Examination Methods for General Joint Laxity

There are various methods for evaluating general joint laxity. In this study, we used typical methods such as Carter's, Beighton's, and Tokyo University's on 40 male students of the Sports Department of Saga University. We used intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for statistics....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrthopedics & Traumatology Vol. 58; no. 4; pp. 673 - 677
Main Authors Nishifuru, Kyota, Morimoto, Tadatsugu, Ikebe, Satoshi, Uesugi, Yuki, Kitajima, Masaru, Shigematsu, Masamori, Mawatari, Masaaki, Hotokebuchi, Takao
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
English
Published West-Japanese Society of Orthopedics & Traumatology 25.09.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There are various methods for evaluating general joint laxity. In this study, we used typical methods such as Carter's, Beighton's, and Tokyo University's on 40 male students of the Sports Department of Saga University. We used intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for statistics. The intra-observer reliability of each method was good, with the Tokyo University's method being the best. The ICC value differed vastly according to the joint. The values of thumb, shoulder, and spine were great, but those of elbow, knee, and ankle were low. Those of wrist, little finger, and hip were intermediate. In the future, there is a need to set criteria for measuring general joint laxity, and determine the joint to be measured, number of joints measured, and measurement method according to purpose.
ISSN:0037-1033
1349-4333
DOI:10.5035/nishiseisai.58.673