DIFFERENT SURGICAL MODALITIES FOR MANAGEMENT OF PERSISTENT GLAUCOMA AFTER SILICONE OIL REMOVAL IN VITRECTOMIZED EYES: One Year Comparative Study
Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in vitrectomized eyes. This is a prospective comparative study, carried out on a cohort of 41 eyes (41 patients). Patients were randomly allocated to Group...
Saved in:
Published in | Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 37; no. 8; p. 1535 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.08.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in vitrectomized eyes.
This is a prospective comparative study, carried out on a cohort of 41 eyes (41 patients). Patients were randomly allocated to Group A (trabeculectomy), Group B (deep sclerectomy), Group C (Ahmed valve), or Group D (Ex-Press Minishunt). Postoperatively, all patients were followed regularly at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year for intraocular pressure evaluation.
Postoperatively, there was significant drop in intraocular pressure in each group, and significant difference between the four groups regarding drop and percentage drop in intraocular pressure, with Group C showing the highest mean percentage drop in intraocular pressure, whereas Group B with the least. Success rate was 100% with Ex-Press minishunt, 80% with Ahmed valve, and 50% for each of trabeculectomy and deep sclerectomy. Hypotony occurred in 50% with Ahmed valve and 40% with trabeculectomy, whereas glaucoma occurred in 50% with deep sclerectomy and 30% with trabeculectomy.
For controlling persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in our work, Ex-Press minishunt had the highest complete success rate with no postoperative complications. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in vitrectomized eyes.
This is a prospective comparative study, carried out on a cohort of 41 eyes (41 patients). Patients were randomly allocated to Group A (trabeculectomy), Group B (deep sclerectomy), Group C (Ahmed valve), or Group D (Ex-Press Minishunt). Postoperatively, all patients were followed regularly at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year for intraocular pressure evaluation.
Postoperatively, there was significant drop in intraocular pressure in each group, and significant difference between the four groups regarding drop and percentage drop in intraocular pressure, with Group C showing the highest mean percentage drop in intraocular pressure, whereas Group B with the least. Success rate was 100% with Ex-Press minishunt, 80% with Ahmed valve, and 50% for each of trabeculectomy and deep sclerectomy. Hypotony occurred in 50% with Ahmed valve and 40% with trabeculectomy, whereas glaucoma occurred in 50% with deep sclerectomy and 30% with trabeculectomy.
For controlling persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in our work, Ex-Press minishunt had the highest complete success rate with no postoperative complications. |
Author | Abdelhakim, Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin El-Saied, Heba Magdy |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Heba Magdy surname: El-Saied fullname: El-Saied, Heba Magdy organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt – sequence: 2 givenname: Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin surname: Abdelhakim fullname: Abdelhakim, Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27828910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpNUNtKw0AUXESxF_0DkfMDrbub28a3Jd3UhSQrm22hvpRNsoGKrSVthf6Fn2zrBZyHOcwwDIcZoMvN-8YhdEfwmOA4epBcjPE_EC_2LlCfBF48oiz0e2iw272e_ICx4Br1aMQoiwnuo8-JTFOhRWGgnOmpTHgGuZrwTBopSkiVhpwXfCryc0Sl8Cx0KUtzVtOMzxKVc-CpERpKmclEFQKUzECLXM1PXbKAuTRaJEbl8kVMQCxE-Qhq42DhbAfJ-3prO7tffTgo94fmeIOuWvu2c7e_d4hmqTDJ0yhT39-NasLC_YmpZU3oB64ifkCDKojruq2sraOK1dYx29iIYI82tHFRXGPqey2llHg4ZNa1dIjuf3q3h2rtmuW2W61td1z-TUO_AKz7XmE |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001393 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1539-2864 |
ExternalDocumentID | 27828910 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .-D .GJ .Z2 01R 0R~ 123 1J1 2V- 40H 53G 5VS 71W 77Y 7O~ AAAAV AAAXR AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAMOA AAMTA AAQKA AAQQT AARTV AASCR AASOK AAXQO AAYEP ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABJNI ABOCM ABVCZ ABXRP ABXVJ ABZAD ACCJW ACDDN ACEWG ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ADFPA ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB AE3 AE6 AEETU AFDTB AFFNX AFMFY AFUWQ AGINI AHOMT AHPAA AHQNM AHVBC AIJEX AINUH AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKULP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AWKKM BOYCO BQLVK BS7 C45 CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIWNM DUNZO E.X EBS ECM EEVPB EIF EJD ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FL- FW0 GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HZ~ IKREB IKYAY IN~ IPNFZ JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 KMI L-C N9A NPM N~7 N~B N~M O9- OCUKA ODA OJAPA OL1 OLG OLH OLU OLV OLW OLY OLZ OPUJH ORVUJ OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OXXIT P-K R58 RIG RLZ S4R S4S ST3 TEORI TSPGW UCJ V2I W3M WOQ WOW X3V X3W YFH ZFV ZGI ZZMQN |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c186t-c12a8d645eb14525b59ccfbaac7b8cae8ada71032d2de79c0243f22213068aef2 |
IngestDate | Wed Oct 16 00:59:29 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c186t-c12a8d645eb14525b59ccfbaac7b8cae8ada71032d2de79c0243f22213068aef2 |
PMID | 27828910 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_27828910 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-Aug |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2017 text: 2017-Aug |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Retina |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
SSID | ssj0015885 |
Score | 2.325367 |
Snippet | Aim of this study was to compare outcome of four different surgical modalities for management of persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal in... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 1535 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Endotamponade - adverse effects Female Follow-Up Studies Glaucoma - etiology Glaucoma - physiopathology Glaucoma - surgery Humans Intraocular Pressure - physiology Male Middle Aged Prognosis Prospective Studies Reoperation Sclerostomy - methods Silicone Oils - adverse effects Trabeculectomy - methods Visual Acuity Vitrectomy - adverse effects Young Adult |
Title | DIFFERENT SURGICAL MODALITIES FOR MANAGEMENT OF PERSISTENT GLAUCOMA AFTER SILICONE OIL REMOVAL IN VITRECTOMIZED EYES: One Year Comparative Study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27828910 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3NjtMwEMetLkiIy4rvb-QDtyhLN4kTh1vUutSoSVZNutrlsnLihKLdditULjwFb8IrMlMnbVgVBPRgtUlkVZ6fJuPx-G9C3tQVY0Xd79uqdLXtVayww4oByw74Pu6Xrqdxo3Cc-OOZ9-GMnfV6PzpVS1_XxVH5be--kv-xKlwDu-Iu2X-w7LZTuADfwb7QgoWh_SsbD-VoJKYiya1sNjVnGsTpMJrIHII8C-Z3HcF-LO85EdNMZjn-ej-JZoM0jqxolGOuSU7kIE2ElUqsmIjTU-hLJtapzKdikKex_CiGljgXGaYQUohMz1EBaNDRDs-2QrWt3jfuplYYwmLWBuUoV3NTmnuijjoZCHFlZ-qzSbqOq0JZsfqkt5n-qNC4qH9pTn2Or-dqobQVLb5YmbpSc0to3YiHN7kLeB-2lXPw6mn9bWg73AiZtw7ZqMA04PGOd4Wn2V63b-SEZSSMHGXzgeDW7T4OA7RabFBwApxomnraP9-9Icbd3jogBwFHt5pgcqhZtGKcs3Z3Zhi83fd3UHu66eLGPGYTz-T3yGEzEaGRoeo-6VXLB-RO3JRaPCTft3DRFi66g4sCXHQHF01HdAcXbeGiG7hoCxcFuGgDF5UJ_QUuinC9o4AWRbRoBy26QesRmY1EPhjbzfEddnnM_TW0juLa9xiEA7h6XrCwLOtCqTIoeKkqrrQKUM9RO7oKwhK1MWsIVyGq8rmqaucxubW8XlZPCXWdQDEI5OugDr3QVfy4rFVYqL5Xhtr162fkiRnLi5XRaLloR_n5b--8IHd3SL4kt2twCtUriDDXxeuNXX8CwLZmHg |
link.rule.ids | 783 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DIFFERENT+SURGICAL+MODALITIES+FOR+MANAGEMENT+OF+PERSISTENT+GLAUCOMA+AFTER+SILICONE+OIL+REMOVAL+IN+VITRECTOMIZED+EYES%3A+One+Year+Comparative+Study&rft.jtitle=Retina+%28Philadelphia%2C+Pa.%29&rft.au=El-Saied%2C+Heba+Magdy&rft.au=Abdelhakim%2C+Mohamad+Amr+Salah+Eddin&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.eissn=1539-2864&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FIAE.0000000000001393&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27828910&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27828910&rft.externalDocID=27828910 |