Patients' perception of the duration of analgesia provided by intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study

Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inANESTHESIOLOGY AND PERIOPERATIVE SCIENCE Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 1 - 8
Main Authors Lokin, Joost L. C., Savelkoul, Claudia, van Eekeren, Ramon R. J. P., Koning, Mark V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 16.04.2024
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day. Methods This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment. Results The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]), p =0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]), p =0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29], p =0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]), p =0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]), p =0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10], p =0.395). Conclusion Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics.
AbstractList Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day. Methods This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment. Results The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]), p =0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]), p =0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29], p =0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]), p =0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]), p =0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10], p =0.395). Conclusion Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics.
Abstract Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day. Methods This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment. Results The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]), p=0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]), p=0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29], p=0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]), p=0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]), p=0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10], p=0.395). Conclusion Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics.
ArticleNumber 19
Author van Eekeren, Ramon R. J. P.
Koning, Mark V.
Savelkoul, Claudia
Lokin, Joost L. C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joost L. C.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3242-5217
  surname: Lokin
  fullname: Lokin, Joost L. C.
  email: jlokin@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Claudia
  surname: Savelkoul
  fullname: Savelkoul, Claudia
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ramon R. J. P.
  surname: van Eekeren
  fullname: van Eekeren, Ramon R. J. P.
  organization: Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Mark V.
  surname: Koning
  fullname: Koning, Mark V.
  organization: Department of Anaesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Critical Care, Rijnstate Hospital
BookMark eNp9Ub1uHCEYRJEt2bH9Aq7oUm3MAvuXLrISx5KlpEhq9AEfd5zWCwL2pHubPGrwXRJFKVwgho-ZQcy8JWdLWJCQ25a9bxkb7rKUvJMN43UxVlH_hlzyQbTNKMbp7B98QW5y3lUSn7gYuLwkP79B8biU_I5GTAZj8WGhwdGyRWrXBH_OsMC8weyBxhT23qKl-kD9UipliwZmqtfo92DAL3j3HFLcVkDBFUx0hggpZBOiN9SEOSQ0pUrymjaYDh_o0TXHOvV7rIxtSIXmstrDNTl3MGe8-b1fkR-fP32__9I8fX14vP_41Bgu-77RnE3GjW1nhZESRtMN2vXYda3giCCYaIUxwIUep4lPbOxAM95pZlkHzIK4Io8nXxtgp2Lyz5AOKoBXx0FIGwWpeDOjYsPohhZAtpOQCG5yZgJrjdauXmBfvfjJy9RP5YTur1_L1Etl6lSZqpWpY2XqRTT-JzK-HOOvEfv5dak4SXN9Z6mJql1YUy0sv6b6BbwDsk8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2024_07_317
Cites_doi 10.1002/bjs.8691
10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061
10.1002/bjs.7127
10.1002/bjs.11326
10.1002/bjs.7545
10.1111/ans.14322
10.1007/s00464-018-6355-1
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x
10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.021
10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012
10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.017
10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013
10.1002/bjs.11141
10.1093/bja/aes028
10.1016/j.jpain.2021.01.002
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016
10.1111/aas.12651
10.1097/00000542-200003000-00018
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02873.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2024
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.1007/s44254-024-00054-6
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2731-8389
EndPage 8
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_078f71aa41934eaf9fc9addcbbf8f7e6
10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6
GroupedDBID 0R~
AAKKN
AAYZJ
ABEEZ
ACACY
ACULB
AFGXO
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
C24
C6C
EBS
GROUPED_DOAJ
M~E
RSV
SOJ
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b209cf815d3c44a8c57bf6e55132eea30313cca23b89929085ab025b0d05a0da3
IEDL.DBID C6C
ISSN 2731-8389
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:24:35 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:46 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:42:02 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Postoperative analgesia
Intrathecal morphine
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2466-b209cf815d3c44a8c57bf6e55132eea30313cca23b89929085ab025b0d05a0da3
ORCID 0000-0003-3242-5217
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1007/s44254-024-00054-6
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_078f71aa41934eaf9fc9addcbbf8f7e6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6
springer_journals_10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20240416
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-04-16
PublicationDate_xml – month: 4
  year: 2024
  text: 20240416
  day: 16
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Singapore
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Singapore
PublicationTitle ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PERIOPERATIVE SCIENCE
PublicationTitleAbbrev APS
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Springer Nature Singapore
Springer
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Nature Singapore
– name: Springer
References Levy, Scott, Fawcett (CR7) 2011; 98
Colibaseanu, Osagiede, Merchea (CR9) 2019; 106
Arron, Lier, de Wilt (CR20) 2020; 46
Koning, Teunissen, Van Der Harst (CR8) 2018; 43
Virlos, Clements, Beynon (CR11) 2010; 97
Ficari, Borghi, Catarci (CR4) 2019; 40
(CR21) 2020; 107
Gordon, Polomano, Pellino (CR12) 2010; 11
Huang, Tang, Young (CR18) 2018; 88
Schwenkglenks, Gerbershagen, Taylor (CR15) 2014; 155
Walter, Collin, Dumville (CR2) 2009; 11
Wongyingsinn, Baldini, Stein (CR6) 2012; 108
Modasi, Pace, Godwin (CR19) 2019; 33
Gustafsson, Scott, Schwenk (CR1) 2012; 31
Feldheiser, Aziz, Baldini (CR3) 2016; 60
Komann, Baumbach, Stamer (CR22) 2021; 22
Ummenhofer, Arends, Shen, Bernards (CR16) 2000; 92
Kong, Onsiong, Chiu, Li (CR5) 2002; 57
Koning, Klimek, Rijs (CR10) 2020; 125
von Elm, Altman, Egger (CR13) 2008; 61
Rothaug, Zaslansky, Schwenkglenks (CR14) 2013; 14
Gorissen, Benning, Berghmans (CR17) 2012; 99
M Schwenkglenks (54_CR15) 2014; 155
E Collaborative (54_CR21) 2020; 107
M Komann (54_CR22) 2021; 22
E von Elm (54_CR13) 2008; 61
UO Gustafsson (54_CR1) 2012; 31
MV Koning (54_CR10) 2020; 125
WC Ummenhofer (54_CR16) 2000; 92
MV Koning (54_CR8) 2018; 43
CJ Walter (54_CR2) 2009; 11
DB Gordon (54_CR12) 2010; 11
A Feldheiser (54_CR3) 2016; 60
I Virlos (54_CR11) 2010; 97
DT Colibaseanu (54_CR9) 2019; 106
KJ Gorissen (54_CR17) 2012; 99
F Ficari (54_CR4) 2019; 40
BF Levy (54_CR7) 2011; 98
J Rothaug (54_CR14) 2013; 14
A Modasi (54_CR19) 2019; 33
SK Kong (54_CR5) 2002; 57
MNN Arron (54_CR20) 2020; 46
Y Huang (54_CR18) 2018; 88
M Wongyingsinn (54_CR6) 2012; 108
References_xml – volume: 99
  start-page: 721
  year: 2012
  end-page: 727
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Risk of anastomotic leakage with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal surgery
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.8691
– volume: 125
  start-page: 358
  year: 2020
  end-page: 372
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Intrathecal hydrophilic opioids for abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1401
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1406
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Short-term outcomes with intrathecal versus epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7127
– volume: 107
  start-page: e161
  year: 2020
  end-page: e169
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.11326
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1068
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1078
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7545
– volume: 88
  start-page: 959
  year: 2018
  end-page: 965
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: ANZ J Surg
  doi: 10.1111/ans.14322
– volume: 33
  start-page: 879
  year: 2019
  end-page: 885
  ident: CR19
  article-title: NSAID administration post colorectal surgery increases anastomotic leak rate: systematic review/meta-analysis
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6355-1
– volume: 11
  start-page: 344
  year: 2009
  end-page: 353
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Color Dis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x
– volume: 155
  start-page: 1401
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1411
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Correlates of satisfaction with pain treatment in the acute postoperative period: Results from the international PAIN OUT registry
  publication-title: Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.021
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1172
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1186
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation
  publication-title: J Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012
– volume: 43
  start-page: 166
  year: 2018
  end-page: 173
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Intrathecal morphine for laparoscopic segmental colonic resection as part of an enhanced recovery protocol: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
– volume: 46
  start-page: 2167
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2173
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Postoperative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal cancer surgery does not increase anastomotic leak rate; A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.017
– volume: 31
  start-page: 783
  year: 2012
  end-page: 800
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations
  publication-title: Clin Nutr
  doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013
– volume: 106
  start-page: 692
  year: 2019
  end-page: 699
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.11141
– volume: 108
  start-page: 850
  year: 2012
  end-page: 856
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aes028
– volume: 22
  start-page: 730
  year: 2021
  end-page: 738
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Desire to receive more pain treatment – a relevant patient-reported outcome measure to assess quality of post-operative pain management? Results from 79,996 patients enrolled in the pain registry QUIPS from 2016 to 2019
  publication-title: J Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.01.002
– volume: 61
  start-page: 344
  year: 2008
  end-page: 349
  ident: CR13
  article-title: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1361
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1370
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Patients’ perception of postoperative pain management: Validation of the international pain outcomes (IPO) questionnaire
  publication-title: J Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016
– volume: 60
  start-page: 289
  year: 2016
  end-page: 334
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  doi: 10.1111/aas.12651
– volume: 92
  start-page: 739
  year: 2000
  end-page: 753
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00018
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 40
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Enhanced recovery pathways in colorectal surgery: a consensus paper by the Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI) and the PeriOperative Italian Society (POIS)
  publication-title: G Chir
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1168
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1173
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02873.x
– volume: 61
  start-page: 344
  year: 2008
  ident: 54_CR13
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1401
  year: 2010
  ident: 54_CR11
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7127
– volume: 92
  start-page: 739
  year: 2000
  ident: 54_CR16
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00018
– volume: 99
  start-page: 721
  year: 2012
  ident: 54_CR17
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.8691
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1361
  year: 2013
  ident: 54_CR14
  publication-title: J Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1168
  year: 2002
  ident: 54_CR5
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02873.x
– volume: 43
  start-page: 166
  year: 2018
  ident: 54_CR8
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
– volume: 46
  start-page: 2167
  year: 2020
  ident: 54_CR20
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.017
– volume: 11
  start-page: 344
  year: 2009
  ident: 54_CR2
  publication-title: Color Dis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x
– volume: 106
  start-page: 692
  year: 2019
  ident: 54_CR9
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.11141
– volume: 125
  start-page: 358
  year: 2020
  ident: 54_CR10
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1172
  year: 2010
  ident: 54_CR12
  publication-title: J Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012
– volume: 33
  start-page: 879
  year: 2019
  ident: 54_CR19
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6355-1
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1068
  year: 2011
  ident: 54_CR7
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.7545
– volume: 108
  start-page: 850
  year: 2012
  ident: 54_CR6
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aes028
– volume: 155
  start-page: 1401
  year: 2014
  ident: 54_CR15
  publication-title: Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.021
– volume: 107
  start-page: e161
  year: 2020
  ident: 54_CR21
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.11326
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 54_CR4
  publication-title: G Chir
– volume: 31
  start-page: 783
  year: 2012
  ident: 54_CR1
  publication-title: Clin Nutr
  doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013
– volume: 60
  start-page: 289
  year: 2016
  ident: 54_CR3
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  doi: 10.1111/aas.12651
– volume: 88
  start-page: 959
  year: 2018
  ident: 54_CR18
  publication-title: ANZ J Surg
  doi: 10.1111/ans.14322
– volume: 22
  start-page: 730
  year: 2021
  ident: 54_CR22
  publication-title: J Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.01.002
SSID ssj0002923724
Score 2.2535932
Snippet Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However,...
Abstract Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia....
SourceID doaj
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Anesthesiology
Critical Care Medicine
Intensive
Intrathecal morphine
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosciences
Original Research
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Postoperative analgesia
Surgery
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA6yJy-iqLi-yEHwoME-0rT1puKyCIoHF_ZWkjSBwtqW7a7gv_GnOpN2y4qwXrz1kTRlvklmps18Q8iFAM0VudYsVp5lPIp9mFI2gZhHRRCQ2MR4mO_8_CLGE_40jaZrpb5wT1hLD9wK7gZMmI19KTl4GtxIm1qdwpzUSlm4YRzZNti8tWAK1-AA_JY44F2WjMuV46CdnIFJYs5PYeKHJXKE_b_-hjojM9olO513SO_at9ojW6bcJ1-vLfdpc0nrfhsKrSwF343myxZCPJclFu1oCkm7_Lqcqk9a4OdbaApgULWsiw-pJZJjvFcgYjigrkw4nYHVRGbLqi40RSprXAqhS9PmTd9S99RVYibFwrrzBXXstAdkMnp8exizrrAC0wEXgimQmLaJH-Wh5lwmOoqVFQZrvQTGyBD5HAHZIFQQjQUpeGVSgW-kvNyLpJfL8JAMyqo0R4TanMcKYizhCwmhGpc81VJ6QnuAGiwWQ-KvhJzpjnUci1_Msp4v2QGTATCZAyYTQ3LV96lbzo2Nre8Ru74l8mW7C6BFWadF2V9aNCTXK-SzbhI3G8Y8_o8xT8h24NSRM1-cksFivjRn4OEs1LlT5m_DSvtz
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Patients' perception of the duration of analgesia provided by intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44254-024-00054-6
https://doaj.org/article/078f71aa41934eaf9fc9addcbbf8f7e6
Volume 2
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA4-QLyIT3wuOQgeNNimabr1posiwooHF_ZWkjSBhXV3sbuCF3-LP9WZNFvwwYKX0keSlswk803S-YaQUwmaK0tjWKYjx0SaxTCkXBt8Hp2CQ-LaNsJ45-6jvO-Jh37aDzQ5GAvzY__-shKgVIKBJWEeXjC5TFbTOMkwTUNHdpr1FA5IJeMixMX8XfWb7fEU_b_2P71ZudskGwEP0utagFtkyY62yVo37HjvkM-nmvi0OqOT5h8UOnYUgBstZ7X88FqNMGNHNVA0BNeVVL_TAa7dQlGQBNWzyeBNGYXMGC9j6F84oT5HOB2CyURay_FkYCjyWOM8CFWqOmj6ivpW51GZFLPqvk6pp6bdJb272-fOPQtZFZjhQkqmeZQb147TMjFCqLZJM-2kxUQv3FqVIJkjiJUnGlwxngMkUxqAkY7KKFVRqZI9sjIaj-w-oa4UmQYHS8ZSgZ8mlMiNUpE0kcvQyz0g8by_CxMoxzHzxbBoyJK9jAqQUeFlVMgDct7UmdSEGwtL36AYm5JIlu1vgA4VYewVgILge5QSAFaFVS53Jodp3Wjt4IGFRi7mSlCEEVwteOfh_4ofkXXudVCwWB6TlenrzJ4AkJnqFmgwFy2vxy2_GADH7sftF1bj78M
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9swEBdtCmtfStttNOu66qGwh03gD1mO-9aWlaxNwh4ayJuQZGkYujjEyWD_zf7U3cmyYXQU9uaPk210p9PvLN3vCLkUYLmiNIblOnKMZ3kMQ8qNIObRGQQkbmQjzHeezsR4zu8X2SIkhTXdbvduSdJ76j7ZjYN5cQZzCvNAg4ldsschZsaNfLchxwH9bwKYJU94yJD5d9O_ZiFP1v9sJdRPMHdH5DAgQ3rdqvKY7NjlCXk1DWvfr8nvby0FavORrvrdKLR2FCAcLbetJvFcLbF2R1MpGtLsSqp_0Qr_4oIo6ITq7ar6qYxCjowfNfQ0HFBfLZw-weSJBJf1qjIUGa3RI0KTpk2fvqL-qV1-JsX6uusN9SS1b8j87svj7ZiF-grMJFwIppOoMG4UZ2VqOFcjk-XaCYslXxJrVYq0jqDgJNUQlCUFgDOlASLpqIwyFZUqfUsGy3ppTwl1Jc81hFoiFgoiNq54YZSKhIlcjvHukMRdf0sTyMexBsaT7GmTvY4k6Eh6HUkxJJ_6NquWeuNF6RtUYy-JtNn-Qr3-LsMolICH4HuUArNJuVWucKYAB2-0dnDDwkM-d0Ygw1huXnjnu_8TvyD748fpRE6-zh7OyEHi7ZGzWLwng816a88B3mz0B2_NfwCG3vOt
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA4-QLyIT1yfOQgeNNh203TrTVcX33hQ8BaSNJEFbcs-BP-NP9WZtFsURfDWxyQtmUnyTZL5hpA9AZYrMmNYogPHeJyE0KVcB3weHYND4jo2wHjn2ztx8civnuKnL1H8_rT7ZEuyimlAlqZ8dFRm7qgJfONgapzB_MI86GBimsyCpxKi-9UV3WaVJQL8kkS8jpb5vei3GckT9__YFfWTTW-RLNQokZ5Ual0iUzZfJnO39T74Cvm4r-hQh_u0bE6m0MJRgHM0G1daxXuVYx6PYV_ROuQuo_qd9nFFF0RBP1SPy_6bMgr5Ml4LaHW4oD5zOH2BiRTJLouybyiyW-PoCEWGVSj1MfW1TmI1KebaHYyoJ6xdJY-984fuBatzLTATcSGYjoLUuE4YZ23DueqYONFOWEz_Elmr2kjxCMqO2hoctCgFoKY0wCUdZEGsgky118hMXuR2nVCX8USD2yVCocB744qnRqlAmMAl6Pu2SDhpb2lqInLMh_EiGwplryMJOpJeR1K0yEFTpqxoOP6UPkU1NpJIoe0fFINnWfdICdgI_kcpDhCWW-VSZ1IY7I3WDl5YqORwYgSy7tfDP7658T_xXTJ3f9aTN5d315tkPvLmyFkotsjMaDC224B0RnrHG_Mnhq_4EA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%27+perception+of+the+duration+of+analgesia+provided+by+intrathecal+bupivacaine%2Fmorphine+after+laparoscopic+colorectal+surgery%3A+a+prospective+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=ANESTHESIOLOGY+AND+PERIOPERATIVE+SCIENCE&rft.au=Lokin%2C+Joost+L.+C.&rft.au=Savelkoul%2C+Claudia&rft.au=van+Eekeren%2C+Ramon+R.+J.+P.&rft.au=Koning%2C+Mark+V.&rft.date=2024-04-16&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+Singapore&rft.eissn=2731-8389&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs44254-024-00054-6&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2731-8389&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2731-8389&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2731-8389&client=summon