Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 38; no. 9; pp. 5259 - 5265
• Main Authors: Chang, Michelle, Weiss, Barry, Worrell, Stephanie, Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, Ghaderi, Iman
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.09.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: 2024 SAGES Oral; Abdominal Surgery; Comprehension; Gastroenterology; Gynecology; Health education; Health Literacy; Hepatology; Humans; Internet; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Multimedia; Patient education; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Proctology; Readability; Surgery; Foregut surgery; Health literacy; Patient education; Readability
• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218

Introduction Health literacy is the ability of individuals to use basic health information and services to make well-informed decisions. Low health literacy among surgical patients has been associated with nonadherence to preoperative and/or discharge instructions as well as poor comprehension of surgery. It likely poses as a barrier to patients considering foregut surgery which requires an understanding of different treatment options and specific diet instructions. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for foregut surgery. Methods Using Google, the terms “anti-reflux surgery, “GERD surgery,” and “foregut surgery” were searched and a total of 30 webpages from universities and national organizations were selected. The readability of the text was assessed with seven instruments: Flesch Reading Ease formula (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Coleman Liau Index (CL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF). Mean readability scores were calculated with standard deviations. We performed a qualitative analysis gathering characteristics such as, type of information (preoperative or postoperative), organization, use of multimedia, inclusion of a version in another language. Results The overall average readability of the top PEM for foregut surgery was 12th grade. There was only one resource at the recommended sixth grade reading level. Nearly half of PEM included some form of multimedia. Conclusions The American Medical Association and National Institute of Health have recommended that PEMs to be written at the 5th–6th grade level. The majority of online PEM for foregut surgery is above the recommended reading level. This may be a barrier for patients seeking foregut surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential gaps in understanding of their patients to help them make informed decisions and improve overall health outcomes.