Experience with percutaneous right ventricular support in the early post-left ventricular assist device implantation period (clinical case report and literature reviews)

• Published in: Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennykh organov Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 77 - 89
• Main Authors: Poptsov, V. N., Spirina, E. A., Ryabtsev, D. V., Solodovnikova, A. K., Epremian, A. S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 08.04.2023
• DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2023-1-77-89
• ISSN: 1995-1191

Implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a state-of-the-art treatment for adults and children with end-stage heart failure. The early and late period after LVAD implantation can be severely complicated. Right ventricular failure (RVF) still remains a common complication after LVAD implantation. RVF is the cause of reduced post-implant survival. We suggest that an additional temporary or permanent right ventricular assist device (RVAD) is an effective treatment for LVAD-associated RVF. In this clinical case report, we describe the medical history of a pediatric patient (14 years old) with severe heart failure (PediMACS Level 1) against a background of dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient required peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) prior to urgent LVAD (HM3) implantation. In the early post-LVAD implantation (1 POD) period, the patient presented with hemodynamic and echocardiographic events of acute RVF that was resistant to drug therapy (inotropic/vasopressor support, iNO) and required mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with a preoperatively implanted VA-ECMO. In the LVAD-associated RVF scenario, VA-ECMO as a means of total cardiac bypass is a non-physiological MCS method and, therefore, undesirable. In this clinical situation, our solution was to use a paracorporeal centrifugal blood pump for temporary right heart support. A RVAD was assembled using percutaneous cannulation in two sites and a modification of the pre-existing VA-ECMO circuit. For RVAD, we used an ECMO cannula previously installed through the femoral vein (26 F) and added a reverse venous cannula (22 F) through the right internal jugular vein into the pulmonary trunk. To facilitate the passage of the return cannula into the pulmonary artery, we used a contralateral sheath (6 F, 40 cm) and an Amplatz Super Stiff guidewire under radiological control. The oxygenator was removed from the circuit on day 2 of RVAD. Central hemodynamics (reduction in right atrial pressure (RAP) to 10 mm Hg, increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) to 14 mm Hg), as well as right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volume characteristics all improved. These observations allowed us to optimize the performance of the implantable LVAD (increase in flow rate to 4.2 l/min or 2.1 l/min/m 2 ). The duration of paracorporeal RVAD after LVAD implantation was 7 days with an average flow rate of 2.3 ± 0.2 l/min. Postoperative treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) lasted for 15 days. The patient was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 34.