Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for B2 glenoids treated with asymmetric reaming has equivalent survivorship and patient outcomes compared with type A glenoids at a mean 9-year follow-up

Walch B2 glenoids can present a challenge to shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Short-term studies have demonstrated that corrective reaming to 10° of retroversion in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can result in good outcomes; however, there is little data reporting the long-term outcomes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 33; no. 11; pp. 2392 - 2399
Main Authors Cirino, Carl M., Kantrowitz, David E., Boucher, Thomas, Patel, Akshar, Duey, Akiro H., Cagle, Paul J., Flatow, Evan L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Walch B2 glenoids can present a challenge to shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Short-term studies have demonstrated that corrective reaming to 10° of retroversion in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can result in good outcomes; however, there is little data reporting the long-term outcomes in this cohort. B2 glenoids treated with high-side reaming present a theoretical risk of early glenoid component failure as one may ream into the subchondral bone. This study aimed to demonstrate that (1) B2 glenoids treated with corrective reaming have durable results and (2) offer similar results to Walch A1/2 in long-term follow-up. Patients who underwent aTSA by a single surgeon (E.L.F.) were identified from a shoulder arthroplasty registry. Inclusion criteria included Walch A1, A2, or B2 glenoid; a diagnosis of primary shoulder osteoarthritis; and a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 5 years. Forty-three patients with B2 glenoids were compared to a cohort of 42 patients with A1 or A2 glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and radiographs were used to assess deformity, glenoid version, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Postoperatively, patients were assessed with radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and visual analog scale (VAS). Eighty-five shoulders (82 patients, 42 B2 and 43 A1/A2 glenoids) with an average follow-up of 9.4 years were included. In the B2 cohort, the average retroversion was 21.1° and posterior subluxation was 69.4% compared with 10.6° (P < .001) and 57.5% (P < .001), respectively, in the A1 or A2 cohort. The cohort demographics were similar except for male sex (B2 69.8% vs. A1 or A2 37.2%, P = .008). There was no difference between the cohorts in their improvement in ASES (P = .807), SST (P = .586), and VAS (P = .930) scores. There was no difference in lateral humeral offset (P = .889) or acromial humeral interval (P = .468) between initial postoperative and final follow-up visits. Survivorship for B2 glenoids was 97.6%, 94.1%, and 73.3% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, compared with 97.6%, 91.9%, and 83.5% in type A glenoids. The revision rate was similar between the 2 groups (P = .432). Lazarus score (P = .682) and rates of humeral radiolucency (P = .366) and humeral osteolysis (P = .194) were similar between the 2 cohorts at final follow-up. Asymmetric reaming of patients with B2 glenoids is a reliable method of glenoid preparation with excellent mid- to long-term clinical results, patient-reported outcomes, and low revision rates similar to their A1 and A2 counterparts.
AbstractList Walch B2 glenoids can present a challenge to shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Short-term studies have demonstrated that corrective reaming to 10° of retroversion in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can result in good outcomes; however, there is little data reporting the long-term outcomes in this cohort. B2 glenoids treated with high-side reaming present a theoretical risk of early glenoid component failure as one may ream into the subchondral bone. This study aimed to demonstrate that (1) B2 glenoids treated with corrective reaming have durable results and (2) offer similar results to Walch A1/2 in long-term follow-up. Patients who underwent aTSA by a single surgeon (E.L.F.) were identified from a shoulder arthroplasty registry. Inclusion criteria included Walch A1, A2, or B2 glenoid; a diagnosis of primary shoulder osteoarthritis; and a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 5 years. Forty-three patients with B2 glenoids were compared to a cohort of 42 patients with A1 or A2 glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and radiographs were used to assess deformity, glenoid version, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Postoperatively, patients were assessed with radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and visual analog scale (VAS). Eighty-five shoulders (82 patients, 42 B2 and 43 A1/A2 glenoids) with an average follow-up of 9.4 years were included. In the B2 cohort, the average retroversion was 21.1° and posterior subluxation was 69.4% compared with 10.6° (P < .001) and 57.5% (P < .001), respectively, in the A1 or A2 cohort. The cohort demographics were similar except for male sex (B2 69.8% vs. A1 or A2 37.2%, P = .008). There was no difference between the cohorts in their improvement in ASES (P = .807), SST (P = .586), and VAS (P = .930) scores. There was no difference in lateral humeral offset (P = .889) or acromial humeral interval (P = .468) between initial postoperative and final follow-up visits. Survivorship for B2 glenoids was 97.6%, 94.1%, and 73.3% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, compared with 97.6%, 91.9%, and 83.5% in type A glenoids. The revision rate was similar between the 2 groups (P = .432). Lazarus score (P = .682) and rates of humeral radiolucency (P = .366) and humeral osteolysis (P = .194) were similar between the 2 cohorts at final follow-up. Asymmetric reaming of patients with B2 glenoids is a reliable method of glenoid preparation with excellent mid- to long-term clinical results, patient-reported outcomes, and low revision rates similar to their A1 and A2 counterparts.
Walch B2 glenoids can present a challenge to shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Short-term studies have demonstrated that corrective reaming to 10° of retroversion in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can result in good outcomes; however, there is little data reporting the long-term outcomes in this cohort. B2 glenoids treated with high-side reaming present a theoretical risk of early glenoid component failure as one may ream into the subchondral bone. This study aimed to demonstrate that (1) B2 glenoids treated with corrective reaming have durable results and (2) offer similar results to Walch A1/2 in long-term follow-up.BACKGROUNDWalch B2 glenoids can present a challenge to shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Short-term studies have demonstrated that corrective reaming to 10° of retroversion in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can result in good outcomes; however, there is little data reporting the long-term outcomes in this cohort. B2 glenoids treated with high-side reaming present a theoretical risk of early glenoid component failure as one may ream into the subchondral bone. This study aimed to demonstrate that (1) B2 glenoids treated with corrective reaming have durable results and (2) offer similar results to Walch A1/2 in long-term follow-up.Patients who underwent aTSA by a single surgeon (E.L.F.) were identified from a shoulder arthroplasty registry. Inclusion criteria included Walch A1, A2, or B2 glenoid; a diagnosis of primary shoulder osteoarthritis; and a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 5 years. Forty-three patients with B2 glenoids were compared to a cohort of 42 patients with A1 or A2 glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and radiographs were used to assess deformity, glenoid version, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Postoperatively, patients were assessed with radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and visual analog scale (VAS).METHODSPatients who underwent aTSA by a single surgeon (E.L.F.) were identified from a shoulder arthroplasty registry. Inclusion criteria included Walch A1, A2, or B2 glenoid; a diagnosis of primary shoulder osteoarthritis; and a minimum radiographic and clinical follow-up of 5 years. Forty-three patients with B2 glenoids were compared to a cohort of 42 patients with A1 or A2 glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and radiographs were used to assess deformity, glenoid version, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Postoperatively, patients were assessed with radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and visual analog scale (VAS).Eighty-five shoulders (82 patients, 42 B2 and 43 A1/A2 glenoids) with an average follow-up of 9.4 years were included. In the B2 cohort, the average retroversion was 21.1° and posterior subluxation was 69.4% compared with 10.6° (P < .001) and 57.5% (P < .001), respectively, in the A1 or A2 cohort. The cohort demographics were similar except for male sex (B2 69.8% vs. A1 or A2 37.2%, P = .008). There was no difference between the cohorts in their improvement in ASES (P = .807), SST (P = .586), and VAS (P = .930) scores. There was no difference in lateral humeral offset (P = .889) or acromial humeral interval (P = .468) between initial postoperative and final follow-up visits. Survivorship for B2 glenoids was 97.6%, 94.1%, and 73.3% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, compared with 97.6%, 91.9%, and 83.5% in type A glenoids. The revision rate was similar between the 2 groups (P = .432). Lazarus score (P = .682) and rates of humeral radiolucency (P = .366) and humeral osteolysis (P = .194) were similar between the 2 cohorts at final follow-up.RESULTSEighty-five shoulders (82 patients, 42 B2 and 43 A1/A2 glenoids) with an average follow-up of 9.4 years were included. In the B2 cohort, the average retroversion was 21.1° and posterior subluxation was 69.4% compared with 10.6° (P < .001) and 57.5% (P < .001), respectively, in the A1 or A2 cohort. The cohort demographics were similar except for male sex (B2 69.8% vs. A1 or A2 37.2%, P = .008). There was no difference between the cohorts in their improvement in ASES (P = .807), SST (P = .586), and VAS (P = .930) scores. There was no difference in lateral humeral offset (P = .889) or acromial humeral interval (P = .468) between initial postoperative and final follow-up visits. Survivorship for B2 glenoids was 97.6%, 94.1%, and 73.3% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, compared with 97.6%, 91.9%, and 83.5% in type A glenoids. The revision rate was similar between the 2 groups (P = .432). Lazarus score (P = .682) and rates of humeral radiolucency (P = .366) and humeral osteolysis (P = .194) were similar between the 2 cohorts at final follow-up.Asymmetric reaming of patients with B2 glenoids is a reliable method of glenoid preparation with excellent mid- to long-term clinical results, patient-reported outcomes, and low revision rates similar to their A1 and A2 counterparts.CONCLUSIONAsymmetric reaming of patients with B2 glenoids is a reliable method of glenoid preparation with excellent mid- to long-term clinical results, patient-reported outcomes, and low revision rates similar to their A1 and A2 counterparts.
Author Flatow, Evan L.
Patel, Akshar
Cagle, Paul J.
Duey, Akiro H.
Cirino, Carl M.
Kantrowitz, David E.
Boucher, Thomas
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Carl M.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2779-5312
  surname: Cirino
  fullname: Cirino, Carl M.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: David E.
  surname: Kantrowitz
  fullname: Kantrowitz, David E.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Thomas
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0617-4135
  surname: Boucher
  fullname: Boucher, Thomas
  email: Thomas.boucher@mountsinai.org
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Akshar
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8620-4802
  surname: Patel
  fullname: Patel, Akshar
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Akiro H.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0308-0512
  surname: Duey
  fullname: Duey, Akiro H.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Paul J.
  surname: Cagle
  fullname: Cagle, Paul J.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Evan L.
  surname: Flatow
  fullname: Flatow, Evan L.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38688420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctu1DAUhiNURC_wAGyQl2wynNiOk4jVUHGTKrGBtXXGPul4lMSp7UyVl-PZ8Gha2CEd-fr_ny__dXEx-YmK4m0Fmwoq9eGwOUTacOByAyIXvCiuqlrwUtUAF3kMdVvyRqrL4jrGAwB0Evir4lK0qm0lh6vi93bC5EdnWPIJBxb3fhksBYYh7YOfB4xpZb0P7BNn9wNN3tnIUiBMZNmjS3uGcR1HSiEz8vLopnu2x8joYXFHzI7E4hKO7uhD3LuZ4WTZjMmdNvySjB8pstzOGJ6JaZ2Jbf8dh4khGwkn1pUrYcj3GQb_WC7z6-Jlj0OkN0_9TfHry-eft9_Kux9fv99u70rDRZ3KDlvTIXK124GQPE9t2xuQVCmyUhglekWyAanqHSpEw6kXVlnBCRpEKW6K92fuHPzDQjHp0UVDw4AT-SVqAbJrqqar2yytzlITfIyBej0HN2JYdQX6FJs-6BybPsWmQeSC7Hn3hF92I9m_juecsuDjWUD5kUdHQUeTf9CQdYFM0ta7_-D_AJvqr4w
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.024
10.1016/j.jse.2006.07.010
10.2106/00004623-199274040-00005
10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8
10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.036
10.2106/JBJS.G.01263
10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.025
10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.050
10.2106/00004623-200207000-00013
10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.030
10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.021
10.1097/BTE.0000000000000048
10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00112
10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.019
10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.003
10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.006
10.1007/s00402-023-04802-4
10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.115
10.2106/JBJS.J.00699
10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.030
10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049
10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90232-2
10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.003
10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.010
10.1067/mse.2001.118482
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024
– notice: Published by Elsevier Inc.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1532-6500
EndPage 2399
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_jse_2024_03_030
38688420
S1058274624003100
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKAS
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXKI
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADZCM
AEBSH
AEKER
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFJKZ
AFKWA
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEK
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF0
OR.
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TEORI
UHS
UV1
WUQ
YFH
Z5R
~G-
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-9a8c9aa26bb03429a8d8fc04e16ed43c63f6e470465ba6aac2ef3d6d32e07aa43
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 1058-2746
1532-6500
IngestDate Fri Oct 18 23:32:25 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 16 15:13:38 EDT 2024
Sat Nov 02 12:29:56 EDT 2024
Sat Oct 19 15:54:31 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
Walch B2 glenoid
retroversion
humeral subluxation
Retrospective Cohort Comparison
corrective high-side reaming
Level III
Prognosis Study
glenohumeral osteoarthritis
Language English
License Published by Elsevier Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c235t-9a8c9aa26bb03429a8d8fc04e16ed43c63f6e470465ba6aac2ef3d6d32e07aa43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0617-4135
0000-0001-8620-4802
0000-0003-0308-0512
0000-0002-2779-5312
PMID 38688420
PQID 3049717958
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3049717958
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2024_03_030
pubmed_primary_38688420
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jse_2024_03_030
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2024
2024-Nov
2024-11-00
20241101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2024
  text: November 2024
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate J Shoulder Elbow Surg
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Loew, Schnetzke, Kappes, Bruckner, Nolte (bib12) 2023; 143
Jensen, Tangtiphaiboontana, Marigi, Mallett, Sperling, Sanchez-Sotelo (bib10) 2021; 30
Piponov, Savin, Shah, Esposito, Schwartz, Moretti (bib17) 2016; 40
Yanke, Shin, Pearson, Bach, Romeo, Cole (bib26) 2017; 33
Sheth, Morris, Laughlin, Cox, Jones, Elkousy (bib21) 2020; 29
Orvets, Chamberlain, Patterson, Chalmers, Gosselin, Salazar (bib16) 2018; 27
Walch, Moraga, Young, Castellanos-Rosas (bib24) 2012; 21
Walch, Badet, Boulahia, Khoury (bib23) 1999; 14
Huijsmans, Haen, Kidd, Dhert, van der Hulst, Willems (bib9) 2007; 16
Cagle, Shukla, Parsons, Flatow (bib2) 2015; 16
Farron, Terrier, Buchler (bib5) 2006; 15
Hinse, Pastor, Hasler, Ernstbrunner, Wieser, Gerber (bib8) 2023; 7
Raymond, McCann, Sarangi (bib18) 2013; 22
Matsen, Clinton, Lynch, Bertelsen, Richardson (bib15) 2008; 90
Lowe, Testa, Li, Miller, DeAngelis, Jawa (bib13) 2017; 26
Bryce, Davison, Okita, Lewis, Sharkey, Armstrong (bib1) 2010; 19
Chalmers, Salazar, Chamberlain, Keener (bib3) 2017; 26
Collins, Tencer, Sidles, Matsen (bib4) 1992; 74
Flurin, Roche, Wright, Marczuk, Zuckerman (bib6) 2015; 73
Wagner, Farley, Higgins, Wilson, Daly, Gottschalk (bib22) 2020; 29
Walch, Young, Boileau, Loew, Gazielly, Mole (bib25) 2012; 94
Luedke, Kissenberth, Tolan, Hawkins, Tokish (bib14) 2018; 6
Shapiro, McGarry, Gupta, Lee, Lee (bib20) 2007; 16
Harold, Sweeney, Torchia, Chamberlain, Keener (bib7) 2023; 32
Lazarus, Jensen, Southworth, Matsen (bib11) 2002; 84
Sanchez-Sotelo, O’Driscoll, Torchia, Cofield, Rowland (bib19) 2001; 10
Cagle (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib2) 2015; 16
Loew (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib12) 2023; 143
Lowe (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib13) 2017; 26
Bryce (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib1) 2010; 19
Luedke (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib14) 2018; 6
Shapiro (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib20) 2007; 16
Sheth (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib21) 2020; 29
Flurin (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib6) 2015; 73
Orvets (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib16) 2018; 27
Jensen (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib10) 2021; 30
Wagner (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib22) 2020; 29
Harold (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib7) 2023; 32
Sanchez-Sotelo (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib19) 2001; 10
Collins (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib4) 1992; 74
Huijsmans (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib9) 2007; 16
Raymond (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib18) 2013; 22
Walch (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib24) 2012; 21
Hinse (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib8) 2023; 7
Walch (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib23) 1999; 14
Walch (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib25) 2012; 94
Farron (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib5) 2006; 15
Yanke (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib26) 2017; 33
Chalmers (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib3) 2017; 26
Lazarus (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib11) 2002; 84
Matsen (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib15) 2008; 90
Piponov (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib17) 2016; 40
References_xml – volume: 27
  start-page: S58
  year: 2018
  end-page: S64
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a B2 glenoid addressed with corrective reaming
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Salazar
– volume: 16
  start-page: 38
  year: 2015
  end-page: 42
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Subscapularis repair after shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Flatow
– volume: 15
  start-page: 521
  year: 2006
  end-page: 526
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Buchler
– volume: 14
  start-page: 756
  year: 1999
  end-page: 760
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  contributor:
    fullname: Khoury
– volume: 26
  start-page: 258
  year: 2017
  end-page: 264
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Keener
– volume: 32
  start-page: S8
  year: 2023
  end-page: S16
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a B2 glenoid addressed with corrective reaming: mean 8-year follow-up
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Keener
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2601
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2609
  ident: bib22
  article-title: The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Gottschalk
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1174
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1182
  ident: bib11
  article-title: The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  contributor:
    fullname: Matsen
– volume: 94
  start-page: 145
  year: 2012
  end-page: 150
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  contributor:
    fullname: Mole
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1083
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Magnetic resonance scanning vs axillary radiography in the assessment of glenoid version for osteoarthritis
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Sarangi
– volume: 19
  start-page: 994
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1002
  ident: bib1
  article-title: A biomechanical study of posterior glenoid bone loss and humeral head translation
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Armstrong
– volume: 73
  start-page: S118
  year: 2015
  end-page: S123
  ident: bib6
  article-title: A comparison and correlation of clinical outcome metrics in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)
  contributor:
    fullname: Zuckerman
– volume: 16
  start-page: 803
  year: 2007
  end-page: 809
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Willems
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2571
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2577
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty performed on B2 vs. A1 type glenoids
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Elkousy
– volume: 33
  start-page: 709
  year: 2017
  end-page: 715
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Three-Dimensional magnetic resonance imaging quantification of glenoid bone loss is equivalent to 3-dimensional computed tomography quantification: cadaveric study
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  contributor:
    fullname: Cole
– volume: 26
  start-page: 669
  year: 2017
  end-page: 673
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Jawa
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2347
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2353
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?
  publication-title: Int Orthop
  contributor:
    fullname: Moretti
– volume: 7
  start-page: 464
  year: 2023
  end-page: 471
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Mid- to long-term clinical and radiological results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with B2 glenoids
  publication-title: JSES Int
  contributor:
    fullname: Gerber
– volume: 74
  start-page: 501
  year: 1992
  end-page: 507
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Edge displacement and deformation of glenoid components in response to eccentric loading. The effect of preparation of the glenoid bone
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  contributor:
    fullname: Matsen
– volume: 10
  start-page: 526
  year: 2001
  end-page: 531
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Radiographic assessment of cemented humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Rowland
– volume: 143
  start-page: 4853
  year: 2023
  end-page: 4860
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Nolte
– volume: 16
  start-page: S90
  year: 2007
  end-page: S95
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Lee
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1526
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1533
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Castellanos-Rosas
– volume: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with B2 glenoids: a systematic review
  publication-title: JBJS Rev
  contributor:
    fullname: Tokish
– volume: 30
  start-page: S131
  year: 2021
  end-page: S139
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with excellent outcomes and low revision rates in the elderly
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  contributor:
    fullname: Sanchez-Sotelo
– volume: 90
  start-page: 885
  year: 2008
  end-page: 896
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  contributor:
    fullname: Richardson
– volume: 26
  start-page: 669
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib13
  article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.024
  contributor:
    fullname: Lowe
– volume: 16
  start-page: S90
  issue: 3 Suppl
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib20
  article-title: Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.07.010
  contributor:
    fullname: Shapiro
– volume: 74
  start-page: 501
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib4
  article-title: Edge displacement and deformation of glenoid components in response to eccentric loading. The effect of preparation of the glenoid bone
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-199274040-00005
  contributor:
    fullname: Collins
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2347
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib17
  article-title: Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?
  publication-title: Int Orthop
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3201-8
  contributor:
    fullname: Piponov
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib18
  article-title: Magnetic resonance scanning vs axillary radiography in the assessment of glenoid version for osteoarthritis
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.036
  contributor:
    fullname: Raymond
– volume: 90
  start-page: 885
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib15
  article-title: Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01263
  contributor:
    fullname: Matsen
– volume: 33
  start-page: 709
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib26
  article-title: Three-Dimensional magnetic resonance imaging quantification of glenoid bone loss is equivalent to 3-dimensional computed tomography quantification: cadaveric study
  publication-title: Arthroscopy
  doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.025
  contributor:
    fullname: Yanke
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2571
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib21
  article-title: Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty performed on B2 vs. A1 type glenoids
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.050
  contributor:
    fullname: Sheth
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1174
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib11
  article-title: The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion
  publication-title: J Bone Jt Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00013
  contributor:
    fullname: Lazarus
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1526
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib24
  article-title: Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.030
  contributor:
    fullname: Walch
– volume: 26
  start-page: 258
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib3
  article-title: Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.021
  contributor:
    fullname: Chalmers
– volume: 73
  start-page: S118
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib6
  article-title: A comparison and correlation of clinical outcome metrics in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)
  contributor:
    fullname: Flurin
– volume: 16
  start-page: 38
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib2
  article-title: Subscapularis repair after shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1097/BTE.0000000000000048
  contributor:
    fullname: Cagle
– volume: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib14
  article-title: Outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with B2 glenoids: a systematic review
  publication-title: JBJS Rev
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00112
  contributor:
    fullname: Luedke
– volume: 32
  start-page: S8
  issue: 6S
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib7
  article-title: Total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a B2 glenoid addressed with corrective reaming: mean 8-year follow-up
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.019
  contributor:
    fullname: Harold
– volume: 27
  start-page: S58
  issue: 6S
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib16
  article-title: Total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a B2 glenoid addressed with corrective reaming
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Orvets
– volume: 7
  start-page: 464
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib8
  article-title: Mid- to long-term clinical and radiological results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with B2 glenoids
  publication-title: JSES Int
  doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.006
  contributor:
    fullname: Hinse
– volume: 143
  start-page: 4853
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib12
  article-title: Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04802-4
  contributor:
    fullname: Loew
– volume: 16
  start-page: 803
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib9
  article-title: Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.115
  contributor:
    fullname: Huijsmans
– volume: 94
  start-page: 145
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib25
  article-title: Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00699
  contributor:
    fullname: Walch
– volume: 30
  start-page: S131
  issue: 7S
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib10
  article-title: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with excellent outcomes and low revision rates in the elderly
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.030
  contributor:
    fullname: Jensen
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2601
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib22
  article-title: The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049
  contributor:
    fullname: Wagner
– volume: 14
  start-page: 756
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib23
  article-title: Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
  publication-title: J Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90232-2
  contributor:
    fullname: Walch
– volume: 15
  start-page: 521
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib5
  article-title: Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Farron
– volume: 19
  start-page: 994
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib1
  article-title: A biomechanical study of posterior glenoid bone loss and humeral head translation
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.010
  contributor:
    fullname: Bryce
– volume: 10
  start-page: 526
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030_bib19
  article-title: Radiographic assessment of cemented humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.118482
  contributor:
    fullname: Sanchez-Sotelo
SSID ssj0009402
Score 2.4797566
Snippet Walch B2 glenoids can present a challenge to shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Short-term studies have demonstrated that corrective reaming to 10° of...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2392
SubjectTerms Aged
Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods
corrective high-side reaming
Female
Follow-Up Studies
glenohumeral osteoarthritis
Glenoid Cavity - diagnostic imaging
Glenoid Cavity - surgery
Humans
humeral subluxation
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Range of Motion, Articular
Retrospective Studies
retroversion
Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Shoulder Prosthesis
Treatment Outcome
Walch B2 glenoid
Title Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for B2 glenoids treated with asymmetric reaming has equivalent survivorship and patient outcomes compared with type A glenoids at a mean 9-year follow-up
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.030
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38688420
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3049717958
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELba7YULouK1PKpB4oQUNrUdr3NcqlYLiF6gUm_WxHZoqiZZmgS0F35af1vHeVAhAQekXGzJj3hmPDP25xnGXsfCkQSRkyOXiYqk8y7C1HOSeJ0nOrOpleHt8KdTtT6TH86T8x12NL2FCbDKce8f9vR-tx5rFuNqLjZFsfhMloEmn0oFFGQ4pt5le6SOuJ6xvdX7j-vTu9i7coQeJsQU1GC63OxhXpdNCJbJZR_qNGCh_6ye_mZ-9mro5AG7P9qPsBqmuM92fPWQ3awq8p3LwkJbkzENzUVIXO2vgf4kpEEgC7ndApmn8I7DV9IzdeEa6DHm3kE4igVstmUZsmtZoOqSFBpcYAP-W1cQL5JmgqajXeV73cOeASsHY0hWqLuWVs83MOHZhx7D4S6s7obDFhBKjxWk0Zbki-ZzdVX_iLrNI3Z2cvzlaB2NiRkiy0XSRilqmyJylWUhgiAVnc5tLP2h8k4Kq0SuvFyS651kqBAt97lwygnu4yWiFI_ZrKor_5QBWZ95Sl2IZZZL5XNUQshUZxkRynEUc_ZmoofZDPE3zARMuzREPBOIZ2JBXzxncqKY-Y2JDOmHfzV7NVHXkHCFGxOsfN01JtxBkr-bJnrOngxk_zULoZXWksfP_m_Q5-xeKA3PGl-wWXvd-Zdk37TZAdt9-_PwYOTiW5p8_aE
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,4509,24128,27936,27937,45597,45691
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKe4ALAvFanoPECSnaYDte57hUVFva7oVW6s2a2A5N1STbJgHtn-O3Mc6DCgk4IOUSR37E4_F8Y38eM_YuFo40iJwcuUhUJJ13Eaaek8brPNGZTa0MZ4dP1mp1Jj-fJ-c7bH86CxNolePcP8zp_Ww9pszH3pxvimL-hZCBJp9KBRZkWKa-w_YIDaSknXvLw6PV-jb2rhyphwkNCsowbW72NK_LJgTL5LIPdRq40H82T3-Dn70ZOnjA7o_4EZZDEx-yHV89Yj-WFfnOZWGhrQlMQ3MRLq72N0B_Eq5BIITcboHgKXzk8JXsTF24BnqOuXcQlmIBm21Zhtu1LFBySQYNLrABf90VNBbJMkHT0azyre5pz4CVgzEkK9RdS73nG5j47EOJYXEXlrfVYQsIpccK0mhL-kXtubqqv0fd5jE7O_h0ur-KxosZIstF0kYpapsicpVlIYIgvTqd21j6D8o7KawSufJyQa53kqFCtNznwiknuI8XiFI8YbtVXflnDAh95ikVIRZZLpXPUQkhU51lJCjHUczY-0keZjPE3zATMe3SkPBMEJ6JBT3xjMlJYua3QWTIPvwr29tJuoaUK-yYYOXrrjFhD5L83TTRM_Z0EPuvVgittJY8fv5_lb5hd1enJ8fm-HB99ILdC1-GI44v2W570_lXhHXa7PU4ln8CvG__lQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomic+total+shoulder+arthroplasty+for+B2+glenoids+treated+with+asymmetric+reaming+has+equivalent+survivorship+and+patient+outcomes+compared+with+type+A+glenoids+at+a+mean+9-year+follow-up&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+shoulder+and+elbow+surgery&rft.au=Cirino%2C+Carl+M.&rft.au=Kantrowitz%2C+David+E.&rft.au=Boucher%2C+Thomas&rft.au=Patel%2C+Akshar&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2392&rft.epage=2399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jse.2024.03.030&rft.externalDocID=S1058274624003100
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1058-2746&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1058-2746&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1058-2746&client=summon