Efflux Pumps, Biofilm Formation, and Susceptibility Testing of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and bacteria. The most frequent UTI cause is Escherichia coli (E.coli). Antibiotic resistance in E. coli has been linked to overexpression of the effl...
Saved in:
Published in | Bionatura Vol. 8; no. CSS 3; pp. 1 - 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
15.10.2023
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused
by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and bacteria. The
most frequent UTI cause is Escherichia coli (E.coli). Antibiotic resistance in E.
coli has been linked to overexpression of the efflux system. This study aimed to
isolate various bacteria from UTI and then select E. coli isolates to study the
prevalence of the efflux pump genes TetA and MdfA.This study included 150
midstream urine samples from patients suffering from UTI (115 females and 35
males) with ages ranging between(5-70)years. The results showed that only 100
samples exhibited bacterial growth; 72.5% referred to female patients, while
27.5% referred to male patients. Infection with bacteria occurred most frequently
in the age group of 21-30 years. Bacterial isolates were identified by macroscopic
and microscopic examination, biochemical test and VITEK2 system. The result
showed that 40% of these growth were confirmed to be E.coli,19% Klebsiella
pneumonia,17% Staph.aureus, 13%Proteus mirabilis,7% Pseudomonas aeroginosa, 2% Staph. saprophyticus,1%Proteus vulgaris and 1%Enterobacter cloaca.The
results of sensitivity to antibiotics showed that UPEC isolates were utterly resistant
to novobiocin and rifampin 100%, ampicillin 87.5%, cefotaxime 85%, tetracycline82.5%, ciprofloxacin77.5%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 50%, gentamicin 22.5%, nitrofurantoin 17.5% and meropenem 2.5%. All of the isolates were
multidrug resistant. The result of the biofilm-formation ability of E.coli isolates
showed that 31/40(77.5%) of isolates producing biofilm were divided into three
groups: 1 (2,5%) had strong biofilm formation, 4(10%) were moderate, and 26(65
%) were weak. The phenotypic detection of the efflux pumps was observed in
100% of the bacterial isolates at a concentration of 0.5 mg/l of ethidium bromide(ETBR). The prevalence of the TetA and MdfA efflux pump genes was
72.5% for each. The gel electrophoresis showed that the molecular weight of TetA
and MdfA genes were 131bp and 403bp respectively.
Keywords: Efflux pumps, Urinary Tract, Infection, Parasites, E-coli. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused
by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and bacteria. The
most frequent UTI cause is Escherichia coli (E.coli). Antibiotic resistance in E.
coli has been linked to overexpression of the efflux system. This study aimed to
isolate various bacteria from UTI and then select E. coli isolates to study the
prevalence of the efflux pump genes TetA and MdfA.This study included 150
midstream urine samples from patients suffering from UTI (115 females and 35
males) with ages ranging between(5-70)years. The results showed that only 100
samples exhibited bacterial growth; 72.5% referred to female patients, while
27.5% referred to male patients. Infection with bacteria occurred most frequently
in the age group of 21-30 years. Bacterial isolates were identified by macroscopic
and microscopic examination, biochemical test and VITEK2 system. The result
showed that 40% of these growth were confirmed to be E.coli,19% Klebsiella
pneumonia,17% Staph.aureus, 13%Proteus mirabilis,7% Pseudomonas aeroginosa, 2% Staph. saprophyticus,1%Proteus vulgaris and 1%Enterobacter cloaca.The
results of sensitivity to antibiotics showed that UPEC isolates were utterly resistant
to novobiocin and rifampin 100%, ampicillin 87.5%, cefotaxime 85%, tetracycline82.5%, ciprofloxacin77.5%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 50%, gentamicin 22.5%, nitrofurantoin 17.5% and meropenem 2.5%. All of the isolates were
multidrug resistant. The result of the biofilm-formation ability of E.coli isolates
showed that 31/40(77.5%) of isolates producing biofilm were divided into three
groups: 1 (2,5%) had strong biofilm formation, 4(10%) were moderate, and 26(65
%) were weak. The phenotypic detection of the efflux pumps was observed in
100% of the bacterial isolates at a concentration of 0.5 mg/l of ethidium bromide(ETBR). The prevalence of the TetA and MdfA efflux pump genes was
72.5% for each. The gel electrophoresis showed that the molecular weight of TetA
and MdfA genes were 131bp and 403bp respectively.
Keywords: Efflux pumps, Urinary Tract, Infection, Parasites, E-coli. |
Author | M. Atiyea, Qanat M. Kareem, Zahraa |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Zahraa surname: M. Kareem fullname: M. Kareem, Zahraa organization: Ministry of Health, Al Rasheed Health Center, Kirkuk Health Directorate, Kirkuk, Iraq – sequence: 2 givenname: Qanat surname: M. Atiyea fullname: M. Atiyea, Qanat organization: Department of Biology, College of Science, Tikrit University, Salahaddin, Iraq |
BookMark | eNo9kN9KwzAYxYMoOOceQcgDrNuXpm3SS1c2HQyU_bkOWfbFBdpmJC3o29upeHUOB87h8Hsgt61vkZAnBrOUlZzNt4t5tdvNU0j5DOQM-JDfkBHjJSQlz_Pbf5-JezKJ0R0hywRnRc5GpF9aW_ef9L1vLnFKF85bVzd05UOjO-fbKdXtie76aPDSuaOrXfdF9xg7135Qb-kymjMGZ85O08rXjq6jr3WHJ2qDb-ghuFaHoRG06ei6tWiuq4_kzuo64uRPx-SwWu6r12Tz9rKunjeJSVnOEo6iBMtSBJTIMs6kzMDicJwjKzKBgoNBbgoJUpRHkRWilNqmJ0CdF5jzMcl_d03wMQa06hJcMxxSDNQPPrVdqAGfuuJTIBXwIeffgTlmCQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.090 10.3390/antibiotics9060304 10.1016/j.disamonth.2014.12.002 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70329-8 10.4265/bio.16.69 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104196 10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21 10.5863/1551-6776-21.4.308 10.15200/winn.141832.26907 10.1155/2020/8042540 10.5812/jjm.112547 10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0 10.24996/ijs.2021.62.7.1 10.2174/1874285801307010072 10.3390/antibiotics10091117 10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4 10.3390/diseases9010015 10.1186/s13104-019-4064-z 10.5812/jjm.40884 10.1186/s13104-019-4825-8 10.1093/cid/ciw055 10.1038/ng.2334 10.5604/17331331.1234990 10.1093/femspd/ftx053 10.1038/nrmicro3380 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1390-9355 |
EndPage | 11 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21 |
GroupedDBID | 5VS AAYXX ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ KQ8 M~E |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2151-3e790f12e0e8e14318840fe6513e1647e730ce3c680879b746798af2d0ea56e53 |
ISSN | 1390-9347 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 23 03:51:41 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | CSS 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2151-3e790f12e0e8e14318840fe6513e1647e730ce3c680879b746798af2d0ea56e53 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/css/2023.08.03.21 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-10-15 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-10-15 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2023 text: 2023-10-15 day: 15 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Bionatura |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
References | ref57 ref56 ref59 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref55 ref54 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref100 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref39 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref97 ref96 ref11 ref99 ref10 ref98 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref93 ref92 ref95 ref94 ref91 ref90 ref89 ref86 ref85 ref88 ref87 ref82 ref81 ref84 ref83 ref80 ref79 ref78 ref75 ref74 ref77 ref76 ref0 ref2 ref1 ref71 ref70 ref73 ref72 ref68 ref67 ref69 ref64 ref63 ref66 ref65 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
References_xml | – ident: ref62 – ident: ref84 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.090 – ident: ref85 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060304 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2014.12.002 – ident: ref24 – ident: ref99 – ident: ref100 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70329-8 – ident: ref9 – ident: ref97 doi: 10.4265/bio.16.69 – ident: ref53 – ident: ref76 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104196 – ident: ref91 doi: 10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21 – ident: ref30 – ident: ref13 – ident: ref36 – ident: ref65 – ident: ref6 – ident: ref70 doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-21.4.308 – ident: ref82 – ident: ref0 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060304 – ident: ref50 – ident: ref47 – ident: ref79 – ident: ref96 – ident: ref71 – ident: ref16 – ident: ref12 – ident: ref33 – ident: ref3 – ident: ref83 – ident: ref68 – ident: ref29 – ident: ref41 – ident: ref60 – ident: ref74 – ident: ref15 – ident: ref38 – ident: ref63 – ident: ref88 – ident: ref21 – ident: ref49 – ident: ref52 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.15200/winn.141832.26907 – ident: ref94 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.1155/2020/8042540 – ident: ref10 – ident: ref35 – ident: ref89 doi: 10.5812/jjm.112547 – ident: ref37 – ident: ref5 – ident: ref66 – ident: ref20 – ident: ref81 – ident: ref43 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0 – ident: ref72 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.24996/ijs.2021.62.7.1 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1155/2020/8042540 – ident: ref69 – ident: ref95 – ident: ref11 – ident: ref17 – ident: ref34 – ident: ref86 – ident: ref61 – ident: ref40 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.2174/1874285801307010072 – ident: ref23 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091117 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4 – ident: ref26 – ident: ref75 – ident: ref67 doi: 10.3390/diseases9010015 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0 – ident: ref92 – ident: ref78 doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4064-z – ident: ref22 doi: 10.5812/jjm.40884 – ident: ref77 doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4825-8 – ident: ref39 – ident: ref64 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21 – ident: ref87 – ident: ref45 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw055 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1038/ng.2334 – ident: ref51 – ident: ref48 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.5604/17331331.1234990 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4 – ident: ref93 – ident: ref4 – ident: ref90 – ident: ref59 – ident: ref80 doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftx053 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3380 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref98 – ident: ref73 – ident: ref14 – ident: ref31 |
SSID | ssib044731651 ssj0002140255 |
Score | 2.283703 |
Snippet | Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused
by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and... |
SourceID | crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 1 |
Title | Efflux Pumps, Biofilm Formation, and Susceptibility Testing of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection |
Volume | 8 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PT9swFLYquOwyMbFpDDb5wC0kTewkdY4UFcEk0NYfEuISJeFZqzRaVFoJOPC37z07CS6aEHCJqlR5cvJ9-vxsvx-M7VOV_LSkSLVK9nz0iJVfUCHIFOemLBSltrE5Z-fpyST-eZFcdDqPbnbJsgyqh__mlbwHVbyHuFKW7BuQbY3iDfyN-OIVEcbrqzAeaP13def9QkgMHP0pNeC-9o6bjMQ2NnN1a8JXTCTsvTem0ho22nlwS6hNKeKZNhGm3ikOuSA31CSeTBY2X3dMyVQoJjZya7Z2FEybiVS9o8UuMClmYJh2WfxZFO5fh8vpPRiP9XeBz7m7DsLEr9m8y1ooZRb6mbTVMgNw79myu426KodER6ORJx21jJxp10ruc0FHPZWk6MM-lQsejSh_BUdjqq7KQERPs1hzcv9scmtDDnGxY4zlw36OhnIyk1MHTplTHYJNgUJFCnn2OGj0KI6prVd9akozu8DVqDCNdNvXt0lhxnJ32O-i5e7aAB13x_FbxlvsY73g4IeWPZ9YB2bbbGWZww1zDnjNG97y5oAja_g6a3jNGj7X3GENJ9bwhjWcWMNr1nDDGt6y5jObHA_GRyd-3YDDr8gT9CX0slBHAkJQgI51pFQcasBPIoHq0AFODxXIitq39LKSOtdkqtDiKoQiSSGRX9jGbD6Dr4xrAFGKKsnQXNwLrxSKQKxirSuhUhklOyxovlN-Y-us5C9C9u2tD-yyD09E3mMby8UKvqNDuSx_GNT_AZANblA |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27936,27937 |
linkProvider | ISSN International Centre |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efflux+Pumps%2C+Biofilm+Formation%2C+and+Susceptibility+Testing+of+Escherichia+Coli+Isolated+from+Urinary+Tract+Infection&rft.jtitle=Bionatura&rft.au=M.+Kareem%2C+Zahraa&rft.au=M.+Atiyea%2C+Qanat&rft.date=2023-10-15&rft.issn=1390-9347&rft.eissn=1390-9355&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=CSS+3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.21931%2FRB%2FCSS%2F2023.08.03.21&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1390-9347&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1390-9347&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1390-9347&client=summon |