GaBoDS: The garching-bonn deep survey. VII. Cosmic shear analysis

Aims. We present a cosmic shear analysis and data validation of 15 square degree high-quality R-band data of the Garching-Bonn Deep Survey obtained with the Wide Field Imager of the MPG/ESO 2.2 m telescope. Methods. We measure the two-point shear correlation functions to calculate the aperture mass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAstronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) Vol. 468; no. 3; pp. 859 - 876
Main Authors HETTERSCHEIDT, M, SIMON, P, SCHIRMER, M, HILDEBRANDT, H, SCHRABBACK, T, ERBEN, T, SCHNEIDER, P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Les Ulis EDP Sciences 01.06.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims. We present a cosmic shear analysis and data validation of 15 square degree high-quality R-band data of the Garching-Bonn Deep Survey obtained with the Wide Field Imager of the MPG/ESO 2.2 m telescope. Methods. We measure the two-point shear correlation functions to calculate the aperture mass dispersion. Both statistics are used to perform the data quality control. Combining the cosmic shear signal with a photometric redshift distribution of a galaxy sub-sample obtained from two square degree of UBVRI-band observations of the Deep Public Survey we determine constraints for the matter density \Omega_{\rm m}, the mass power spectrum normalisation \sigma_8 and the dark energy density \Omega_\Lambda in the magnitude interval R\in [21.5,24.5]. In this magnitude interval the effective number density of source galaxies is n=12.5\,{\rm arcmin} less than or equal to and their mean redshift is \bar z=0.78. To estimate the posterior likelihood we employ the Monte Carlo Markov Chain method. Results. Using the aperture mass dispersion we obtain for the mass power spectrum normalisation \sigma_8=0.80\pm 0.10 (1\sigma statistical error) at a fixed matter density \Omega_{\rm m}=0.30 assuming a flat universe with negligible baryon content and marginalising over the Hubble parameter and the uncertainties in the fitted redshift distribution.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0004-6361
1432-0746
DOI:10.1051/0004-6361:20065885