Relation between Stuttering and Higher Brain Function

Pathogenesis of developmental stuttering is controversial. We have presented two interesting cases of stuttering and discussed the factors of stuttering. Case 1. A 53-year-old right handed male had developmental stuttering. In October, 1985, he developed left putaminal hemorrhage with right hemipare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHigher Brain Function Research Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 118 - 126
Main Authors Yamamoto, Seiji, Sugiura, Syouji, Uemura, Kenichi, Igarashi, Ahemi, Kojima, Yoshiji
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society of Aphasiology (Renamed as Japan Society for Higher Brain Dysfunction) 1989
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0285-9513
1880-6716
DOI10.2496/apr.9.118

Cover

More Information
Summary:Pathogenesis of developmental stuttering is controversial. We have presented two interesting cases of stuttering and discussed the factors of stuttering. Case 1. A 53-year-old right handed male had developmental stuttering. In October, 1985, he developed left putaminal hemorrhage with right hemiparesis and Wernicke's aphasia. He did not stutter, while he had poor auditory comprehension and neglected his illness. But when his auditory comprehension was improved, his stuttering reappeared. Case 2. A 46-year-old right handed male had developmental stuttering. In February, 1984, he had left putaminal hemorrhage with Broca's aphasia and right hemiparesis. His auditory comprehension and awareness of his illness were not disturbed, and his stuttering did not disappear. The cerebral dominant theory (Orton and Travis' theory) alone cannot explain these cases of stuttering. If their cerebral dominancy had not been established, left putaminal hemorrhage might not have caused typical aphasia. We emphasize that the auditory comprehension and awareness of his illness -- monitoring system of speech -- is one of the most important factors of stuttering.
ISSN:0285-9513
1880-6716
DOI:10.2496/apr.9.118