Safeguarding Fertility With Whole Ovary Cryopreservation and Microvascular Transplantation: Higher Follicular Survival With Vitrification Than With Slow Freezing in a Ewe Model
In young women, ovarian cortex cryopreservation before gonadotoxic chemotherapy and its avascular grafting after cancer healing permitted fertility restoration. However, ischemia reduced the grafts' lifespan. Microvascular transplantation of cryopreserved whole ovary may allow immediate revascu...
Saved in:
Published in | Transplantation Vol. 100; no. 9; p. 1889 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.09.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In young women, ovarian cortex cryopreservation before gonadotoxic chemotherapy and its avascular grafting after cancer healing permitted fertility restoration. However, ischemia reduced the grafts' lifespan. Microvascular transplantation of cryopreserved whole ovary may allow immediate revascularization, ensuring better fertility preservation, but the best cryopreservation method is unknown. We aimed to compare slow freezing and vitrification of whole ovary for fertility preservation purposes, in an ewe model.
Twelve ewes were allocated at random to slow freezing (n = 6) or vitrification group (n = 6). Ewes' left ovary was removed and cryopreserved. Dimethyl sulfoxide 2 M was used as cryoprotector for slow freezing. Vitrification was obtained using increasing concentrations of a vitrification solution of the latest generation (VM3) and gradual temperature lowering to minimize toxicity. After a month, the right ovary was removed, the left ovary was thawed/warmed, and its vessels were anastomosed to the right pedicle. Fertility and ovarian function were assessed for 3 years. Ovarian follicles in native and transplanted ovaries were counted and compared at study completion.
Hormonal secretion resumed in all ewes of both groups. One ewe of the slow-freezing group delivered healthy twins 1 year 9 months and 12 days after transplantation. Estimated whole follicle survival was very low in both groups but significantly higher after vitrification than after slow freezing (0.3% ± 0.5% vs 0.017% ± 0.019%, respectively; p < 0.05).
Further progress is needed before whole-ovary cryopreservation can be considered an option for safeguarding fertility. Whole ovary vitrification provides better follicular survival compared to slow freezing and may be a valuable cryopreservation option. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In young women, ovarian cortex cryopreservation before gonadotoxic chemotherapy and its avascular grafting after cancer healing permitted fertility restoration. However, ischemia reduced the grafts' lifespan. Microvascular transplantation of cryopreserved whole ovary may allow immediate revascularization, ensuring better fertility preservation, but the best cryopreservation method is unknown. We aimed to compare slow freezing and vitrification of whole ovary for fertility preservation purposes, in an ewe model.
Twelve ewes were allocated at random to slow freezing (n = 6) or vitrification group (n = 6). Ewes' left ovary was removed and cryopreserved. Dimethyl sulfoxide 2 M was used as cryoprotector for slow freezing. Vitrification was obtained using increasing concentrations of a vitrification solution of the latest generation (VM3) and gradual temperature lowering to minimize toxicity. After a month, the right ovary was removed, the left ovary was thawed/warmed, and its vessels were anastomosed to the right pedicle. Fertility and ovarian function were assessed for 3 years. Ovarian follicles in native and transplanted ovaries were counted and compared at study completion.
Hormonal secretion resumed in all ewes of both groups. One ewe of the slow-freezing group delivered healthy twins 1 year 9 months and 12 days after transplantation. Estimated whole follicle survival was very low in both groups but significantly higher after vitrification than after slow freezing (0.3% ± 0.5% vs 0.017% ± 0.019%, respectively; p < 0.05).
Further progress is needed before whole-ovary cryopreservation can be considered an option for safeguarding fertility. Whole ovary vitrification provides better follicular survival compared to slow freezing and may be a valuable cryopreservation option. |
Author | Lornage, Jacqueline Vertu-Ciolino, Delphine Salle, Bruno Torre, Antoine Mazoyer, Claire Selva, Jacqueline |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Antoine surname: Torre fullname: Torre, Antoine organization: 1 INSERM U846, Stem-cell and Brain Research Institute, Bron, France. 2 Laboratory of Medicine and Biology of Reproduction, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France. 3 UFR des Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines University, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France. 4 Department of Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfants, Bron, France – sequence: 2 givenname: Delphine surname: Vertu-Ciolino fullname: Vertu-Ciolino, Delphine – sequence: 3 givenname: Claire surname: Mazoyer fullname: Mazoyer, Claire – sequence: 4 givenname: Jacqueline surname: Selva fullname: Selva, Jacqueline – sequence: 5 givenname: Jacqueline surname: Lornage fullname: Lornage, Jacqueline – sequence: 6 givenname: Bruno surname: Salle fullname: Salle, Bruno |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27336395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpNkNtKw0AQhhdR7EGfQJB9gdRsTpt4J6WxQotCo70sk82kWdlmw-ZQ6lP5iEaj4NwMzPx8888_IeelLpGQG2bPmB3xu-RlZv8r5kTBGRkz3_WswA7tEZnU9Xu_8F3OL8nI4a4buJE_Jp8byHHfgslkuacxmkYq2ZzoVjYF3RZaIX3uwJzo3Jx0ZbBG00EjdUmhzOhaCqM7qEWrwNDEQFlXCsrmR3FPl3JfoKGxVkoOkk1rOtmBGvhvsjEyl2IAJgWUw3yj9JHGBvHj25Tsb9HFEelaZ6iuyEUOqsbr3z4lr_EimS-t1fPj0_xhZQmn_83iwIMcbcYFy1jueSFmPg9Sm2OIYWi7fULARMQgDQWGkObM8yEH7vRqEQTcmZLbgVu16QGzXWXkoc9h9xed8wWoHHWo |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1097/TP.0000000000001296 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1534-6080 |
ExternalDocumentID | 27336395 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .-D .55 .GJ .XZ .Z2 01R 0R~ 123 1J1 3O- 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5RE 5VS 77Y 7O~ AAAAV AAAXR AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAMOA AAMTA AAQKA AARTV AASCR AASOK AAUEB AAXQO AAYEP ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABJNI ABOCM ABPPZ ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ACBNA ACCJW ACDDN ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ADFPA ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB AE3 AE6 AEBDS AEETU AENEX AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFSOK AFUWQ AGINI AHOMT AHQNM AHRYX AHVBC AIJEX AINUH AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKULP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AWKKM BOYCO BQLVK BS7 C45 CGR CS3 CUY CVF D0S DIWNM DU5 DUNZO E.X EBS ECM EEVPB EIF EJD ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FL- FW0 GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HZ~ IH2 IKREB IKYAY IN~ J5H JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 KMI L-C L7B MVM N9A NPM N~7 N~B N~M O9- OAG OAH OCUKA ODA ODMTH OHT OHYEH OJAPA OL1 OLG OLH OLU OLV OLW OLY OLZ OPUJH ORVUJ OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OVOZU OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P-K P2P R58 RLZ S4R S4S T8P TEORI TSPGW V2I VVN W3M WOQ WOW X3V X3W X7M XXN XYM YFH YOC ZFV ZGI ZXP ZZMQN |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2336-7a76fe017c1d1f448ed576b07e8e8803129a1c91ab8ce8abf145afa72d1fc6672 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 15 23:56:11 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2336-7a76fe017c1d1f448ed576b07e8e8803129a1c91ab8ce8abf145afa72d1fc6672 |
PMID | 27336395 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_27336395 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-Sep |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2016 text: 2016-Sep |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Transplantation |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Transplantation |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
SSID | ssj0005377 |
Score | 2.3022623 |
Snippet | In young women, ovarian cortex cryopreservation before gonadotoxic chemotherapy and its avascular grafting after cancer healing permitted fertility... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 1889 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Biomarkers - blood Cryopreservation - methods Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology Dimethyl Sulfoxide - pharmacology Female Fertility Preservation - methods Graft Survival Live Birth Microvessels - transplantation Models, Animal Ovarian Follicle - transplantation Ovary - blood supply Ovary - secretion Ovary - transplantation Pregnancy Progesterone - blood Recovery of Function Sheep Time Factors Vitrification |
Title | Safeguarding Fertility With Whole Ovary Cryopreservation and Microvascular Transplantation: Higher Follicular Survival With Vitrification Than With Slow Freezing in a Ewe Model |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27336395 |
Volume | 100 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEF6cFkovpU36fjCH0ktQq5e1Um_BxISC04Kdxy2s1qvEoEjGyA72r-pP6k_pzO5KVtS0tPVBmN31rqz5mJkdfTvD2PuMB0p4sXKCYJo4lNDbSQRiOZJZ4LuScsRRHHJ0HB2dhF_O--e93o8Wa2lZpR_l5s5zJf8jVWxDudIp2X-QbDMpNuB3lC9eUcJ4_SsZj0WmLrWMcb8_JIa0dqrPKLZ6RoVv97-uiBU3WKx1sZM6AGvYFUTFa4ioJsl5LsxJJE33sBSQIaXtNoPGS1QsKwqx0wqns2pBRCMz5eRKFKZ9nJc36BArtbHnZcT-4Y3SVdfyti_cWXIb715Y6m9Rla23_qf4_5bOYEZVhkqjKvP5VWvASGzKtT3XmIsWq3es8pWlBEs0g3n9Gxvs8KKGzYW2qlbQoRO5pvpTo8FdtwXVpKWPvdgUKPrFUJgExJNvJn-l_aDvE7VH47OeX2vs-JQ1MjDlQP_c28neXXftsB0ekx4-pmhSTUEKOK8zYSX80x13Q7mq7QydfY_2fyaP2SO7cYEDg8InrKeKXbZ3UIiqvF7DB9BUYv2OZpc9GFnGxh773sYoNBgFQgpojILGKHQxCohRuIVR6ADmMxiEwhahUCPUzH8LoUAINe2EUKgRCjNcCxChoBH6lJ0MDyeDI8dWCXGkj0_G4YJHmULDIr2pl4VhrKa4h05drmKFxinAxyg8mXgijaWKRZp5YV9kgvs4WkYR95-xe0VZqBcMvBTtm4r7qUppI8-TKU9c1Fkh92Ums-lL9tyI4GJuUsFc1MJ59due1-zhFshv2P0MdY96i45slb7TaPgJ0jWlhg |
link.rule.ids | 783 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safeguarding+Fertility+With+Whole+Ovary+Cryopreservation+and+Microvascular+Transplantation%3A+Higher+Follicular+Survival+With+Vitrification+Than+With+Slow+Freezing+in+a+Ewe+Model&rft.jtitle=Transplantation&rft.au=Torre%2C+Antoine&rft.au=Vertu-Ciolino%2C+Delphine&rft.au=Mazoyer%2C+Claire&rft.au=Selva%2C+Jacqueline&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.eissn=1534-6080&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FTP.0000000000001296&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27336395&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27336395&rft.externalDocID=27336395 |