Biomechanical Study of Asymmetric Flexor Tendon Repair Using a 6-Strand 4-0 Supramid Suture Versus a 4-Strand 2-0 Tenoflex Suture

Background: Multi-strand repair of flexor tendons are important for increased strength but this may cause ischemia during the intrinsic healing process. In this study, we aim to compare the strength of the 4-strand modified Asymmetric repair using 2-0 Tenoflex ® suture with the original description...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific Volume Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 792 - 800
Main Authors CHUANG, Xue Ling, LIM, Qian Ru REBECCA, WONG, Yoke Rung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd 01.10.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background: Multi-strand repair of flexor tendons are important for increased strength but this may cause ischemia during the intrinsic healing process. In this study, we aim to compare the strength of the 4-strand modified Asymmetric repair using 2-0 Tenoflex ® suture with the original description of the Asymmetric repair using a 6-strand 4-0 Supramid ® suture under cyclic loading in a porcine tendon model. We hypothesise that the number of core sutures through the repair site can be reduced with advanced suture material. Methods: Two groups consisting of 10 porcine tendons each were repaired using the Asymmetric repair technique. One group underwent the original description using a 6-strand 4-0 Supramid ® suture and the other group underwent a modified 4-strand technique using 2-0 Tenoflex ® suture. The repaired tendons were subjected to a two-stage cyclic loading test. Survival rate and gap formation at the repaired site were analysed. The failure mechanism of each repair was also analysed. Additionally, the cross-sectional area of each strand of core suture used was also calculated. Results: The 1st and 2nd stage survival rates were 90% and 30% for the 6-strand repair and 100% and 60% for the 4-strand repair respectively. The mean gap formation at the end of stage 2 was 1.79 mm (SD 1.57) for the 4-strand repair, which is comparable to that of the 6-strand repair (1.82 mm; [SD 1.20]). The total mean cross-sectional area of 2-0 Tenoflex ® and 4-0 Supramid ® suture strands were 0.078 and 0.086 mm 2 , respectively. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that despite having fewer core sutures, the 4-strand modified Asymmetric repair using 2-0 Tenoflex ® may be a better option as compared to the original 6-strand Asymmetric repair using 4-0 Supramid ® .
AbstractList Background: Multi-strand repair of flexor tendons are important for increased strength but this may cause ischemia during the intrinsic healing process. In this study, we aim to compare the strength of the 4-strand modified Asymmetric repair using 2-0 Tenoflex ® suture with the original description of the Asymmetric repair using a 6-strand 4-0 Supramid ® suture under cyclic loading in a porcine tendon model. We hypothesise that the number of core sutures through the repair site can be reduced with advanced suture material. Methods: Two groups consisting of 10 porcine tendons each were repaired using the Asymmetric repair technique. One group underwent the original description using a 6-strand 4-0 Supramid ® suture and the other group underwent a modified 4-strand technique using 2-0 Tenoflex ® suture. The repaired tendons were subjected to a two-stage cyclic loading test. Survival rate and gap formation at the repaired site were analysed. The failure mechanism of each repair was also analysed. Additionally, the cross-sectional area of each strand of core suture used was also calculated. Results: The 1st and 2nd stage survival rates were 90% and 30% for the 6-strand repair and 100% and 60% for the 4-strand repair respectively. The mean gap formation at the end of stage 2 was 1.79 mm (SD 1.57) for the 4-strand repair, which is comparable to that of the 6-strand repair (1.82 mm; [SD 1.20]). The total mean cross-sectional area of 2-0 Tenoflex ® and 4-0 Supramid ® suture strands were 0.078 and 0.086 mm 2 , respectively. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that despite having fewer core sutures, the 4-strand modified Asymmetric repair using 2-0 Tenoflex ® may be a better option as compared to the original 6-strand Asymmetric repair using 4-0 Supramid ® .
Background: Multi-strand repair of flexor tendons are important for increased strength but this may cause ischemia during the intrinsic healing process. In this study, we aim to compare the strength of the 4-strand modified Asymmetric repair using 2-0 Tenoflex® suture with the original description of the Asymmetric repair using a 6-strand 4-0 Supramid® suture under cyclic loading in a porcine tendon model. We hypothesise that the number of core sutures through the repair site can be reduced with advanced suture material.Methods: Two groups consisting of 10 porcine tendons each were repaired using the Asymmetric repair technique. One group underwent the original description using a 6-strand 4-0 Supramid® suture and the other group underwent a modified 4-strand technique using 2-0 Tenoflex® suture. The repaired tendons were subjected to a two-stage cyclic loading test. Survival rate and gap formation at the repaired site were analysed. The failure mechanism of each repair was also analysed. Additionally, the cross-sectional area of each strand of core suture used was also calculated.Results: The 1st and 2nd stage survival rates were 90% and 30% for the 6-strand repair and 100% and 60% for the 4-strand repair respectively. The mean gap formation at the end of stage 2 was 1.79 mm (SD 1.57) for the 4-strand repair, which is comparable to that of the 6-strand repair (1.82 mm; [SD 1.20]). The total mean cross-sectional area of 2-0 Tenoflex® and 4-0 Supramid® suture strands were 0.078 and 0.086 mm2, respectively.Conclusions: These results demonstrate that despite having fewer core sutures, the 4-strand modified Asymmetric repair using 2-0 Tenoflex® may be a better option as compared to the original 6-strand Asymmetric repair using 4-0 Supramid®.
Author WONG, Yoke Rung
LIM, Qian Ru REBECCA
CHUANG, Xue Ling
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Xue Ling
  surname: CHUANG
  fullname: CHUANG, Xue Ling
  organization: Department of Hand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Qian Ru REBECCA
  surname: LIM
  fullname: LIM, Qian Ru REBECCA
  organization: Department of Hand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yoke Rung
  surname: WONG
  fullname: WONG, Yoke Rung
  organization: Biomechanics Laboratory, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
BookMark eNpl0U1LAzEQBuAgFazaH-At4MXLajJJ9uNYi19QEGzrdYm7E92ym9RkF-zRf25K1YNeMsPLw0tgjsnIOouEnHF2ybmEqwVIkLlQCkAxlqn8gIx3UZKLVIx-d6WOyCSENWOMZ_GR6Zh8Xjeuw-pN26bSLV30Q72lztBp2HYd9r6p6G2LH87TJdraWfqEG914ugqNfaWapsmi99rWVCaMLoaN111Tx6UfPNJn9GEIUckfBVHFImdi57c6JYdGtwEn3_OErG5vlrP7ZP549zCbzpMKVN4nNTAGAlSFyhjBVZaC0ZKrAjJTQI3pi4gJMuBYVIWpC-SAMS9AqbowqTghF_vejXfvA4a-7JpQYdtqi24IJWTApAAhWaTnf-jaDd7G3-1UISDPxE7xvaq8C8GjKTe-6bTflpyVu7uU_-4ivgBctH9n
Cites_doi 10.1016/0266-7681_89_90160-5
10.1142/S2424835518500285
10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00080-9
10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.010
10.1177/1558944716685829
10.2106/00004623-200411000-00019
10.1177/1753193411415936
10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.014
10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0214
10.1016/j.otsr.2014.05.009
10.5435/00124635-199501000-00006
10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.008
10.1177/1753193418758828
10.1142/S2424835519500371
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.03.012
10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.12.005
10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80189-3
10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.003
10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.03.011
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022. Asian-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022. Asian-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1142/S2424835522500758
DatabaseName CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2424-8363
1793-6535
EndPage 800
ExternalDocumentID 10_1142_S2424835522500758
GroupedDBID 0R~
53G
AAYXX
ABDBF
ADSJI
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EOJEC
EPL
ESX
O9-
OBODZ
RWJ
SV3
TUS
---
36B
4.4
CS3
F5P
HZ~
P71
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d2002325ce5ff315762fa415927f92de6b362fe021e9c9fd9e12e2de9255d9f63
ISSN 2424-8355
IngestDate Fri Jun 28 11:52:47 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 08:10:34 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 00:38:36 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c258t-d2002325ce5ff315762fa415927f92de6b362fe021e9c9fd9e12e2de9255d9f63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 2729328730
PQPubID 2049890
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2720432340
proquest_journals_2729328730
crossref_primary_10_1142_S2424835522500758
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-10-00
20221001
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2022
  text: 20221001
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Singapore
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Singapore
PublicationTitle The Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific Volume
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd
References S2424835522500758BIB013
S2424835522500758BIB003
S2424835522500758BIB014
S2424835522500758BIB011
S2424835522500758BIB001
S2424835522500758BIB012
S2424835522500758BIB020
Tang JB (S2424835522500758BIB002) 1999; 18
S2424835522500758BIB010
S2424835522500758BIB008
S2424835522500758BIB019
S2424835522500758BIB009
S2424835522500758BIB006
S2424835522500758BIB017
S2424835522500758BIB007
S2424835522500758BIB018
S2424835522500758BIB004
S2424835522500758BIB015
S2424835522500758BIB005
S2424835522500758BIB016
References_xml – ident: S2424835522500758BIB007
  doi: 10.1016/0266-7681_89_90160-5
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB009
  doi: 10.1142/S2424835518500285
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB015
  doi: 10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00080-9
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB018
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.010
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB005
  doi: 10.1177/1558944716685829
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB016
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00019
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB012
  doi: 10.1177/1753193411415936
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB014
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.014
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB010
  doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0214
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB011
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.05.009
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB003
  doi: 10.5435/00124635-199501000-00006
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB019
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.008
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB006
  doi: 10.1177/1753193418758828
– volume: 18
  start-page: 254
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  ident: S2424835522500758BIB002
  publication-title: Chir Main
  contributor:
    fullname: Tang JB
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB008
  doi: 10.1142/S2424835519500371
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB013
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.03.012
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB017
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.12.005
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB001
  doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80189-3
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB020
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.003
– ident: S2424835522500758BIB004
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.03.011
SSID ssj0001700046
ssj0014749
Score 2.240485
Snippet Background: Multi-strand repair of flexor tendons are important for increased strength but this may cause ischemia during the intrinsic healing process. In...
SourceID proquest
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
StartPage 792
SubjectTerms Ischemia
Survival
Sutures
Tendons
Title Biomechanical Study of Asymmetric Flexor Tendon Repair Using a 6-Strand 4-0 Supramid Suture Versus a 4-Strand 2-0 Tenoflex Suture
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2729328730/abstract/
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2720432340
Volume 27
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fi9NAEF7q3YsvoqhYPWUFnwzRNr_z2OqVQ84TbQr1KWySXTmkydE2oL754P_tN9ndpuXu4fQllGS6hJ2PmW8mM7OMvQJo4BhiOjRDFW4QFolbVJTESUsBQk5D9KlR-ONFdLYIPizD5WDwZ69qqd0Wb8pfN_aV_I9WcQ96pS7Zf9DsblHcwG_oF1doGNdb6XhKvfPUutvt9NzOh55sfq5WdFJW6UAtP5q1k0k6tIPYtrhcO7pMQDiRS7Np68qhsb3z9motVpegn92UEYcSae0GUoGV8iCFhRqFNY3UPrUlwO3NodAZed10jTcCCl1TAOhoi9gXFrQmZ71sJeUIvu2KhPRJz5_JBn1pLRJ2bsQUE39tvks8Nn8zCQzEvrYUDv6nM3TUoeImvjF0xirriQEGfeGeiY312XnWW3dzTm9wBAENlp3T0uCYIJkhkaOk93r2S__Fp3y2OD_Ps9Nldocde3EaIoY_nkzfT2d9si7uumzNV3Gs_fbayoe85tCtd1wlu8_umSCDTzRiHrCBrB-y3wdo4R1aeKN4jxau0cI1WrhGC-_QwgW3aOFAC7do4RoHXKMFUhYtHGjhFi1G6hFbzE6zd2euOYDDLb0w2boVVfD4XljKUCl_jNDUUwKML_VilXqVjArQHyVBE2VapqpK5diTuJ8iTq1SFfmP2VHd1PIJ43EpqlKUAoRYBtE4EUFajSIVhFh-5Ct_yF7b7cuv9JyVXPfMe_m1vR6yE7vBuQH2JvcQJvqI__3RkL3cPYaxpC9gopZN28nQCEo_GD29hcwzdrfH6wk72q5b-RwUdFu8MAD5C_lFho8
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27957,27958
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical+Study+of+Asymmetric+Flexor+Tendon+Repair+Using+a+6-Strand+4-0+Supramid+Suture+Versus+a+4-Strand+2-0+Tenoflex+Suture&rft.jtitle=The+journal+of+hand+surgery+Asian-Pacific+volume&rft.au=Chuang%2C+Xue+Ling&rft.au=Lim%2C+Qian+Ru+Rebecca&rft.au=Wong%2C+Yoke+Rung&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.eissn=2424-8363&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1142%2FS2424835522500758&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2424-8355&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2424-8355&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2424-8355&client=summon