The effect of uncertainty in humidity and model parameters on the prediction of contrail energy forcing

• Published in: Environmental Research Communications Vol. 6; no. 9; pp. 95015 - 95029
• Main Authors: Platt, John C, Shapiro, Marc L, Engberg, Zebediah, McCloskey, Kevin, Geraedts, Scott, Sankar, Tharun, Stettler, Marc E J, Teoh, Roger, Schumann, Ulrich, Rohs, Susanne, Brand, Erica, Van Arsdale, Christopher
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bristol IOP Publishing 01.09.2024
• Subjects: Avoidance; climate forcing; Climate prediction; Contrails; Energy; Energy distribution; Flight; Humidity; Monte Carlo simulation; Parameter estimation; Parameter identification; Parameter uncertainty; Performance prediction; Segments; Weather; Weather forecasting; weather prediction
• DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad6ee5
• ISSN: 2515-7620

Abstract Previous work has shown that while the net effect of aircraft condensation trails (contrails) on the climate is warming, the exact magnitude of the energy forcing per meter of contrail remains uncertain. In this paper, we explore the skill of a Lagrangian contrail model (CoCiP) in identifying flight segments with high contrail energy forcing. We find that skill is greater than climatological predictions alone, even accounting for uncertainty in weather fields and model parameters. We estimate the uncertainty due to humidity by using the ensemble ERA5 weather reanalysis from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) as Monte Carlo inputs to CoCiP. We unbias and correct under-dispersion on the ERA5 humidity data by forcing a match to the distribution of in situ humidity measurements taken at cruising altitude. We take CoCiP energy forcing estimates calculated using one of the ensemble members as a proxy for ground truth, and report the skill of CoCiP in identifying segments with large positive proxy energy forcing. We further estimate the uncertainty due to model parameters in CoCiP by performing Monte Carlo simulations with CoCiP model parameters drawn from uncertainty distributions consistent with the literature. When CoCiP outputs are averaged over seasons to form climatological predictions, the skill in predicting the proxy is 44%, while the skill of per-flight CoCiP outputs is 84%. If these results carry over to the true (unknown) contrail EF, they indicate that per-flight energy forcing predictions can reduce the number of potential contrail avoidance route adjustments by 2x, hence reducing both the cost and fuel impact of contrail avoidance.