Comparing the Effects of Two Facets of Multiple Intelligences Theory on Developing EFL Learners’ Listening

Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT), however having been embraced in the field of language acquisition, has apparently failed to play a role in research on learning styles as an alternative construct. This study aims at examining the potential effects of MI-based activities, as learning st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in language and literary studies Vol. 6; no. 4; pp. 62 - 71
Main Author Bemani Naeini, Ma'ssoumeh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Footscray Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC) 01.08.2015
Australian International Academic Centre PTY, LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2203-4714
2203-4714
DOI10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.62

Cover

More Information
Summary:Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT), however having been embraced in the field of language acquisition, has apparently failed to play a role in research on learning styles as an alternative construct. This study aims at examining the potential effects of MI-based activities, as learning styls, on the listening proficiency of Iranian TEFL university students. Based on two assumptions derived from MIT, one of the experimental groups (EG1; N=30) worked on activities across intelligences while the other experimental group (EG2; N=30) focused on the activities related to their most developed intelligence. McKenzie’s (1999) MI Inventory was used to identify the subjects’ preferred intelligences. There was a significant difference between listening scores on TOEFL before and after the intervention of MI-based activities as well as between the two experimental groups, indicating EG1 outperforming EG2. So, as the findings reveal, integration of MIT can significantly contribute to the enhancement of EFL learners’ listening comprehension and the effect is even more significant if teachers practice an integration of all intelligences rather than the most developed ones, only.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2203-4714
2203-4714
DOI:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.62