Investigating the impact of data monitoring committee recommendations on the probability of trial success

Determining the probability of success of a clinical trial using a prior distribution on the treatment effect can significantly enhance decision-making by the sponsor. In a group sequential design, the probability of success calculated at the design stage can be updated to incorporate the informatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics pp. 1 - 17
Main Authors Rondano, Luca, Saint-Hilary, Gaëlle, Gasparini, Mauro, Vezzoli, Stefano
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 08.12.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1054-3406
1520-5711
1520-5711
DOI10.1080/10543406.2024.2430308

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Determining the probability of success of a clinical trial using a prior distribution on the treatment effect can significantly enhance decision-making by the sponsor. In a group sequential design, the probability of success calculated at the design stage can be updated to incorporate the information disclosed by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), usually consisting in a simple statement that advises to continue or to stop the trial, either for efficacy or futility, following pre-specified rules defined in the protocol. We define the "probability of success post interim" as the probability of success conditioned on the assumption that the DMC recommends continuing the trial after an interim analysis. A good assessment of this probability helps mitigate the tendency of the study team to express excessive optimism or unwarranted pessimism regarding the trial's ultimate outcome after the DMC recommendation. We explore the relationship between this "probability of success post interim" and the initial probability of success, and we provide an in-depth investigation of how interim boundaries impact these probabilities. This analysis offers valuable insights that can guide the selection of boundaries for both efficacy and futility interim analyses, leading to more informed clinical trial designs.
AbstractList Determining the probability of success of a clinical trial using a prior distribution on the treatment effect can significantly enhance decision-making by the sponsor. In a group sequential design, the probability of success calculated at the design stage can be updated to incorporate the information disclosed by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), usually consisting in a simple statement that advises to continue or to stop the trial, either for efficacy or futility, following pre-specified rules defined in the protocol. We define the "probability of success post interim" as the probability of success conditioned on the assumption that the DMC recommends continuing the trial after an interim analysis. A good assessment of this probability helps mitigate the tendency of the study team to express excessive optimism or unwarranted pessimism regarding the trial's ultimate outcome after the DMC recommendation. We explore the relationship between this "probability of success post interim" and the initial probability of success, and we provide an in-depth investigation of how interim boundaries impact these probabilities. This analysis offers valuable insights that can guide the selection of boundaries for both efficacy and futility interim analyses, leading to more informed clinical trial designs.Determining the probability of success of a clinical trial using a prior distribution on the treatment effect can significantly enhance decision-making by the sponsor. In a group sequential design, the probability of success calculated at the design stage can be updated to incorporate the information disclosed by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), usually consisting in a simple statement that advises to continue or to stop the trial, either for efficacy or futility, following pre-specified rules defined in the protocol. We define the "probability of success post interim" as the probability of success conditioned on the assumption that the DMC recommends continuing the trial after an interim analysis. A good assessment of this probability helps mitigate the tendency of the study team to express excessive optimism or unwarranted pessimism regarding the trial's ultimate outcome after the DMC recommendation. We explore the relationship between this "probability of success post interim" and the initial probability of success, and we provide an in-depth investigation of how interim boundaries impact these probabilities. This analysis offers valuable insights that can guide the selection of boundaries for both efficacy and futility interim analyses, leading to more informed clinical trial designs.
Determining the probability of success of a clinical trial using a prior distribution on the treatment effect can significantly enhance decision-making by the sponsor. In a group sequential design, the probability of success calculated at the design stage can be updated to incorporate the information disclosed by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), usually consisting in a simple statement that advises to continue or to stop the trial, either for efficacy or futility, following pre-specified rules defined in the protocol. We define the "probability of success post interim" as the probability of success conditioned on the assumption that the DMC recommends continuing the trial after an interim analysis. A good assessment of this probability helps mitigate the tendency of the study team to express excessive optimism or unwarranted pessimism regarding the trial's ultimate outcome after the DMC recommendation. We explore the relationship between this "probability of success post interim" and the initial probability of success, and we provide an in-depth investigation of how interim boundaries impact these probabilities. This analysis offers valuable insights that can guide the selection of boundaries for both efficacy and futility interim analyses, leading to more informed clinical trial designs.
Author Gasparini, Mauro
Saint-Hilary, Gaëlle
Rondano, Luca
Vezzoli, Stefano
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Luca
  surname: Rondano
  fullname: Rondano, Luca
  organization: Politecnico di Torino, DISMA, Turin, Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Gaëlle
  surname: Saint-Hilary
  fullname: Saint-Hilary, Gaëlle
  organization: Politecnico di Torino, DISMA, Turin, Italy, Saryga, Statistical Methodology, Tournus, France
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mauro
  surname: Gasparini
  fullname: Gasparini, Mauro
  organization: Politecnico di Torino, DISMA, Turin, Italy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Stefano
  surname: Vezzoli
  fullname: Vezzoli, Stefano
  organization: Chiesi Farmaceutici, Statistical Methodology, Parma, Italy
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39648488$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kctOwzAQRS1URB_wCaAs2aT4mThLVPGoVIkNrK2J7RSjxC6xi9S_J6Etq7nSnDuamTtHEx-8ReiW4CXBEj8QLDjjuFhSTPmScoYZlhdoRgTFuSgJmQx6YPIRmqJ5jF8YE1FKfoWmrCq45FLOkFv7HxuT20JyfpulT5u5bgc6ZaHJDCTIuuBdCv3Y1aHrXErWZr0dtfUD4YKPWfB_1l0faqhd69Jh9KfeQZvFvdY2xmt02UAb7c2pLtDH89P76jXfvL2sV4-bXFNRppzSpoQC86Y2jBY1BVpDVVIqtTAgOamoIVBZg3UDVWVAW0mkKasS11BqztgC3R_nDst874fbVOeitm0L3oZ9VIzwQkhaETmgdyd0X3fWqF3vOugP6vyeARBHQPchxt42_wjBaoxBnWNQYwzqFAP7BYvPe8Q
Cites_doi 10.1002/pst.2346
10.1186/s13063-018-2886-y
10.1002/pst.1764
10.1080/10543406.2014.972508
10.2427/8760
10.1080/00031305.2021.1901782
10.1002/pst.175
10.1007/978-3-319-46076-5
10.1002/pst.1856
10.1201/9781003218531
10.1002/sim.4780131308
10.1002/pst.2128
10.1080/10543406.2013.813527
10.1002/pst.232
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/10543406.2024.2430308
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Statistics
Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 1520-5711
EndPage 17
ExternalDocumentID 39648488
10_1080_10543406_2024_2430308
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.7F
.QJ
0BK
0R~
29K
30N
36B
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
8VB
AAENE
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAJMT
AALDU
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAYXX
ABCCY
ABDBF
ABFIM
ABHAV
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPAQ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACTIO
ADCVX
ADGTB
ADXPE
ADYSH
AEISY
AENEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AFKVX
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AHDZW
AIJEM
AIYEW
AJWEG
AKBVH
AKOOK
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AMPGV
AQRUH
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BLEHA
CCCUG
CE4
CITATION
CS3
D-I
DGEBU
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EBR
EBS
EBU
EHE
EMB
EST
ESX
E~A
E~B
F5P
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HZ~
H~P
IPNFZ
J.P
KYCEM
LJTGL
M4Z
NA5
NY~
O9-
P2P
PQQKQ
QWB
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RTWRZ
S-T
SNACF
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TEJ
TFL
TFT
TFW
TTHFI
TUROJ
TWF
UT5
UU3
ZGOLN
ZL0
~S~
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-22f7a604fbd326b2a2ba97228c5da84192d1a9ed0cfa99dace818d7970ba7c433
ISSN 1054-3406
1520-5711
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 17:31:01 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:59:09 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Assurance
interim analysis
hybrid Bayesian/frequentist design
group sequential design
probability of success
futility
efficacy
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c257t-22f7a604fbd326b2a2ba97228c5da84192d1a9ed0cfa99dace818d7970ba7c433
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 39648488
PQID 3146582918
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 17
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3146582918
pubmed_primary_39648488
crossref_primary_10_1080_10543406_2024_2430308
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-12-08
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-12-08
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-12-08
  day: 08
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics
PublicationTitleAlternate J Biopharm Stat
PublicationYear 2024
References Chuang-Stein C. (e_1_3_3_4_1) 2017
e_1_3_3_7_1
e_1_3_3_6_1
e_1_3_3_9_1
e_1_3_3_14_1
Grieve A. P. (e_1_3_3_8_1) 2022
e_1_3_3_13_1
e_1_3_3_15_1
e_1_3_3_3_1
e_1_3_3_10_1
e_1_3_3_2_1
e_1_3_3_5_1
e_1_3_3_12_1
e_1_3_3_11_1
References_xml – ident: e_1_3_3_9_1
  doi: 10.1002/pst.2346
– ident: e_1_3_3_12_1
  doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2886-y
– ident: e_1_3_3_13_1
  doi: 10.1002/pst.1764
– ident: e_1_3_3_14_1
  doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.972508
– ident: e_1_3_3_7_1
  doi: 10.2427/8760
– ident: e_1_3_3_10_1
  doi: 10.1080/00031305.2021.1901782
– ident: e_1_3_3_11_1
  doi: 10.1002/pst.175
– volume-title: Quantitative decisions in drug development
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_3_3_4_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46076-5
– ident: e_1_3_3_5_1
  doi: 10.1002/pst.1856
– volume-title: Hybrid Frequentist/bayesian power and bayesian power in planning clinical trials
  year: 2022
  ident: e_1_3_3_8_1
  doi: 10.1201/9781003218531
– ident: e_1_3_3_6_1
  doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131308
– ident: e_1_3_3_15_1
  doi: 10.1002/pst.2128
– ident: e_1_3_3_2_1
  doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.813527
– ident: e_1_3_3_3_1
  doi: 10.1002/pst.232
SSID ssj0015784
Score 2.3585298
Snippet Determining the probability of success of a clinical trial using a prior distribution on the treatment effect can significantly enhance decision-making by the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1
Title Investigating the impact of data monitoring committee recommendations on the probability of trial success
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39648488
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3146582918
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF5BeukFQXmVlxYJ9ZI6-G3vsUBLhNJSKQlEXKxd766w1NpVYh-aX8_sw3aCUqlwsaxN1hv5-zKe8ew3g9AH4efEFTF33IB7Ks0YOIRBzCNoKkN43kkvVQLn84t4PA-_LaLFRsZUqUtqNsrXO3Ul_4MqjAGuSiX7D8h2F4UBOAd84QgIw_FeGG8UybCip170qLZ-Dq_1P3ZphbXXRV0L1SZFnQvbTalNF6idWswU7dZJd9POY9Xohop3uLCsqG5-b70TV_okU_q5z-TAQrq_93DS9PuCprQoa2dcQGBttDJUp-w_XV11TPtKV6pFou45NTynzbJqP_kh1uvK6LqntZBw-c2XF74ukehu2VuIXqPE2luxY8zYVW-ntTfbI8FDDAPwS0ZqgZEfBqoET_94a1P6F9-zs_lkks1OF7OHaM-HsMIfoL2T8ZdfP7u8E9gvvQ-h_Qmt5it1P-5cZtubuSNE0a7K7DF6ZAHCJ4YwT9ADUR6go0uD1O0xnvWau9UxPsKXffny2wO0P-0wfIqKLYph4Ak2FMOVxIpiuKcY7iiG_6IYrko9dYNiar6mGLYUe4bmZ6ezz2PHdudwcjDzteP7MqGxG0rGIQRgPvUZJXBP0zziNFWbC7hHieBuLikhHJgIviFPSOIymuRhEDxHg7IqxUuEWR7F3JMBk1IF0B6JZJIKjwdKWe7m5BCN2ruc3ZgiLJlna9u2sGQKlszCcojet1hkYC5VDoyWompWWQCeQZT6xIPvvDAgdZcMSAzmKU1f3WP2a7Tf8_kNGtTLRrwF97Rm7yyn_gA9HpM1
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating+the+impact+of+data+monitoring+committee+recommendations+on+the+probability+of+trial+success&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+biopharmaceutical+statistics&rft.au=Rondano%2C+Luca&rft.au=Saint-Hilary%2C+Ga%C3%ABlle&rft.au=Gasparini%2C+Mauro&rft.au=Vezzoli%2C+Stefano&rft.date=2024-12-08&rft.issn=1520-5711&rft.eissn=1520-5711&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F10543406.2024.2430308&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1054-3406&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1054-3406&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1054-3406&client=summon