The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning

Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that subjects were more likely to object to the truth of the premises and the conclusions of an argument than to the strength of the link between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThinking & reasoning Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 51 - 80
Main Author Shaw, Victoria F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.05.1996
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1354-6783
1464-0708
DOI10.1080/135467896394564

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that subjects were more likely to object to the truth of the premises and the conclusions of an argument than to the strength of the link between them. Experiment 1 also revealed two manipulations that helped subjects object to the link between premises and conclusions: rating how well the premises support the conclusions and rating the believability of the premises and conclusions. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that subjects who identified the premises and conclusions of an argument were better at formulating objections to the link between premises and conclusions. Moreover, subjects in Experiment 2 were better and faster at formulating objections to the truth of the premises and conclusions than to the link between premises and conclusions. The results are discussed in terms of the constraints they pose for developing a cognitive theory of informal reasoning.
AbstractList Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that subjects were more likely to object to the truth of the premises and the conclusions of an argument than to the strength of the link between them. Experiment 1 also revealed two manipulations that helped subjects object to the link between premises and conclusions: rating how well the premises support the conclusions and rating the believability of the premises and conclusions. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that subjects who identified the premises and conclusions of an argument were better at formulating objections to the link between premises and conclusions. Moreover, subjects in Experiment 2 were better and faster at formulating objections to the truth of the premises and conclusions than to the link between premises and conclusions. The results are discussed in terms of the constraints they pose for developing a cognitive theory of informal reasoning.
Author Shaw, Victoria F.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Victoria F.
  surname: Shaw
  fullname: Shaw, Victoria F.
BookMark eNp9j11LwzAYhYNMcJtee9s_UPembz5a76SoGwwUmdclSdMZ6RJJirJ_b6VeDfTqHDg8B54FmfngLSHXFG4olLCiyJmQZSWwYlywMzKnTLAcJJSzsY9rPs54QRYpvQNAwZDPSb57s1kd9t4N7tNmzzEYm5JNmfPZxnchHlSfvViVgnd-f0nOO9Une_WbS_L6cL-r1_n26XFT321zU4AcckRGK4O0RIPSaM2kli3lVSmV0BaErExHkRVYyrbTiLqQrQJVGAEWeKVwSVbTr4khpWi75iO6g4rHhkLzY9uc2I4EPyGMG9Tggh-icv0_3O3EuUn2K8S-bQZ17EPsovLGpQb_gr8BHnRqwA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_00219266_2023_2250346
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2017_04_054
crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2025_2473353
crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2015_1087295
crossref_primary_10_1177_2372732218814855
crossref_primary_10_1080_713699143
crossref_primary_10_36681_tused_2022_139
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11618_023_01147_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_02724980244000701
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10503_023_09620_x
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevPhysEducRes_18_010115
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_024_10395_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2015_1127289
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10212_024_00930_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_00461520_2014_916217
crossref_primary_10_1080_00220973_2013_769423
crossref_primary_10_1026_0033_3042_a000371
crossref_primary_10_1026_0012_1924_a000225
crossref_primary_10_19128_turje_980874
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43031_019_0007_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_576273
crossref_primary_10_1590_1807_0191202228133
crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2016_1257406
crossref_primary_10_1080_09500690601083375
crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2013_855868
crossref_primary_10_1080_2153599X_2013_767036
crossref_primary_10_1080_0309877X_2018_1450967
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2009_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_019_00088_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_13546783_2024_2370074
crossref_primary_10_1348_000712607X204317
crossref_primary_10_15285_maruaebd_674490
crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2015_1025665
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_021_00272_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2004_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjep_12298
crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327809JLS1202_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11165_012_9343_9
crossref_primary_10_1057_jird_2012_9
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1270931
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci11090522
crossref_primary_10_1080_00028533_2002_11821574
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10503_011_9256_1
crossref_primary_10_33225_jbse_13_12_271
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2005_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1162_COLI_a_00276
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X1000292X
crossref_primary_10_1080_09500690903505661
crossref_primary_10_1080_09500693_2012_671558
crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21819
crossref_primary_10_3998_ergo_6784
crossref_primary_10_1017_S193029750000913X
crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_568
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cedpsych_2013_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_02103702231224633
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11251_018_9471_3
crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2024_1170118
crossref_primary_10_1080_17470210701282618
crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2013_855533
Cites_doi 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90035-T
10.1016/0010-0277(94)90028-0
10.1016/S0010-0277(86)80002-6
10.1037/0033-295X.90.1.38
10.1080/14640749508401408
10.1017/CBO9780511571350
10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4
10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X
10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331
10.1207/s15516709cog1301_1
10.1207/s1532690xci0303_7
10.1080/02698599408573479
10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1996
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1996
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1080/135467896394564
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
Philosophy
EISSN 1464-0708
EndPage 80
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_135467896394564
10099242
GroupedDBID .7I
07M
0BK
0R~
123
1TA
29Q
4.4
4B3
5VS
8V8
AAGZJ
AAMFJ
AAMIU
AAPUL
AATTQ
AAZMC
ABCCY
ABDBF
ABFIM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABRYG
ABTAI
ABVXC
ABWZE
ABXUL
ABXYU
ABZLS
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIKQ
ACTIO
ACTOA
ACUHS
ADAHI
ADCVX
ADIUE
ADXAZ
ADXPE
AECIN
AEMOZ
AEMXT
AEPSL
AEYOC
AFHDM
AGRBW
AHDZW
AHQJS
AJWEG
AKBVH
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BEJHT
BLEHA
BOHLJ
C5A
CAG
CBZAQ
CCCUG
CKOZC
COF
CS3
C~T
DU5
EAP
EBO
EBR
EBS
EBU
EJD
EMK
EPL
EPS
ESO
ESX
FEDTE
FXNIP
G-F
GTTXZ
H13
HVGLF
HZ~
I-F
IPNFZ
J.O
JLMOS
K1G
KYCEM
L7Y
M4Z
NA5
NW-
O9-
P2P
PQQKQ
QZZOY
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RSYQP
S-F
STATR
TBH
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TFH
TFL
TFW
TH9
TNTFI
TUROJ
UA1
UT5
VAE
~01
.QK
53G
AAGDL
AAHIA
AANPH
AAYXX
ABPEM
ACPKE
ACRBO
ADEWX
ADKVQ
ADYSH
AEFOU
AEISY
AEKEX
AEOZL
AEXSR
AEZRU
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AIJEM
AIXGP
AIYEW
ALLRG
AMPGV
BMOTO
CITATION
CQ1
DGFLZ
DGXZK
DKSSO
EFRLQ
EGDCR
E~B
E~C
HF~
LJTGL
RBICI
TEH
TRJHH
TUS
UT9
~S~
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c207t-33419c3183c37cbb47b7d15987a6be0679cf1342387dfb33b27da0a2c60e059a3
ISSN 1354-6783
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 03:02:00 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:11 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:01:16 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c207t-33419c3183c37cbb47b7d15987a6be0679cf1342387dfb33b27da0a2c60e059a3
PageCount 30
ParticipantIDs informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_135467896394564
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_135467896394564
crossref_primary_10_1080_135467896394564
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 5/1/1996
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1996-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 1996
  text: 5/1/1996
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationTitle Thinking & reasoning
PublicationYear 1996
Publisher Taylor & Francis Group
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis Group
References Kuhn D. (CIT0014) 1992; 62
CIT0010
Toulmin S. E. (CIT0025) 1958
Rips L. J. (CIT0023) 1988
Johnson-Laird P. N. (CIT0012) 1993
Braine M. D. S. (CIT0001) 1984; 18
Evans J. St. B. T. (CIT0004) 1993
Cheng P. W. (CIT0002) 1993
Perkins D. N. (CIT0018) 1986
CIT0013
CIT0015
CIT0017
Perkins D. N. (CIT0019) 1983
Johnson-Laird P. N. (CIT0009) 1983
CIT0021
Green D. W. (CIT0007) 1995
CIT0022
Halpren D. F. (CIT0008) 1989
Stevenson R. J. (CIT0024) 1995; 48
Osherson D. (CIT0016) 1975
Johnson-Laird P. N. (CIT0011) 1992
CIT0003
CIT0005
CIT0027
CIT0026
CIT0006
Perkins D. N. (CIT0020) 1990
References_xml – ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90035-T
– volume-title: The uses of argument
  year: 1958
  ident: CIT0025
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90028-0
– start-page: 171
  volume-title: Perspectives on thinking and reasoning
  year: 1995
  ident: CIT0007
– volume-title: The psychology of human thought
  year: 1988
  ident: CIT0023
– volume-title: Rules for reasoning
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0002
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(86)80002-6
– volume-title: Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0004
– volume-title: Deduction
  year: 1992
  ident: CIT0011
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.1.38
– volume: 48
  start-page: 613
  year: 1995
  ident: CIT0024
  publication-title: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  doi: 10.1080/14640749508401408
– volume-title: Knowledge as design
  year: 1986
  ident: CIT0018
– volume-title: Thinking: The frontier expands
  year: 1983
  ident: CIT0019
– volume-title: Reasoning and decision making
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0012
– volume: 18
  volume-title: The psychology of learning and motivation
  year: 1984
  ident: CIT0001
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
– volume-title: Reasoning: Representation and process in children and adults
  year: 1975
  ident: CIT0016
– volume-title: Informal reasoning and education
  year: 1990
  ident: CIT0020
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4
– volume-title: Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking
  year: 1989
  ident: CIT0008
– ident: CIT0027
  doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331
– volume-title: Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness
  year: 1983
  ident: CIT0009
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1301_1
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0303_7
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1080/02698599408573479
– volume: 62
  start-page: 155
  year: 1992
  ident: CIT0014
  publication-title: Harvard Educational Review
  doi: 10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1
SSID ssj0002435
Score 1.4269487
Snippet Two experiments investigated the factors that people consider when evaluating informal arguments in newspaper and magazine editorials. Experiment 1 showed that...
SourceID crossref
informaworld
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 51
Title The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135467896394564
Volume 2
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NS8MwFA-6XXYRP3F-0YMHYWR2TZp0xzGVISgeJoqXkaQpDGXKrIf51_vSpNmHG0yhlDakCc2vfe_19b3fQ-hctmMStYTAKtYZpvDJgEVoDLk0FTHY47CZ3OG7e9Z7pLfP8fO0mGKRXZLLpvpemlfyH1ShDXA1WbJ_QNYPCg1wDPjCHhCG_doYd338j4v5LyKsGi7NyDDni8_C5Tprhppqna_WScAa47kewpZTL-Jfh8ajPxSNm-bUOWDjictQPCfPSEwx6CMrQ7Rto4xieNOTWSEY_cLaCjTHButUY7hU6NooRTMVzAQvdNtQ1Ez1S_lPfUHt-GDAlmMpXRhgE1Ujzs2v92qnd_Xy5PVrRIuyqf7WSsKmJLxcGGLO1phjop2xIfrbaMsZ_0HHIrmDNvRoF9UeymoSE3NSKqTJHsKAb-DxDTy-wXAUlPgGHt999Hhz3e_2sCtvgVUU8hwTQ6WnjExVhCspKZc8Besy4YJJbRx8KmsZgsaEp5kkREY8FaGIFAs1GMWCHKDK6H2kD1HASBaCntIJ9KciTEVbCqUjRrhkTGW0jprlQgyU4343JUjeBisWv44u_AUflvZkdVcyu7KDvPA0ZbYszICsuOpo_QmOUW36aJ-gSj7-0qdgCebyzD0aP_QyVEs
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Cognitive+Processes+in+Informal+Reasoning&rft.jtitle=Thinking+%26+reasoning&rft.au=Shaw%2C+Victoria+F.&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.issn=1354-6783&rft.eissn=1464-0708&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=80&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F135467896394564&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1080_135467896394564
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1354-6783&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1354-6783&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1354-6783&client=summon