Efflux Pumps, Biofilm Formation, and Susceptibility Testing of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and bacteria. The most frequent UTI cause is Escherichia coli (E.coli). Antibiotic resistance in E. coli has been linked to overexpression of the effl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBionatura Vol. 8; no. CSS 3; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors M. Kareem, Zahraa, M. Atiyea, Qanat
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 15.10.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and bacteria. The most frequent UTI cause is Escherichia coli (E.coli). Antibiotic resistance in E. coli has been linked to overexpression of the efflux system. This study aimed to isolate various bacteria from UTI and then select E. coli isolates to study the prevalence of the efflux pump genes TetA and MdfA.This study included 150 midstream urine samples from patients suffering from UTI (115 females and 35 males) with ages ranging between(5-70)years. The results showed that only 100 samples exhibited bacterial growth; 72.5% referred to female patients, while 27.5% referred to male patients. Infection with bacteria occurred most frequently in the age group of 21-30 years. Bacterial isolates were identified by macroscopic and microscopic examination, biochemical test and VITEK2 system. The result showed that 40% of these growth were confirmed to be E.coli,19% Klebsiella pneumonia,17% Staph.aureus, 13%Proteus mirabilis,7% Pseudomonas aeroginosa, 2% Staph. saprophyticus,1%Proteus vulgaris and 1%Enterobacter cloaca.The results of sensitivity to antibiotics showed that UPEC isolates were utterly resistant to novobiocin and rifampin 100%, ampicillin 87.5%, cefotaxime 85%, tetracycline82.5%, ciprofloxacin77.5%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 50%, gentamicin 22.5%, nitrofurantoin 17.5% and meropenem 2.5%. All of the isolates were multidrug resistant. The result of the biofilm-formation ability of E.coli isolates showed that 31/40(77.5%) of isolates producing biofilm were divided into three groups: 1 (2,5%) had strong biofilm formation, 4(10%) were moderate, and 26(65 %) were weak. The phenotypic detection of the efflux pumps was observed in 100% of the bacterial isolates at a concentration of 0.5 mg/l of ethidium bromide(ETBR). The prevalence of the TetA and MdfA efflux pump genes was 72.5% for each. The gel electrophoresis showed that the molecular weight of TetA and MdfA genes were 131bp and 403bp respectively. Keywords: Efflux pumps, Urinary Tract, Infection, Parasites, E-coli.
AbstractList Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and bacteria. The most frequent UTI cause is Escherichia coli (E.coli). Antibiotic resistance in E. coli has been linked to overexpression of the efflux system. This study aimed to isolate various bacteria from UTI and then select E. coli isolates to study the prevalence of the efflux pump genes TetA and MdfA.This study included 150 midstream urine samples from patients suffering from UTI (115 females and 35 males) with ages ranging between(5-70)years. The results showed that only 100 samples exhibited bacterial growth; 72.5% referred to female patients, while 27.5% referred to male patients. Infection with bacteria occurred most frequently in the age group of 21-30 years. Bacterial isolates were identified by macroscopic and microscopic examination, biochemical test and VITEK2 system. The result showed that 40% of these growth were confirmed to be E.coli,19% Klebsiella pneumonia,17% Staph.aureus, 13%Proteus mirabilis,7% Pseudomonas aeroginosa, 2% Staph. saprophyticus,1%Proteus vulgaris and 1%Enterobacter cloaca.The results of sensitivity to antibiotics showed that UPEC isolates were utterly resistant to novobiocin and rifampin 100%, ampicillin 87.5%, cefotaxime 85%, tetracycline82.5%, ciprofloxacin77.5%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 50%, gentamicin 22.5%, nitrofurantoin 17.5% and meropenem 2.5%. All of the isolates were multidrug resistant. The result of the biofilm-formation ability of E.coli isolates showed that 31/40(77.5%) of isolates producing biofilm were divided into three groups: 1 (2,5%) had strong biofilm formation, 4(10%) were moderate, and 26(65 %) were weak. The phenotypic detection of the efflux pumps was observed in 100% of the bacterial isolates at a concentration of 0.5 mg/l of ethidium bromide(ETBR). The prevalence of the TetA and MdfA efflux pump genes was 72.5% for each. The gel electrophoresis showed that the molecular weight of TetA and MdfA genes were 131bp and 403bp respectively. Keywords: Efflux pumps, Urinary Tract, Infection, Parasites, E-coli.
Author M. Atiyea, Qanat
M. Kareem, Zahraa
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Zahraa
  surname: M. Kareem
  fullname: M. Kareem, Zahraa
  organization: Ministry of Health, Al Rasheed Health Center, Kirkuk Health Directorate, Kirkuk, Iraq
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Qanat
  surname: M. Atiyea
  fullname: M. Atiyea, Qanat
  organization: Department of Biology, College of Science, Tikrit University, Salahaddin, Iraq
BookMark eNo9kN9KwzAYxYMoOOceQcgDrNuXpm3SS1c2HQyU_bkOWfbFBdpmJC3o29upeHUOB87h8Hsgt61vkZAnBrOUlZzNt4t5tdvNU0j5DOQM-JDfkBHjJSQlz_Pbf5-JezKJ0R0hywRnRc5GpF9aW_ef9L1vLnFKF85bVzd05UOjO-fbKdXtie76aPDSuaOrXfdF9xg7135Qb-kymjMGZ85O08rXjq6jr3WHJ2qDb-ghuFaHoRG06ei6tWiuq4_kzuo64uRPx-SwWu6r12Tz9rKunjeJSVnOEo6iBMtSBJTIMs6kzMDicJwjKzKBgoNBbgoJUpRHkRWilNqmJ0CdF5jzMcl_d03wMQa06hJcMxxSDNQPPrVdqAGfuuJTIBXwIeffgTlmCQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.090
10.3390/antibiotics9060304
10.1016/j.disamonth.2014.12.002
10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70329-8
10.4265/bio.16.69
10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104196
10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21
10.5863/1551-6776-21.4.308
10.15200/winn.141832.26907
10.1155/2020/8042540
10.5812/jjm.112547
10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0
10.24996/ijs.2021.62.7.1
10.2174/1874285801307010072
10.3390/antibiotics10091117
10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4
10.3390/diseases9010015
10.1186/s13104-019-4064-z
10.5812/jjm.40884
10.1186/s13104-019-4825-8
10.1093/cid/ciw055
10.1038/ng.2334
10.5604/17331331.1234990
10.1093/femspd/ftx053
10.1038/nrmicro3380
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1390-9355
EndPage 11
ExternalDocumentID 10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21
GroupedDBID 5VS
AAYXX
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
KQ8
M~E
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2151-3e790f12e0e8e14318840fe6513e1647e730ce3c680879b746798af2d0ea56e53
ISSN 1390-9347
IngestDate Fri Aug 23 03:51:41 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue CSS 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2151-3e790f12e0e8e14318840fe6513e1647e730ce3c680879b746798af2d0ea56e53
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/css/2023.08.03.21
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-10-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-10-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-10-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Bionatura
PublicationYear 2023
References ref57
ref56
ref59
ref58
ref53
ref52
ref55
ref54
ref51
ref50
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref41
ref44
ref43
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref100
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref32
ref39
ref38
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref97
ref96
ref11
ref99
ref10
ref98
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref93
ref92
ref95
ref94
ref91
ref90
ref89
ref86
ref85
ref88
ref87
ref82
ref81
ref84
ref83
ref80
ref79
ref78
ref75
ref74
ref77
ref76
ref0
ref2
ref1
ref71
ref70
ref73
ref72
ref68
ref67
ref69
ref64
ref63
ref66
ref65
ref60
ref62
ref61
References_xml – ident: ref62
– ident: ref84
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.090
– ident: ref85
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060304
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2014.12.002
– ident: ref24
– ident: ref99
– ident: ref100
  doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70329-8
– ident: ref9
– ident: ref97
  doi: 10.4265/bio.16.69
– ident: ref53
– ident: ref76
  doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104196
– ident: ref91
  doi: 10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21
– ident: ref30
– ident: ref13
– ident: ref36
– ident: ref65
– ident: ref6
– ident: ref70
  doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-21.4.308
– ident: ref82
– ident: ref0
  doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060304
– ident: ref50
– ident: ref47
– ident: ref79
– ident: ref96
– ident: ref71
– ident: ref16
– ident: ref12
– ident: ref33
– ident: ref3
– ident: ref83
– ident: ref68
– ident: ref29
– ident: ref41
– ident: ref60
– ident: ref74
– ident: ref15
– ident: ref38
– ident: ref63
– ident: ref88
– ident: ref21
– ident: ref49
– ident: ref52
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.15200/winn.141832.26907
– ident: ref94
– ident: ref56
  doi: 10.1155/2020/8042540
– ident: ref10
– ident: ref35
– ident: ref89
  doi: 10.5812/jjm.112547
– ident: ref37
– ident: ref5
– ident: ref66
– ident: ref20
– ident: ref81
– ident: ref43
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0
– ident: ref72
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.24996/ijs.2021.62.7.1
– ident: ref55
  doi: 10.1155/2020/8042540
– ident: ref69
– ident: ref95
– ident: ref11
– ident: ref17
– ident: ref34
– ident: ref86
– ident: ref61
– ident: ref40
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.2174/1874285801307010072
– ident: ref23
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091117
– ident: ref58
  doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4
– ident: ref26
– ident: ref75
– ident: ref67
  doi: 10.3390/diseases9010015
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0
– ident: ref92
– ident: ref78
  doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4064-z
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.5812/jjm.40884
– ident: ref77
  doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4825-8
– ident: ref39
– ident: ref64
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.21
– ident: ref87
– ident: ref45
– ident: ref54
  doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw055
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1038/ng.2334
– ident: ref51
– ident: ref48
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.5604/17331331.1234990
– ident: ref57
  doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0109-4
– ident: ref93
– ident: ref4
– ident: ref90
– ident: ref59
– ident: ref80
  doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftx053
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3380
– ident: ref28
– ident: ref98
– ident: ref73
– ident: ref14
– ident: ref31
SSID ssib044731651
ssj0002140255
Score 2.283703
Snippet Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are infectious diseases of the urinary system caused by several causative agents, including parasites, viruses, fungi and...
SourceID crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
StartPage 1
Title Efflux Pumps, Biofilm Formation, and Susceptibility Testing of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PT9swFLYquOwyMbFpDDb5wC0kTewkdY4UFcEk0NYfEuISJeFZqzRaVFoJOPC37z07CS6aEHCJqlR5cvJ9-vxsvx-M7VOV_LSkSLVK9nz0iJVfUCHIFOemLBSltrE5Z-fpyST-eZFcdDqPbnbJsgyqh__mlbwHVbyHuFKW7BuQbY3iDfyN-OIVEcbrqzAeaP13def9QkgMHP0pNeC-9o6bjMQ2NnN1a8JXTCTsvTem0ho22nlwS6hNKeKZNhGm3ikOuSA31CSeTBY2X3dMyVQoJjZya7Z2FEybiVS9o8UuMClmYJh2WfxZFO5fh8vpPRiP9XeBz7m7DsLEr9m8y1ooZRb6mbTVMgNw79myu426KodER6ORJx21jJxp10ruc0FHPZWk6MM-lQsejSh_BUdjqq7KQERPs1hzcv9scmtDDnGxY4zlw36OhnIyk1MHTplTHYJNgUJFCnn2OGj0KI6prVd9akozu8DVqDCNdNvXt0lhxnJ32O-i5e7aAB13x_FbxlvsY73g4IeWPZ9YB2bbbGWZww1zDnjNG97y5oAja_g6a3jNGj7X3GENJ9bwhjWcWMNr1nDDGt6y5jObHA_GRyd-3YDDr8gT9CX0slBHAkJQgI51pFQcasBPIoHq0AFODxXIitq39LKSOtdkqtDiKoQiSSGRX9jGbD6Dr4xrAFGKKsnQXNwLrxSKQKxirSuhUhklOyxovlN-Y-us5C9C9u2tD-yyD09E3mMby8UKvqNDuSx_GNT_AZANblA
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27936,27937
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efflux+Pumps%2C+Biofilm+Formation%2C+and+Susceptibility+Testing+of+Escherichia+Coli+Isolated+from+Urinary+Tract+Infection&rft.jtitle=Bionatura&rft.au=M.+Kareem%2C+Zahraa&rft.au=M.+Atiyea%2C+Qanat&rft.date=2023-10-15&rft.issn=1390-9347&rft.eissn=1390-9355&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=CSS+3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.21931%2FRB%2FCSS%2F2023.08.03.21&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_03_21
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1390-9347&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1390-9347&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1390-9347&client=summon