The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning
Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that subjects were more likely to object to the truth of the premises and the conclusions of an argument than to the strength of the link between...
Saved in:
Published in | Thinking & reasoning Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 51 - 80 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Taylor & Francis Group
01.05.1996
|
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1354-6783 1464-0708 |
DOI | 10.1080/135467896394564 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that subjects were more likely to object to the truth of the premises and the conclusions of an argument than to the strength of the link between them. Experiment 1 also revealed two manipulations that helped subjects object to the link between premises and conclusions: rating how well the premises support the conclusions and rating the believability of the premises and conclusions. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that subjects who identified the premises and conclusions of an argument were better at formulating objections to the link between premises and conclusions. Moreover, subjects in Experiment 2 were better and faster at formulating objections to the truth of the premises and conclusions than to the link between premises and conclusions. The results are discussed in terms of the constraints they pose for developing a cognitive theory of informal reasoning. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that subjects were more likely to object to the truth of the premises and the conclusions of an argument than to the strength of the link between them. Experiment 1 also revealed two manipulations that helped subjects object to the link between premises and conclusions: rating how well the premises support the conclusions and rating the believability of the premises and conclusions. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that subjects who identified the premises and conclusions of an argument were better at formulating objections to the link between premises and conclusions. Moreover, subjects in Experiment 2 were better and faster at formulating objections to the truth of the premises and conclusions than to the link between premises and conclusions. The results are discussed in terms of the constraints they pose for developing a cognitive theory of informal reasoning. |
Author | Shaw, Victoria F. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Victoria F. surname: Shaw fullname: Shaw, Victoria F. |
BookMark | eNp9j11LwzAYhYNMcJtee9s_UPembz5a76SoGwwUmdclSdMZ6RJJirJ_b6VeDfTqHDg8B54FmfngLSHXFG4olLCiyJmQZSWwYlywMzKnTLAcJJSzsY9rPs54QRYpvQNAwZDPSb57s1kd9t4N7tNmzzEYm5JNmfPZxnchHlSfvViVgnd-f0nOO9Une_WbS_L6cL-r1_n26XFT321zU4AcckRGK4O0RIPSaM2kli3lVSmV0BaErExHkRVYyrbTiLqQrQJVGAEWeKVwSVbTr4khpWi75iO6g4rHhkLzY9uc2I4EPyGMG9Tggh-icv0_3O3EuUn2K8S-bQZ17EPsovLGpQb_gr8BHnRqwA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_00219266_2023_2250346 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2017_04_054 crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2025_2473353 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2015_1087295 crossref_primary_10_1177_2372732218814855 crossref_primary_10_1080_713699143 crossref_primary_10_36681_tused_2022_139 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11618_023_01147_x crossref_primary_10_1080_02724980244000701 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10503_023_09620_x crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_18_010115 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_024_10395_5 crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2015_1127289 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10212_024_00930_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_00461520_2014_916217 crossref_primary_10_1080_00220973_2013_769423 crossref_primary_10_1026_0033_3042_a000371 crossref_primary_10_1026_0012_1924_a000225 crossref_primary_10_19128_turje_980874 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43031_019_0007_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_576273 crossref_primary_10_1590_1807_0191202228133 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2016_1257406 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500690601083375 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2013_855868 crossref_primary_10_1080_2153599X_2013_767036 crossref_primary_10_1080_0309877X_2018_1450967 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2009_02_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_019_00088_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2024_2370074 crossref_primary_10_1348_000712607X204317 crossref_primary_10_15285_maruaebd_674490 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2015_1025665 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_021_00272_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2004_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjep_12298 crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327809JLS1202_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_012_9343_9 crossref_primary_10_1057_jird_2012_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1270931 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11090522 crossref_primary_10_1080_00028533_2002_11821574 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10503_011_9256_1 crossref_primary_10_33225_jbse_13_12_271 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2005_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1162_COLI_a_00276 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X1000292X crossref_primary_10_1080_09500690903505661 crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2012_671558 crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21819 crossref_primary_10_3998_ergo_6784 crossref_primary_10_1017_S193029750000913X crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_568 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cedpsych_2013_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_02103702231224633 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_018_9471_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2024_1170118 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470210701282618 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2013_855533 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90035-T 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90028-0 10.1016/S0010-0277(86)80002-6 10.1037/0033-295X.90.1.38 10.1080/14640749508401408 10.1017/CBO9780511571350 10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4 10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331 10.1207/s15516709cog1301_1 10.1207/s1532690xci0303_7 10.1080/02698599408573479 10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1996 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1996 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1080/135467896394564 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology Philosophy |
EISSN | 1464-0708 |
EndPage | 80 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1080_135467896394564 10099242 |
GroupedDBID | .7I 07M 0BK 0R~ 123 1TA 29Q 4.4 4B3 5VS 8V8 AAGZJ AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAZMC ABCCY ABDBF ABFIM ABIVO ABJNI ABLIJ ABRYG ABTAI ABVXC ABWZE ABXUL ABXYU ABZLS ACGEJ ACGFS ACHQT ACIKQ ACTIO ACTOA ACUHS ADAHI ADCVX ADIUE ADXAZ ADXPE AECIN AEMOZ AEMXT AEPSL AEYOC AFHDM AGRBW AHDZW AHQJS AJWEG AKBVH AKVCP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BOHLJ C5A CAG CBZAQ CCCUG CKOZC COF CS3 C~T DU5 EAP EBO EBR EBS EBU EJD EMK EPL EPS ESO ESX FEDTE FXNIP G-F GTTXZ H13 HVGLF HZ~ I-F IPNFZ J.O JLMOS K1G KYCEM L7Y M4Z NA5 NW- O9- P2P PQQKQ QZZOY RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F STATR TBH TBQAZ TDBHL TFH TFL TFW TH9 TNTFI TUROJ UA1 UT5 VAE ~01 .QK 53G AAGDL AAHIA AANPH AAYXX ABPEM ACPKE ACRBO ADEWX ADKVQ ADYSH AEFOU AEISY AEKEX AEOZL AEXSR AEZRU AFRVT AGDLA AGMYJ AIJEM AIXGP AIYEW ALLRG AMPGV BMOTO CITATION CQ1 DGFLZ DGXZK DKSSO EFRLQ EGDCR E~B E~C HF~ LJTGL RBICI TEH TRJHH TUS UT9 ~S~ |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-33419c3183c37cbb47b7d15987a6be0679cf1342387dfb33b27da0a2c60e059a3 |
ISSN | 1354-6783 |
IngestDate | Tue Jul 01 03:02:00 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:11 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:01:16 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c207t-33419c3183c37cbb47b7d15987a6be0679cf1342387dfb33b27da0a2c60e059a3 |
PageCount | 30 |
ParticipantIDs | informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_135467896394564 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_135467896394564 crossref_primary_10_1080_135467896394564 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 5/1/1996 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1996-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 1996 text: 5/1/1996 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationTitle | Thinking & reasoning |
PublicationYear | 1996 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis Group |
References | Kuhn D. (CIT0014) 1992; 62 CIT0010 Toulmin S. E. (CIT0025) 1958 Rips L. J. (CIT0023) 1988 Johnson-Laird P. N. (CIT0012) 1993 Braine M. D. S. (CIT0001) 1984; 18 Evans J. St. B. T. (CIT0004) 1993 Cheng P. W. (CIT0002) 1993 Perkins D. N. (CIT0018) 1986 CIT0013 CIT0015 CIT0017 Perkins D. N. (CIT0019) 1983 Johnson-Laird P. N. (CIT0009) 1983 CIT0021 Green D. W. (CIT0007) 1995 CIT0022 Halpren D. F. (CIT0008) 1989 Stevenson R. J. (CIT0024) 1995; 48 Osherson D. (CIT0016) 1975 Johnson-Laird P. N. (CIT0011) 1992 CIT0003 CIT0005 CIT0027 CIT0026 CIT0006 Perkins D. N. (CIT0020) 1990 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90035-T – volume-title: The uses of argument year: 1958 ident: CIT0025 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90028-0 – start-page: 171 volume-title: Perspectives on thinking and reasoning year: 1995 ident: CIT0007 – volume-title: The psychology of human thought year: 1988 ident: CIT0023 – volume-title: Rules for reasoning year: 1993 ident: CIT0002 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(86)80002-6 – volume-title: Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction year: 1993 ident: CIT0004 – volume-title: Deduction year: 1992 ident: CIT0011 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.1.38 – volume: 48 start-page: 613 year: 1995 ident: CIT0024 publication-title: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology doi: 10.1080/14640749508401408 – volume-title: Knowledge as design year: 1986 ident: CIT0018 – volume-title: Thinking: The frontier expands year: 1983 ident: CIT0019 – volume-title: Reasoning and decision making year: 1993 ident: CIT0012 – volume: 18 volume-title: The psychology of learning and motivation year: 1984 ident: CIT0001 – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511571350 – volume-title: Reasoning: Representation and process in children and adults year: 1975 ident: CIT0016 – volume-title: Informal reasoning and education year: 1990 ident: CIT0020 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4 – volume-title: Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking year: 1989 ident: CIT0008 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331 – volume-title: Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness year: 1983 ident: CIT0009 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1301_1 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0303_7 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1080/02698599408573479 – volume: 62 start-page: 155 year: 1992 ident: CIT0014 publication-title: Harvard Educational Review doi: 10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1 |
SSID | ssj0002435 |
Score | 1.4269487 |
Snippet | Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that... |
SourceID | crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 51 |
Title | The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135467896394564 |
Volume | 2 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NS8MwFA-6XXYRP3F-0YMHYWR2TZp0xzGVISgeJoqXkaQpDGXKrIf51_vSpNmHG0yhlDakCc2vfe_19b3fQ-hctmMStYTAKtYZpvDJgEVoDLk0FTHY47CZ3OG7e9Z7pLfP8fO0mGKRXZLLpvpemlfyH1ShDXA1WbJ_QNYPCg1wDPjCHhCG_doYd338j4v5LyKsGi7NyDDni8_C5Tprhppqna_WScAa47kewpZTL-Jfh8ajPxSNm-bUOWDjictQPCfPSEwx6CMrQ7Rto4xieNOTWSEY_cLaCjTHButUY7hU6NooRTMVzAQvdNtQ1Ez1S_lPfUHt-GDAlmMpXRhgE1Ujzs2v92qnd_Xy5PVrRIuyqf7WSsKmJLxcGGLO1phjop2xIfrbaMsZ_0HHIrmDNvRoF9UeymoSE3NSKqTJHsKAb-DxDTy-wXAUlPgGHt999Hhz3e_2sCtvgVUU8hwTQ6WnjExVhCspKZc8Besy4YJJbRx8KmsZgsaEp5kkREY8FaGIFAs1GMWCHKDK6H2kD1HASBaCntIJ9KciTEVbCqUjRrhkTGW0jprlQgyU4343JUjeBisWv44u_AUflvZkdVcyu7KDvPA0ZbYszICsuOpo_QmOUW36aJ-gSj7-0qdgCebyzD0aP_QyVEs |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Cognitive+Processes+in+Informal+Reasoning&rft.jtitle=Thinking+%26+reasoning&rft.au=Shaw%2C+Victoria+F.&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.issn=1354-6783&rft.eissn=1464-0708&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=80&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F135467896394564&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1080_135467896394564 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1354-6783&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1354-6783&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1354-6783&client=summon |