Intersectionality and women's participation in peace negotiations

This article proposes the concept of a ‘travelling’ intersectionality as an alternative to current high-level practitioners' understanding of gender and their expectations of women's participation in peace negotiations. Abstract The Women, Peace and Security resolutions have consistently c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational affairs (London) Vol. 100; no. 6; pp. 2543 - 2561
Main Authors Sapiano, Jenna, Jin, Xianan, Heathcote, Gina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford University Press 04.11.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This article proposes the concept of a ‘travelling’ intersectionality as an alternative to current high-level practitioners' understanding of gender and their expectations of women's participation in peace negotiations. Abstract The Women, Peace and Security resolutions have consistently called for women's increased participation at all levels in institutions and mechanisms for preventing, managing and resolving conflict. Despite a long history of feminist interventions to disrupt categories of gender as a stagnant, ahistorical or geographically consistent structure, rationales for women's inclusion continue to rest on problematic narratives and assumptions. We draw on twenty-nine interviews with practitioners whom we asked to speak about their experiences in peace negotiations and the expectations placed on women involved in these processes. The problematic narratives and assumptions we identify on the basis of these interviews and academic literature have the effect of diminishing women's agency and, thus, their ability to participate in peace negotiations on their terms. Women contribute positively to the durability of peace and the inclusion of gender provisions in agreements. Still, when women's identities are constructed as one-dimensional, the benefits of women's inclusion remain paradoxically a cause for celebration and a partial gain. In this article, we apply theories of intersectionality, informed by Black and African feminisms, to expose women's subject positions that may be made invisible because of assumptions that continue to be associated with calls for women's participation in peace negotiations.
AbstractList The Women, Peace and Security resolutions have consistently called for women's increased participation at all levels in institutions and mechanisms for preventing, managing and resolving conflict. Despite a long history of feminist interventions to disrupt categories of gender as a stagnant, ahistorical or geographically consistent structure, rationales for women's inclusion continue to rest on problematic narratives and assumptions. We draw on twenty-nine interviews with practitioners whom we asked to speak about their experiences in peace negotiations and the expectations placed on women involved in these processes. The problematic narratives and assumptions we identify on the basis of these interviews and academic literature have the effect of diminishing women's agency and, thus, their ability to participate in peace negotiations on their terms. Women contribute positively to the durability of peace and the inclusion of gender provisions in agreements. Still, when women's identities are constructed as one-dimensional, the benefits of women's inclusion remain paradoxically a cause for celebration and a partial gain. In this article, we apply theories of intersectionality, informed by Black and African feminisms, to expose women's subject positions that may be made invisible because of assumptions that continue to be associated with calls for women's participation in peace negotiations.
This article proposes the concept of a ‘travelling’ intersectionality as an alternative to current high-level practitioners' understanding of gender and their expectations of women's participation in peace negotiations. Abstract The Women, Peace and Security resolutions have consistently called for women's increased participation at all levels in institutions and mechanisms for preventing, managing and resolving conflict. Despite a long history of feminist interventions to disrupt categories of gender as a stagnant, ahistorical or geographically consistent structure, rationales for women's inclusion continue to rest on problematic narratives and assumptions. We draw on twenty-nine interviews with practitioners whom we asked to speak about their experiences in peace negotiations and the expectations placed on women involved in these processes. The problematic narratives and assumptions we identify on the basis of these interviews and academic literature have the effect of diminishing women's agency and, thus, their ability to participate in peace negotiations on their terms. Women contribute positively to the durability of peace and the inclusion of gender provisions in agreements. Still, when women's identities are constructed as one-dimensional, the benefits of women's inclusion remain paradoxically a cause for celebration and a partial gain. In this article, we apply theories of intersectionality, informed by Black and African feminisms, to expose women's subject positions that may be made invisible because of assumptions that continue to be associated with calls for women's participation in peace negotiations.
Author Heathcote, Gina
Sapiano, Jenna
Jin, Xianan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jenna
  surname: Sapiano
  fullname: Sapiano, Jenna
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xianan
  surname: Jin
  fullname: Jin, Xianan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Gina
  surname: Heathcote
  fullname: Heathcote, Gina
BookMark eNp9j01LAzEURYNUsK1u_AWzEUEY-_IxmcmyFKuFghtdD8_0RSJtMiQR6b-3tV27unDv4cKZsFGIgRi75fDIwciZx5n3SEI0F2zMle5qIZUesTGAgLrpGrhik5y_AIBLacZsvgqFUiZbfAy49WVfYdhUP3FH4T5XA6birR_wOFc-VAOhpSrQZyz-r8zX7NLhNtPNOafsffn0tnip16_Pq8V8XVshoNROc3SdQtuajlqCBrlCSWAsfLScHKAzUohWGHDKKg2aS6W42khJTh9iyh5OvzbFnBO5fkh-h2nfc-iP8r3H_ix_gO9OcPwe_uN-AexDXGo
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of International Affairs. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com . 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of International Affairs. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com . 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1093/ia/iiae225
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline International Relations
Law
EISSN 1468-2346
EndPage 2561
ExternalDocumentID 10_1093_ia_iiae225
10.1093/ia/iiae225
GroupedDBID -DZ
-ET
-~X
.-4
.3N
.4H
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
1OL
1TH
29J
2AX
31~
3EH
3R3
4.4
41~
48X
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52S
52T
52U
52W
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
85S
8UM
8VB
930
A04
AAESR
AAHHS
AAJQQ
AAMZS
AANHP
AAONW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAUOS
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
AAYJJ
AAYOK
AAZKR
AAZSN
ABAWQ
ABBHK
ABCDL
ABCQN
ABCQX
ABDBF
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABEML
ABGNP
ABJNI
ABKEB
ABLJU
ABPPZ
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABPVW
ABTBU
ABWST
ABXSQ
ABXVV
ABZEH
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACDXO
ACFRR
ACGFS
ACHJO
ACHQT
ACIPB
ACKIV
ACNCT
ACOZV
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUFI
ACUHS
ACUTJ
ACVCV
ACVHY
ACVJI
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ACZBC
ADBKU
ADEMA
ADEZT
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADIPN
ADIZJ
ADLMC
ADLOL
ADNBA
ADNMO
ADQBN
ADQIT
ADULT
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIMD
AEMDU
AEMOZ
AENZO
AEQDE
AEUPB
AEWNT
AFBPY
AFCKW
AFDVO
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFZL
AFHLB
AFIQY
AFKFF
AFOFC
AFYAG
AFZJQ
AGINJ
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGORE
AGQPQ
AGQXC
AGQZG
AGTJU
AHGBF
AHQJS
AIDAL
AIDGQ
AIRXX
AIWBW
AJAOE
AJBDE
AJBYB
AJDVS
AJNCP
AKVCP
ALAGY
ALEEW
ALJLX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMBMR
AMHCJ
AMMGX
ANDVN
APJGH
APXXL
AQDSO
ASPBG
ASTYK
ASUFR
ATGXG
ATXSR
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFKA
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BDRZF
BEYMZ
BHZBG
BKOMP
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
BZYEK
CAG
COF
CS3
D-C
D-D
DAKXR
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EAU
EBA
EBO
EBR
EBS
EBU
EHI
EIS
EJD
EMI
EMK
ESX
ETYVG
F00
F01
F5P
FEDTE
FIL
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FQBLK
FTKQU
FXEWX
G-S
G.N
G50
GAOTZ
GJXCC
GODZA
H13
HGD
HMHOC
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
H~9
I.T
IHE
IPSME
IX1
J0M
JAAYA
JAC
JBMMH
JBZCM
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLEZI
JLXEF
JOPPD
JPL
JST
JXSIZ
K1G
K48
KBUDW
KOP
KSI
KSN
LC2
LC4
LH4
LP6
LP7
LW6
MBUXU
MJWOD
MK4
MVM
N04
N06
N9A
NF~
NOMLY
NPJNY
NU-
NVLIB
O9-
OAIJC
OIG
OJZSN
OKKKP
OXVUA
P2Y
P4C
PEELM
PLIXB
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
Q5Y
QB0
QWB
R.K
RIG
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RX1
RXW
SA0
SUPJJ
TAE
TH9
TJJ
TKY
TN5
TSS
UB1
UBW
UBZ
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHG
WQZ
WYUIH
XG1
XOL
XSW
Y6R
YADRA
YAJVU
YKOAZ
YXANX
ZCA
ZCG
ZL0
ZY4
~02
~45
~IA
~SN
~WP
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-f61af84ac798e7e05a14a3e09c0b71ef0af93227290f4c4606134414d33ef64d3
ISSN 0020-5850
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 02:13:02 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:34:40 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords inclusion
gender
peace processes
peace and security
intersectionality
women
Language English
License This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c220t-f61af84ac798e7e05a14a3e09c0b71ef0af93227290f4c4606134414d33ef64d3
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1093_ia_iiae225
oup_primary_10_1093_ia_iiae225
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-11-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-11-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-11-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle International affairs (London)
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
SSID ssj0001339
Score 2.3859253
Snippet This article proposes the concept of a ‘travelling’ intersectionality as an alternative to current high-level practitioners' understanding of gender and their...
The Women, Peace and Security resolutions have consistently called for women's increased participation at all levels in institutions and mechanisms for...
SourceID crossref
oup
SourceType Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2543
Title Intersectionality and women's participation in peace negotiations
Volume 100
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1JS8NAFB5cLl7E3boxoOApOp1M0-QobkXUg7bQW5lJZiQekmIjgr_eN0vSxIpUL0nIMpB5X16-9-YtCJ1EYDSEHLRfImjiMRmFXig7gScS4EhREoWB0PnOD49Bb8Duhp3hNJTXZJcU4iz-_DGv5D9ShXMgV50l-wfJVoPCCTgG-cIWJAzbuWRs3HkTE0zl-LR2g5uiCsYPP-a1oGkbL87hO87kS16kNVfda224yjvI7VpPvedH5TR45mOAVV6Gx1Sq_c5WJBjCxSnqepplxrntw3fr2nWXngbKTModq2tPMDXBvLDrKNIqTJ25RX3nRiw1KiE16DT0Y8cWZXL_WuBb7R_1uK1xpcOFb9KUS2qTo5vlsr_9xqrgQrus7o9SPnLPLqJlClaEbnBx9TStLgbmuYsAsq9VVq-N_POUn7tnG3xF50DW6Ed_Da06uwFfWBCsowWZbaCdhsRwFdi4gRbv-ccmupgBCAaAYAOQ0wluwAOnGTbwwHV4bKHBzXX_sue5nhleTCkpPBW0uQoZj7tRKLuSdHibcV-SKCai25aKcAWMnYJJRRSLWaDpHDBilvi-VAHsttFSlmdyF-EgSYBLU2A4kjFBSRhr9i8UUSROqFAtdFzOzGhsS6OMZue-hY5g0n65YW-uYfbRyhSSB2ipeHuXh0AHC3FkhPoFN9JiIg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intersectionality+and+women%27s+participation+in+peace+negotiations&rft.jtitle=International+affairs+%28London%29&rft.au=Sapiano%2C+Jenna&rft.au=Jin%2C+Xianan&rft.au=Heathcote%2C+Gina&rft.date=2024-11-04&rft.issn=0020-5850&rft.eissn=1468-2346&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2543&rft.epage=2561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fia%2Fiiae225&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_ia_iiae225
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0020-5850&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0020-5850&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0020-5850&client=summon