Relationship Between the Number of Repetitions and Selected Percentages of One Repetition Maximum in Free Weight Exercises in Trained and Untrained Men
Resistance exercise intensity is commonly prescribed as a percent of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). However, the relationship between percent 1RM and the number of repetitions allowed remains poorly studied, especially using free weight exercises. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of strength and conditioning research Vol. 20; no. 4; p. 819 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.11.2006
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Resistance exercise intensity is commonly prescribed as a percent of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). However, the relationship between percent 1RM and the number of repetitions allowed remains poorly studied, especially using free weight exercises. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal number of repetitions that trained (T) and untrained (UT) men can perform during free weight exercises at various percentages of 1RM. Eight T and 8 UT men were tested for 1RM strength. Then, subjects performed 1 set to failure at 60, 80, and 90% of 1RM in the back squat, bench press, and arm curl in a randomized, balanced design. There was a significant (p < 0.05) intensity x exercise interaction. More repetitions were performed during the back squat than the bench press or arm curl at 60% 1RM for T and UT. At 80 and 90% 1RM, there were significant differences between the back squat and other exercises; however, differences were much less pronounced. No differences in number of repetitions performed at a given exercise intensity were noted between T and UT (except during bench press at 90% 1RM). In conclusion, the number of repetitions performed at a given percent of 1RM is influenced by the amount of muscle mass used during the exercise, as more repetitions can be performed during the back squat than either the bench press or arm curl. Training status of the individual has a minimal impact on the number of repetitions performed at relative exercise intensity.Resistance exercise intensity is commonly prescribed as a percent of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). However, the relationship between percent 1RM and the number of repetitions allowed remains poorly studied, especially using free weight exercises. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal number of repetitions that trained (T) and untrained (UT) men can perform during free weight exercises at various percentages of 1RM. Eight T and 8 UT men were tested for 1RM strength. Then, subjects performed 1 set to failure at 60, 80, and 90% of 1RM in the back squat, bench press, and arm curl in a randomized, balanced design. There was a significant (p < 0.05) intensity x exercise interaction. More repetitions were performed during the back squat than the bench press or arm curl at 60% 1RM for T and UT. At 80 and 90% 1RM, there were significant differences between the back squat and other exercises; however, differences were much less pronounced. No differences in number of repetitions performed at a given exercise intensity were noted between T and UT (except during bench press at 90% 1RM). In conclusion, the number of repetitions performed at a given percent of 1RM is influenced by the amount of muscle mass used during the exercise, as more repetitions can be performed during the back squat than either the bench press or arm curl. Training status of the individual has a minimal impact on the number of repetitions performed at relative exercise intensity. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Resistance exercise intensity is commonly prescribed as a percent of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). However, the relationship between percent 1RM and the number of repetitions allowed remains poorly studied, especially using free weight exercises. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal number of repetitions that trained (T) and untrained (UT) men can perform during free weight exercises at various percentages of 1RM. Eight T and 8 UT men were tested for 1RM strength. Then, subjects performed 1 set to failure at 60, 80, and 90% of 1RM in the back squat, bench press, and arm curl in a randomized, balanced design. There was a significant (p < 0.05) intensity x exercise interaction. More repetitions were performed during the back squat than the bench press or arm curl at 60% 1RM for T and UT. At 80 and 90% 1RM, there were significant differences between the back squat and other exercises; however, differences were much less pronounced. No differences in number of repetitions performed at a given exercise intensity were noted between T and UT (except during bench press at 90% 1RM). In conclusion, the number of repetitions performed at a given percent of 1RM is influenced by the amount of muscle mass used during the exercise, as more repetitions can be performed during the back squat than either the bench press or arm curl. Training status of the individual has a minimal impact on the number of repetitions performed at relative exercise intensity.Resistance exercise intensity is commonly prescribed as a percent of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). However, the relationship between percent 1RM and the number of repetitions allowed remains poorly studied, especially using free weight exercises. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal number of repetitions that trained (T) and untrained (UT) men can perform during free weight exercises at various percentages of 1RM. Eight T and 8 UT men were tested for 1RM strength. Then, subjects performed 1 set to failure at 60, 80, and 90% of 1RM in the back squat, bench press, and arm curl in a randomized, balanced design. There was a significant (p < 0.05) intensity x exercise interaction. More repetitions were performed during the back squat than the bench press or arm curl at 60% 1RM for T and UT. At 80 and 90% 1RM, there were significant differences between the back squat and other exercises; however, differences were much less pronounced. No differences in number of repetitions performed at a given exercise intensity were noted between T and UT (except during bench press at 90% 1RM). In conclusion, the number of repetitions performed at a given percent of 1RM is influenced by the amount of muscle mass used during the exercise, as more repetitions can be performed during the back squat than either the bench press or arm curl. Training status of the individual has a minimal impact on the number of repetitions performed at relative exercise intensity. |
Author | Vingren, Jakob L. Newton, Robert U. Kraemer, William J. Fleck, Steven J. Spiering, Barry A. Spreuwenberg, Luuk P.B. Maresh, Carl M. Häkkinen, Keijo Hatfield, Disa L. Volek, Jeff S. Fragala, Maren S. Shimano, Tomoko Silvestre, Ricardo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tomoko surname: Shimano fullname: Shimano, Tomoko – sequence: 2 givenname: William J. surname: Kraemer fullname: Kraemer, William J. – sequence: 3 givenname: Barry A. surname: Spiering fullname: Spiering, Barry A. – sequence: 4 givenname: Jeff S. surname: Volek fullname: Volek, Jeff S. – sequence: 5 givenname: Disa L. surname: Hatfield fullname: Hatfield, Disa L. – sequence: 6 givenname: Ricardo surname: Silvestre fullname: Silvestre, Ricardo – sequence: 7 givenname: Jakob L. surname: Vingren fullname: Vingren, Jakob L. – sequence: 8 givenname: Maren S. surname: Fragala fullname: Fragala, Maren S. – sequence: 9 givenname: Carl M. surname: Maresh fullname: Maresh, Carl M. – sequence: 10 givenname: Steven J. surname: Fleck fullname: Fleck, Steven J. – sequence: 11 givenname: Robert U. surname: Newton fullname: Newton, Robert U. – sequence: 12 givenname: Luuk P.B. surname: Spreuwenberg fullname: Spreuwenberg, Luuk P.B. – sequence: 13 givenname: Keijo surname: Häkkinen fullname: Häkkinen, Keijo |
BookMark | eNptkcFOwkAQhjcGEwE9-AZ7MvFQ2G27ZXtUAmoCYirEY7PdTmFNu8XdJeKT-Lq2wMEYTzOT-f4_k_l7qKNrDQhdUzKgjMbDxKOcxmxAz1CXsiDwQp-POk1PotDjhNIL1LP2nRCfMRZ00XcCpXCq1najtvge3CeAxm4D-HlXZWBwXeAEtuDUAcJC5_gVSpAOcvwCRoJ2Yg225RYafrF4Lvaq2lVYaTw1APgN1Hrj8GTfqJRtJM1iaYTSjVNru9LuNM1BX6LzQpQWrk61j1bTyXL86M0WD0_ju5kn_ZA6L88KLvI4liKKC8khF0xykgEPeEgyNopiKmIRZpCRKAsCOSJFQIQPOVBGRMaDPro5-m5N_bED69JKWQllKTTUO5tG3B_FlLTg8AhKU1troEilcofPtVeXKSVpG0CapIcAUtoobv8otkZVwnz9w_4A-riK5Q |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1123_ijspp_2023_0357 crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2024_2371733 crossref_primary_10_1123_ijspp_2024_0194 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2021_686744 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_020_04540_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_1758_5996_2_31 crossref_primary_10_5114_hm_2023_107245 crossref_primary_10_5812_asjsm_29247 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_024_02880_x crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_9084725 crossref_primary_10_17338_trainology_3_2_41 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_10663 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2020_00481 crossref_primary_10_2478_hukin_2020_0001 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2018_00247 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_017_3786_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fspor_2024_1418640 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_891385 crossref_primary_10_5114_jhk_162021 crossref_primary_10_1080_02701367_2022_2119197 crossref_primary_10_1080_02701367_2021_2005235 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1519/R-18195.1 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Recreation & Sports |
EISSN | 1533-4287 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1519_R_18195_1 |
GroupedDBID | -~X .Z2 01R 0R~ 123 186 29L 2FS 36B 40H 4R4 53G 5AM 5VS 6PF 7O~ 7RV 7X7 88E 88I 8AO 8C1 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 9M8 AAAAV AAAXR AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAMOA AAQKA AARTV AASCR AAUEB AAWTL AAXQO AAYXX ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABJNI ABNJN ABPXF ABUWG ABVCZ ABXVJ ABXYN ABZAD ABZZY ACDDN ACDOF ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACIFK ACILI ACJBD ACLDA ACPRK ACTAD ACTHT ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ACZKN ADBBV ADBIZ ADEGP ADFPA ADGGA ADGHP ADHPY ADLEJ ADNKB ADNVM AEBDS AEETU AENEX AFBFQ AFDTB AFEXH AFKRA AFMBP AFNMH AFPHX AFSOK AFYGQ AGINI AHMBA AHOMT AHQNM AHQVU AHVBC AHWXW AIJEX AINUH AJCLO AJEOO AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKCTQ AKULP ALIPV ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC ATPOU AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKEYQ BKNYI BOYCO BPHCQ BQLVK BVXVI C45 CAG CCPQU CITATION COF DIWNM DU5 DUNZO DWQXO D~A E.X EBS EEVPB EJD ERAAH EX3 FCALG FL- FYUFA GNUQQ GNXGY GQDEL HCIFZ HLJTE HMCUK HZ~ IKREB IKYAY IN~ IPNFZ IYOWL JK3 JK8 K8S K9- KD2 L-C LK8 M0R M1P M2P M7P MMDCI MPPUT NAPCQ N~6 N~7 N~B O9- OBZCC OCUKA ODA ODMTH OGKNY OHT OHYEH OKBHI OLL OPUJH ORVUJ OUVQU OVD OVDLW OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OVOZU OXXIT P2P PCD PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X QMB R2J R58 RIG RLZ ROL RWF S4S SJN TEORI TSPGW TWG UAP UKHRP UKR UMD UPT V2I VJK W3M WF8 WH7 WOQ WOW X3V X3W XOL YQT YR5 YRY ZCA ZHY ZZMQN 7X8 PPXIY PQGLB |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-dbf8ad99ca69fc8eda5c80be83840b57691a9a4beb06b33c70f30a2ede150ab83 |
ISSN | 1064-8011 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 12:18:33 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:02:25 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:09 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c241t-dbf8ad99ca69fc8eda5c80be83840b57691a9a4beb06b33c70f30a2ede150ab83 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PQID | 68279108 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68279108 crossref_citationtrail_10_1519_R_18195_1 crossref_primary_10_1519_R_18195_1 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2006-11-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2006 text: 2006-11-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationTitle | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
PublicationYear | 2006 |
SSID | ssj0025553 |
Score | 2.267487 |
Snippet | Resistance exercise intensity is commonly prescribed as a percent of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). However, the relationship between percent 1RM and the number... |
SourceID | proquest crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 819 |
Title | Relationship Between the Number of Repetitions and Selected Percentages of One Repetition Maximum in Free Weight Exercises in Trained and Untrained Men |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/68279108 |
Volume | 20 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZK98ILGgPEGGzWhBBSlJJ7nMd16jRN6pjaDvoW2Ykzqq3JFFIJ-CP8KP4Ux5e42bqHwUvUOrbT5nw6N58LQu9DmntR7se252aeHQSxb1NQ7G3KXJYlICByWVJofB6dXgZn83De6_3pRC2tGjbIfj2YV_I_VIUxoKvIkv0HyppNYQA-A33hChSG66NobCLZRMTVUEdcyahF2edDFRq55aoekSrGPJV9b0DLvBARLWVDr1TV2c8l78y1xvTHYrlaCm_ISc259VV6UK2RbtAkg2hnorsEl6VeQXVt9Lexzi3bVHhFWkp5ZVLpxFm5dgbrikPGMz39tlhS2RPcmlXL6royYqGmXLd70Y4i62zQDQCodYuWIa3rn9aRufeluuHXbeaaNR3cc3a4xtmh-DNoUEKoqiHe8mzfFpZfl6l7Tge8QYdDE8WhNyQHaLJA7ontioPFgbsWj21IwD2paWIZhRUFi9NJKpemYIpveWCzeH20NRydX0yM_R-Gocr30P9BF7qCxZ_Mc--qR3e1A6nyzLbRM006fKSA9xz1eLmDdtaGBv6Ap_LE6QX63YUi1lDEAEWsoIirAnegiAECuIUi7kBRzAModuZiDUW8KLGAIlZQxAaK4oaGotzWQBEDFF-iy5PR7PjU1j0_7Ax0ycbOWUFoniQZjZIiIzynYUYcxolPAoeBcZy4NKEB48yJmO9nsVP4DvV4zsGyoYz4r1C_rEr-GuGioHEY8Sz3SARr4QUTlicw5ruUx9TdRR_bV51muiC--IE36QZJd9GhmXqrqsA8NOmgpVcKPFocvNGSV6vvaUS8GNRy8uYx2-yhp2vkv0X9pl7xd6D4NmwfPYnnMVzJsbuvwfUX5x63cg |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship+Between+the+Number+of+Repetitions+and+Selected+Percentages+of+One+Repetition+Maximum+in+Free+Weight+Exercises+in+Trained+and+Untrained+Men&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+strength+and+conditioning+research&rft.au=Shimano%2C+Tomoko&rft.au=Kraemer%2C+William+J.&rft.au=Spiering%2C+Barry+A.&rft.au=Volek%2C+Jeff+S.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=819&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519%2FR-18195.1&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1519_R_18195_1 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1064-8011&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1064-8011&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1064-8011&client=summon |