DIFFERENT SURGICAL MODALITIES FOR MANAGEMENT OF PERSISTENT GLAUCOMA AFTER SILICONE OIL REMOVAL IN VITRECTOMIZED EYES: One Year Comparative Study

Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in vitrectomized eyes. This is a prospective comparative study, carried out on a cohort of 41 eyes (41 patients). Patients were randomly allocated to Group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 37; no. 8; p. 1535
Main Authors El-Saied, Heba Magdy, Abdelhakim, Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in vitrectomized eyes. This is a prospective comparative study, carried out on a cohort of 41 eyes (41 patients). Patients were randomly allocated to Group A (trabeculectomy), Group B (deep sclerectomy), Group C (Ahmed valve), or Group D (Ex-Press Minishunt). Postoperatively, all patients were followed regularly at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year for intraocular pressure evaluation. Postoperatively, there was significant drop in intraocular pressure in each group, and significant difference between the four groups regarding drop and percentage drop in intraocular pressure, with Group C showing the highest mean percentage drop in intraocular pressure, whereas Group B with the least. Success rate was 100% with Ex-Press minishunt, 80% with Ahmed valve, and 50% for each of trabeculectomy and deep sclerectomy. Hypotony occurred in 50% with Ahmed valve and 40% with trabeculectomy, whereas glaucoma occurred in 50% with deep sclerectomy and 30% with trabeculectomy. For controlling persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in our work, Ex-Press minishunt had the highest complete success rate with no postoperative complications.
AbstractList Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in vitrectomized eyes. This is a prospective comparative study, carried out on a cohort of 41 eyes (41 patients). Patients were randomly allocated to Group A (trabeculectomy), Group B (deep sclerectomy), Group C (Ahmed valve), or Group D (Ex-Press Minishunt). Postoperatively, all patients were followed regularly at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year for intraocular pressure evaluation. Postoperatively, there was significant drop in intraocular pressure in each group, and significant difference between the four groups regarding drop and percentage drop in intraocular pressure, with Group C showing the highest mean percentage drop in intraocular pressure, whereas Group B with the least. Success rate was 100% with Ex-Press minishunt, 80% with Ahmed valve, and 50% for each of trabeculectomy and deep sclerectomy. Hypotony occurred in 50% with Ahmed valve and 40% with trabeculectomy, whereas glaucoma occurred in 50% with deep sclerectomy and 30% with trabeculectomy. For controlling persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in our work, Ex-Press minishunt had the highest complete success rate with no postoperative complications.
Author Abdelhakim, Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin
El-Saied, Heba Magdy
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Heba Magdy
  surname: El-Saied
  fullname: El-Saied, Heba Magdy
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin
  surname: Abdelhakim
  fullname: Abdelhakim, Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27828910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNUNtKw0AUXESxF_0DkfMDrbub28a3Jd3UhSQrm22hvpRNsoGKrSVthf6Fn2zrBZyHOcwwDIcZoMvN-8YhdEfwmOA4epBcjPE_EC_2LlCfBF48oiz0e2iw272e_ICx4Br1aMQoiwnuo8-JTFOhRWGgnOmpTHgGuZrwTBopSkiVhpwXfCryc0Sl8Cx0KUtzVtOMzxKVc-CpERpKmclEFQKUzECLXM1PXbKAuTRaJEbl8kVMQCxE-Qhq42DhbAfJ-3prO7tffTgo94fmeIOuWvu2c7e_d4hmqTDJ0yhT39-NasLC_YmpZU3oB64ifkCDKojruq2sraOK1dYx29iIYI82tHFRXGPqey2llHg4ZNa1dIjuf3q3h2rtmuW2W61td1z-TUO_AKz7XmE
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001393
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1539-2864
ExternalDocumentID 27828910
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.GJ
.Z2
01R
0R~
123
1J1
2V-
40H
53G
5VS
71W
77Y
7O~
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AAQQT
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AAXQO
AAYEP
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABVCZ
ABXRP
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AE6
AEETU
AFDTB
AFFNX
AFMFY
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHPAA
AHQNM
AHVBC
AIJEX
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKULP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BOYCO
BQLVK
BS7
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FL-
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
N9A
NPM
N~7
N~B
N~M
O9-
OCUKA
ODA
OJAPA
OL1
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLW
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OXXIT
P-K
R58
RIG
RLZ
S4R
S4S
ST3
TEORI
TSPGW
UCJ
V2I
W3M
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
YFH
ZFV
ZGI
ZZMQN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c186t-c12a8d645eb14525b59ccfbaac7b8cae8ada71032d2de79c0243f22213068aef2
IngestDate Wed Oct 16 00:59:29 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c186t-c12a8d645eb14525b59ccfbaac7b8cae8ada71032d2de79c0243f22213068aef2
PMID 27828910
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_27828910
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-Aug
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-Aug
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Retina
PublicationYear 2017
SSID ssj0015885
Score 2.325367
Snippet Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 1535
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Endotamponade - adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma - etiology
Glaucoma - physiopathology
Glaucoma - surgery
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
Sclerostomy - methods
Silicone Oils - adverse effects
Trabeculectomy - methods
Visual Acuity
Vitrectomy - adverse effects
Young Adult
Title DIFFERENT SURGICAL MODALITIES FOR MANAGEMENT OF PERSISTENT GLAUCOMA AFTER SILICONE OIL REMOVAL IN VITRECTOMIZED EYES: One Year Comparative Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27828910
Volume 37
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3NjtMwEMetLkiIy4rvb-QDtyhLN4kTh1vUutSoSVZNutrlsnLihKLdditULjwFb8IrMlMnbVgVBPRgtUlkVZ6fJuPx-G9C3tQVY0Xd79uqdLXtVayww4oByw74Pu6Xrqdxo3Cc-OOZ9-GMnfV6PzpVS1_XxVH5be--kv-xKlwDu-Iu2X-w7LZTuADfwb7QgoWh_SsbD-VoJKYiya1sNjVnGsTpMJrIHII8C-Z3HcF-LO85EdNMZjn-ej-JZoM0jqxolGOuSU7kIE2ElUqsmIjTU-hLJtapzKdikKex_CiGljgXGaYQUohMz1EBaNDRDs-2QrWt3jfuplYYwmLWBuUoV3NTmnuijjoZCHFlZ-qzSbqOq0JZsfqkt5n-qNC4qH9pTn2Or-dqobQVLb5YmbpSc0to3YiHN7kLeB-2lXPw6mn9bWg73AiZtw7ZqMA04PGOd4Wn2V63b-SEZSSMHGXzgeDW7T4OA7RabFBwApxomnraP9-9Icbd3jogBwFHt5pgcqhZtGKcs3Z3Zhi83fd3UHu66eLGPGYTz-T3yGEzEaGRoeo-6VXLB-RO3JRaPCTft3DRFi66g4sCXHQHF01HdAcXbeGiG7hoCxcFuGgDF5UJ_QUuinC9o4AWRbRoBy26QesRmY1EPhjbzfEddnnM_TW0juLa9xiEA7h6XrCwLOtCqTIoeKkqrrQKUM9RO7oKwhK1MWsIVyGq8rmqaucxubW8XlZPCXWdQDEI5OugDr3QVfy4rFVYqL5Xhtr162fkiRnLi5XRaLloR_n5b--8IHd3SL4kt2twCtUriDDXxeuNXX8CwLZmHg
link.rule.ids 783
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DIFFERENT+SURGICAL+MODALITIES+FOR+MANAGEMENT+OF+PERSISTENT+GLAUCOMA+AFTER+SILICONE+OIL+REMOVAL+IN+VITRECTOMIZED+EYES%3A+One+Year+Comparative+Study&rft.jtitle=Retina+%28Philadelphia%2C+Pa.%29&rft.au=El-Saied%2C+Heba+Magdy&rft.au=Abdelhakim%2C+Mohamad+Amr+Salah+Eddin&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.eissn=1539-2864&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FIAE.0000000000001393&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27828910&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27828910&rft.externalDocID=27828910