Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomised study

This is a prospective randomised study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Sel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe bone & joint journal Vol. 95-B; no. 3; pp. 401 - 406
Main Authors Rebolledo, B J, Gladnick, B P, Unnanuntana, A, Nguyen, J T, Kepler, C K, Lane, J M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.03.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This is a prospective randomised study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively. The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre- and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence of cement leakage was recorded for each group. Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p < 0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.09). A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
AbstractList This is a prospective randomised study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively. The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre- and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence of cement leakage was recorded for each group. Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p < 0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.09). A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:401–6.
This is a prospective randomised study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively. The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre- and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence of cement leakage was recorded for each group. Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p < 0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.09). A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
This is a prospective randomised study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively. The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre- and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence of cement leakage was recorded for each group. Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p &lt; 0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.09). A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Author Nguyen, J T
Lane, J M
Rebolledo, B J
Unnanuntana, A
Kepler, C K
Gladnick, B P
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: B J
  surname: Rebolledo
  fullname: Rebolledo, B J
  email: rebolledob@hss.edu
  organization: Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, New York 10021, USA. rebolledob@hss.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: B P
  surname: Gladnick
  fullname: Gladnick, B P
– sequence: 3
  givenname: A
  surname: Unnanuntana
  fullname: Unnanuntana, A
– sequence: 4
  givenname: J T
  surname: Nguyen
  fullname: Nguyen, J T
– sequence: 5
  givenname: C K
  surname: Kepler
  fullname: Kepler, C K
– sequence: 6
  givenname: J M
  surname: Lane
  fullname: Lane, J M
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23450028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkctOHDEQRS0ECo_MH6DIy2x64ic9zi4ZJSESEhuQ2Fl-lDUN3e2O7R5p_oZPxR0gijflkm7dW_Y5R8djHAGhS0rWlBP2hXBCmytGHtZKfudrpjZUHaEzRoRqhCCb4_c7V-IUrXJ-JPVsCKWCfkCnjAtJCNucoedtHCaTuhxHHAOex24C37m5Nwmb0WP7X29N38eqezpMuzj1JpcDDjHhsgNcEpgywFgWl5gLxCmmWDqH95AK2GR67GpUgpy76hGScWWu3Vds8JRinsCVbg841dQ4dBk8zmX2h4_oJJg-w-qtXqD7nz_uttfNze2v39tvN41j8qo0yrW0Na5tpVJOWkG9JQ6kYm27FOKtdfXNUnkbqGT1X1ggPHhvZAAnPL9An1996zJ_ZshF1yUc9L0ZIc5ZU04F55xRXqXiVerq3jlB0FPqBpMOmhK94NELHr3g0Qse_RdPHfv0ljDbAfy_oXcY_AXc-ZJo
Cites_doi 10.1097/00000542-197810000-00003
10.3171/foc.2005.18.3.4
10.1097/01.brs.0000150831.46856.87
10.1097/BSD.0b013e318213c113
10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f99d70
10.1007/s00198-009-0872-7
10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.021
10.1148/radiol.2253011413
10.1359/JBMR.041203
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115204
10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.013
10.1007/s00198-009-1096-6
10.1097/00007632-200107150-00026
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6
10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006
10.1016/j.ocl.2007.03.010
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116756
10.1097/01.brs.0000232803.71640.ba
10.1001/jama.285.6.785
10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.16
10.1359/jbmr.061113
10.5435/00124635-201103000-00007
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815d6997
10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00350-3
10.1002/art.1780360603
10.1002/jbmr.364
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.29819
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2049-4408
EndPage 406
ExternalDocumentID 10_1302_0301_620X_95B3_29819
23450028
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID .XZ
08P
0R~
3EH
4.4
53G
5RS
5VS
AAEJM
AAQQT
AAWTL
ABSQV
ACRZS
ADDZX
AENEX
AFFNX
AFHIN
AFOSN
AJJEV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
H13
HZ~
I4R
INIJC
KQ8
M5~
NPM
O9-
OB4
ODZKP
OFXIZ
OHH
OK1
OVD
OVIDX
PONUX
PQQKQ
R0Z
RHF
SJN
TEORI
TJB
W1P
ZCG
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9c717ac77599c5b41db0ce59277ce590dbbc45059dbf1524392f03fdda5fec4d3
ISSN 2049-4394
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 20:50:30 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 03:33:26 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 27 13:44:53 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c256t-9c717ac77599c5b41db0ce59277ce590dbbc45059dbf1524392f03fdda5fec4d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 23450028
PQID 1314333213
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1314333213
crossref_primary_10_1302_0301_620X_95B3_29819
pubmed_primary_23450028
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-Mar
2013-03-00
20130301
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-Mar
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle The bone & joint journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Bone Joint J
PublicationYear 2013
References r3
r4
r5
Ledlie JT (r30) 2003; 98
r6
r7
r8
r9
Old JL (r2) 2004; 69
r10
r31
r12
r11
r13
r16
r15
r18
r17
r19
Fairbank JC (r14) 1980; 66
r21
r20
r23
r22
r25
r24
r27
r26
r29
r28
r1
References_xml – ident: r16
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-197810000-00003
– ident: r31
  doi: 10.3171/foc.2005.18.3.4
– ident: r13
  doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150831.46856.87
– ident: r21
  doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318213c113
– ident: r20
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004
– ident: r26
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f99d70
– ident: r27
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0872-7
– ident: r28
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.021
– ident: r15
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2253011413
– ident: r29
  doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041203
– ident: r4
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115204
– volume: 98
  start-page: 36
  year: 2003
  ident: r30
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
  contributor:
    fullname: Ledlie JT
– ident: r25
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.013
– ident: r10
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1096-6
– ident: r7
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00026
– ident: r9
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6
– ident: r19
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006
– ident: r11
  doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.03.010
– volume: 66
  start-page: 271
  year: 1980
  ident: r14
  publication-title: Physiotherapy
  contributor:
    fullname: Fairbank JC
– ident: r23
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116756
– ident: r24
  doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232803.71640.ba
– ident: r1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.285.6.785
– ident: r3
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.16
– volume: 69
  start-page: 111
  year: 2004
  ident: r2
  publication-title: Am Fam Physician
  contributor:
    fullname: Old JL
– ident: r5
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113
– ident: r12
  doi: 10.5435/00124635-201103000-00007
– ident: r17
  doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815d6997
– ident: r18
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
– ident: r6
  doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00350-3
– ident: r22
  doi: 10.1002/art.1780360603
– ident: r8
  doi: 10.1002/jbmr.364
SSID ssj0000801141
Score 2.3351576
Snippet This is a prospective randomised study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 401
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fractures, Compression - surgery
Humans
Kyphoplasty - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery
Pain Measurement
Prospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Self Report
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Title Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomised study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23450028
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1314333213
Volume 95-B
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LjtMwFLXKsGGDQLzKS0ZiV6UkdtzE7OgIGIEYCWkqdRf5kcDMlKQamsXwNfwA_8i9jpO4YkYCNmmbNI6Sc-Sc-zQhL60yokykjESZplHKWR4pZbC9drzQmVaJLtGh_-l4cbRKP6zFejL5FWQttTs9Nz-urCv5H1RhH-CKVbL_gOwwKOyA74AvbAFh2P4VxofhIoKztj7dYtjFJZaiP1wHvzUG2OF_55fbr80WJLPP1ETdOSabwyhY9NGAKG-wkysu1oyR5Y1LPe9SZutZhZVV7UWXTacwxauv15zBm882QB2QsWPj2rORkbpxonYxO2tO4XrhXWLUBya_zaa0zn27HCNW7zfK1n7J9-VYkbaqa1W3NchbteeVPf7SXvqaE58D7t0auMREn9c1L930x8B2iXA97HCuliJaBqzkwdSbdmf_8UrgrsUsWn7RgsXruRRLPmcy72bqgCXbb44mjANPY1-xvt-Kuz90g9xkmRRo63_8nA8uPRDfYF0mvkATrvvqqqti-2k_zr4WusbAcULn5A657S0U-qaj210yKet75OdINdpUNKQaBchpQDXqqUYDqlGgGgWq0YFqOEpINTpQjQZUowPVXlNFA6LRkWjUEe0-Wb17e3J4FPnFPSIDKnsXSZMlGcwKmZDSCJ0mVsdYEsiyDD9iq7WBpySk1RVoTNDNrIp5Za0SVWlSyx-Qgxo4-4hQnhtlwJSINehhY1VeppXO4jw1XEmh8ymJ-sdcbLseLkUXyGUFIlQgQgUiVDiEpuRFj0UBN4IRNFWXTfsdTgHzgnOW8Cl52IE0jNiD-vjaI0_IrZHpT8nB7qItn4Gk3ennjki_AcJip4c
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27957,27958
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+unipedicular+and+bipedicular+balloon+kyphoplasty+for+the+treatment+of+osteoporotic+vertebral+compression+fractures%3A+a+prospective+randomised+study&rft.jtitle=The+bone+%26+joint+journal&rft.au=Rebolledo%2C+B+J&rft.au=Gladnick%2C+B+P&rft.au=Unnanuntana%2C+A&rft.au=Nguyen%2C+J+T&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft.volume=95-B&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302%2F0301-620X.95B3.29819&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23450028&rft.externalDocID=23450028
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2049-4394&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2049-4394&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2049-4394&client=summon