Second Order Methods for Optimizing Convex Matrix Functions and Sparse Covariance Clustering

A variety of first-order methods have recently been proposed for solving matrix optimization problems arising in machine learning. The premise for utilizing such algorithms is that second order information is too expensive to employ, and so simple first-order iterations are likely to be optimal. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on audio, speech, and language processing Vol. 21; no. 11; pp. 2244 - 2254
Main Authors Chin, Gillian M., Nocedal, Jorge, Olsen, Peder A., Rennie, Steven J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A variety of first-order methods have recently been proposed for solving matrix optimization problems arising in machine learning. The premise for utilizing such algorithms is that second order information is too expensive to employ, and so simple first-order iterations are likely to be optimal. In this paper, we argue that second-order information is in fact efficiently accessible in many matrix optimization problems, and can be effectively incorporated into optimization algorithms. We begin by reviewing how certain Hessian operations can be conveniently represented in a wide class of matrix optimization problems, and provide the first proofs for these results. Next we consider a concrete problem, namely the minimization of the ℓ 1 regularized Jeffreys divergence, and derive formulae for computing Hessians and Hessian vector products. This allows us to propose various second order methods for solving the Jeffreys divergence problem. We present extensive numerical results illustrating the behavior of the algorithms and apply the methods to a speech recognition problem. We compress full covariance Gaussian mixture models utilized for acoustic models in automatic speech recognition. By discovering clusters of (sparse inverse) covariance matrices, we can compress the number of covariance parameters by a factor exceeding 200, while still outperforming the word error rate (WER) performance of a diagonal covariance model that has 20 times less covariance parameters than the original acoustic model.
ISSN:1558-7916
1558-7924
DOI:10.1109/TASL.2013.2263142