Assessing Team Performance: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using Interprofessional in situ Simulation
Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to comprehensively measure this impact is underexplored. In this study we aimed to 1) evaluate ED team performance using current team-based assessme...
Saved in:
Published in | The western journal of emergency medicine Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 557 - 564 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
01.07.2024
eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to comprehensively measure this impact is underexplored. In this study we aimed to 1) evaluate ED team performance using current team-based assessment tools during an interprofessional in situ simulation and 2) identify characteristics of effective ED teams.
This mixed-methods study employed case study methodology based on a constructivist paradigm. Sixty-three eligible nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and postgraduate year 2-4 emergency medicine residents at a tertiary academic ED participated in a 10-minute in situ simulation of a critically ill patient. Participants self-rated performance using the
(TPOT) 2.0 and completed a brief demographic form. Two raters independently reviewed simulation videos and rated performance using the TPOT 2.0,
(TEAM), and
(Ottawa GRS). Following simulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with in situ participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Eighteen team-based simulations took place between January-April 2021. Raters' scores were on the upper end of the tools for the TPOT 2.0 (R1 4.90, SD 0.17; R2 4.53, SD 0.27, IRR [inter-rater reliability] 0.47), TEAM (R1 3.89, SD 0.19; R2 3.58, SD 0.39, IRR 0.73), and Ottawa GRS (R1 6.6, SD 0.56; R2 6.2, SD 0.54, IRR 0.68). We identified six themes from our interview data: team member entrustment; interdependent energy; leadership tone; optimal communication; strategic staffing; and simulation empowering team performance.
Current team performance assessment tools insufficiently discriminate among high performing teams in the ED. Emergency department-specific assessments that capture features of entrustability, interdependent energy, and leadership tone may offer a more comprehensive way to assess an individual's contribution to a team's performance. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to comprehensively measure this impact is underexplored. In this study we aimed to 1) evaluate ED team performance using current team-based assessment tools during an interprofessional in situ simulation and 2) identify characteristics of effective ED teams.IntroductionOptimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to comprehensively measure this impact is underexplored. In this study we aimed to 1) evaluate ED team performance using current team-based assessment tools during an interprofessional in situ simulation and 2) identify characteristics of effective ED teams.This mixed-methods study employed case study methodology based on a constructivist paradigm. Sixty-three eligible nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and postgraduate year 2-4 emergency medicine residents at a tertiary academic ED participated in a 10-minute in situ simulation of a critically ill patient. Participants self-rated performance using the Team Performance Observation Tool (TPOT) 2.0 and completed a brief demographic form. Two raters independently reviewed simulation videos and rated performance using the TPOT 2.0, Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), and Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). Following simulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with in situ participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.MethodsThis mixed-methods study employed case study methodology based on a constructivist paradigm. Sixty-three eligible nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and postgraduate year 2-4 emergency medicine residents at a tertiary academic ED participated in a 10-minute in situ simulation of a critically ill patient. Participants self-rated performance using the Team Performance Observation Tool (TPOT) 2.0 and completed a brief demographic form. Two raters independently reviewed simulation videos and rated performance using the TPOT 2.0, Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), and Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). Following simulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with in situ participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.Eighteen team-based simulations took place between January-April 2021. Raters' scores were on the upper end of the tools for the TPOT 2.0 (R1 4.90, SD 0.17; R2 4.53, SD 0.27, IRR [inter-rater reliability] 0.47), TEAM (R1 3.89, SD 0.19; R2 3.58, SD 0.39, IRR 0.73), and Ottawa GRS (R1 6.6, SD 0.56; R2 6.2, SD 0.54, IRR 0.68). We identified six themes from our interview data: team member entrustment; interdependent energy; leadership tone; optimal communication; strategic staffing; and simulation empowering team performance.ResultsEighteen team-based simulations took place between January-April 2021. Raters' scores were on the upper end of the tools for the TPOT 2.0 (R1 4.90, SD 0.17; R2 4.53, SD 0.27, IRR [inter-rater reliability] 0.47), TEAM (R1 3.89, SD 0.19; R2 3.58, SD 0.39, IRR 0.73), and Ottawa GRS (R1 6.6, SD 0.56; R2 6.2, SD 0.54, IRR 0.68). We identified six themes from our interview data: team member entrustment; interdependent energy; leadership tone; optimal communication; strategic staffing; and simulation empowering team performance.Current team performance assessment tools insufficiently discriminate among high performing teams in the ED. Emergency department-specific assessments that capture features of entrustability, interdependent energy, and leadership tone may offer a more comprehensive way to assess an individual's contribution to a team's performance.ConclusionCurrent team performance assessment tools insufficiently discriminate among high performing teams in the ED. Emergency department-specific assessments that capture features of entrustability, interdependent energy, and leadership tone may offer a more comprehensive way to assess an individual's contribution to a team's performance. Introduction: Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to comprehensively measure this impact is underexplored. In this study we aimed to 1) evaluate ED team performance using current team-based assessment tools during an interprofessional in situ simulation and 2) identify characteristics of effective ED teams. Methods: This mixed-methods study employed case study methodology based on a constructivist paradigm. Sixty-three eligible nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and postgraduate year 2–4 emergency medicine residents at a tertiary academic ED participated in a 10-minute in situ simulation of a critically ill patient. Participants self-rated performance using the Team Performance Observation Tool (TPOT) 2.0 and completed a brief demographic form. Two raters independently reviewed simulation videos and rated performance using the TPOT 2.0, Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), and Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). Following simulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with in situ participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Eighteen team-based simulations took place between January–April 2021. Raters’ scores were on the upper end of the tools for the TPOT 2.0 (R1 4.90, SD 0.17; R2 4.53, SD 0.27, IRR [inter-rater reliability] 0.47), TEAM (R1 3.89, SD 0.19; R2 3.58, SD 0.39, IRR 0.73), and Ottawa GRS (R1 6.6, SD 0.56; R2 6.2, SD 0.54, IRR 0.68). We identified six themes from our interview data: team member entrustment; interdependent energy; leadership tone; optimal communication; strategic staffing; and simulation empowering team performance. Conclusion: Current team performance assessment tools insufficiently discriminate among high performing teams in the ED. Emergency department-specific assessments that capture features of entrustability, interdependent energy, and leadership tone may offer a more comprehensive way to assess an individual’s contribution to a team’s performance. Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to comprehensively measure this impact is underexplored. In this study we aimed to 1) evaluate ED team performance using current team-based assessment tools during an interprofessional in situ simulation and 2) identify characteristics of effective ED teams. This mixed-methods study employed case study methodology based on a constructivist paradigm. Sixty-three eligible nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and postgraduate year 2-4 emergency medicine residents at a tertiary academic ED participated in a 10-minute in situ simulation of a critically ill patient. Participants self-rated performance using the (TPOT) 2.0 and completed a brief demographic form. Two raters independently reviewed simulation videos and rated performance using the TPOT 2.0, (TEAM), and (Ottawa GRS). Following simulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with in situ participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Eighteen team-based simulations took place between January-April 2021. Raters' scores were on the upper end of the tools for the TPOT 2.0 (R1 4.90, SD 0.17; R2 4.53, SD 0.27, IRR [inter-rater reliability] 0.47), TEAM (R1 3.89, SD 0.19; R2 3.58, SD 0.39, IRR 0.73), and Ottawa GRS (R1 6.6, SD 0.56; R2 6.2, SD 0.54, IRR 0.68). We identified six themes from our interview data: team member entrustment; interdependent energy; leadership tone; optimal communication; strategic staffing; and simulation empowering team performance. Current team performance assessment tools insufficiently discriminate among high performing teams in the ED. Emergency department-specific assessments that capture features of entrustability, interdependent energy, and leadership tone may offer a more comprehensive way to assess an individual's contribution to a team's performance. Introduction: Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to comprehensively measure this impact is underexplored. In this study we aimed to 1) evaluate ED team performance using current team-based assessment tools during an interprofessional in situ simulation and 2) identify characteristics of effective ED teams. Methods: This mixed-methods study employed case study methodology based on a constructivist paradigm. Sixty-three eligible nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and postgraduate year 2–4 emergency medicine residents at a tertiary academic ED participated in a 10-minute in situ simulation of a critically ill patient. Participants self-rated performance using the Team Performance Observation Tool (TPOT) 2.0 and completed a brief demographic form. Two raters independently reviewed simulation videos and rated performance using the TPOT 2.0, Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM), and Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). Following simulations, we conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with in situ participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Eighteen team-based simulations took place between January–April 2021. Raters’ scores were on the upper end of the tools for the TPOT 2.0 (R1 4.90, SD 0.17; R2 4.53, SD 0.27, IRR [inter-rater reliability] 0.47), TEAM (R1 3.89, SD 0.19; R2 3.58, SD 0.39, IRR 0.73), and Ottawa GRS (R1 6.6, SD 0.56; R2 6.2, SD 0.54, IRR 0.68). We identified six themes from our interview data: team member entrustment; interdependent energy; leadership tone; optimal communication; strategic staffing; and simulation empowering team performance. Conclusion: Current team performance assessment tools insufficiently discriminate among high performing teams in the ED. Emergency department-specific assessments that capture features of entrustability, interdependent energy, and leadership tone may offer a more comprehensive way to assess an individual’s contribution to a team’s performance. |
Author | Sebok-Syer, Stefanie S Rider, Ashley C Jones, Vivien Gisondi, Michael A Williams, Sarah R Schertzer, Kimberly Rebagliati, Daniel |
AuthorAffiliation | Albany Medical College, Albany, New York Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California – name: Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland – name: Albany Medical College, Albany, New York |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ashley C surname: Rider fullname: Rider, Ashley C organization: Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California – sequence: 2 givenname: Sarah R surname: Williams fullname: Williams, Sarah R organization: Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California – sequence: 3 givenname: Vivien surname: Jones fullname: Jones, Vivien organization: Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland – sequence: 4 givenname: Daniel surname: Rebagliati fullname: Rebagliati, Daniel organization: Albany Medical College, Albany, New York – sequence: 5 givenname: Kimberly surname: Schertzer fullname: Schertzer, Kimberly organization: Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California – sequence: 6 givenname: Michael A surname: Gisondi fullname: Gisondi, Michael A organization: Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California – sequence: 7 givenname: Stefanie S surname: Sebok-Syer fullname: Sebok-Syer, Stefanie S organization: Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39028241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVkc1vEzEQxS1URNvAkSvykcu2_ljv2lxQVAUa1AikpuJoee3Z1NGuHexdoP89m6RU7cVjvXnzG8vvHJ2EGACh95RcCEnp5R_Iwxb6CyoJZa_QGVW8KhSh8uTZ_RSd57wlRIiaizfolCvCJCvpGdLznCFnHzZ4DabHPyC1MfUmWPiE53jl_4IrVjDcR5fxPJjuIfuM7w4DyzBA2qXY7gFx6mEfcPbDiG99P3ZmmMS36HVrugzvHusM3X1ZrK-ui5vvX5dX85vCMiFY0fDGUjudrSGlI5Q0UjJla6Vs1TInSC1V6dqaydZaVhMBpKbUlWpSm8pxPkPLI9dFs9W75HuTHnQ0Xh-EmDbapMHbDnRprGuFIpJyUtZGKaPqiW9KBsqaZs_6fGTtxqYHZyEMyXQvoC87wd_rTfytKWWipNMfz9DHR0KKv8YpId37bKHrTIA4Zs2JZBWTFWeTtThabYo5J2if9lCi9wnrn4vb9bfFSh8Snvwfnj_uyf0_Uv4PFp2lQQ |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 Rider et al. 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 Rider et al. 2024 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.5811/westjem.18012 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Public Health |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Mixed-Methods Analysis Using Interprofessional in situ Simulation |
EISSN | 1936-9018 |
EndPage | 564 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_4acdf590813047a99a97078a42e9cab3 10_5811_WESTJEM_18012 39028241 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 04C 123 29R 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AUK BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BKEYQ BMSDO BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CGR CUY CVF DIK E3Z EBD EBS ECM EIF EIHBH EJD F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IPNFZ KQ8 M48 M~E NAPCQ NPM O5R O5S OK1 PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RIG RNS RPM TR2 UKHRP AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-b3bc1cb3bfa04d010b8829c799c6f2d507894df728fcc2705e0711d4994db6d33 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1936-9018 1936-900X |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 14:59:19 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:28:26 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 04:35:32 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 04:39:45 EDT 2024 Sat Nov 02 12:10:43 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2552-b3bc1cb3bfa04d010b8829c799c6f2d507894df728fcc2705e0711d4994db6d33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254157/ |
PMID | 39028241 |
PQID | 3082628632 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4acdf590813047a99a97078a42e9cab3 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11254157 proquest_miscellaneous_3082628632 crossref_primary_10_5811_WESTJEM_18012 pubmed_primary_39028241 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-Jul |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: 2024-Jul |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | The western journal of emergency medicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | West J Emerg Med |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
Publisher_xml | – name: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine – name: eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
SSID | ssj0055735 |
Score | 2.3480833 |
Snippet | Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment tools to... Introduction: Optimizing the performance of emergency department (ED) teams impacts patient care, but the utility of current, team-based performance assessment... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 557 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Clinical Competence Emergency Department Operations Emergency Medicine - education Emergency Service, Hospital Female Focus Groups Humans Interprofessional Relations Male Original Research Patient Care Team Patient Simulation Simulation Training |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bS8MwFA6yJ0HEu_NGBPEt2qbX-DZlYwwmwjbcW0iTFCusE7eBP9-TpN1FBF986UNbSDin7fm-5uT7ELrxdaaAWAhiuAWBCu0RkVJGvJwq7SdKMet12H-Ou6OwN47Ga1ZfpifMyQO7wN2HQqrcGHP7ZoFIMCaYEagRIdVMiszpfHqsJlPuGxxFibXWBHQSE-Z5Y6euGaW-bxUI3vXkzjff5o1qZEX7f0OaPxsm1ypQZw_tVtARt9yU99GWLg_Qjvvvht12okPE3SouFCQ81GKCX1YbAx5wC_eLL61I39pGz3CtSIJt4wCuGhBXWh24KPGsmC_woJhUNl9HaNRpD5-6pDJRIBLYAiVZkElfwjEXXqiAfWWAqZlMGJMx5CMycvOhyhOa5lLSxIs0gA5fAREKVRarIDhGjXJa6lOEYxkDn6Sm0QRQC1VpkoVAELWM0iSPA6-Jbutg8g-nlcGBY5io89f2YNhr97mNehM9mlAvbzIS1_YEJJ5Xied_Jb6JrutEcXglzDqHKPV0MeNGgcfsuA1goBOXuOVQgVGrAdTSROlGSjfmsnmlLN6s7DYg0wjgTnL2H7M_R9sU4JFr_L1AjfnnQl8CvJlnV_ZJ_gZ9T_fM priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bS8MwFA5eXgQR784bEcS3jDZNL_FFVCYiTAQ33FtIk1QrrtNdYP57T9Juc-qjL33ohYRzmp7v6zn5DkKnvkk1EAtJLLcgEKE9IhPKiZdRbfxYa-56HTbvo9s2u-uEnZmkUGXAwZ_UzvaTavff6uOPzwtY8IBf62Hi-05T4NV067792i6iZcqApNsqPjZNKIRh7HptAlyJCPe8Tim3-fvxufDkVPz_gp4_Kyi_haSbdbRWYUl8WTp_Ay2YYhOtlj_icLm_aAuJMq0LEQq3jOzih9lOgXN8iZv52GjSdH2kB3giUYJdJQGuKhJn4h04L_AgH47wY96t-n5to_ZNo3V9S6quCkQBfaAkDVLlKzhm0mMa6FgKIJurmHMVgYNCqz_PdBbTJFOKxl5oAIX4GpgR02mkg2AHLRW9wuwhHKkICCa1lScAY6hO4pQBYzQqTOIsCrwaOpsYU7yX4hkCSIe1unhqPLbuGk3hrF5DV9bU05us5rU70es_i2oJCSaVzmyLdt-mCiXnklupIsmo4UqmQQ2dTBwlYI3YxIcsTG80EFaSx27BDWCg3dJx06ECK18DMKaGkjmXzs1l_kqRvzgdboCqIeCfeP8_Zn-AVijgpbIS-BAtDfsjcwR4Z5geuzf5C6f3_-8 priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Assessing Team Performance: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Using Interprofessional in situ Simulation |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39028241 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3082628632 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11254157 https://doaj.org/article/4acdf590813047a99a97078a42e9cab3 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB6S9FIope9umy4qlN60a8tP9ZaEDSHgsDQbujehl1uX2huyu9Cf35FkJ9mQUy8--IGEZqz5Pmn0DcCX2CqDxEJSxy0oRuiIypJxGtXM2Lgwhvtah9VFfnaVni-z5R7kw1kYn7SvVTPp_rSTrvnlcyuvWz0d8sSm8-oEMUKGgaeY7sM-eujA0cP8m2WFL6uJyCSnPIqWQVkzK-PYqw_8tu0kdvPyTiTygv2PocyHyZL3os_pC3jew0ZyFLr3EvZs9wqehTU3Eo4SvQYRdnAxGJGFlS2Z3x0K-EaOSNX8tYZWvmT0mgxqJMQnDZA--fBOp4M0HVk3my25bNq-xNcbuDqdLU7OaF9AgWpkCoyqROlY47WWUWqQeSnE01wXnOscbZE5qfnU1AUra61ZEWUWAUdskASlRuUmSd7CQbfq7Hsguc6RSzKXZIKIhZmyUCmSQ6uzsqjzJBrB12EwxXXQyRDIL9yoix-zy8X5rBJ-1Edw7Ib69iUnb-1vrG5-it7IIpXa1K4ae-x2BSXnkjtVIpkyy7VUyQg-D4YS-Du4PQ7Z2dV2LZz6jjttm2BD74LhbptKnFINIpYRlDsm3enL7hP0QC-5PXjch___9CM8ZQiIQqrvIRxsbrb2EwKajRqjFy-LMTw5nl3Mv4_9sgBeq7Qce8_-B_Nx-20 |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,730,783,787,867,888,2109,2228,24330,27936,27937,31732,33757,53804,53806 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFH4q5QBSxb4Mq5EQN2eyJ-ZWqqmG0lSVOlXnZnkLpJBM1ZmREL-eZztpmYoLXHLIoizP9vu--PP3AN5HRmokFoJabkExQ4dUlDGjYR1rExVaM1frsDrKp6fpwTybb0E-rIVxon0lm6D70QZd881pKy9aNR50YuPjag8xQoaJpxjfgtvYYcN0YOl-BM6ywhXWRGySUxaGc--tmZVR5PwHzk0bRHZk3shFzrL_bzjzplzyj_yzfx_Ohif3spPvwXolA_Xrhqnjv7_aA7jXQ1Ky648_hC3TPYId_z-P-GVKj4H72WFMdGRmREuOrxccfCS7pGp-Gk0rV456SQanE-IECaQXNl57gJCmI8tmtSYnTduXD3sCp_uT2d6U9sUZqEIWElOZSBUp3NYiTDWyOolYnamCMZVjnDNrY5_quojLWqm4CDODYCbSSLBSLXOdJE9hu1t05jmQXOXIU2MrYEE0FOuykCkST6OysqjzJBzBhyFM_MJ7cHDkLjae_GxyMjuYVNzFcwSfbBCvTrLW2W7H4vIr778yT4XSta30HtkZR8GYYNbxSKSxYUrIZATvhibAsavZ-RPRmcV6ya2zj13Jm-CNnvkmcXWrxLrgIBoaQbnRWDaeZfMINgFn5z2E_MX_X_oW7kxn1SE__Hz05SXcjRF4eUnxK9heXa7NawROK_nG9ZLfC6UZTQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwGLVgSAgJcR8rVyMh3pwmztW8jdFqDDJVWicq8WD5Fsi2pNXaStN-PZ_tZKMTT3vJQ-Iol8_Od058fD6EPkZGaiAWglhuQSBDh0QUlJGwotpEudbM1TosD7P94-Rgls46VeWyk1W2StZBe9YEbf3HaSsXjRr2OrHhpNwDjJBC4smHC10N76J7MGjDrGfq_iucprkrrgn4JCMsDGfeXzMtosh5EJyYJojs13kjHznb_v9hzZuSyX9y0Pgx-tXfvZeenAbrlQzU5Q1jx9s93hP0qIOmeNe3eYrumPYZeuj_62G_XOk54n6WGBIenhrR4Mn1woPPeBeX9YXRpHRlqZe4dzzBTpiAO4HjtRcIrlu8rFdrfFQ3XRmxF-h4PJru7ZOuSANRwEYokbFUkYJtJcJEA7uTgNmZyhlTGcQ7tXb2ia5yWlRK0TxMDYCaSAPRSrTMdBxvo6123podhDOVAV-lVsgCqIjqIpcJEFCj0iKvsjgcoE99qPjCe3Fw4DA2pvzn6Gh6MCq5i-kAfbGBvGpkLbTdjvn5b969aZ4IpStb8T2yM4-CMcGs85FIqGFKyHiAPvTdgMOQs_MoojXz9ZJbhx-7ojeGC7303eLqUrF1wwFUNEDFRofZuJfNI9ANnK13H_ZXtz_1Pbo_-TrmP74dfn-NHlDAX15Z_AZtrc7X5i3gp5V85wbKX9IMG80 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+Team+Performance%3A+A+Mixed-Methods+Analysis+Using+Interprofessional+in+situ+Simulation&rft.jtitle=The+western+journal+of+emergency+medicine&rft.au=Ashley+C.+Rider&rft.au=Sarah+R.+Williams&rft.au=Vivien+Jones&rft.au=Daniel+Rebagliati&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.pub=eScholarship+Publishing%2C+University+of+California&rft.issn=1936-900X&rft.eissn=1936-9018&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=564&rft_id=info:doi/10.5811%2Fwestjem.18012&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_4acdf590813047a99a97078a42e9cab3 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1936-9018&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1936-9018&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1936-9018&client=summon |