Reduced Antibacterial Drug Resistance and bla CTX-M β-Lactamase Gene Carriage in Cattle-Associated Escherichia coli at Low Temperatures, at Sites Dominated by Older Animals, and on Pastureland: Implications for Surveillance

Little is known about the drivers of critically important antibacterial resistance in species with zoonotic potential present on farms (e.g., CTX-M β-lactamase-positive ). We collected samples monthly between January 2017 and December 2018 on 53 dairy farms in South West England, along with data for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied and environmental microbiology Vol. 87; no. 6
Main Authors Schubert, Hannah, Morley, Katy, Puddy, Emma F, Arbon, Robert, Findlay, Jacqueline, Mounsey, Oliver, Gould, Virginia C, Vass, Lucy, Evans, Madeleine, Rees, Gwen M, Barrett, David C, Turner, Katy M, Cogan, Tristan A, Avison, Matthew B, Reyher, Kristen K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 26.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Little is known about the drivers of critically important antibacterial resistance in species with zoonotic potential present on farms (e.g., CTX-M β-lactamase-positive ). We collected samples monthly between January 2017 and December 2018 on 53 dairy farms in South West England, along with data for 610 variables concerning antibacterial usage, management practices, and meteorological factors. We detected resistant to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, and tetracycline in 2,754/4,145 (66%), 263/4,145 (6%), 1,475/4,145 (36%), and 2,874/4,145 (69%), respectively, of samples from fecally contaminated on-farm and near-farm sites. positive for were detected in 224/4,145 (5.4%) of samples. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression showed antibacterial dry cow therapeutic choice (including use of cefquinome or framycetin) to be associated with higher odds of positivity. Low average monthly ambient temperature was associated with lower odds of positivity in samples and with lower odds of finding resistant to each of the four test antibacterials. This was in addition to the effect of temperature on total density. Furthermore, samples collected close to calves had higher odds of having resistant to each antibacterial, as well as positive for Samples collected on pastureland had lower odds of having resistant to amoxicillin or tetracycline, as well as lower odds of being positive for Antibacterial resistance poses a significant threat to human and animal health and global food security. Surveillance for resistance on farms is important for many reasons, including tracking impacts of interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of resistance. In this longitudinal survey of dairy farm antibacterial resistance, we showed that local temperature-as it changes over the course of a year-was associated with the prevalence of antibacterial-resistant We also showed that prevalence of resistant was lower on pastureland and higher in environments inhabited by young animals. These findings have profound implications for routine surveillance and for surveys carried out for research. They provide important evidence that sampling at a single time point and/or single location on a farm is unlikely to be adequate to accurately determine the status of the farm regarding the presence of samples containing resistant .
AbstractList Antibacterial resistance poses a significant threat to human and animal health and global food security. Surveillance for resistance on farms is important for many reasons, including tracking impacts of interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of resistance. ABSTRACT Little is known about the drivers of critically important antibacterial resistance in species with zoonotic potential present on farms (e.g., CTX-M β-lactamase-positive Escherichia coli ). We collected samples monthly between January 2017 and December 2018 on 53 dairy farms in South West England, along with data for 610 variables concerning antibacterial usage, management practices, and meteorological factors. We detected E. coli resistant to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, and tetracycline in 2,754/4,145 (66%), 263/4,145 (6%), 1,475/4,145 (36%), and 2,874/4,145 (69%), respectively, of samples from fecally contaminated on-farm and near-farm sites. E. coli positive for bla CTX-M were detected in 224/4,145 (5.4%) of samples. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression showed antibacterial dry cow therapeutic choice (including use of cefquinome or framycetin) to be associated with higher odds of bla CTX-M positivity. Low average monthly ambient temperature was associated with lower odds of bla CTX-M E. coli positivity in samples and with lower odds of finding E. coli resistant to each of the four test antibacterials. This was in addition to the effect of temperature on total E. coli density. Furthermore, samples collected close to calves had higher odds of having E. coli resistant to each antibacterial, as well as E. coli positive for bla CTX-M . Samples collected on pastureland had lower odds of having E. coli resistant to amoxicillin or tetracycline, as well as lower odds of being positive for bla CTX-M . IMPORTANCE Antibacterial resistance poses a significant threat to human and animal health and global food security. Surveillance for resistance on farms is important for many reasons, including tracking impacts of interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of resistance. In this longitudinal survey of dairy farm antibacterial resistance, we showed that local temperature—as it changes over the course of a year—was associated with the prevalence of antibacterial-resistant E. coli . We also showed that prevalence of resistant E. coli was lower on pastureland and higher in environments inhabited by young animals. These findings have profound implications for routine surveillance and for surveys carried out for research. They provide important evidence that sampling at a single time point and/or single location on a farm is unlikely to be adequate to accurately determine the status of the farm regarding the presence of samples containing resistant E. coli .
Little is known about the drivers of critically important antibacterial resistance in species with zoonotic potential present on farms (e.g., CTX-M β-lactamase-positive ). We collected samples monthly between January 2017 and December 2018 on 53 dairy farms in South West England, along with data for 610 variables concerning antibacterial usage, management practices, and meteorological factors. We detected resistant to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, streptomycin, and tetracycline in 2,754/4,145 (66%), 263/4,145 (6%), 1,475/4,145 (36%), and 2,874/4,145 (69%), respectively, of samples from fecally contaminated on-farm and near-farm sites. positive for were detected in 224/4,145 (5.4%) of samples. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression showed antibacterial dry cow therapeutic choice (including use of cefquinome or framycetin) to be associated with higher odds of positivity. Low average monthly ambient temperature was associated with lower odds of positivity in samples and with lower odds of finding resistant to each of the four test antibacterials. This was in addition to the effect of temperature on total density. Furthermore, samples collected close to calves had higher odds of having resistant to each antibacterial, as well as positive for Samples collected on pastureland had lower odds of having resistant to amoxicillin or tetracycline, as well as lower odds of being positive for Antibacterial resistance poses a significant threat to human and animal health and global food security. Surveillance for resistance on farms is important for many reasons, including tracking impacts of interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of resistance. In this longitudinal survey of dairy farm antibacterial resistance, we showed that local temperature-as it changes over the course of a year-was associated with the prevalence of antibacterial-resistant We also showed that prevalence of resistant was lower on pastureland and higher in environments inhabited by young animals. These findings have profound implications for routine surveillance and for surveys carried out for research. They provide important evidence that sampling at a single time point and/or single location on a farm is unlikely to be adequate to accurately determine the status of the farm regarding the presence of samples containing resistant .
Author Schubert, Hannah
Rees, Gwen M
Avison, Matthew B
Cogan, Tristan A
Puddy, Emma F
Mounsey, Oliver
Reyher, Kristen K
Evans, Madeleine
Morley, Katy
Gould, Virginia C
Vass, Lucy
Arbon, Robert
Findlay, Jacqueline
Turner, Katy M
Barrett, David C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hannah
  surname: Schubert
  fullname: Schubert, Hannah
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Katy
  surname: Morley
  fullname: Morley, Katy
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Emma F
  surname: Puddy
  fullname: Puddy, Emma F
  organization: School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Robert
  surname: Arbon
  fullname: Arbon, Robert
  organization: Jean Golding Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jacqueline
  surname: Findlay
  fullname: Findlay, Jacqueline
  organization: School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Oliver
  surname: Mounsey
  fullname: Mounsey, Oliver
  organization: School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Virginia C
  surname: Gould
  fullname: Gould, Virginia C
  organization: School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Lucy
  surname: Vass
  fullname: Vass, Lucy
  organization: Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Madeleine
  surname: Evans
  fullname: Evans, Madeleine
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Gwen M
  surname: Rees
  fullname: Rees, Gwen M
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 11
  givenname: David C
  surname: Barrett
  fullname: Barrett, David C
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Katy M
  surname: Turner
  fullname: Turner, Katy M
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Tristan A
  surname: Cogan
  fullname: Cogan, Tristan A
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Matthew B
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1454-8440
  surname: Avison
  fullname: Avison, Matthew B
  email: bimba@bristol.ac.uk
  organization: School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom bimba@bristol.ac.uk
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Kristen K
  surname: Reyher
  fullname: Reyher, Kristen K
  organization: Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kU1uFDEQhS0URCaBHWvkJYt08F__mN1oMoRIEwUlg8SuZXuqEyO3PbHdoFyLg3AGjoI7CazKZX3v6ZXeETrwwQNCbyk5pZR1H5bry1NCRdNVjLxAC0pkV9WcNwdoQYiUFWOCHKKjlL4TQgRpulfokHMu20bKBfpzDbvJwA4vfbZamQzRKofP4nSLryHZlJU3gJXfYe0UXm2_VZf4969qU1A1qgT4HDzglYpFdwvY-vLO2UG1TCkYq3LxXidzV3zNnVXYBGexyngTfuItjHuIKk8R0sn8eWMzJHwWRusfhfoBX7kdxJLOjsrNUAkSPP6i0qxyZf2IL8a9s0ZlG3zCQ4j4Zoo_wDo3R3-NXg5FCW-e5zH6-mm9XX2uNlfnF6vlpjK0FaQC06ihZq2QRgulW2CGcmqk1KQBTWvCQLaGd2oYxCAFZYo3WjZ6YCDq1ih-jN4_-e5juJ8g5X60ycAcAsKUeibamkvZSVLQkyfUxJBShKHfx3JefOgp6edO-9Jp_9hpz2b83bPzpEfY_Yf_lcj_AgbNoig
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41564_022_01263_0
crossref_primary_10_1099_jmm_0_001447
crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_15419
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rvsc_2022_01_010
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2021_21455
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2022_107516
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12030539
crossref_primary_10_1128_AAC_01004_21
crossref_primary_10_1093_jac_dkac208
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_960748
crossref_primary_10_1093_jac_dkab310
crossref_primary_10_1093_jac_dkad148
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2022_23083
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics10040453
crossref_primary_10_1128_aem_01791_23
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2022_838498
Cites_doi 10.1093/jac/dkq396
10.1093/jac/dkx146
10.2165/11597960-000000000-00000
10.1093/jac/dkaa207
10.3967/bes2016.048
10.1128/AEM.00373-12
10.1128/AEM.03061-15
10.1093/jac/dks118
10.1093/jac/dki412
10.1093/jac/dkr507
10.1093/jac/dky007
10.18637/jss.v080.i01
10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.09.018
10.1093/cid/ciu785
10.3168/jds.2014-8521
10.1093/biomet/asq017
10.1128/JCM.39.5.1845-1849.2001
10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.09.001
10.1093/jac/dks295
10.1007/s40265-019-01180-3
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009
10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.020
10.1186/s12866-019-1576-6
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.005
10.1093/jac/dkz397
10.3201/eid1707.110209
10.1038/s41558-018-0161-6
10.3168/jds.2017-13196
10.1038/s41598-018-35657-0
10.3168/jds.2017-13826
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1128/AEM.01468-20
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Engineering
Biology
EISSN 1098-5336
Editor Dozois, Charles M.
Editor_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Charles M.
  surname: Dozois
  fullname: Dozois, Charles M.
ExternalDocumentID 10_1128_AEM_01468_20
33397699
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
0R~
23M
2WC
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
85S
AAZTW
ABOGM
ABPPZ
ACBTR
ACGFO
ACIWK
ACNCT
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADUKH
AENEX
AFRAH
AGVNZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BKOMP
BTFSW
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
D0L
DIK
E.-
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EIF
F5P
GX1
H13
HYE
HZ~
K-O
KQ8
L7B
NPM
O9-
OK1
P2P
PQQKQ
RHF
RHI
RNS
RPM
RSF
RXW
TAE
TN5
TR2
TWZ
UCJ
UHB
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X6Y
~02
~KM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1740-ec6af52749cb4ab7e2c131c99b06eb1502e97c38aff4f9412a36b96bf2e457ca3
ISSN 0099-2240
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 23:44:24 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 12 17:25:23 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:25:18 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords mathematical modeling
antibiotic resistance
surveillance studies
food-borne pathogens
Language English
License Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1740-ec6af52749cb4ab7e2c131c99b06eb1502e97c38aff4f9412a36b96bf2e457ca3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1454-8440
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105006
PMID 33397699
PQID 2475399890
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2475399890
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_01468_20
pubmed_primary_33397699
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-02-26
20210226
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-02-26
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-02-26
  day: 26
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Applied and environmental microbiology
PublicationTitleAlternate Appl Environ Microbiol
PublicationYear 2021
References e_1_3_3_17_2
e_1_3_3_16_2
e_1_3_3_19_2
Dohoo I (e_1_3_3_34_2) 2011
e_1_3_3_18_2
e_1_3_3_13_2
e_1_3_3_36_2
e_1_3_3_12_2
e_1_3_3_37_2
e_1_3_3_15_2
e_1_3_3_14_2
e_1_3_3_35_2
e_1_3_3_32_2
e_1_3_3_33_2
e_1_3_3_11_2
e_1_3_3_30_2
e_1_3_3_10_2
e_1_3_3_31_2
e_1_3_3_6_2
e_1_3_3_5_2
e_1_3_3_8_2
e_1_3_3_7_2
e_1_3_3_28_2
e_1_3_3_9_2
e_1_3_3_27_2
e_1_3_3_29_2
e_1_3_3_24_2
e_1_3_3_23_2
e_1_3_3_26_2
e_1_3_3_25_2
e_1_3_3_2_2
e_1_3_3_20_2
e_1_3_3_4_2
e_1_3_3_22_2
e_1_3_3_3_2
e_1_3_3_21_2
References_xml – ident: e_1_3_3_12_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq396
– ident: e_1_3_3_7_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx146
– ident: e_1_3_3_31_2
  doi: 10.2165/11597960-000000000-00000
– ident: e_1_3_3_10_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa207
– ident: e_1_3_3_3_2
– ident: e_1_3_3_29_2
  doi: 10.3967/bes2016.048
– ident: e_1_3_3_18_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.00373-12
– ident: e_1_3_3_4_2
– ident: e_1_3_3_23_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.03061-15
– ident: e_1_3_3_15_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dks118
– ident: e_1_3_3_33_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dki412
– ident: e_1_3_3_11_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr507
– ident: e_1_3_3_16_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dky007
– ident: e_1_3_3_35_2
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
– volume-title: Veterinary epidemiologic research
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_3_3_34_2
  contributor:
    fullname: Dohoo I
– ident: e_1_3_3_2_2
– ident: e_1_3_3_19_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.09.018
– ident: e_1_3_3_6_2
  doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu785
– ident: e_1_3_3_24_2
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8521
– ident: e_1_3_3_36_2
  doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq017
– ident: e_1_3_3_5_2
– ident: e_1_3_3_30_2
  doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1845-1849.2001
– ident: e_1_3_3_8_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.09.001
– ident: e_1_3_3_14_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dks295
– ident: e_1_3_3_28_2
  doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01180-3
– ident: e_1_3_3_17_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009
– ident: e_1_3_3_22_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.020
– ident: e_1_3_3_25_2
  doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1576-6
– ident: e_1_3_3_20_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.005
– ident: e_1_3_3_9_2
  doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz397
– ident: e_1_3_3_13_2
  doi: 10.3201/eid1707.110209
– ident: e_1_3_3_21_2
  doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0161-6
– ident: e_1_3_3_26_2
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13196
– ident: e_1_3_3_37_2
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35657-0
– ident: e_1_3_3_32_2
– ident: e_1_3_3_27_2
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13826
SSID ssj0004068
Score 2.4006054
Snippet Little is known about the drivers of critically important antibacterial resistance in species with zoonotic potential present on farms (e.g., CTX-M...
Antibacterial resistance poses a significant threat to human and animal health and global food security. Surveillance for resistance on farms is important for...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
SubjectTerms Aging
Amoxicillin - pharmacology
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
beta-Lactamases - genetics
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - microbiology
Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli - genetics
Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology
Farms
Feces - microbiology
Streptomycin - pharmacology
Temperature
Tetracycline - pharmacology
Title Reduced Antibacterial Drug Resistance and bla CTX-M β-Lactamase Gene Carriage in Cattle-Associated Escherichia coli at Low Temperatures, at Sites Dominated by Older Animals, and on Pastureland: Implications for Surveillance
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397699
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2475399890
Volume 87
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3dbtMwFMetMYSACwTja3zpILGrLiNxPhpzV0qnCdptYp3Uu8gODkSiKWoT0HgsHgTxCDwK5zhxk2kgATdRZSVW1fOrfeyc_9-MPQuVRnYz4XAttRN4aeDEKhaO1kLGmRf1tU9658lhdHAavJ6Fs42NH52qpapUe-nX3-pK_ieq2IZxJZXsP0R23Sk24GeML14xwnj9qxi_Jd9VzBgHRZmr2naZRrFlZSrqKDO0egD1UfaG05kz6e0MRzsvuTPG2-VcNsbTVPeBz743DiJD42vs2MBh_6MVhTansugegpOTAnK8-NKbaky6a1NmgwM2n-S0kftqQRU2ZZ3dHtFB4Pgd8zn-ILZaFKE7litj50yllf7A-BSva9up-PGkWn7WdCiS5dKa5TaJM3XT0emRDCZvbaXaN0wfKtUIkw5kUbT735PFstmwfyPL9f3H1bt63hnN57Ktex4sVeNEYErRu5sl3DPi88Zqux7gyT8VU9yoOwM0U37eDucXJxZOYonBaLLnGrEad9sJ1BYNHB4l-6fjcTIdzaaX2GWOQ19k94-sUteNYiu_4PHzbn_nE6M_rHZM1jO9yW40yxUY1OzdYhu62GJX6gNMz7bYVatrX22x6x1ry9vsZ8MmnGMTiE1o2QSMISCbYNiE799aLoG4BMsl5AVc4BI6XAJxCbIE5BK6XO5So6ES1lSCOgNDJTRU7povsiigw-QL6BIJSCR0ibzDTvdH0-GB05wm4qS46nYdnUYyC3k_EKkKpOprnnq-lwqh3AgTltDlWvRTP5ZZFmQi8Lj0IyUilXEdhP1U-nfZZrEo9H0GOBHyKMxUpFyN3QkRajo2SYsMe5aRt812bCiTT7VpTGIW2zxOMOSJCXnC3W321MY5wVGdXtXJQi-qVcKDPllGxwLvuVcDsO7J92kNIcSDv3j6IbvW_g0esc1yWenHmEWX6okB8xf9nNN-
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27936,27937
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduced+Antibacterial+Drug+Resistance+and+bla+CTX-M+%CE%B2-Lactamase+Gene+Carriage+in+Cattle-Associated+Escherichia+coli+at+Low+Temperatures%2C+at+Sites+Dominated+by+Older+Animals%2C+and+on+Pastureland%3A+Implications+for+Surveillance&rft.jtitle=Applied+and+environmental+microbiology&rft.au=Schubert%2C+Hannah&rft.au=Morley%2C+Katy&rft.au=Puddy%2C+Emma+F&rft.au=Arbon%2C+Robert&rft.date=2021-02-26&rft.eissn=1098-5336&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128%2FAEM.01468-20&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon