Phenomenal transparency and the transparency of subjecthood

According to phenomenal transparency, phenomenal concepts are transparent where a transparent concept is one that reveals the nature of that to which it refers. What is the connection between phenomenal transparency and our concept of a subject of experience? This paper focuses on a recent argument,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnalysis (Oxford) Vol. 81; no. 1; pp. 39 - 45
Main Author Morris, Kevin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2021
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:According to phenomenal transparency, phenomenal concepts are transparent where a transparent concept is one that reveals the nature of that to which it refers. What is the connection between phenomenal transparency and our concept of a subject of experience? This paper focuses on a recent argument, due to Philip Goff, for thinking that phenomenal transparency entails transparency about subjecthood. The argument is premissed on the idea that subjecthood is related to specific phenomenal properties as a determinable of more specific determinates. I argue that the argument fails, which opens the door for one to endorse phenomenal transparency while denying transparency about the concept of a subject of experience. I draw out the consequences of this for certain versions of the combination problem for panpsychist metaphysics and moreover argue that rejecting the transparency of subjecthood does not undermine anti-physicalist arguments premissed on considerations relating to phenomenal transparency .
ISSN:0003-2638
1467-8284
DOI:10.1093/analys/anaa047