) 2015; 2015 Rouzi A (ref24) 2023; 43 McDonagh M (ref35) 1996; 11 Addah AO (ref11) 2023; 23 Chan M (ref3) 2008; 372 Kharazi SS (ref26) 2020; 8 Zegeye EA (ref8) 2018; 18 Fagbamigbe AF (ref25) 2017; 9 Vitner D (ref33) 2020; 302 Hansda R (ref36) 2022; 11 Lawn JE (ref5) 2014; 12 Butt S (ref4) 2012; 12 Bangera RT (ref19) 2020; 7 Almarri SS (ref41) 2022; 14 Scheele J (ref20) 2023; 127 Okojie OH (ref34) 2022; 34 Kukura E (ref40) 2021; 93 Mahapatro SR (ref12) 2022 ref9 Aamir F (ref2) 2012; 28 Obetta HI (ref29) 2021; 8 ref6 Sahoo S (ref15) 2015; 4 Setia S (ref13) 2020; 4 Gamberini C (ref27) 2022; 22 Lima M (ref31) 2023 Riaz B (ref16) 2017; 11 Anyigor-Ogah CS (ref37) 2024; 14 |
References_xml | – volume: 9 year: 2017 ident: ref25 article-title: Are the timings and risk factors changing? Survival analysis of timing of first antenatal care visit among pregnant women in Nigeria (2003-2013) publication-title: Int J Womens Health doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S138329 contributor: fullname: Fagbamigbe AF – volume: 11 year: 1996 ident: ref35 article-title: Is antenatal care effective in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality? publication-title: Health Policy Plan doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.1 contributor: fullname: McDonagh M – volume: 4 year: 2015 ident: ref15 article-title: Obstetric & perinatal morbidity & mortality in booked & unbooked antenatal patients publication-title: Indian J Basic Appl Med Res contributor: fullname: Sahoo S – year: 2023 ident: ref31 article-title: Frailty in children: from the perioperative management to the multidisciplinary approach contributor: fullname: Lima M – volume: 22 year: 2022 ident: ref27 article-title: Exploring solutions to improve antenatal care in resource-limited settings: an expert consultation publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04742-1 contributor: fullname: Gamberini C – volume: 43 year: 2023 ident: ref24 article-title: Mortality outcomes between pregnant women booked for antenatal care and unbooked pregnant women publication-title: Ann Saudi Med doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.357 contributor: fullname: Rouzi A – volume: 7 year: 2018 ident: ref38 article-title: Appraisal of maternal outcome of twin gestation publication-title: Saudi J Health Sci doi: 10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_45_18 contributor: fullname: Oraekwe OI – year: 2022 ident: ref30 article-title: Neonatal complications of prematurity contributor: fullname: de Paula Fiod Costa H – volume: 8 year: 2021 ident: ref29 article-title: Prevalence, risk factors and outcome of preterm births at University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital (UMTH), Maiduguri, Nigeria: a 2-year case-control study publication-title: Int J Res Rev doi: 10. 52403/ijrr.20210610 contributor: fullname: Obetta HI – volume: 86 year: 2009 ident: ref39 article-title: Pregnancy outcome in booked and unbooked mothers in South Eastern Nigeria publication-title: East Afr Med J doi: 10.4314/eamj.v86i6.54136 contributor: fullname: Chigbu B – volume: 2015 year: 2015 ident: ref14 article-title: Incidence and correlates of maternal near miss in southeast Iran publication-title: Int J Reprod Med doi: 10.1155/2015/914713 contributor: fullname: Naderi T – volume: 372 year: 2008 ident: ref3 article-title: Return to alma-ata publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61372-0 contributor: fullname: Chan M – volume: 302 year: 2020 ident: ref33 article-title: Community-based, population-focused preterm birth prevention programs - a review publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05759-0 contributor: fullname: Vitner D – volume: 18 year: 2018 ident: ref8 article-title: Factors associated with the utilization of antenatal care and prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission services in Ethiopia: applying a count regression model publication-title: BMC Womens Health doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0679-9 contributor: fullname: Zegeye EA – volume: 9 year: 2019 ident: ref21 article-title: Impact of antenatal care in feto maternal outcome publication-title: J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak contributor: fullname: Zaki N – volume: 127 year: 2023 ident: ref20 article-title: Current preconception care practice in the Netherlands - an evaluation study among birth care professionals publication-title: Midwifery doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103855 contributor: fullname: Scheele J – ident: ref9 – volume: 14 year: 2022 ident: ref41 article-title: The effects of booking status on the outcome of infants of ≥32 weeks gestational age admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit in a tertiary academic Center publication-title: Cureus doi: 10.7759/cureus.31020 contributor: fullname: Almarri SS – volume: 7 year: 2020 ident: ref19 article-title: Comparative study of outcome of high risk pregnancies in unbooked and booked cases in tertiary care centre publication-title: J Gynaecol Obstet Mother Health contributor: fullname: Bangera RT – ident: ref32 – volume: 33 year: 2010 ident: ref1 article-title: Obstetric and perinatal outcome of teenage and older Primigravidas - a retrospective analysis publication-title: Health and Population - Perspectives and Issues contributor: fullname: Saxena P – volume: 11 year: 2017 ident: ref16 article-title: Outcome of twin pregnancy in registered versus un-registered cases publication-title: Pak J Med Health Sci contributor: fullname: Riaz B – ident: ref17 – volume: 12 year: 2014 ident: ref5 article-title: Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 contributor: fullname: Lawn JE – volume: 30 year: 2021 ident: ref7 article-title: Immune regulation, maternal infection, vaccination, and pregnancy outcome publication-title: J Womens Health (Larchmt) doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8854 contributor: fullname: PrabhuDas M – volume: 7 year: 2011 ident: ref28 article-title: Maternal complications and perinatal outcomes in booked and unbooked mothers publication-title: J Am Sci contributor: fullname: Gonied AS – volume: 8 year: 2020 ident: ref26 article-title: The relationship between maternal health literacy and nutritional dietary self-efficacy with pregnancy outcome publication-title: J Midwifery Reprod Health doi: 10.22038/jmrh.2019.32291.1350 contributor: fullname: Kharazi SS – ident: ref6 – volume: 28 year: 2012 ident: ref2 article-title: A comparative review of maternal morbidity and perinatal outcome in booked and un-booked mothers publication-title: J Surg Pak contributor: fullname: Aamir F – volume: 13 year: 2023 ident: ref22 article-title: Factors associated with first antenatal care (ANC) attendance within 12 weeks of pregnancy among women in Lira City, Northern Uganda: a facility-based cross-sectional study publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071165 contributor: fullname: Acup W – volume: 14 year: 2024 ident: ref37 article-title: Determinants and outcomes of pregnancies among booked versus unbooked patients in a tertiary hospital south east, Nigeria publication-title: Open J Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Anyigor-Ogah CS – volume: 23 year: 2023 ident: ref11 article-title: Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of booked and unbooked patients in the Niger Delta publication-title: Niger Health J contributor: fullname: Addah AO – volume: 10 year: 2023 ident: ref18 article-title: Modified Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale 2023: stratification and updates publication-title: Int J Community Med Public Health doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233487. contributor: fullname: Radhakrishnan M – volume: 93 year: 2021 ident: ref40 article-title: Better birth publication-title: Temp L Rev contributor: fullname: Kukura E – volume: 4 year: 2020 ident: ref13 article-title: To study maternal complications in booked and unbooked cases publication-title: Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.33545/gynae.2020.v4.i4b.629 contributor: fullname: Setia S – year: 2022 ident: ref12 article-title: Towards newborn survival: challenges and priorities doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3417-9 contributor: fullname: Mahapatro SR – volume: 18 year: 2018 ident: ref23 article-title: Antenatal care satisfaction in a developing country: a cross-sectional study from Nigeria publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5285-0 contributor: fullname: Onyeajam DJ – volume: 34 year: 2022 ident: ref34 article-title: Maternal and neonatal outcomes of booked and UN-booked pregnancies in Benin City, Southern Nigeria: a comparative study publication-title: J Community Med Prim Health Care doi: 10.4314/jcmphc.v34i2.8 contributor: fullname: Okojie OH – volume: 11 year: 2022 ident: ref36 article-title: Study on types of anaemia and foetomaternal outcome in antenatal patients publication-title: J Family Med Prim Care doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2418_21 contributor: fullname: Hansda R – ident: ref10 – volume: 12 year: 2012 ident: ref4 article-title: Comparison of maternal outcome in booked vs unbooked women in Lady Willingdon Hospital, Lahore publication-title: Medical Channel contributor: fullname: Butt S |
SSID | ssj0001072070 |
Score | 2.312337 |
Snippet | Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care... BackgroundAntenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care... Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | e66066 |
SubjectTerms | Clinical outcomes Epidemiology/Public Health Health services utilization Maternal & child health Maternal mortality Medical Education Obstetrics/Gynecology Prenatal care Socioeconomic factors Womens health |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La-MwEB76gLKX0tfuui9UaI_eOpJt2acSQkMppIXSQG5GL7O9OF0nPpT--c7ITtJsoRcfrMEPjR6fRp_mA7hUvRJRfOnCWMZ40VaGWmc6dFEW28QiIPHZ-UcP6d04vp8kky7gNutolYsx0Q_UdmooRn4tSBNdEuC9ef0XkmoU7a52EhqbsN3jUUqULjmRqxhLJDk26ZbvLmWSX5umds3sT0qwfX0m-gIv_2dJfpp2hnuw2-FF1m8dvA8brjqAnVG3I34I7302WCXwZkQLfGPTkg0domqmKstGqs3zzB6bOf6qm7GXij05OvhDOp3eZlzVqxt9YrVTVIcNcIrz5oo9E_9a1W-MDiwxigm7-gjGw9vnwV3YCSqEhqd8HhqjucMOzTONsxJpc0qVlsbKSEohjRKKxy5Orc01DpKpEE7r0iRYV7kTvNTiJ2xV08r9BqZLncoIn6ZFHuec5zaOMiN4znF1zqMkgKtF5Ravbd6MAtcb5ISidULhnRDA6aLmi673zIqVrwO4WBZju6fNDFW5aUM2fkWd9UQAv1pHLV-EmI-TpHIA2ZoLlwaUU3u9pHr563Nrk8RNhrjn-PvvOoEfHNGNZwKKU9ia1407Q3Qy1-e-CX4Ax-fnoA priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Open Access Journals dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Ra9swED7aDEpfyrqtrbtsqLA9OnUk2bKfRggLZZANSgN9M5It00BxWieGhv753slOsjR96Isf7EO27yTdd9LpPoAful8gii-sL5XEi8mVb0xsfBvEMg9zBCSuOv_4b3Q1kX9uw9s9WLGNtgqcvxnaEZ_UpLrvPT0uf-GAR_zaUypMLrO6svW8FxEW34cPXGKMTkl8LdB3qy2B4oFjjuP9KPbRS8kmC36ngW3_tAM6X-dO_ueMRh_hqEWRbNCY_Rj2bPkJDsbtPvlneB6w4aasN6NkwSWbFWxk8TeZLnM21k31Z_avXmCns3M2Ldm1peNAxN7pZCZltbkxoFx3WuthQ3R8TlyzG8rK1tWS0TEmRivFtvoCk9Hvm-GV39Is-BmP-MLPMsMtDnMeG_RVxNipdFRkuQqUEirTQnNpZZTnicGpMxLCGlNkIeoqsYIXRpxAp5yV9gyYKUykAmzNiEQmnCe5DOJM8IRjzM6D0IOfK-WmD001jRSjEDJC2hghdUbwoLvSfLrqEqnAaVkoCnk8uFg_xtFAWxy6tLOaZFycHfeFB6eNodYvQiTIiWjZg3jLhGsBqrS9_aSc3rmK20R8EyMaOn_n93-FQ47gxyUKii50FlVtvyF4WZjvrl--AEKR8EM priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | A Comparative Study of Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Registered and Unregistered Antenatal Cases in a Tertiary Care Center |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39224735 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3111373056 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3100274813 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11368021 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swED_aDsZexr7nrQsabI9OXEm27McsNJSBu1IayJuRZJkFVqU48UPZP787OU6b7W0vBlvnD3Qn3--kn-4AvuizBlF842KpJB5MrWJjchO7JJd1WiMgCdn5y8vsYiG_L9PlEWTDXphA2rdmNfa_bsd-9TNwK-9u7WTgiU2uyhnVIcnROU2O4Rgt9FGMHmZWEsXRkHuWu1JpMbFd67rNOCOwfuh__gGVf3MjHzmb-Qt4vkOJbNp_zUs4cv4VPC136-Cv4feUzR7SdjMiA96zdcPmDrE0075mpe6zO7Mf3RaNym3YyrNrR9t9qDpnkFn49uHClLjsNJfDZujYgrhmN8S61u09o21KjGaCXfsGFvPzm9lFvCujEFue8W1sreEOhzHPDfoiqsipdNbYWiVKCWW10Fw6mdV1YfDXmAnhjGlsin1VOMEbI97CiV979x6YaUymEnyaEYUsOC9qmeRW8IJjTM6TNIKvQ-dWd322jAqjDFJC1SuhCkqI4HTo-Wo3ZjaVoKr3ikKaCD7vm9HaaQlDe7fuSCbE0fmZiOBdr6j9ixDpcSqkHEF-oMK9AGXSPmxBAwsZtQeD-vD_t36EZxzxTuAGilM42bad-4R4ZWtGaKRLNYIn384vr67xrJT5KJjsH73A8qQ |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,730,783,787,888,2228,12068,21400,24330,27936,27937,31731,31732,33756,33757,43322,43817,53804,53806,74073,74630 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9NAEB6VVgIuiPIohgJbCY6mzq7ttU8oiohSaFoJJVJu1r6s5mK3Tnyo-uc7s3YSAhIXH7wjP3Z2d76ZnZ0P4IsalIjiSxfGMsaLtjLUOtOhi7LYJhYBia_OP71KJ_P45yJZ9AG3VZ9WuVkT_UJta0Mx8nNBnOiSAO_327uQWKNod7Wn0HgCR1SHixgM5ELuYiyR5Diku3x3KZP83LSNa1ffUoLt-5boH3j5d5bkH2Zn_BJe9HiRDTsFH8OBq17B02m_I_4aHoZstCvgzSgt8J7VJRs7RNVMVZZNVVfnmV23a_xVt2LLiv12dPCHeDq9zLxqdjeGlNVOUR02QhPnxRWbUf61au4ZHVhiFBN2zRuYj3_MRpOwJ1QIDU_5OjRGc4cTmmcarRJxc0qVlsbKSEohjRKKxy5Orc01LpKpEE7r0iTYV7kTvNTiLRxWdeXeAdOlTmWET9Mij3POcxtHmRE85-id8ygJ4Oumc4vbrm5Ggf4GKaHolFB4JQRwuun5op89q2Kn6wDOts047mkzQ1WubknGe9TZQARw0ilq-yLEfJwolQPI9lS4FaCa2vst1fLG19YmipsMcc_7_3_XZ3g2mU0vi8uLq18f4DlHpOOzAsUpHK6b1n1EpLLWn_xwfAS-EeqH |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9tAEB4VKiEuqA8ebmm7lejRxOzaXvtURYGIFgIVIlJu1r4suDjgxAfUP9-ZtZMQkHrxwTvyY2d295vZb2cAjtRJiSi-dGEsY7xoK0OtMx26KIttYhGQ-Oz8o6v0fBz_niSTjv8062iViznRT9R2aihG3hNUE10S4O2VHS3iz-nw58NjSBWkaKe1K6exAW8leilk83IiV_GWSHI075b7LmWS90xTu2Z2nBKEX1-VXkHNl4zJZ0vQ8B3sdNiR9Vtlv4c3rvoAW6Nud_wj_O2zwSqZNyOK4BOblmzoEGEzVVk2Um3OZ3bdzPG33YzdV-zG0SEgqtnpZcZVvbrRJ4Y7RXjYAJc7L67YLXGxVf3E6PASo_iwq3dhPDy7HZyHXXGF0PCUz0NjNHc4uHmmcYWiOp1SpaWxMpJSSKOE4rGLU2tzjRNmKoTTujQJ9lXuBC-12IPNalq5A2C61KmM8Gla5HHOeW7jKDOC5xw9dR4lAfxYdG7x0ObQKND3ICUUrRIKr4QADhc9X3QjaVas9B7A92UzjgHa2FCVmzYk473r7EQEsN8qavkixH-cyisHkK2pcClA-bXXW6r7O59nm8rdZIiBPv3_u77BFlpicfnr6uIzbHMEPZ4gKA5hc1437guClrn-6q3xH4Kj7r8 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Comparative+Study+of+Fetal+and+Maternal+Outcomes+in+Registered+and+Unregistered+Antenatal+Cases+in+a+Tertiary+Care+Center&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us+%28Palo+Alto%2C+CA%29&rft.au=Gaikwad%2C+Vidya&rft.au=Bhadoriya%2C+Ayushi&rft.au=Gaikwad%2C+Suhas&rft.date=2024-08-03&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759%2Fcureus.66066&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_7759_cureus_66066 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |