ESG-driven optimal portfolio selection for separated environmental, social, and governance preferences
We propose and examine the optimal portfolio selection problem when the investor has different preferences in each of the portfolio’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) average scores. We provide an explicit formula for the optimal weights in the case of the mean-variance model subject to t...
Saved in:
Published in | Operational research Vol. 25; no. 2; p. 30 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
01.06.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1109-2858 1866-1505 |
DOI | 10.1007/s12351-025-00907-3 |
Cover
Abstract | We propose and examine the optimal portfolio selection problem when the investor has different preferences in each of the portfolio’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) average scores. We provide an explicit formula for the optimal weights in the case of the mean-variance model subject to the E, S, and G constraints and show that the same formula also holds in the case of other models that minimize a risk measure of the portfolio, with focusing on the tail-value-at-risk measure. We show that such models that go beyond the mean-variance model have the same formula for the optimal weight but with an effective risk aversion parameter that depends on the E, S, and G preferences of the investor, unlike in the original mean-variance model where the risk aversion is an external parameter. We then provide some numerical illustrations based on ten stocks from the NASDAQ, which offers clear guidance for allocating the portfolio between the different stocks and shows how each stock is sensitive to changes in the E, S, and G constraints. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We propose and examine the optimal portfolio selection problem when the investor has different preferences in each of the portfolio’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) average scores. We provide an explicit formula for the optimal weights in the case of the mean-variance model subject to the E, S, and G constraints and show that the same formula also holds in the case of other models that minimize a risk measure of the portfolio, with focusing on the tail-value-at-risk measure. We show that such models that go beyond the mean-variance model have the same formula for the optimal weight but with an effective risk aversion parameter that depends on the E, S, and G preferences of the investor, unlike in the original mean-variance model where the risk aversion is an external parameter. We then provide some numerical illustrations based on ten stocks from the NASDAQ, which offers clear guidance for allocating the portfolio between the different stocks and shows how each stock is sensitive to changes in the E, S, and G constraints. |
ArticleNumber | 30 |
Author | Shushi, Tomer |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tomer orcidid: 0000-0003-1164-5747 surname: Shushi fullname: Shushi, Tomer |
BookMark | eNotkEFLAzEQhYNUsNb-AU8Br0ZnNt1scpRSq1DwoJ5DujsrW7bJmmwL_ntT61zeG3gM875rNvHBE2O3CA8IUD0mLGSJAopSABiohLxgU9RKCSyhnGSPYEShS33F5intII8sKr3QU9au3teiid2RPA_D2O1dz4cQxzb0XeCJeqrHLnjehpi3wUU3UsPJH7sY_J786Pp7nkLdndT5hn-FI0XvfE18iNRSpGzTDbtsXZ9o_q8z9vm8-li-iM3b-nX5tBF1ATAKo13tCqloobB0zqBDdDXKBQKVErZaLVSjJBjdbLVp9Fa6KheuAFsCwkbO2N357hDD94HSaHfhkN_pk5VYKWNyFHOqOKfqGFLKX9oh5ubxxyLYE1J7RmozUvuH1Er5C52xa3w |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.04.003 10.3905/jpm.2019.45.4.067 10.1080/03461238.2022.2092419 10.1080/20430795.2021.1923336 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4394 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.09.001 10.1007/s10957-020-01664-3 10.1016/j.orl.2022.07.008 10.1002/csr.2682 10.1057/jdhf.2009.1 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jun 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jun 2025 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7TB 8FD FR3 KR7 |
DOI | 10.1007/s12351-025-00907-3 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Civil Engineering Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Civil Engineering Abstracts Engineering Research Database Technology Research Database Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Civil Engineering Abstracts CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 1866-1505 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1007_s12351_025_00907_3 |
GroupedDBID | -Y2 .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 1N0 203 29N 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2VQ 30V 4.4 406 408 40D 40E 5VS 67Z 6NX 7WY 875 8FE 8FG 8FL 8TC 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AAPKM AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYXX AAYZH ABAKF ABBRH ABDBE ABDZT ABECU ABFSG ABFTV ABHQN ABJCF ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACPIV ACSNA ACSTC ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AEZWR AFBBN AFDZB AFGCZ AFHIU AFKRA AFLOW AFOHR AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHPBZ AHSBF AHWEU AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AIXLP AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ATHPR AXYYD AYFIA AYQZM B-. BA0 BAPOH BDATZ BENPR BEZIV BGLVJ BGNMA BPHCQ CAG CCPQU CITATION COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP DWQXO EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRNLG FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ7 H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG6 HLICF HMJXF HRMNR HZ~ IKXTQ IWAJR IXD I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JZLTJ K60 K6~ K8~ KOV L6V LLZTM M0C M4Y M7S MA- NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9J P9M PF0 PHGZM PHGZT PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PTHSS Q2X QOS R89 R9I ROL RPX RSV S16 S1Z S27 S3B SAP SBE SDH SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 TSG TSK TUC U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 WK8 YLTOR Z45 ZMTXR ~A9 7TB 8FD ABRTQ FR3 KR7 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-98aca236e4615aa91a11ac13410e530b8646d63098db89d8b3a7907701fe0e1d3 |
ISSN | 1109-2858 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 25 09:18:54 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 03 08:45:19 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c200t-98aca236e4615aa91a11ac13410e530b8646d63098db89d8b3a7907701fe0e1d3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1164-5747 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-025-00907-3 |
PQID | 3176997011 |
PQPubID | 326268 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_3176997011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12351_025_00907_3 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-06-00 20250601 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2025 text: 2025-06-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Heidelberg |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Heidelberg |
PublicationTitle | Operational research |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | R Henriksson (907_CR5) 2019; 45 S Kim (907_CR6) 2023; 69 Z Landsman (907_CR7) 2016; 71 T Shushi (907_CR11) 2022; 50 RJ Davies (907_CR2) 2009; 15 H Hanbali (907_CR4) 2023; 2023 G Abate (907_CR1) 2024; 31 LH Pedersen (907_CR9) 2021; 142 Z Landsman (907_CR8) 2020; 185 B Roorda (907_CR10) 2007; 40 J De Spiegeleer (907_CR3) 2023; 13 |
References_xml | – volume: 40 start-page: 209 year: 2007 ident: 907_CR10 publication-title: Insurance Math Econom doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.04.003 – volume: 45 start-page: 67 year: 2019 ident: 907_CR5 publication-title: J Portf Manage doi: 10.3905/jpm.2019.45.4.067 – volume: 2023 start-page: 219 year: 2023 ident: 907_CR4 publication-title: Scand Actuar J doi: 10.1080/03461238.2022.2092419 – volume: 13 start-page: 827 year: 2023 ident: 907_CR3 publication-title: J Sustain Finance Invest doi: 10.1080/20430795.2021.1923336 – volume: 69 start-page: 741 year: 2023 ident: 907_CR6 publication-title: Manage Sci doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4394 – volume: 71 start-page: 179 year: 2016 ident: 907_CR7 publication-title: Insurance Math Econom doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.09.001 – volume: 185 start-page: 622 year: 2020 ident: 907_CR8 publication-title: J Optim Theory Appl doi: 10.1007/s10957-020-01664-3 – volume: 50 start-page: 513 year: 2022 ident: 907_CR11 publication-title: Oper Res Lett doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2022.07.008 – volume: 31 start-page: 2054 year: 2024 ident: 907_CR1 publication-title: Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag doi: 10.1002/csr.2682 – volume: 15 start-page: 91 year: 2009 ident: 907_CR2 publication-title: J Deriv Hedge Funds doi: 10.1057/jdhf.2009.1 – volume: 142 start-page: 572 year: 2021 ident: 907_CR9 publication-title: J Financ Econ doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001 |
SSID | ssj0000327848 ssib004298988 |
Score | 2.3197732 |
Snippet | We propose and examine the optimal portfolio selection problem when the investor has different preferences in each of the portfolio’s environmental, social,... |
SourceID | proquest crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 30 |
SubjectTerms | Constraints Environmental social & governance Mean Parameters Risk Risk aversion |
Title | ESG-driven optimal portfolio selection for separated environmental, social, and governance preferences |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3176997011 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JTsMwELWgXOCAWEXZ5AO3YhRncexjQSxCAg5tJW6RkziARJuqaS98PWPHWYpAAi5RZbXTJvNsv47nzSB0Frt-yllCCeUyJb6UkohAJcTR5DbRNZ6MKu3hkd2N_Pvn4Lnp4mjUJfP4Ivn4VlfyH6_CGPhVq2T_4NnaKAzAa_AvXMHDcP2Vj68HtySd6fWql8PUH2tVFdDpLH9_y3uF6XBTZRIWyhT5BnrZkraZYv82bF6lcb6Y5rtGSDCte5AUbQ77NFWzKoRoawXVMeXB66IwbYJ7w3xsE39tTMENmtwnuwxSfe7Cy6LqF6oc44wRoI9Be-0sRcsWI-63S7JjJcquF1BivssROjbabEDVofuXfanOFmwqK2sbEdiIjI3IW0Vrbhjq4_m1_s3l5WN7l-VVITazJ3v6gNXoIqtbswqqUkf59ccts5TlTdowj-EW2rR_GXC_9P82WlGTHbTRKiS5i7IGCdgiAddIwDUSMCAB10jAS0g4xyUOzjGgADcowC0U7KHRzfXw6o7YDhokgXkyJ4LLRLoeUz4QVykFlZTKRNfwc1TgOTFnPkthQgqexlykPPZkCPcfOjRTjqKpt486k3yiDhCGT3lC8jTMNKuLGacM3iYzYIhJxnzaRb3qiUXTslBK9LPjuui4eqiRnVBFBFSWCQFW6eGfjB2h9QbEx6gzny3UCVDFeXxqcfEJETZkAQ |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ESG-driven+optimal+portfolio+selection+for+separated+environmental%2C+social%2C+and+governance+preferences&rft.jtitle=Operational+research&rft.au=Shushi%2C+Tomer&rft.date=2025-06-01&rft.issn=1109-2858&rft.eissn=1866-1505&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs12351-025-00907-3&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s12351_025_00907_3 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1109-2858&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1109-2858&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1109-2858&client=summon |