Aging alters face expressions processing and recognition: insights on possible neural mechanisms

The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 134; no. 2; pp. 543 - 558
Main Authors Ginatempo, Francesca, Loi, Nicola, Zeroual, Mohammed, Cadoni, Marinella, Fadda, Mauro, Lagorio, Andrea, Deriu, Franca
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.08.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions. The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response, and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to 1) recording of fixation patterns, 2) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, 3) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1), and 4) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy, and sad faces expressions. Senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size, and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared with young subjects, and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects’ excitability of face M1 was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with recognition accuracy. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces, which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings provide new insights into the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expression recognition. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions.
AbstractList The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expressions processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to i) recording of fixation patterns, ii) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, iii) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1) , and iv) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy and sad faces expressions. senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared to young ones; and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects' excitability of face M1 (was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with pupil size and recognition accuracy, and positively correlated with N170 latency. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings prove new insights in the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expressions recognition.The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expressions processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to i) recording of fixation patterns, ii) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, iii) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1) , and iv) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy and sad faces expressions. senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared to young ones; and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects' excitability of face M1 (was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with pupil size and recognition accuracy, and positively correlated with N170 latency. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings prove new insights in the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expressions recognition.
The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions. The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response, and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to 1) recording of fixation patterns, 2) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, 3) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1), and 4) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy, and sad faces expressions. Senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size, and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared with young subjects, and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects’ excitability of face M1 was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with recognition accuracy. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces, which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings provide new insights into the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expression recognition. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions.
The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response, and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to ) recording of fixation patterns, ) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, ) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1), and ) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy, and sad faces expressions. Senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size, and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared with young subjects, and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects' excitability of face M1 was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with recognition accuracy. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces, which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings provide new insights into the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expression recognition. The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions.
Author Fadda, Mauro
Lagorio, Andrea
Zeroual, Mohammed
Ginatempo, Francesca
Loi, Nicola
Deriu, Franca
Cadoni, Marinella
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Francesca
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8424-6037
  surname: Ginatempo
  fullname: Ginatempo, Francesca
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Nicola
  surname: Loi
  fullname: Loi, Nicola
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mohammed
  surname: Zeroual
  fullname: Zeroual, Mohammed
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Marinella
  surname: Cadoni
  fullname: Cadoni, Marinella
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mauro
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0615-6546
  surname: Fadda
  fullname: Fadda, Mauro
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Andrea
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9113-6103
  surname: Lagorio
  fullname: Lagorio, Andrea
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Franca
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8235-6091
  surname: Deriu
  fullname: Deriu, Franca
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40590789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kE1PwzAMhiM0xD7gyBXlyKXDSZam5TZNfEmTuMC5pIm7ZWrTkqwS_Hs6NjjZ8vvIsp8pGfnWIyHXDOaMSX6383MALtScA1-ckckw4wmTeTYikyHgiQClxmQa4w4AlAR-QcYLkDmoLJ-Qj-XG-Q3V9R5DpJU2SPGrCxija32kXWjNoT8g3tKApt14tx-ye-p8dJvtPtLW064doLJG6rEPuqYNmq32LjbxkpxXuo54daoz8v748LZ6TtavTy-r5ToxHOQiKTETqrKp1symVQ7couXaLHiVMyyl4LpEC8JYWQkGikteZdKkikmLTJeZmJHb497h5M8e475oXDRY19pj28dCcJ4KCULBgN6c0L5s0BZdcI0O38WflQFIjoAJw18Bq3-EQXGwXux88Wu9OFgXP8WwdeU
Cites_doi 10.1080/00207450490270901
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.059
10.1002/hbm.22466
10.1007/s00702-004-0250-8
10.1126/sciadv.aaz4232
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003
10.1038/372669a0
10.1038/nrn1724
10.1007/s00221-020-05777-z
10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.128
10.1113/JP283137
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0861-19.2020
10.1177/1534582302001001003
10.1002/cne.23908
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-05879.1995
10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001
10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.003
10.1016/j.neures.2009.01.009
10.1080/0964704X.2018.1524683
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.006
10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0
10.1097/WNR.0b013e328012272e
10.1016/j.neucli.2006.04.005
10.1371/journal.pone.0002389
10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245746
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.001
10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01824
10.1163/156856897X00357
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.018
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.003
10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.887
10.1080/13506289508401722
10.1093/schbul/sbn047
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006
10.1002/gps.4982
10.1093/ageing/25.6.432
10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.094
10.3390/brainsci11091203
10.1177/0748730412441172
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03794.x
10.1097/00001756-200401190-00041
10.1037/0894-4105.19.6.739
10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00635.x
10.1038/s41598-018-23265-x
10.1073/pnas.95.3.781
10.1093/geronb/62.1.p53
10.1111/j.1755-3768.1965.tb00334.x
10.3389/fncir.2016.00014
10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00099-4
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.065
10.1080/13825585.2019.1708253
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.043
10.1093/geronb/gby148
10.1016/j.neures.2010.03.001
10.1098/rstb.2002.1220
10.1007/s00213-015-3929-7
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.023
10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01436-9
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.016
10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x
10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.037
10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028
10.1016/j.exger.2010.04.005
10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.054
10.1111/psyp.12685
10.1113/JP278877
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.048
10.3758/cabn.3.2.97
10.1007/s00221-002-1346-8
10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00268-9
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.118
10.1073/pnas.0935845100
10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02239-x
10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x
10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00037-6
10.1097/00001756-200203250-00013
10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.005
10.3758/CABN.9.4.380
10.1097/00001756-200007140-00021
10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031393
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.006
10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1406
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01110
10.1152/jn.00328.2021
10.1006/nimg.2002.1126
10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00002-5
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00487.x
10.1007/s00213-012-2893-8
10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1815
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00853.x
10.1097/01.wnr.0000127827.73576.d8
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001
10.1007/s10919-011-0113-6
10.1007/s40520-022-02097-w
10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.08.001
10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003
10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.023
10.1093/scan/nsm024
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.059
10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.005
10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.06.052
10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00276-8
10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00149-5
10.1037/a0022758
10.1093/scan/nst071
10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.011
10.1016/j.schres.2007.05.001
10.3390/vision5040046
10.1080/02699930802664623
10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.007
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.016
10.1093/geronb/gbv033
10.15412/J.BCN.03080104
10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00223
10.1371/journal.pone.0263594
10.1093/brain/awg241
10.1037//0022-3514.37.11.2049
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.004
10.1006/nimg.2001.0982
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.035
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1152/jn.00237.2024
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1598
EndPage 558
ExternalDocumentID 40590789
10_1152_jn_00237_2024
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Next Generation EU
  grantid: PNRR-MAD-2022-12376667
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
2WC
39C
4.4
5GY
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABHWK
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADFNX
ADHGD
AENEX
AFFNX
AFOSN
AIZAD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BKKCC
BTFSW
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EMOBN
F5P
H13
H~9
ITBOX
KQ8
L7B
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHI
RPL
RPRKH
SJN
TR2
UHB
UPT
WH7
WOQ
X7M
XSW
YQT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c2054-be837fd6aa1d6f902ded2ac42f91eb532abed03cd5f3107252f85c6715de1ab83
ISSN 0022-3077
1522-1598
IngestDate Sat Aug 23 12:16:35 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 02 01:40:57 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 06 19:06:26 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords ocular movements
electroencephalography
aging
face expressions
transcranial magnetic stimulation
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2054-be837fd6aa1d6f902ded2ac42f91eb532abed03cd5f3107252f85c6715de1ab83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-8235-6091
0000-0001-9113-6103
0000-0002-0615-6546
0000-0002-8424-6037
OpenAccessLink https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/jn.00237.2024
PMID 40590789
PQID 3226350370
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3226350370
pubmed_primary_40590789
crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00237_2024
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2025
References B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
Rossion B (B16) 2012
B27
B28
B29
Hood BM (B64) 1996
B30
B31
B32
B33
B34
B35
B36
B37
B38
B39
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B40
B41
B42
B43
B44
B45
B46
B47
B48
B49
B50
B51
B52
B53
B54
B55
B56
B57
B58
B59
B109
B107
B108
B105
B106
B103
B104
B101
B102
B100
B60
B61
B62
B63
B65
B66
B67
B68
B69
B118
B119
B116
B117
B114
B115
B112
B113
B110
B111
B70
B71
B72
B73
B74
B75
B77
B78
B79
B129
B127
B128
B125
B126
B123
B124
B121
B122
B120
B80
B81
B82
B83
B84
B85
B86
B87
B88
B89
B90
B91
B92
B93
B94
B95
B96
B97
B10
B98
B11
B99
B12
B13
B14
B15
B17
B18
B19
References_xml – ident: B50
  doi: 10.1080/00207450490270901
– ident: B113
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.059
– ident: B93
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.22466
– ident: B96
  doi: 10.1007/s00702-004-0250-8
– ident: B90
  doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4232
– ident: B32
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003
– ident: B55
  doi: 10.1038/372669a0
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1038/nrn1724
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05777-z
– ident: B40
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.128
– ident: B81
  doi: 10.1113/JP283137
– ident: B112
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0861-19.2020
– ident: B15
  doi: 10.1177/1534582302001001003
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.1002/cne.23908
– ident: B56
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-05879.1995
– ident: B84
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001
– ident: B128
  doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.003
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.01.009
– ident: B106
  doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2018.1524683
– ident: B121
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.006
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0
– ident: B8
  doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328012272e
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2006.04.005
– ident: B63
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002389
– ident: B83
  doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245746
– ident: B38
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.001
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
– ident: B102
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01824
– ident: B77
  doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
– ident: B28
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.018
– ident: B36
  doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.003
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.887
– ident: B65
  doi: 10.1080/13506289508401722
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn047
– ident: B114
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006
– ident: B53
  doi: 10.1002/gps.4982
– ident: B67
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/25.6.432
– ident: B92
  doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.094
– ident: B124
  doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091203
– ident: B89
  doi: 10.1177/0748730412441172
– ident: B103
  doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03794.x
– ident: B33
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-200401190-00041
– ident: B61
  doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.6.739
– ident: B78
  doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00635.x
– ident: B71
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23265-x
– ident: B99
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.781
– ident: B48
  doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.1.p53
– ident: B69
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1965.tb00334.x
– ident: B70
  doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00014
– ident: B52
  doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00099-4
– ident: B79
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.065
– ident: B43
  doi: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1708253
– ident: B120
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.043
– ident: B73
  doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby148
– ident: B19
  doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.03.001
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1220
– ident: B116
  doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3929-7
– ident: B123
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.023
– ident: B66
  doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01436-9
– ident: B27
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.016
– ident: B105
  doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x
– ident: B107
  doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013
– ident: B87
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.037
– ident: B91
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028
– ident: B118
  doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.04.005
– ident: B95
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.054
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1111/psyp.12685
– ident: B82
  doi: 10.1113/JP278877
– ident: B109
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.048
– ident: B34
  doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.2.97
– ident: B13
  doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1346-8
– ident: B35
  doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00268-9
– ident: B122
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.118
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0935845100
– ident: B117
  doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02239-x
– ident: B100
  doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x
– ident: B62
  doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00037-6
– ident: B31
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-200203250-00013
– ident: B129
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.005
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.4.380
– ident: B30
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-200007140-00021
– ident: B115
  doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031393
– ident: B26
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.006
– ident: B108
  doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1406
– ident: B41
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01110
– ident: B42
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00328.2021
– year: 1996
  ident: B64
  publication-title: Psychol Sci
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1126
– ident: B57
  doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00002-5
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00487.x
– ident: B104
  doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2893-8
– ident: B111
  doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1815
– ident: B39
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00853.x
– ident: B98
  doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000127827.73576.d8
– ident: B47
  doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001
– ident: B127
  doi: 10.1007/s10919-011-0113-6
– ident: B88
  doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02097-w
– ident: B119
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.08.001
– ident: B75
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003
– ident: B18
  doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.023
– ident: B51
  doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm024
– ident: B110
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.059
– ident: B54
  doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.005
– ident: B29
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014
– ident: B125
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.06.052
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00276-8
– ident: B45
  doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00149-5
– ident: B60
  doi: 10.1037/a0022758
– ident: B46
  doi: 10.1093/scan/nst071
– ident: B94
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.011
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.05.001
– ident: B68
  doi: 10.3390/vision5040046
– ident: B74
  doi: 10.1080/02699930802664623
– ident: B44
  doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.007
– ident: B37
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.016
– ident: B49
  doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv033
– start-page: 115
  volume-title: The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components
  year: 2012
  ident: B16
– ident: B101
  doi: 10.15412/J.BCN.03080104
– ident: B59
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00223
– ident: B80
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263594
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awg241
– ident: B58
  doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.37.11.2049
– ident: B85
  doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
– ident: B86
  doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.004
– ident: B97
  doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0982
– ident: B72
  doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002
– ident: B126
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.035
SSID ssj0007502
Score 2.4810064
Snippet The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the...
The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor...
The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expressions processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 543
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aging - physiology
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Facial Expression
Facial Recognition - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Cortex - physiology
Recognition, Psychology - physiology
Young Adult
Title Aging alters face expressions processing and recognition: insights on possible neural mechanisms
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40590789
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3226350370
Volume 134
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9RAFB60gvRFWutlrZURpC8luplkkqxvi6jFGwotFF_i3EJT7GRpdh_aX-85M5kkay2oL2GZ7CYw37dnzv0Q8sJoESeFlBEoC0mUuiChUiZSPNMiE1UqKqx3_vwlOzxOP5zwkyFc4KpLlvKluvpjXcn_oAprgCtWyf4Dsv1DYQE-A75wBYTh-lcYz92EIRfwbnFyjsGG_T6x1bYHC18DEKoQ-1Qhn8xR2xbtchctWDT4z_hpDrC7pSsnwXrguu06mV_XXV0XTOcUWfPKv6-tcL2ugkoM7x9SgT41dc-9fvG7uWhWbugAiJdTdKPrISyiGzdwCguKakzHEWMfBeN9hhwcMZ1cBZsXNKdiTfB2bsx6ZAB7Mcp966br4p1ju9gzi26wJAfr3tdfj6BenDusU6ypzf1wot_6aYdbt8kdYCbDqRcfvw0d5kGDYqEXK2ev1t61Se6GX6-rMTfYJk5HOdoi9zqA6NwzZZvcMvY-2ZkDKM35Jd2nX3vEdsgPRx7qyUORPHREHjqQhwJ56Ig8r2mgDm0sDdShnjp0oM4Dcvzu7dGbw6gbtxEpBop7JE2R5JXOhIh1Vs2mTBvNhEpZNYuN5AkT0uhpojSvwCbIGWdVwVWWx1ybWMgieUg2bGPNY0JTzeC7aQzGPBZ6m5kEq1TAeSJMCo9SE7Ifdq9c-K4qpbNGOSvPbOl2vMQdn5DnYW9LkHsYzBLWNKu2hIMIdOVpkk8n5JHf9P5RAaQnN97ZJZsDT5-SjeXFyuyBdrmUzxwdfgFLoYAF
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aging+alters+face+expressions+processing+and+recognition%3A+insights+on+possible+neural+mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Ginatempo%2C+Francesca&rft.au=Loi%2C+Nicola&rft.au=Zeroual%2C+Mohammed&rft.au=Cadoni%2C+Marinella&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00237.2024&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40590789&rft.externalDocID=40590789
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon