A framework for the evaluation of continuing education short courses in dentistry

• Published in: British dental journal Vol. 187; no. 8; pp. 445 - 449
• Main Authors: Bullock, A D, Belfield, C R, Butterfield, S, Morris, Z S, Ribbins, P M, Frame, J W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 23.10.1999
• Subjects: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Curriculum; Data Collection; Dentistry; Education, Dental, Continuing - methods; England; General Practice, Dental - education; Humans; Pilot Projects; Practice Patterns, Dentists; Program Evaluation - methods; Program Evaluation - standards; Total Quality Management - methods; Total Quality Management - standards; England
• DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800300
• ISSN: 0007-0610

The objective of this paper is to propose an evaluation framework for short courses in continuing education for general dental practitioners (GDPs) (so called, Section 63 courses). Existing monitoring and evaluation procedures in the West Midlands deanery were examined and an improved evaluation framework was then devised, piloted and revised. A 5 phase method was used incorporating the examination of existing practice (Phases 1 and 2), development of a new framework (Phase 3), piloting (Phase 4) and revision of the evaluation framework in the light of the pilot. This approach will be implemented in the West Midlands and may be adapted for national use (Phase 5). It was found that existing monitoring and evaluation was inconsistent in prevalence and scope. Those involved in short courses were in favour of a more consistent and visible evaluation, including some assessment of impact-on-practice and cost-effectiveness. In conclusion, meaningful evaluation needs to include four key processes: data gathering; data analysis; dissemination and, action planning (reviewing provision in the light of the data analysis). Thus, this evaluation framework feeds into a quality development cycle designed to ensure high quality and relevant short course provision for general dental practitioners.