Patients' perception of the duration of analgesia provided by intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study
Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed...
Saved in:
Published in | ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PERIOPERATIVE SCIENCE Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 1 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Singapore
Springer Nature Singapore
16.04.2024
Springer |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose
The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day.
Methods
This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment.
Results
The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]),
p
=0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]),
p
=0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29],
p
=0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]),
p
=0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]),
p
=0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10],
p
=0.395).
Conclusion
Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose
The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day.
Methods
This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment.
Results
The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]),
p
=0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]),
p
=0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29],
p
=0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]),
p
=0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]),
p
=0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10],
p
=0.395).
Conclusion
Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics. Abstract Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day. Methods This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment. Results The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]), p=0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]), p=0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29], p=0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]), p=0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]), p=0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10], p=0.395). Conclusion Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics. |
ArticleNumber | 19 |
Author | van Eekeren, Ramon R. J. P. Koning, Mark V. Savelkoul, Claudia Lokin, Joost L. C. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joost L. C. orcidid: 0000-0003-3242-5217 surname: Lokin fullname: Lokin, Joost L. C. email: jlokin@gmail.com organization: Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Claudia surname: Savelkoul fullname: Savelkoul, Claudia organization: Department of Anaesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht – sequence: 3 givenname: Ramon R. J. P. surname: van Eekeren fullname: van Eekeren, Ramon R. J. P. organization: Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital – sequence: 4 givenname: Mark V. surname: Koning fullname: Koning, Mark V. organization: Department of Anaesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Critical Care, Rijnstate Hospital |
BookMark | eNp9Ub1uHCEYRJEt2bH9Aq7oUm3MAvuXLrISx5KlpEhq9AEfd5zWCwL2pHubPGrwXRJFKVwgho-ZQcy8JWdLWJCQ25a9bxkb7rKUvJMN43UxVlH_hlzyQbTNKMbp7B98QW5y3lUSn7gYuLwkP79B8biU_I5GTAZj8WGhwdGyRWrXBH_OsMC8weyBxhT23qKl-kD9UipliwZmqtfo92DAL3j3HFLcVkDBFUx0hggpZBOiN9SEOSQ0pUrymjaYDh_o0TXHOvV7rIxtSIXmstrDNTl3MGe8-b1fkR-fP32__9I8fX14vP_41Bgu-77RnE3GjW1nhZESRtMN2vXYda3giCCYaIUxwIUep4lPbOxAM95pZlkHzIK4Io8nXxtgp2Lyz5AOKoBXx0FIGwWpeDOjYsPohhZAtpOQCG5yZgJrjdauXmBfvfjJy9RP5YTur1_L1Etl6lSZqpWpY2XqRTT-JzK-HOOvEfv5dak4SXN9Z6mJql1YUy0sv6b6BbwDsk8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2024_07_317 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/bjs.8691 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061 10.1002/bjs.7127 10.1002/bjs.11326 10.1002/bjs.7545 10.1111/ans.14322 10.1007/s00464-018-6355-1 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.021 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.017 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013 10.1002/bjs.11141 10.1093/bja/aes028 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.01.002 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016 10.1111/aas.12651 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00018 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02873.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024 |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.1007/s44254-024-00054-6 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2731-8389 |
EndPage | 8 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_078f71aa41934eaf9fc9addcbbf8f7e6 10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6 |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ AAKKN AAYZJ ABEEZ ACACY ACULB AFGXO ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS C24 C6C EBS GROUPED_DOAJ M~E RSV SOJ AAYXX CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2466-b209cf815d3c44a8c57bf6e55132eea30313cca23b89929085ab025b0d05a0da3 |
IEDL.DBID | C6C |
ISSN | 2731-8389 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:09 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:24:35 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:46 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:42:02 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Postoperative analgesia Intrathecal morphine |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2466-b209cf815d3c44a8c57bf6e55132eea30313cca23b89929085ab025b0d05a0da3 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3242-5217 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44254-024-00054-6 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_078f71aa41934eaf9fc9addcbbf8f7e6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6 springer_journals_10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20240416 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-04-16 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 4 year: 2024 text: 20240416 day: 16 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Singapore |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Singapore |
PublicationTitle | ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PERIOPERATIVE SCIENCE |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | APS |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Springer Nature Singapore Springer |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Nature Singapore – name: Springer |
References | Levy, Scott, Fawcett (CR7) 2011; 98 Colibaseanu, Osagiede, Merchea (CR9) 2019; 106 Arron, Lier, de Wilt (CR20) 2020; 46 Koning, Teunissen, Van Der Harst (CR8) 2018; 43 Virlos, Clements, Beynon (CR11) 2010; 97 Ficari, Borghi, Catarci (CR4) 2019; 40 (CR21) 2020; 107 Gordon, Polomano, Pellino (CR12) 2010; 11 Huang, Tang, Young (CR18) 2018; 88 Schwenkglenks, Gerbershagen, Taylor (CR15) 2014; 155 Walter, Collin, Dumville (CR2) 2009; 11 Wongyingsinn, Baldini, Stein (CR6) 2012; 108 Modasi, Pace, Godwin (CR19) 2019; 33 Gustafsson, Scott, Schwenk (CR1) 2012; 31 Feldheiser, Aziz, Baldini (CR3) 2016; 60 Komann, Baumbach, Stamer (CR22) 2021; 22 Ummenhofer, Arends, Shen, Bernards (CR16) 2000; 92 Kong, Onsiong, Chiu, Li (CR5) 2002; 57 Koning, Klimek, Rijs (CR10) 2020; 125 von Elm, Altman, Egger (CR13) 2008; 61 Rothaug, Zaslansky, Schwenkglenks (CR14) 2013; 14 Gorissen, Benning, Berghmans (CR17) 2012; 99 M Schwenkglenks (54_CR15) 2014; 155 E Collaborative (54_CR21) 2020; 107 M Komann (54_CR22) 2021; 22 E von Elm (54_CR13) 2008; 61 UO Gustafsson (54_CR1) 2012; 31 MV Koning (54_CR10) 2020; 125 WC Ummenhofer (54_CR16) 2000; 92 MV Koning (54_CR8) 2018; 43 CJ Walter (54_CR2) 2009; 11 DB Gordon (54_CR12) 2010; 11 A Feldheiser (54_CR3) 2016; 60 I Virlos (54_CR11) 2010; 97 DT Colibaseanu (54_CR9) 2019; 106 KJ Gorissen (54_CR17) 2012; 99 F Ficari (54_CR4) 2019; 40 BF Levy (54_CR7) 2011; 98 J Rothaug (54_CR14) 2013; 14 A Modasi (54_CR19) 2019; 33 SK Kong (54_CR5) 2002; 57 MNN Arron (54_CR20) 2020; 46 Y Huang (54_CR18) 2018; 88 M Wongyingsinn (54_CR6) 2012; 108 |
References_xml | – volume: 99 start-page: 721 year: 2012 end-page: 727 ident: CR17 article-title: Risk of anastomotic leakage with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.8691 – volume: 125 start-page: 358 year: 2020 end-page: 372 ident: CR10 article-title: Intrathecal hydrophilic opioids for abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061 – volume: 97 start-page: 1401 year: 2010 end-page: 1406 ident: CR11 article-title: Short-term outcomes with intrathecal versus epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.7127 – volume: 107 start-page: e161 year: 2020 end-page: e169 ident: CR21 article-title: Safety and efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce ileus after colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.11326 – volume: 98 start-page: 1068 year: 2011 end-page: 1078 ident: CR7 article-title: Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.7545 – volume: 88 start-page: 959 year: 2018 end-page: 965 ident: CR18 article-title: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis publication-title: ANZ J Surg doi: 10.1111/ans.14322 – volume: 33 start-page: 879 year: 2019 end-page: 885 ident: CR19 article-title: NSAID administration post colorectal surgery increases anastomotic leak rate: systematic review/meta-analysis publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6355-1 – volume: 11 start-page: 344 year: 2009 end-page: 353 ident: CR2 article-title: Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Color Dis doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x – volume: 155 start-page: 1401 year: 2014 end-page: 1411 ident: CR15 article-title: Correlates of satisfaction with pain treatment in the acute postoperative period: Results from the international PAIN OUT registry publication-title: Pain doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.021 – volume: 11 start-page: 1172 year: 2010 end-page: 1186 ident: CR12 article-title: Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation publication-title: J Pain doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012 – volume: 43 start-page: 166 year: 2018 end-page: 173 ident: CR8 article-title: Intrathecal morphine for laparoscopic segmental colonic resection as part of an enhanced recovery protocol: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med – volume: 46 start-page: 2167 year: 2020 end-page: 2173 ident: CR20 article-title: Postoperative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal cancer surgery does not increase anastomotic leak rate; A systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.017 – volume: 31 start-page: 783 year: 2012 end-page: 800 ident: CR1 article-title: Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations publication-title: Clin Nutr doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013 – volume: 106 start-page: 692 year: 2019 end-page: 699 ident: CR9 article-title: Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.11141 – volume: 108 start-page: 850 year: 2012 end-page: 856 ident: CR6 article-title: Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aes028 – volume: 22 start-page: 730 year: 2021 end-page: 738 ident: CR22 article-title: Desire to receive more pain treatment – a relevant patient-reported outcome measure to assess quality of post-operative pain management? Results from 79,996 patients enrolled in the pain registry QUIPS from 2016 to 2019 publication-title: J Pain doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.01.002 – volume: 61 start-page: 344 year: 2008 end-page: 349 ident: CR13 article-title: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 – volume: 14 start-page: 1361 year: 2013 end-page: 1370 ident: CR14 article-title: Patients’ perception of postoperative pain management: Validation of the international pain outcomes (IPO) questionnaire publication-title: J Pain doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016 – volume: 60 start-page: 289 year: 2016 end-page: 334 ident: CR3 article-title: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand doi: 10.1111/aas.12651 – volume: 92 start-page: 739 year: 2000 end-page: 753 ident: CR16 article-title: Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00018 – volume: 40 start-page: 1 year: 2019 end-page: 40 ident: CR4 article-title: Enhanced recovery pathways in colorectal surgery: a consensus paper by the Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI) and the PeriOperative Italian Society (POIS) publication-title: G Chir – volume: 57 start-page: 1168 year: 2002 end-page: 1173 ident: CR5 article-title: Use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02873.x – volume: 61 start-page: 344 year: 2008 ident: 54_CR13 publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 – volume: 97 start-page: 1401 year: 2010 ident: 54_CR11 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.7127 – volume: 92 start-page: 739 year: 2000 ident: 54_CR16 publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00018 – volume: 99 start-page: 721 year: 2012 ident: 54_CR17 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.8691 – volume: 14 start-page: 1361 year: 2013 ident: 54_CR14 publication-title: J Pain doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016 – volume: 57 start-page: 1168 year: 2002 ident: 54_CR5 publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02873.x – volume: 43 start-page: 166 year: 2018 ident: 54_CR8 publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med – volume: 46 start-page: 2167 year: 2020 ident: 54_CR20 publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.017 – volume: 11 start-page: 344 year: 2009 ident: 54_CR2 publication-title: Color Dis doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x – volume: 106 start-page: 692 year: 2019 ident: 54_CR9 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.11141 – volume: 125 start-page: 358 year: 2020 ident: 54_CR10 publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061 – volume: 11 start-page: 1172 year: 2010 ident: 54_CR12 publication-title: J Pain doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012 – volume: 33 start-page: 879 year: 2019 ident: 54_CR19 publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6355-1 – volume: 98 start-page: 1068 year: 2011 ident: 54_CR7 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.7545 – volume: 108 start-page: 850 year: 2012 ident: 54_CR6 publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aes028 – volume: 155 start-page: 1401 year: 2014 ident: 54_CR15 publication-title: Pain doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.021 – volume: 107 start-page: e161 year: 2020 ident: 54_CR21 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.11326 – volume: 40 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 54_CR4 publication-title: G Chir – volume: 31 start-page: 783 year: 2012 ident: 54_CR1 publication-title: Clin Nutr doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013 – volume: 60 start-page: 289 year: 2016 ident: 54_CR3 publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand doi: 10.1111/aas.12651 – volume: 88 start-page: 959 year: 2018 ident: 54_CR18 publication-title: ANZ J Surg doi: 10.1111/ans.14322 – volume: 22 start-page: 730 year: 2021 ident: 54_CR22 publication-title: J Pain doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.01.002 |
SSID | ssj0002923724 |
Score | 2.2535932 |
Snippet | Purpose
The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However,... Abstract Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia.... |
SourceID | doaj crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine Intensive Intrathecal morphine Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosciences Original Research Pharmacology/Toxicology Postoperative analgesia Surgery |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA6yJy-iqLi-yEHwoME-0rT1puKyCIoHF_ZWkjSBwtqW7a7gv_GnOpN2y4qwXrz1kTRlvklmps18Q8iFAM0VudYsVp5lPIp9mFI2gZhHRRCQ2MR4mO_8_CLGE_40jaZrpb5wT1hLD9wK7gZMmI19KTl4GtxIm1qdwpzUSlm4YRzZNti8tWAK1-AA_JY44F2WjMuV46CdnIFJYs5PYeKHJXKE_b_-hjojM9olO513SO_at9ojW6bcJ1-vLfdpc0nrfhsKrSwF343myxZCPJclFu1oCkm7_Lqcqk9a4OdbaApgULWsiw-pJZJjvFcgYjigrkw4nYHVRGbLqi40RSprXAqhS9PmTd9S99RVYibFwrrzBXXstAdkMnp8exizrrAC0wEXgimQmLaJH-Wh5lwmOoqVFQZrvQTGyBD5HAHZIFQQjQUpeGVSgW-kvNyLpJfL8JAMyqo0R4TanMcKYizhCwmhGpc81VJ6QnuAGiwWQ-KvhJzpjnUci1_Msp4v2QGTATCZAyYTQ3LV96lbzo2Nre8Ru74l8mW7C6BFWadF2V9aNCTXK-SzbhI3G8Y8_o8xT8h24NSRM1-cksFivjRn4OEs1LlT5m_DSvtz priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Patients' perception of the duration of analgesia provided by intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44254-024-00054-6 https://doaj.org/article/078f71aa41934eaf9fc9addcbbf8f7e6 |
Volume | 2 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA4-QLyIT3wuOQgeNNimabr1posiwooHF_ZWkjSBhXV3sbuCF3-LP9WZNFvwwYKX0keSlswk803S-YaQUwmaK0tjWKYjx0SaxTCkXBt8Hp2CQ-LaNsJ45-6jvO-Jh37aDzQ5GAvzY__-shKgVIKBJWEeXjC5TFbTOMkwTUNHdpr1FA5IJeMixMX8XfWb7fEU_b_2P71ZudskGwEP0utagFtkyY62yVo37HjvkM-nmvi0OqOT5h8UOnYUgBstZ7X88FqNMGNHNVA0BNeVVL_TAa7dQlGQBNWzyeBNGYXMGC9j6F84oT5HOB2CyURay_FkYCjyWOM8CFWqOmj6ivpW51GZFLPqvk6pp6bdJb272-fOPQtZFZjhQkqmeZQb147TMjFCqLZJM-2kxUQv3FqVIJkjiJUnGlwxngMkUxqAkY7KKFVRqZI9sjIaj-w-oa4UmQYHS8ZSgZ8mlMiNUpE0kcvQyz0g8by_CxMoxzHzxbBoyJK9jAqQUeFlVMgDct7UmdSEGwtL36AYm5JIlu1vgA4VYewVgILge5QSAFaFVS53Jodp3Wjt4IGFRi7mSlCEEVwteOfh_4ofkXXudVCwWB6TlenrzJ4AkJnqFmgwFy2vxy2_GADH7sftF1bj78M |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9swEBdtCmtfStttNOu66qGwh03gD1mO-9aWlaxNwh4ayJuQZGkYujjEyWD_zf7U3cmyYXQU9uaPk210p9PvLN3vCLkUYLmiNIblOnKMZ3kMQ8qNIObRGQQkbmQjzHeezsR4zu8X2SIkhTXdbvduSdJ76j7ZjYN5cQZzCvNAg4ldsschZsaNfLchxwH9bwKYJU94yJD5d9O_ZiFP1v9sJdRPMHdH5DAgQ3rdqvKY7NjlCXk1DWvfr8nvby0FavORrvrdKLR2FCAcLbetJvFcLbF2R1MpGtLsSqp_0Qr_4oIo6ITq7ar6qYxCjowfNfQ0HFBfLZw-weSJBJf1qjIUGa3RI0KTpk2fvqL-qV1-JsX6uusN9SS1b8j87svj7ZiF-grMJFwIppOoMG4UZ2VqOFcjk-XaCYslXxJrVYq0jqDgJNUQlCUFgDOlASLpqIwyFZUqfUsGy3ppTwl1Jc81hFoiFgoiNq54YZSKhIlcjvHukMRdf0sTyMexBsaT7GmTvY4k6Eh6HUkxJJ_6NquWeuNF6RtUYy-JtNn-Qr3-LsMolICH4HuUArNJuVWucKYAB2-0dnDDwkM-d0Ygw1huXnjnu_8TvyD748fpRE6-zh7OyEHi7ZGzWLwng816a88B3mz0B2_NfwCG3vOt |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA4-QLyIT1yfOQgeNNh203TrTVcX33hQ8BaSNJEFbcs-BP-NP9WZtFsURfDWxyQtmUnyTZL5hpA9AZYrMmNYogPHeJyE0KVcB3weHYND4jo2wHjn2ztx8civnuKnL1H8_rT7ZEuyimlAlqZ8dFRm7qgJfONgapzB_MI86GBimsyCpxKi-9UV3WaVJQL8kkS8jpb5vei3GckT9__YFfWTTW-RLNQokZ5Ual0iUzZfJnO39T74Cvm4r-hQh_u0bE6m0MJRgHM0G1daxXuVYx6PYV_ROuQuo_qd9nFFF0RBP1SPy_6bMgr5Ml4LaHW4oD5zOH2BiRTJLouybyiyW-PoCEWGVSj1MfW1TmI1KebaHYyoJ6xdJY-984fuBatzLTATcSGYjoLUuE4YZ23DueqYONFOWEz_Elmr2kjxCMqO2hoctCgFoKY0wCUdZEGsgky118hMXuR2nVCX8USD2yVCocB744qnRqlAmMAl6Pu2SDhpb2lqInLMh_EiGwplryMJOpJeR1K0yEFTpqxoOP6UPkU1NpJIoe0fFINnWfdICdgI_kcpDhCWW-VSZ1IY7I3WDl5YqORwYgSy7tfDP7658T_xXTJ3f9aTN5d315tkPvLmyFkotsjMaDC224B0RnrHG_Mnhq_4EA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%27+perception+of+the+duration+of+analgesia+provided+by+intrathecal+bupivacaine%2Fmorphine+after+laparoscopic+colorectal+surgery%3A+a+prospective+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=ANESTHESIOLOGY+AND+PERIOPERATIVE+SCIENCE&rft.au=Lokin%2C+Joost+L.+C.&rft.au=Savelkoul%2C+Claudia&rft.au=van+Eekeren%2C+Ramon+R.+J.+P.&rft.au=Koning%2C+Mark+V.&rft.date=2024-04-16&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+Singapore&rft.eissn=2731-8389&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs44254-024-00054-6&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s44254_024_00054_6 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2731-8389&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2731-8389&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2731-8389&client=summon |