Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Live Donor Nephrectomy

Objective: To compare laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with open live donor nephrectomy. Study Design: Cross Sectional Analytical Study. Place and Duration of study: Armed Forces Institute of Urology, from May 2023 to Apr 2024 Methodology: With non-probability consecutive sampling technique, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPakistan Armed Forces medical journal Vol. 75; no. SUPPL-5; pp. S768 - S772
Main Authors Hashmi, Syed Daood, Razik, Sohail, Aziz, Majid, Naeem, Muhammad, Ali, Muhammad, Saeed, Bilal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Rawalpindi Army Medical Corps 31.07.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To compare laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with open live donor nephrectomy. Study Design: Cross Sectional Analytical Study. Place and Duration of study: Armed Forces Institute of Urology, from May 2023 to Apr 2024 Methodology: With non-probability consecutive sampling technique, the patients who presented in OPD between May 2023 and April 2024 and underwent live donor nephrectomy were selected by non-convenience sampling technique. The kidney donors were divided into two groups: Group A -those scheduled for open donor nephrectomy and Group B - those receiving laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Results: There were 22 donors each group. The donors' ages varied from 36 to 59 years, with an average age of 47.75+5.29 years. In the participating group were thirty males and fourteen females. Study involved the performance of 7 right-sided donor nephrectomies (RDN) and 37 left-sided donor nephrectomies (LDN). In cases with Group B, the average length of the procedure was noticeably longer. Furthermore, the initial warm ischemia in Group B - lasted an average of 9.43 + 1.93 minutes, a significantly longer time than in Group A (4.04+1.21 minutes). It was determined that this difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Our study concluded that laparoscopic donor nephrectomy showed advantages including less discomfort after surgery, a faster recovery period, and comparable results for graft function when compared to open live donor nephrectomy. These results imply that laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a practical and well-liked procedure, which adds to its growing acceptance in the medical community.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0030-9648
2411-8842
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v75iSUPPL-5.12109