Exploring the impact of feedback timing on student performance in online testing
This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the effect of feedback intervals on student performance. A pre-experimental study with 36 students was conducted to determine the delayed time for pro...
Saved in:
Published in | Asia Pacific education review Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 303 - 315 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer Nature B.V
01.06.2025
교육연구소 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the effect of feedback intervals on student performance. A pre-experimental study with 36 students was conducted to determine the delayed time for providing feedback based on student behavioral data. A formal experiment with 80 students was then conducted to explore the joint effects of feedback interventions and task difficulty on student performance improvement. The findings revealed that feedback conditions had no significant impact on student learning gains in easy or difficult tasks. However, for medium difficulty tasks, feedback delays of 23 and 30 s led to greater academic improvement compared to immediate feedback, while feedback with a 35-s delay resulted in worse performance. Overall, the study highlights the importance of considering task difficulty when determining optimal feedback intervals and suggests that well-timed feedback can significantly enhance student learning, especially for tasks of moderate complexity. This challenges the common practice of providing immediate feedback, which may not always be optimal. Moreover, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for educators and instructional designers when designing online assessments and feedback mechanisms. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the effect of feedback intervals on student performance. A pre-experimental study with 36 students was conducted to determine the delayed time for providing feedback based on student behavioral data. A formal experiment with 80 students was then conducted to explore the joint effects of feedback interventions and task difficulty on student performance improvement. The findings revealed that feedback conditions had no significant impact on student learning gains in easy or difficult tasks. However, for medium difficulty tasks, feedback delays of 23 and 30 s led to greater academic improvement compared to immediate feedback, while feedback with a 35-s delay resulted in worse performance. Overall, the study highlights the importance of considering task difficulty when determining optimal feedback intervals and suggests that well-timed feedback can significantly enhance student learning, especially for tasks of moderate complexity. This challenges the common practice of providing immediate feedback, which may not always be optimal. Moreover, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for educators and instructional designers when designing online assessments and feedback mechanisms. KCI Citation Count: 0 This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the effect of feedback intervals on student performance. A pre-experimental study with 36 students was conducted to determine the delayed time for providing feedback based on student behavioral data. A formal experiment with 80 students was then conducted to explore the joint effects of feedback interventions and task difficulty on student performance improvement. The findings revealed that feedback conditions had no significant impact on student learning gains in easy or difficult tasks. However, for medium difficulty tasks, feedback delays of 23 and 30 s led to greater academic improvement compared to immediate feedback, while feedback with a 35-s delay resulted in worse performance. Overall, the study highlights the importance of considering task difficulty when determining optimal feedback intervals and suggests that well-timed feedback can significantly enhance student learning, especially for tasks of moderate complexity. This challenges the common practice of providing immediate feedback, which may not always be optimal. Moreover, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for educators and instructional designers when designing online assessments and feedback mechanisms. |
Author | Li, Mailin Ding, Guozhu Li, Shan Wu, Hao |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Guozhu orcidid: 0000-0002-2043-8320 surname: Ding fullname: Ding, Guozhu – sequence: 2 givenname: Mailin surname: Li fullname: Li, Mailin – sequence: 3 givenname: Shan surname: Li fullname: Li, Shan – sequence: 4 givenname: Hao surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Hao |
BackLink | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003222123$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNotkEtLAzEUhYNUsK3-AVcBd8JoHpNkZllK1UJBkQruQppHnT6SMZOC9tebdtzcB-e7l8MZgYEP3gJwi9EDRkg8dpgwXhaIlEXecz1egCGuBC9KJD4HeWZ1lSUqrsCo6zYIcVrjegjeZj_tLsTGr2H6srDZt0onGBx01pqV0luYmv1JDR526WCsT7C10YW4V17nA5-VXeMtTLZLGbwGl07tOnvz38fg42m2nL4Ui9fn-XSyKDThOBXK6IpRQpywGjuHOTPKsBVSGK1Y7RwTpsSYIkW5pjWqqCLcmrxXtaqMUHQM7vu_Pjq51Y0Mqjn3dZDbKCfvy7nESFDCEc3wXQ-3MXwfslG5CYfosz-ZPfCKcFqyTJGe0jF0XbROtrHZq_ibH8lTzLKPWeaA5TlmeaR__pJx5g |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/jcal.12540 10.1080/10494820.2011.649766 10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273 10.2991/icaicte.2013.28 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.013 10.3102/00346543058001079 10.1037/h0033243 10.1016/0361-476X(92)90048-4 10.1002/jnr.23748 10.1002/cae.22640 10.2991/icaicte-15.2015.19 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.005 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.002 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.014 10.1080/01587919.2022.2088480 10.1109/icalt.2015.75 10.3102/003465430298487 10.4324/9780203839089-22 10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 10.1080/03055698.2021.1943648 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.06.028 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104271 10.1007/BF02319855 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.002 10.1007/BF03395451 10.1007/BF03395423 10.1037/edu0000693 10.3102/0034654314564881 10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001 10.1080/1475939x.2013.822416 10.3109/0142159X.2013.826793 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011 10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119171 10.1007/BF02504913 10.1177/1747021820977739 10.1007/3-540-47987-2_37 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 10.1111/bjet.12503 10.1080/10494820701365952 10.1111/bjet.12495 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012 10.1037/h0083307 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887 10.1109/MIPRO.2014.6859649 10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y 10.1080/09541440701326097 10.1037/0022-0663.70.3.378 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.007 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990080 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.012 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03122.x 10.1111/psyp.14324 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Education Research Institute, Seoul National University 2024. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Education Research Institute, Seoul National University 2024. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION AHOVV ACYCR |
DOI | 10.1007/s12564-024-10024-z |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Education Research Index Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Education |
EISSN | 1876-407X |
EndPage | 315 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10732603 10_1007_s12564_024_10024_z |
GroupedDBID | 0-V 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 203 23N 2KG 2LR 2VQ 3-Y 30V 4.4 406 408 40D 5GY 5VS 67Z 8TC 8UJ 96X AAAVM AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AAPKM AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYXX AAYZH AAZMS ABAKF ABBRH ABDBE ABDZT ABECU ABFSG ABFTV ABIVO ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMQK ABOPQ ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABUWG ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHQT ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACPIV ACSTC ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETCA AEVLU AEXYK AEZWR AFBBN AFDZB AFGCZ AFHIU AFKRA AFLOW AFOHR AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHPBZ AHSBF AHWEU AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AIXLP AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR ANMIH AOCGG ARALO ATHPR AXYYD AYFIA AYQZM AZQEC BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ CAG CCPQU CITATION CJNVE COF CSCUP DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP DWQXO EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FYJPI GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GQ7 H13 HF~ HG6 HMJXF HRMNR HZ~ IKXTQ IWAJR IXC IXD I~X J-C J0Z JBSCW JZLTJ KOV LLZTM M0P M4Y MA- NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O9J P2P P9Q PHGZM PHGZT PQEDU PQQKQ PROAC PT4 R9I ROL RSV S1Z S27 S3B SDH SHS SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE T13 TR2 TSG U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 WK8 Z45 ZMTXR ~A9 ABRTQ AHOVV ACYCR |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-adc85322f7ec1ff165dad5b0a10b59ff57d41130a36c39083a26ed30a89a8d7a3 |
ISSN | 1598-1037 |
IngestDate | Sun Jul 06 03:13:46 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:13:14 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 08:41:45 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c261t-adc85322f7ec1ff165dad5b0a10b59ff57d41130a36c39083a26ed30a89a8d7a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-2043-8320 |
PQID | 3226826345 |
PQPubID | 2034556 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10732603 proquest_journals_3226826345 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12564_024_10024_z |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-06-00 20250601 2025-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2025 text: 2025-06-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Dordrecht |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Dordrecht |
PublicationTitle | Asia Pacific education review |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Springer Nature B.V 교육연구소 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: 교육연구소 |
References | AN Kluger (10024_CR40) 1996; 119 10024_CR6 10024_CR8 10024_CR9 C Candel (10024_CR7) 2021 V Kopp (10024_CR41) 2008; 42 S Narciss (10024_CR50) 2014; 71 M Förster (10024_CR23) 2018; 121 RE Dihoff (10024_CR20) 2003; 53 W Guo (10024_CR29) 2024; 50 10024_CR66 PT Sturges (10024_CR54) 1978; 70 X Gao (10024_CR26) 2024; 42 N Kornell (10024_CR42) 2014; 40 10024_CR69 K Wojcikowski (10024_CR67) 2013; 35 G Corbalan (10024_CR18) 2010; 55 O Noroozi (10024_CR52) 2017; 30 A Tozzi (10024_CR62) 2016; 94 A Xin (10024_CR68) 2009; 19 AC Butler (10024_CR5) 2007; 19 K-H Cheng (10024_CR12) 2013; 24 Y Attali (10024_CR3) 2017; 110 J Hattie (10024_CR31) 2007; 77 LX Jensen (10024_CR37) 2021; 173 TH Wang (10024_CR65) 2011; 56 C Van Beuningen (10024_CR63) 2010; 10 A Espasa (10024_CR22) 2022; 43 NTT Thai (10024_CR59) 2017; 107 ML Epstein (10024_CR21) 2002; 52 O Noroozi (10024_CR51) 2022 PA Higham (10024_CR33) 2021 X Chen (10024_CR11) 2018; 117 JA Kulik (10024_CR44) 1988; 58 K-H Cheng (10024_CR13) 2012; 22 RB Clariana (10024_CR16) 2000; 48 N Iwaki (10024_CR36) 2017; 181 Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.Smits, M. H., Boon, J., Sluijsmans, D. M., & Van Gog, T (10024_CR56) 2008; 16 ML Schroth (10024_CR55) 1992; 17 J Sweller (10024_CR58) 1988; 12 EH Mory (10024_CR48) 2004 M Sánchez-Santillán (10024_CR53) 2023; 31 RW Kulhavy (10024_CR43) 1972; 63 10024_CR47 RE Jones (10024_CR38) 1964; 18 RB Clariana (10024_CR15) 2001; 49 D Corral (10024_CR19) 2021; 74 C Timmers (10024_CR60) 2011; 56 D Lefevre (10024_CR46) 2017; 48 RJ Nadolski (10024_CR49) 2017; 48 10024_CR28 E Triantafyllidis (10024_CR61) 2020; 8 MJ Hays (10024_CR32) 2013; 39 BM Hinneberg (10024_CR34) 2021 10024_CR30 I Arroyo (10024_CR2) 2014; 24 10024_CR35 FM Van der Kleij (10024_CR64) 2015; 85 C Albrecht (10024_CR1) 2023 CV Clark-Gordon (10024_CR17) 2019; 128 JW Gikandi (10024_CR27) 2011; 57 AC Butler (10024_CR4) 2007; 13 |
References_xml | – year: 2021 ident: 10024_CR7 publication-title: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning doi: 10.1111/jcal.12540 – volume: 22 start-page: 271 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 10024_CR13 publication-title: Interactive Learning Environments doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.649766 – volume: 13 start-page: 273 issue: 4 year: 2007 ident: 10024_CR4 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273 – ident: 10024_CR66 doi: 10.2991/icaicte.2013.28 – volume: 57 start-page: 2333 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10024_CR27 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004 – volume: 19 start-page: 118 issue: 11 year: 2009 ident: 10024_CR68 publication-title: Modern Educational Technology – volume: 117 start-page: 59 year: 2018 ident: 10024_CR11 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.013 – volume: 58 start-page: 79 issue: 1 year: 1988 ident: 10024_CR44 publication-title: Review of Educational Research doi: 10.3102/00346543058001079 – start-page: 745 volume-title: Handbook of research on educational communications and technology year: 2004 ident: 10024_CR48 – volume: 63 start-page: 505 issue: 5 year: 1972 ident: 10024_CR43 publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1037/h0033243 – volume: 17 start-page: 78 issue: 1 year: 1992 ident: 10024_CR55 publication-title: Contemporary Educational Psychology doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(92)90048-4 – volume: 94 start-page: 702 issue: 8 year: 2016 ident: 10024_CR62 publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience Research doi: 10.1002/jnr.23748 – volume: 31 start-page: 1289 issue: 5 year: 2023 ident: 10024_CR53 publication-title: Computer Applications in Engineering Education doi: 10.1002/cae.22640 – ident: 10024_CR9 doi: 10.2991/icaicte-15.2015.19 – volume: 181 start-page: 75 year: 2017 ident: 10024_CR36 publication-title: Acta Psychologica doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.005 – volume: 55 start-page: 692 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10024_CR18 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.002 – volume: 56 start-page: 1062 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10024_CR65 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.014 – volume: 43 start-page: 444 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 10024_CR22 publication-title: Distance Education doi: 10.1080/01587919.2022.2088480 – ident: 10024_CR28 doi: 10.1109/icalt.2015.75 – volume: 77 start-page: 81 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10024_CR31 publication-title: Review of Educational Research doi: 10.3102/003465430298487 – ident: 10024_CR30 doi: 10.4324/9780203839089-22 – volume: 30 start-page: 153 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10024_CR52 publication-title: Educational Psychology Review doi: 10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z – volume: 12 start-page: 257 issue: 2 year: 1988 ident: 10024_CR58 publication-title: Cognitive Science doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 – volume: 50 start-page: 341 issue: 3 year: 2024 ident: 10024_CR29 publication-title: Educational Studies doi: 10.1080/03055698.2021.1943648 – year: 2021 ident: 10024_CR34 publication-title: Neuroscience doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.06.028 – volume: 173 year: 2021 ident: 10024_CR37 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104271 – volume: 40 start-page: 106 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10024_CR42 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition – volume: 48 start-page: 5 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 10024_CR16 publication-title: Educational Technology Research and Development doi: 10.1007/BF02319855 – volume: 128 start-page: 414 year: 2019 ident: 10024_CR17 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.002 – volume: 53 start-page: 533 issue: 4 year: 2003 ident: 10024_CR20 publication-title: The Psychological Record doi: 10.1007/BF03395451 – volume: 52 start-page: 187 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 10024_CR21 publication-title: The Psychological Record doi: 10.1007/BF03395423 – year: 2021 ident: 10024_CR33 publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1037/edu0000693 – volume: 85 start-page: 475 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 10024_CR64 publication-title: Review of Educational Research doi: 10.3102/0034654314564881 – volume: 39 start-page: 290 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 10024_CR32 publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition – ident: 10024_CR6 doi: 10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001 – volume: 24 start-page: 171 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10024_CR12 publication-title: Technology, Pedagogy and Education doi: 10.1080/1475939x.2013.822416 – volume: 35 start-page: 915 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 10024_CR67 publication-title: Medical Teacher doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.826793 – volume: 71 start-page: 56 year: 2014 ident: 10024_CR50 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10024_CR63 publication-title: International Journal of English Studies doi: 10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119171 – volume: 49 start-page: 23 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: 10024_CR15 publication-title: Educational Technology Research and Development doi: 10.1007/BF02504913 – volume: 74 start-page: 786 issue: 4 year: 2021 ident: 10024_CR19 publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology doi: 10.1177/1747021820977739 – ident: 10024_CR47 doi: 10.1007/3-540-47987-2_37 – volume: 119 start-page: 254 issue: 2 year: 1996 ident: 10024_CR40 publication-title: Psychological Bulletin doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 – volume: 48 start-page: 1368 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 10024_CR49 publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology doi: 10.1111/bjet.12503 – volume: 16 start-page: 183 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10024_CR56 publication-title: Interactive Learning Environments doi: 10.1080/10494820701365952 – ident: 10024_CR69 – volume: 48 start-page: 1357 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 10024_CR46 publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology doi: 10.1111/bjet.12495 – volume: 110 start-page: 154 year: 2017 ident: 10024_CR3 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012 – volume: 18 start-page: 266 issue: 4 year: 1964 ident: 10024_CR38 publication-title: Canadian Journal of Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie doi: 10.1037/h0083307 – volume: 42 start-page: 100588 year: 2024 ident: 10024_CR26 publication-title: Educational Research Review doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 – year: 2022 ident: 10024_CR51 publication-title: Interactive Learning Environments doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887 – ident: 10024_CR8 doi: 10.1109/MIPRO.2014.6859649 – volume: 24 start-page: 387 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 10024_CR2 publication-title: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education doi: 10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y – volume: 19 start-page: 514 issue: 4–5 year: 2007 ident: 10024_CR5 publication-title: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology doi: 10.1080/09541440701326097 – volume: 70 start-page: 378 issue: 3 year: 1978 ident: 10024_CR54 publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.70.3.378 – volume: 56 start-page: 923 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10024_CR60 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.007 – volume: 8 start-page: 78213 year: 2020 ident: 10024_CR61 publication-title: IEEE Access doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990080 – ident: 10024_CR35 – volume: 107 start-page: 113 year: 2017 ident: 10024_CR59 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003 – volume: 121 start-page: 100 year: 2018 ident: 10024_CR23 publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.012 – volume: 42 start-page: 823 issue: 8 year: 2008 ident: 10024_CR41 publication-title: Medical Education doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03122.x – year: 2023 ident: 10024_CR1 publication-title: Psychophysiology doi: 10.1111/psyp.14324 |
SSID | ssj0063919 |
Score | 2.3351111 |
Snippet | This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the... |
SourceID | nrf proquest crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 303 |
SubjectTerms | Academic achievement Difficulty Level Distance learning Educational objectives Educational Researchers Electronic Learning Error Correction Feedback (Response) Instructional Materials Learning Activities Learning Experience Learning Problems Learning Processes Literature Reviews Outcomes of Education Researchers Self Evaluation (Individuals) Student Improvement Student Motivation Student Reaction Students 교육학 |
Title | Exploring the impact of feedback timing on student performance in online testing |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3226826345 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003222123 |
Volume | 26 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Asia Pacific Education Review, 2025, 26(2), 87, pp.303-315 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JbtswECWa5NJL0RV1mxYE2puhQCap7egkdZ0uRoAkqG8ExSURXEiBI1_89RmK1OKmKNr6INv0Js88zULOGyL00aRE5pGdqEqkCBgzSZAZaQKVEhHrVElFLBv5-yKeX7Evy2jZL8U07JI6P5Lb3_JK_kerMAZ6tSzZf9Bs96UwAI9Bv3AEDcPxr3TcF9DZ8LEnPBpwSbmQK7tzfFPVXDZtZO2y_-2AKFBAqNg0yhjXtteG92FtS9q7Qox9yZ7v72qRst5ZSzj1O6J83lTbm01X3FM4FlDxsyh3xy5uejD-2DRuT1TDiQcS9QVSOxOPtqrarnV0xBhnRzPbNdb1cznSbgwML6SryXJofB1d3oOMDCwpDenAKVPH-Xxg70PPf4bAjQUQbgS2oywLtr13a1f059MLfn4649_OFl_30AGBrALM4sF0dny8aF03RGvNTjDd2XuWleNa_vobO5HMXrk2D9x5E6NcPkVPfHKBpw4pz9AjXT63-3J75b1A5x1iMCAGO8TgyuAWMdghBlcl9ojBA8TgosQOMdgj5iW6mn26PJkHfk-NQEKuXAdCSQjQCDGJlhNjJnGkhIryUEzCPMqMiRLFJhDXCBpLmkF8LkisFTxPM5GqRNBXaL-sSv0awZkp-JDJtWYZkzEVErLTmMYJ3GSa6hEat_Lht651Cu-bZFtpcpAjb6TJtyP0AUTIV7LgtuO5vb-u-GrNIa87gzclkGeEdIQOWxFzfyHecfg7MWTJlEVv_vzyW_S4B_Ih2q_XG_0OYso6f--RcA_nhXcM |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring+the+impact+of+feedback+timing+on+student+performance+in+online+testing&rft.jtitle=Asia+Pacific+education+review&rft.au=Ding%2C+Guozhu&rft.au=Li%2C+Mailin&rft.au=Li%2C+Shan&rft.au=Wu%2C+Hao&rft.date=2025-06-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=1598-1037&rft.eissn=1876-407X&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs12564-024-10024-z&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1598-1037&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1598-1037&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1598-1037&client=summon |