Students' metacognitive development in an innovative second year chemical engineering course

• Published in: Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 313 - 335
• Main Authors: Case, Jennifer, Gunstone, Richard, Lewis, Alison
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2001
• Subjects: Chemical Engineering; Chemistry; Cognitive development; Concept Formation; Educational Strategies; Engineering education; Higher Education; Interviews; Metacognition; Problem Solving; Student Attitudes; Student development; Student journals; Study habits
• ISSN: 0157-244X; 1573-1898
• DOI: 10.1023/A:1013113807788

In this paper the metacognitive development of students in a second year chemical engineering course (which had such development as an explicit aim) is investigated. Journal data from the class were analysed and a framework comprising four different areas of metacognitive development was arrived at. Within each area, key shifts in approach were identified. The first area (category 1) concerns students' knowledge and awareness (conceptions) of learning, and the important development in this area was from a focus on solving problems towards a stronger valuing of conceptual understanding. The second and third areas deal with aspects of control. The second area (category 2a) is that of organising one's learning, and here students were seen to develop from an uninformed focus on discipline and time management, towards a more metacognitively informed use of resources. The third area (category 2b) is monitoring of learning, with the key shift here from naively accepting outside judgements, to using them strategically for purposes of self-assessment. The fourth area (category 3) involves students' sense of a purpose for learning beyond the subject. Important developments here were both in terms of a career goal, as well as personal growth. Data from interviews with five students largely confirmed the validity of these categories, as well as illustrating that different students showed development in different areas. [Author abstract]