Aging alters face expressions processing and recognition: insights on possible neural mechanisms
The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 134; no. 2; pp. 543 - 558 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.08.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions.
The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response, and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to 1) recording of fixation patterns, 2) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, 3) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1), and 4) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy, and sad faces expressions. Senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size, and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared with young subjects, and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects’ excitability of face M1 was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with recognition accuracy. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces, which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings provide new insights into the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expression recognition.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expressions processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to i) recording of fixation patterns, ii) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, iii) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1) , and iv) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy and sad faces expressions. senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared to young ones; and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects' excitability of face M1 (was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with pupil size and recognition accuracy, and positively correlated with N170 latency. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings prove new insights in the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expressions recognition.The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expressions processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to i) recording of fixation patterns, ii) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, iii) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1) , and iv) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy and sad faces expressions. senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared to young ones; and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects' excitability of face M1 (was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with pupil size and recognition accuracy, and positively correlated with N170 latency. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings prove new insights in the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expressions recognition. The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions. The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response, and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to 1) recording of fixation patterns, 2) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, 3) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1), and 4) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy, and sad faces expressions. Senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size, and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared with young subjects, and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects’ excitability of face M1 was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with recognition accuracy. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces, which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings provide new insights into the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expression recognition. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions. The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor response, and recognition. Thirty-four participants (17 young, 17 senior) were subjected to ) recording of fixation patterns, ) recording of the P100 and the N170 components of event-related potentials, ) excitability of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the face primary motor cortex (face M1), and ) recognition task during the passive viewing of neutral, happy, and sad faces expressions. Senior subjects mostly looked at the mouth, had reduced pupil size, and delayed N170 latency, regardless of expression, compared with young subjects, and a reduced P100 amplitude when viewing sad faces. Senior subjects' excitability of face M1 was enhanced compared to the young group; both groups had a reduced SICI when viewing happy faces, but only senior subjects exhibited reduced SICI for sad faces. Young subjects had better recognition accuracy and response times than senior ones, particularly for sad expressions. When viewing sad expressions, SICI was negatively correlated with recognition accuracy. Data suggested that aging reduces visual attention for sad faces, which appears to be connected to an increased excitability of face M1, which in turn is linked to their impaired recognition skills, especially when processing negative face expressions. These findings provide new insights into the comprehension of how aging affects cognitive functions and the process of face expression recognition. The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the visual attention toward sad faces. This alteration is associated with a reduced intracortical inhibition in face primary motor cortex, which correlates with compromised recognition abilities for sad face expressions. |
Author | Fadda, Mauro Lagorio, Andrea Zeroual, Mohammed Ginatempo, Francesca Loi, Nicola Deriu, Franca Cadoni, Marinella |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Francesca orcidid: 0000-0002-8424-6037 surname: Ginatempo fullname: Ginatempo, Francesca – sequence: 2 givenname: Nicola surname: Loi fullname: Loi, Nicola – sequence: 3 givenname: Mohammed surname: Zeroual fullname: Zeroual, Mohammed – sequence: 4 givenname: Marinella surname: Cadoni fullname: Cadoni, Marinella – sequence: 5 givenname: Mauro orcidid: 0000-0002-0615-6546 surname: Fadda fullname: Fadda, Mauro – sequence: 6 givenname: Andrea orcidid: 0000-0001-9113-6103 surname: Lagorio fullname: Lagorio, Andrea – sequence: 7 givenname: Franca orcidid: 0000-0001-8235-6091 surname: Deriu fullname: Deriu, Franca |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40590789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo9kE1PwzAMhiM0xD7gyBXlyKXDSZam5TZNfEmTuMC5pIm7ZWrTkqwS_Hs6NjjZ8vvIsp8pGfnWIyHXDOaMSX6383MALtScA1-ckckw4wmTeTYikyHgiQClxmQa4w4AlAR-QcYLkDmoLJ-Qj-XG-Q3V9R5DpJU2SPGrCxija32kXWjNoT8g3tKApt14tx-ye-p8dJvtPtLW064doLJG6rEPuqYNmq32LjbxkpxXuo54daoz8v748LZ6TtavTy-r5ToxHOQiKTETqrKp1symVQ7couXaLHiVMyyl4LpEC8JYWQkGikteZdKkikmLTJeZmJHb497h5M8e475oXDRY19pj28dCcJ4KCULBgN6c0L5s0BZdcI0O38WflQFIjoAJw18Bq3-EQXGwXux88Wu9OFgXP8WwdeU |
Cites_doi | 10.1080/00207450490270901 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.059 10.1002/hbm.22466 10.1007/s00702-004-0250-8 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4232 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003 10.1038/372669a0 10.1038/nrn1724 10.1007/s00221-020-05777-z 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.128 10.1113/JP283137 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0861-19.2020 10.1177/1534582302001001003 10.1002/cne.23908 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-05879.1995 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.003 10.1016/j.neures.2009.01.009 10.1080/0964704X.2018.1524683 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.006 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328012272e 10.1016/j.neucli.2006.04.005 10.1371/journal.pone.0002389 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245746 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.001 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01824 10.1163/156856897X00357 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.018 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.003 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.887 10.1080/13506289508401722 10.1093/schbul/sbn047 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006 10.1002/gps.4982 10.1093/ageing/25.6.432 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.094 10.3390/brainsci11091203 10.1177/0748730412441172 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03794.x 10.1097/00001756-200401190-00041 10.1037/0894-4105.19.6.739 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00635.x 10.1038/s41598-018-23265-x 10.1073/pnas.95.3.781 10.1093/geronb/62.1.p53 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1965.tb00334.x 10.3389/fncir.2016.00014 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00099-4 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.065 10.1080/13825585.2019.1708253 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.043 10.1093/geronb/gby148 10.1016/j.neures.2010.03.001 10.1098/rstb.2002.1220 10.1007/s00213-015-3929-7 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.023 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01436-9 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.016 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.037 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028 10.1016/j.exger.2010.04.005 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.054 10.1111/psyp.12685 10.1113/JP278877 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.048 10.3758/cabn.3.2.97 10.1007/s00221-002-1346-8 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00268-9 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.118 10.1073/pnas.0935845100 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02239-x 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00037-6 10.1097/00001756-200203250-00013 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.005 10.3758/CABN.9.4.380 10.1097/00001756-200007140-00021 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031393 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.006 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1406 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01110 10.1152/jn.00328.2021 10.1006/nimg.2002.1126 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00002-5 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00487.x 10.1007/s00213-012-2893-8 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1815 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00853.x 10.1097/01.wnr.0000127827.73576.d8 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001 10.1007/s10919-011-0113-6 10.1007/s40520-022-02097-w 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.08.001 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003 10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.023 10.1093/scan/nsm024 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.059 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.005 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.06.052 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00276-8 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00149-5 10.1037/a0022758 10.1093/scan/nst071 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.011 10.1016/j.schres.2007.05.001 10.3390/vision5040046 10.1080/02699930802664623 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.007 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.016 10.1093/geronb/gbv033 10.15412/J.BCN.03080104 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00223 10.1371/journal.pone.0263594 10.1093/brain/awg241 10.1037//0022-3514.37.11.2049 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.004 10.1006/nimg.2001.0982 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.035 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1152/jn.00237.2024 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1598 |
EndPage | 558 |
ExternalDocumentID | 40590789 10_1152_jn_00237_2024 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Next Generation EU grantid: PNRR-MAD-2022-12376667 |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 18M 2WC 39C 4.4 5GY AAYXX ABCQX ABHWK ABIVO ABJNI ABKWE ACGFO ACGFS ACNCT ADBBV ADFNX ADHGD AENEX AFFNX AFOSN AIZAD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BKKCC BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EMOBN F5P H13 H~9 ITBOX KQ8 L7B OK1 P2P RAP RHI RPL RPRKH SJN TR2 UHB UPT WH7 WOQ X7M XSW YQT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c2054-be837fd6aa1d6f902ded2ac42f91eb532abed03cd5f3107252f85c6715de1ab83 |
ISSN | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
IngestDate | Sat Aug 23 12:16:35 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 02 01:40:57 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 06 19:06:26 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | ocular movements electroencephalography aging face expressions transcranial magnetic stimulation |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c2054-be837fd6aa1d6f902ded2ac42f91eb532abed03cd5f3107252f85c6715de1ab83 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-8235-6091 0000-0001-9113-6103 0000-0002-0615-6546 0000-0002-8424-6037 |
OpenAccessLink | https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/jn.00237.2024 |
PMID | 40590789 |
PQID | 3226350370 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3226350370 pubmed_primary_40590789 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00237_2024 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2025 text: 2025-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
References | B20 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 Rossion B (B16) 2012 B27 B28 B29 Hood BM (B64) 1996 B30 B31 B32 B33 B34 B35 B36 B37 B38 B39 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B40 B41 B42 B43 B44 B45 B46 B47 B48 B49 B50 B51 B52 B53 B54 B55 B56 B57 B58 B59 B109 B107 B108 B105 B106 B103 B104 B101 B102 B100 B60 B61 B62 B63 B65 B66 B67 B68 B69 B118 B119 B116 B117 B114 B115 B112 B113 B110 B111 B70 B71 B72 B73 B74 B75 B77 B78 B79 B129 B127 B128 B125 B126 B123 B124 B121 B122 B120 B80 B81 B82 B83 B84 B85 B86 B87 B88 B89 B90 B91 B92 B93 B94 B95 B96 B97 B10 B98 B11 B99 B12 B13 B14 B15 B17 B18 B19 |
References_xml | – ident: B50 doi: 10.1080/00207450490270901 – ident: B113 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.059 – ident: B93 doi: 10.1002/hbm.22466 – ident: B96 doi: 10.1007/s00702-004-0250-8 – ident: B90 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4232 – ident: B32 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003 – ident: B55 doi: 10.1038/372669a0 – ident: B4 doi: 10.1038/nrn1724 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05777-z – ident: B40 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.128 – ident: B81 doi: 10.1113/JP283137 – ident: B112 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0861-19.2020 – ident: B15 doi: 10.1177/1534582302001001003 – ident: B1 doi: 10.1002/cne.23908 – ident: B56 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-05879.1995 – ident: B84 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 – ident: B128 doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.003 – ident: B24 doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.01.009 – ident: B106 doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2018.1524683 – ident: B121 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.006 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 – ident: B8 doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328012272e – ident: B17 doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2006.04.005 – ident: B63 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002389 – ident: B83 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245746 – ident: B38 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.001 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 – ident: B102 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01824 – ident: B77 doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.018 – ident: B36 doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.003 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.887 – ident: B65 doi: 10.1080/13506289508401722 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn047 – ident: B114 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006 – ident: B53 doi: 10.1002/gps.4982 – ident: B67 doi: 10.1093/ageing/25.6.432 – ident: B92 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.094 – ident: B124 doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091203 – ident: B89 doi: 10.1177/0748730412441172 – ident: B103 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03794.x – ident: B33 doi: 10.1097/00001756-200401190-00041 – ident: B61 doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.6.739 – ident: B78 doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00044-7 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00635.x – ident: B71 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23265-x – ident: B99 doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.781 – ident: B48 doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.1.p53 – ident: B69 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1965.tb00334.x – ident: B70 doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00014 – ident: B52 doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00099-4 – ident: B79 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.065 – ident: B43 doi: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1708253 – ident: B120 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.043 – ident: B73 doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby148 – ident: B19 doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.03.001 – ident: B2 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1220 – ident: B116 doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3929-7 – ident: B123 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.023 – ident: B66 doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01436-9 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.016 – ident: B105 doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x – ident: B107 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013 – ident: B87 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.037 – ident: B91 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028 – ident: B118 doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.04.005 – ident: B95 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.054 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1111/psyp.12685 – ident: B82 doi: 10.1113/JP278877 – ident: B109 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.048 – ident: B34 doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.2.97 – ident: B13 doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1346-8 – ident: B35 doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00268-9 – ident: B122 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.118 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0935845100 – ident: B117 doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02239-x – ident: B100 doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x – ident: B62 doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00037-6 – ident: B31 doi: 10.1097/00001756-200203250-00013 – ident: B129 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.005 – ident: B9 doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.4.380 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1097/00001756-200007140-00021 – ident: B115 doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031393 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.006 – ident: B108 doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1406 – ident: B41 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01110 – ident: B42 doi: 10.1152/jn.00328.2021 – year: 1996 ident: B64 publication-title: Psychol Sci – ident: B23 doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1126 – ident: B57 doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00002-5 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00487.x – ident: B104 doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2893-8 – ident: B111 doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1815 – ident: B39 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00853.x – ident: B98 doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000127827.73576.d8 – ident: B47 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001 – ident: B127 doi: 10.1007/s10919-011-0113-6 – ident: B88 doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02097-w – ident: B119 doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.08.001 – ident: B75 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003 – ident: B18 doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.023 – ident: B51 doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm024 – ident: B110 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.059 – ident: B54 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.005 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014 – ident: B125 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.06.052 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00276-8 – ident: B45 doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00149-5 – ident: B60 doi: 10.1037/a0022758 – ident: B46 doi: 10.1093/scan/nst071 – ident: B94 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.011 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.05.001 – ident: B68 doi: 10.3390/vision5040046 – ident: B74 doi: 10.1080/02699930802664623 – ident: B44 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.007 – ident: B37 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.016 – ident: B49 doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv033 – start-page: 115 volume-title: The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components year: 2012 ident: B16 – ident: B101 doi: 10.15412/J.BCN.03080104 – ident: B59 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00223 – ident: B80 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263594 – ident: B6 doi: 10.1093/brain/awg241 – ident: B58 doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.37.11.2049 – ident: B85 doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 – ident: B86 doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.004 – ident: B97 doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0982 – ident: B72 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002 – ident: B126 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.035 |
SSID | ssj0007502 |
Score | 2.4810064 |
Snippet | The study of the face expression processing in young and senior subjects evidenced that aging alters the fixation pattern for face expressions by reducing the... The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expression processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor... The present work investigated how aging influences the different stages of face expressions processing: fixation patterns, early perception, face motor... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 543 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aging - physiology Electroencephalography Evoked Potentials - physiology Facial Expression Facial Recognition - physiology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Motor Cortex - physiology Recognition, Psychology - physiology Young Adult |
Title | Aging alters face expressions processing and recognition: insights on possible neural mechanisms |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40590789 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3226350370 |
Volume | 134 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9RAFB60gvRFWutlrZURpC8luplkkqxvi6jFGwotFF_i3EJT7GRpdh_aX-85M5kkay2oL2GZ7CYw37dnzv0Q8sJoESeFlBEoC0mUuiChUiZSPNMiE1UqKqx3_vwlOzxOP5zwkyFc4KpLlvKluvpjXcn_oAprgCtWyf4Dsv1DYQE-A75wBYTh-lcYz92EIRfwbnFyjsGG_T6x1bYHC18DEKoQ-1Qhn8xR2xbtchctWDT4z_hpDrC7pSsnwXrguu06mV_XXV0XTOcUWfPKv6-tcL2ugkoM7x9SgT41dc-9fvG7uWhWbugAiJdTdKPrISyiGzdwCguKakzHEWMfBeN9hhwcMZ1cBZsXNKdiTfB2bsx6ZAB7Mcp966br4p1ju9gzi26wJAfr3tdfj6BenDusU6ypzf1wot_6aYdbt8kdYCbDqRcfvw0d5kGDYqEXK2ev1t61Se6GX6-rMTfYJk5HOdoi9zqA6NwzZZvcMvY-2ZkDKM35Jd2nX3vEdsgPRx7qyUORPHREHjqQhwJ56Ig8r2mgDm0sDdShnjp0oM4Dcvzu7dGbw6gbtxEpBop7JE2R5JXOhIh1Vs2mTBvNhEpZNYuN5AkT0uhpojSvwCbIGWdVwVWWx1ybWMgieUg2bGPNY0JTzeC7aQzGPBZ6m5kEq1TAeSJMCo9SE7Ifdq9c-K4qpbNGOSvPbOl2vMQdn5DnYW9LkHsYzBLWNKu2hIMIdOVpkk8n5JHf9P5RAaQnN97ZJZsDT5-SjeXFyuyBdrmUzxwdfgFLoYAF |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aging+alters+face+expressions+processing+and+recognition%3A+insights+on+possible+neural+mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Ginatempo%2C+Francesca&rft.au=Loi%2C+Nicola&rft.au=Zeroual%2C+Mohammed&rft.au=Cadoni%2C+Marinella&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00237.2024&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40590789&rft.externalDocID=40590789 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3077&client=summon |