Asymptotic giant branch stars in the eROSITA-DE eRASS1 catalog

Context . Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars are not expected to be X-ray-emitters, yet a small fraction of them, the so-called X-AGBs, show X-ray emission that can be attributed to coronal activity of a companion or accretion onto one. Aims . By searching the recently released SRG eROSITA-DE eRASS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAstronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) Vol. 689; p. A62
Main Authors Guerrero, M. A., Montez, R., Ortiz, R., Toalá, J. A., Kastner, J. H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg EDP Sciences 01.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Context . Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars are not expected to be X-ray-emitters, yet a small fraction of them, the so-called X-AGBs, show X-ray emission that can be attributed to coronal activity of a companion or accretion onto one. Aims . By searching the recently released SRG eROSITA-DE eRASS1 source catalog, we aim to increase the sample of known X-AGBs and investigate their X-ray and far-UV properties. So far, 36 X-AGBs have been reported, which includes 21 previous detections from ROSAT RASS, Chandra, and XMM-Newton and 15 recent detections from eROSITA eRASS1. Methods . We cross-correlated the position of sources in the eROSITA-DE eRASS1 catalog with the largest available samples of AGB stars in order to find possible X-ray counterparts. We carefully checked the possible counterparts by comparing X-ray and near-IR K images, disregarding those affected by optical loading, those found to be diffuse sources, or those simply considered unreliable positional associations. Results . We have found seven high-confidence X-AGBs and another seven possible ones. Accounting for previous X-ray detections, the sample of X-AGBs is increased by 11 new sources, increasing the sample of X-AGBs from 36 up to 47. Adding these sources to previous eROSITA-DE eRASS1 X-AGB detections, eROSITA has so far discovered 26 new X-AGBs, more than doubling the number of known X-AGBs. This demonstrates eROSITA’s capability to detect X-AGBs despite the challenge posed by the optical loading caused by their near-IR brightness, which makes the X-ray detection untrustworthy in a number of cases. Conclusions . The eRASS1 X-AGBs tend to have a higher X-ray luminosity than that of previously detected X-AGBs, suggesting a bias toward brighter sources that is very likely due to the short exposure time of eRASS1 sources. A comparison of the X-ray and far-UV luminosity of X-AGBs with those of X-ray-emitter symbiotic stars (X-SySts) revealed an overlap in the X-ray luminosity range 10 29.5 < L X (erg s −1 ) <10 33.0 . The average higher X-ray luminosity of X-SySts AGBs (≈10 32 erg s −1 ) can be interpreted as X-ray emission arising from a boundary layer between an accretion disk and a white dwarf, whereas the average lower X-ray luminosity (≈5 × 10 30 erg s −1 ) of X-AGBs would arise from an accretion disk around main-sequence or subgiant F-K companion stars.
ISSN:0004-6361
1432-0746
DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/202450155