How Efficient are LC3 and GGBFS-Contained Mortar Mixtures Submerged into Na2SO4 Solution against External Sulfate Attack at an early Age?

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is one of the most widely used construction materials in civil engineering infrastructure construction but it is susceptible to sulfate attack. One of the ways to improve the sulfate resistance of an OPC mortar/concrete is to replace a certain amount of OPC with differ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKey engineering materials Vol. 902; pp. 145 - 151
Main Authors Shon, Chang Seon, Tugelbayev, Aidyn, Bektimirova, Umut, Orynbassarov, Islam, Kim, Jong Ryeol
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Zurich Trans Tech Publications Ltd 29.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is one of the most widely used construction materials in civil engineering infrastructure construction but it is susceptible to sulfate attack. One of the ways to improve the sulfate resistance of an OPC mortar/concrete is to replace a certain amount of OPC with different pozzolanic materials such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and metakaolin. The use of pozzolanic materials to mortar/concrete not only enhances durability but also reduces carbon dioxide (CO2) emission due to the less usage of OPC at the initial construction state. As considering these aspects, limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) has been developed in recent decades. However, the influence of LC3 on sulfate attack resistance has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, this study investigated the efficiency of LC3 mortar mixtures against sulfate attack at an early age (approximately 4.5 months) after two different curing periods, namely 1-day and 3-day curing, since the strength of the LC3 mixture is lower than OPC mixtures. To evaluate the synergistic effect of a combination of LC3 and GGBFS on the sulfate resistance, the LC3 and OPC mixtures containing 25% GGBFS were also assessed in terms of density, porosity, compressive strength, volumetric expansion, and weight changes. The experiment results show that the expansion of the LC3 mixture regardless of the addition of GGBFS and an initial curing strength made a plateau after a rapid increase up to 7 days, while the expansion of the OPC mixture kept increasing throughout the period. Furthermore, the addition of GGBFS to OPC or LC3 mixture provides the synergistic effect on reducing the expansion due to sulfate attack. Therefore, if LC3 mixture has high initial strength (min. 15 MPa) and dense microstructure to minimize the penetration of sulfate ion into the mixture, it is expected that LC3 mixture is more efficient than OPC mixture against the sulfate attack.
AbstractList Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is one of the most widely used construction materials in civil engineering infrastructure construction but it is susceptible to sulfate attack. One of the ways to improve the sulfate resistance of an OPC mortar/concrete is to replace a certain amount of OPC with different pozzolanic materials such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and metakaolin. The use of pozzolanic materials to mortar/concrete not only enhances durability but also reduces carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission due to the less usage of OPC at the initial construction state. As considering these aspects, limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) has been developed in recent decades. However, the influence of LC3 on sulfate attack resistance has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, this study investigated the efficiency of LC3 mortar mixtures against sulfate attack at an early age (approximately 4.5 months) after two different curing periods, namely 1-day and 3-day curing, since the strength of the LC3 mixture is lower than OPC mixtures. To evaluate the synergistic effect of a combination of LC3 and GGBFS on the sulfate resistance, the LC3 and OPC mixtures containing 25% GGBFS were also assessed in terms of density, porosity, compressive strength, volumetric expansion, and weight changes. The experiment results show that the expansion of the LC3 mixture regardless of the addition of GGBFS and an initial curing strength made a plateau after a rapid increase up to 7 days, while the expansion of the OPC mixture kept increasing throughout the period. Furthermore, the addition of GGBFS to OPC or LC3 mixture provides the synergistic effect on reducing the expansion due to sulfate attack. Therefore, if LC3 mixture has high initial strength (min. 15 MPa) and dense microstructure to minimize the penetration of sulfate ion into the mixture, it is expected that LC3 mixture is more efficient than OPC mixture against the sulfate attack.
Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is one of the most widely used construction materials in civil engineering infrastructure construction but it is susceptible to sulfate attack. One of the ways to improve the sulfate resistance of an OPC mortar/concrete is to replace a certain amount of OPC with different pozzolanic materials such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and metakaolin. The use of pozzolanic materials to mortar/concrete not only enhances durability but also reduces carbon dioxide (CO2) emission due to the less usage of OPC at the initial construction state. As considering these aspects, limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) has been developed in recent decades. However, the influence of LC3 on sulfate attack resistance has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, this study investigated the efficiency of LC3 mortar mixtures against sulfate attack at an early age (approximately 4.5 months) after two different curing periods, namely 1-day and 3-day curing, since the strength of the LC3 mixture is lower than OPC mixtures. To evaluate the synergistic effect of a combination of LC3 and GGBFS on the sulfate resistance, the LC3 and OPC mixtures containing 25% GGBFS were also assessed in terms of density, porosity, compressive strength, volumetric expansion, and weight changes. The experiment results show that the expansion of the LC3 mixture regardless of the addition of GGBFS and an initial curing strength made a plateau after a rapid increase up to 7 days, while the expansion of the OPC mixture kept increasing throughout the period. Furthermore, the addition of GGBFS to OPC or LC3 mixture provides the synergistic effect on reducing the expansion due to sulfate attack. Therefore, if LC3 mixture has high initial strength (min. 15 MPa) and dense microstructure to minimize the penetration of sulfate ion into the mixture, it is expected that LC3 mixture is more efficient than OPC mixture against the sulfate attack.
Author Shon, Chang Seon
Orynbassarov, Islam
Kim, Jong Ryeol
Tugelbayev, Aidyn
Bektimirova, Umut
Author_xml – givenname: Chang Seon
  surname: Shon
  fullname: Shon, Chang Seon
  email: chang.shon@nu.edu.kz
  organization: Nazarbayev University : Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences
– givenname: Aidyn
  surname: Tugelbayev
  fullname: Tugelbayev, Aidyn
  email: aidyn.tugelbayev@nu.edu.kz
  organization: Nazarbayev University : Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences
– givenname: Umut
  surname: Bektimirova
  fullname: Bektimirova, Umut
  email: ubakhbergenova@nu.edu.kz
  organization: Nazarbayev University : Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences
– givenname: Islam
  surname: Orynbassarov
  fullname: Orynbassarov, Islam
  email: islam.orynbassarov@nu.edu.kz
  organization: Nazarbayev University : Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences
– givenname: Jong Ryeol
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Jong Ryeol
  email: jong.kim@nu.edu.kz
  organization: Nazarbayev University : Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences
BookMark eNqNkE1PGzEQhi1EJT7Kf7CE1Nsu9n5415dCGoWAmsAhcLYm3nFYutjU9irwE_jXOEolrj3NSPPOM6PnhBxaZ5GQH5zlFSvai-12mwfdo4296XVuMV78ni1zyYqcV_UBOeZCFJlsZH2YesbLTLaFOCInITwzVvKW18fk48Zt6cwkwA5EwSNdTEsKtqPz-a_rVTZ1NkJvsaNL5yN4uuzf4ugx0NW4fkG_SZPeRkfvoFjdV3TlhjH2zlLYpLUQ6ewtorcwpPxgICKdxAj6D4V0zVIEP7zTyQYvv5NvBoaAZ__qKXm8nj1Mb7LF_fx2OllkuuCszrRpy7aVVdsZIbuq49wAiKJBXVfSdKglQyiFbDR0dYOCF6zD0jRrbaCWuC5Pyfme--rd3xFDVM9u3D0YVMkkF43gTZNSP_cp7V0IHo169f0L-HfFmdrpV0m_-tKvkn6V9KukXyX9CXC1B0QPSQPqp687_4n4BNcDmVk
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017
10.1111/jace.12575
10.1680/jadcr.14.00089
10.1680/jgrma.18.00029
10.1520/c0305-13
10.1520/c0109_c0109m-13
10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.026
10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119630
10.1080/2093761X.2016.1237393
10.1155/2017/5673985
10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005
10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.06.006
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.041
10.3390/jmse8050301
10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.003
10.1520/c1012-03
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd
Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd
– notice: Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. 2021
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7SR
8BQ
8FD
F28
FR3
JG9
DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.902.145
DatabaseName CrossRef
Engineered Materials Abstracts
METADEX
Technology Research Database
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
Engineering Research Database
Materials Research Database
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Materials Research Database
Engineered Materials Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Technology Research Database
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
METADEX
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Materials Research Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 1662-9795
EndPage 151
ExternalDocumentID 10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_902_145
GroupedDBID -~X
.4S
.DC
4.4
8FE
8FG
AAATW
ABDNZ
ABJNI
ACGFS
ACIWK
AFKRA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BENPR
BGLVJ
D1I
DB1
DKFMR
EBS
F5P
KB.
L6V
L8X
P2P
RTP
~02
AAYXX
CITATION
7SR
8BQ
8FD
F28
FR3
JG9
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2105-cf8388948df69d4d11faa627ec549fdec90ea3697cad57e6120de3f7bcfa59eb3
ISSN 1013-9826
1662-9795
IngestDate Wed Aug 14 04:41:06 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 03:18:07 EDT 2024
Fri Jul 05 15:11:15 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Sulfate Attack
Eco-Efficient Cement
Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCM)
Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3)
Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS)
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2105-cf8388948df69d4d11faa627ec549fdec90ea3697cad57e6120de3f7bcfa59eb3
Notes Selected, peer-reviewed papers from the 11th International Conference on Key Engineering Materials (ICKEM 2021), March 26-29, 2021, Moscow, Russian Federation
PQID 3091676177
PQPubID 2040931
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_3091676177
crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_902_145
transtech_journals_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_902_145
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20211029
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-10-29
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2021
  text: 20211029
  day: 29
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Zurich
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Zurich
PublicationTitle Key engineering materials
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Trans Tech Publications Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Trans Tech Publications Ltd
References Al-Akhras (4456372); 36
Scrivener (4456376); 7
Lv (4456371); 258
Shi (4456380); 116
Robledo-Gutiérrez (4456368) 2013; 96
4456382
4456383
4456373
4456384
Dhandapani (4456378); 107
Nguyen (4456377) 2020; 8
Scrivener (4456375); 114
Antoni (4456374); 42
Shon (4456370); 47
4456381
4456369
Shi (4456379); 88
References_xml – volume: 114
  start-page: 49
  ident: 4456375
  article-title: Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3)
  publication-title: Cement and Concrete Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017
  contributor:
    fullname: Scrivener
– volume: 96
  start-page: 3637
  issue: 11
  year: 2013
  ident: 4456368
  article-title: Mineralogical Composition of Clinker as an Indicator of Sulfate Resistance: A Rietveld XRD/Takashima Approach
  publication-title: Journal of the American Ceramic Society
  doi: 10.1111/jace.12575
  contributor:
    fullname: Robledo-Gutiérrez
– ident: 4456369
  doi: 10.1680/jadcr.14.00089
– volume: 7
  start-page: 3
  issn: 2049-1239
  issue: 1
  ident: 4456376
  article-title: Impacting factors and properties of limestone calcined clay cements (LC3)
  publication-title: Green Materials
  doi: 10.1680/jgrma.18.00029
  contributor:
    fullname: Scrivener
– ident: 4456381
  doi: 10.1520/c0305-13
– ident: 4456382
  doi: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-13
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1727
  issue: 9
  ident: 4456372
  article-title: Durability of metakaolin concrete to sulfate attack
  publication-title: Cement and Concrete Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.026
  contributor:
    fullname: Al-Akhras
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1579
  issue: 12
  ident: 4456374
  article-title: Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone
  publication-title: Cement and Concrete Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006
  contributor:
    fullname: Antoni
– volume: 258
  start-page: 119630
  ident: 4456371
  article-title: Resistance improvement of cement mortar containing silica fume to external sulfate attacks at normal temperature
  publication-title: Construction and Building Materials
  doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119630
  contributor:
    fullname: Lv
– ident: 4456373
  doi: 10.1080/2093761X.2016.1237393
– ident: 4456384
  doi: 10.1155/2017/5673985
– volume: 107
  start-page: 136
  ident: 4456378
  article-title: Mechanical properties and durability performance of concretes with Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3)
  publication-title: Cement and Concrete Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005
  contributor:
    fullname: Dhandapani
– volume: 88
  start-page: 60
  ident: 4456379
  article-title: Experimental studies and thermodynamic modeling of the carbonation of Portland cement, metakaolin and limestone mortars
  publication-title: Cement and Concrete Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.06.006
  contributor:
    fullname: Shi
– volume: 47
  start-page: 389
  ident: 4456370
  article-title: Evaluation of West Texas natural zeolite as an alternative of ASTM Class F fly ash
  publication-title: Construction and Building Materials
  doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.041
  contributor:
    fullname: Shon
– volume: 8
  start-page: 301
  issn: 2077-1312
  issue: 5
  year: 2020
  ident: 4456377
  article-title: Influence of Calcined Clay Reactivity on the Mechanical Properties and Chloride Diffusion Resistance of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) Concrete
  publication-title: Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
  doi: 10.3390/jmse8050301
  contributor:
    fullname: Nguyen
– volume: 116
  start-page: 238
  ident: 4456380
  article-title: Sulfate resistance of calcined clay – Limestone – Portland cements
  publication-title: Cement and Concrete Research
  doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Shi
– ident: 4456383
  doi: 10.1520/c1012-03
SSID ssj0031815
Score 2.300003
Snippet Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is one of the most widely used construction materials in civil engineering infrastructure construction but it is susceptible to...
SourceID proquest
crossref
transtech
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 145
SubjectTerms Carbon dioxide
Cement
Compressive strength
Concrete
Curing
GGBS
Limestone
Metakaolin
Mixtures
Mortars (material)
Portland cements
Pozzolans
Sulfate resistance
Synergistic effect
Title How Efficient are LC3 and GGBFS-Contained Mortar Mixtures Submerged into Na2SO4 Solution against External Sulfate Attack at an early Age?
URI https://www.scientific.net/KEM.902.145
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3091676177/abstract/
Volume 902
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1djxIxFG1wTdR9MH5tRFfTB-PLZFjms9Mnw26AjctC4kLC26TT6SBZAQPDxvUf-J_8cd7b-QSNWX0hpDAtmXO4c257e0rIu4hbou3I2PQjIUw80djktmCmkJIpZkk_cnHv8OXQP5-4H6fetNH4Wata2qZRS37_476S_0EV2gBX3CX7D8iWnUIDvAd84RUQhtc7YYznwXW1B4SuFF8rY3Dm6OWAfv-0d2Wi9RRk_qApsaYWHXvm33DFYIPxQu-7ROclUJ9DYV-NXKOYIzPEDC7bpEY394iG739JQJUanTQV8hp3QEJcUNocuTNTe9WBFxBnVOVzaIAozu7GDg-N0fp2CQ_RjVivbsqJns9lFQA6hat6kcAin-2fGZ9u1aqsDDlV1-l8MYdOtA6eLLZpfSrD1rV0dhUw9dNZLynszFnW6pswQuNxFDywc__srM33gWIsO62zCOu8bdcCs5WZVu4_MCB7xk0QWMybbUDF-iycFILGi-5lCzpp5ZfuenUPR2FvMhiE4-50fI_ct2FwTP2DXr_QARAs9fkZ5Q9-QN7nI578Pt5JbbRdiVTlPQ9TvEHo7VuTQOMn5HGeu9BORsSnpKGWz8hhzdHyOfkBlKQlJSlQkgIlKVCS7lGSZpSkBSVpSUmKlKQZJWlBSZpTkhaUpDklaUZJKmC0JdWUpEDJDy_IpNcdn52b-WkfprRB5JsyCZwg4G4QJz6P3diyEiF8mynpuTyJleRtJRyfMylijylQ5u1YOQmLZCI8riLniBwsV0v1klAFwixyPYFL2m4iosiKIxCyCYOIxUWSNAkrbnD4NTN1CSEZRmhCgCasoAkBmhCgCQEayJK9Jjku8AjzQLAJHdDcPoNUgDUJLzGqPr9b16_-3vVr8qj6yxyTg3S9VW9AD6fRW027Xw5Ov00
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27957,27958,33408
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+Efficient+are+LC3+and+GGBFS-Contained+Mortar+Mixtures+Submerged+into+Na2SO4+Solution+against+External+Sulfate+Attack+at+an+early+Age%3F&rft.jtitle=Key+engineering+materials&rft.au=Islam+Orynbassarov&rft.au=Shon%2C+Chang+Seon&rft.au=Kim%2C+Jong+Ryeol&rft.au=Bektimirova%2C+Umut&rft.date=2021-10-29&rft.pub=Trans+Tech+Publications+Ltd&rft.issn=1013-9826&rft.eissn=1662-9795&rft.volume=902&rft.spage=145&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028%2Fwww.scientific.net%2FKEM.902.145&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_s http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientific.net%2FImage%2FTitleCover%2F6264%3Fwidth%3D600