Influences of mechanical decompression using different forces on knee joint space, range of motion, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic subjects
INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is not conclusive. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of different distraction force magnitudes on knee joint space, active range of motion (ROM),...
Saved in:
Published in | Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Vol. 14; p. e5768 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.10.2024
|
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2238-2704 2238-2704 |
DOI | 10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5768 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is not conclusive. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of different distraction force magnitudes on knee joint space, active range of motion (ROM), hamstring flexibility, and self-reported discomfort in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five asymptomatic participants were recruited in this study. The dominant knee was distracted for 30 minutes in a 30° flexion position using three force magnitudes (10%, 20%, and 30% body weight (BW)). The traction forces were randomized with one week in between knee distractions. Joint space, range of motion (ROM), and hamstring flexibility were assessed before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the distraction. The self-reported discomfort was assessed immediately after the distraction only. RESULTS: Medial joint space, ROM, and discomfort showed a significant difference between different force magnitudes post-distraction. The 20% and 30% BW force magnitudes significantly, but equally, increased joint space and ROM post distraction. The discomfort level was directly related to distraction force magnitude and the least comforting was the 30% BW force. Follow-up data was not significantly different than that for post-distraction. Hamstring muscle flexibility showed a significant. Yet, small increase after the 30% BW distraction force. CONCLUSION: Continued mechanical distraction of the knee joint using force magnitudes of 20% and 30% of body weight was effective in increasing medial joint space, active knee ROM, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals. 20% force magnitude was more comfortable than the 30% percent. |
---|---|
AbstractList | INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is not conclusive. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of different distraction force magnitudes on knee joint space, active range of motion (ROM), hamstring flexibility, and self-reported discomfort in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five asymptomatic participants were recruited in this study. The dominant knee was distracted for 30 minutes in a 30° flexion position using three force magnitudes (10%, 20%, and 30% body weight (BW)). The traction forces were randomized with one week in between knee distractions. Joint space, range of motion (ROM), and hamstring flexibility were assessed before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the distraction. The self-reported discomfort was assessed immediately after the distraction only. RESULTS: Medial joint space, ROM, and discomfort showed a significant difference between different force magnitudes post-distraction. The 20% and 30% BW force magnitudes significantly, but equally, increased joint space and ROM post distraction. The discomfort level was directly related to distraction force magnitude and the least comforting was the 30% BW force. Follow-up data was not significantly different than that for post-distraction. Hamstring muscle flexibility showed a significant. Yet, small increase after the 30% BW distraction force. CONCLUSION: Continued mechanical distraction of the knee joint using force magnitudes of 20% and 30% of body weight was effective in increasing medial joint space, active knee ROM, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals. 20% force magnitude was more comfortable than the 30% percent. |
Author | Farrag, Ahmed Taha Aljaluod, Taif Saad Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdelmoniem Hussein, Hisham Mohamed Fadulelmulla, Ibtisam Abdallah Ali, Mohammad Shahid Ansari, Aisha |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hisham Mohamed orcidid: 0000-0003-2184-6147 surname: Hussein fullname: Hussein, Hisham Mohamed – sequence: 2 givenname: Ahmed Abdelmoniem orcidid: 0000-0002-2103-1995 surname: Ibrahim fullname: Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdelmoniem – sequence: 3 givenname: Ibtisam Abdallah orcidid: 0009-0009-8314-6470 surname: Fadulelmulla fullname: Fadulelmulla, Ibtisam Abdallah – sequence: 4 givenname: Aisha orcidid: 0000-0002-8900-6374 surname: Ansari fullname: Ansari, Aisha – sequence: 5 givenname: Mohammad Shahid orcidid: 0009-0001-2266-1067 surname: Ali fullname: Ali, Mohammad Shahid – sequence: 6 givenname: Taif Saad orcidid: 0009-0002-9589-2381 surname: Aljaluod fullname: Aljaluod, Taif Saad – sequence: 7 givenname: Ahmed Taha orcidid: 0000-0003-4954-2479 surname: Farrag fullname: Farrag, Ahmed Taha |
BookMark | eNpNkNtKAzEQhoNUsNa-wzxAW5PsIcmlFE9Q8Eavl2x20qbuJkuyBfsiPq_tWsSrGebn_2C-WzLxwSMhwOiKCV6Ke84zueSC5rG3K055vsJClPKKTP-Syb_9hsxT2lNKmSwzIdSUfL962x7QG0wQLHRodto7o1to0ISuj5iSCx4OyfktNM5ajOgHsCGOFQ-fHhH2wZ2OqdcGFxC13-JIC8OpuwDtG9jpLg3xDLEtfrnatW44gvOg07Hrh9DpwRlIh3qPZkh35NrqNuH8Mmfk4-nxff2y3Lw9v64fNkvDSnX6SSpqJZoG64JxpjQvDRcZNWh5mRV1rXOOVilurRKSUlR5QTGXBS8arliZzYj85ZoYUopoqz66TsdjxWg1Kq7O8qqL4uqsuBoVZz_m53XE |
Cites_doi | 10.9734/ARRB/2015/12068 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304 10.1016/j.joca.2005.03.002 10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.015 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.12.001 10.1177/02692155221091508 10.1589/jpts.30.852 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0099.R3 10.1093/ptj/pzaa231 10.4103/0974-8520.68192 10.1136/ard.2010.142364 10.1055/s-0038-1669447 10.16965/ijpr.2017.171 10.12674/ptk.2019.26.1.060 10.1177/0269215512459062 10.1016/j.knee.2016.05.001 10.3390/healthcare11121749 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.59 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.010 10.1186/s43161-020-00005-9 10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.5.317 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5768 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physical Therapy |
EISSN | 2238-2704 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_17267_2238_2704rpf_2024_e5768 |
GroupedDBID | 5VS AAYXX ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV CITATION DIK EIHBH GROUPED_DOAJ KQ8 M~E OK1 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1698-2890f8ecdeb51219a26c2730cef2635bba42ef992ff97800e9450e48525d29163 |
ISSN | 2238-2704 |
IngestDate | Tue Jul 01 04:29:08 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1698-2890f8ecdeb51219a26c2730cef2635bba42ef992ff97800e9450e48525d29163 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2184-6147 0000-0002-2103-1995 0000-0002-8900-6374 0009-0009-8314-6470 0009-0001-2266-1067 0009-0002-9589-2381 0000-0003-4954-2479 |
OpenAccessLink | https://journals.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/fisioterapia/article/download/5768/5233 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_17267_2238_2704rpf_2024_e5768 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-10-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2024 text: 2024-10-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
References | 86129 86127 86128 86125 86126 86123 86124 86121 86122 86120 86118 86119 86116 86138 86117 86114 86136 86115 86137 86134 86135 86132 86133 86130 86131 |
References_xml | – ident: 86130 doi: 10.9734/ARRB/2015/12068 – ident: 86132 – ident: 86134 – ident: 86121 doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304 – ident: 86116 doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.03.002 – ident: 86117 doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.015 – ident: 86123 doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.12.001 – ident: 86124 doi: 10.1177/02692155221091508 – ident: 86125 doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.852 – ident: 86119 doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0099.R3 – ident: 86114 – ident: 86115 doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa231 – ident: 86131 doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.68192 – ident: 86137 doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.142364 – ident: 86120 doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669447 – ident: 86133 doi: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.171 – ident: 86127 doi: 10.12674/ptk.2019.26.1.060 – ident: 86122 doi: 10.1177/0269215512459062 – ident: 86138 doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.05.001 – ident: 86126 doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121749 – ident: 86128 doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.59 – ident: 86136 doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.010 – ident: 86129 doi: 10.1186/s43161-020-00005-9 – ident: 86135 doi: 10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.5.317 – ident: 86118 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9 |
SSID | ssj0001863779 |
Score | 2.270041 |
Snippet | INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is... |
SourceID | crossref |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | e5768 |
Title | Influences of mechanical decompression using different forces on knee joint space, range of motion, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic subjects |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb5tAEF656aWXvqu-tYfeCClsFgxHVDVyKrXKwZFyQyzMyrQBuwYOyQ_p3-xf6MwuYFK5apvLyhrMgHY-DTOz82DsXaxy8HNRuKgIC1cKmLsxOkKullKDyOd-oajA-fOXcHEuP10EF7PZz0nWUteqo_x6b13JbaSKNJQrVcn-h2RHpkjA3yhfXFHCuP6TjE-HCSONPSanKl577AKUKm5TXGunM_GAYRRKS5mF5pba-VYDOF_XJRJRs9h4-pbKDQw_M-BnSO9cZRWN-KC8S-qhaXJqTc1g1lxVm3ZtW782naLATjO1een4AW1Q5wya713ZZA5UzgmVtFPx86bMdshqmn705oJmQleocHDtq68IvujZr-z052SFdCdRBVzibpd9_Nk0lSy6SySiZ23M4lPV4iMr-isdGYzB76RuMltkn9CzpsEPIcc0ul5HonETUUmdjUnAHtqg5OVESwM5WXu_H3MR0hH2yGK7oTavQh6Nt9xs2f3bp3RMcCTXinilxCntOaXEKTWc7rC7Av0afxIDMEHBKKQGkDQQcXiDPvuMmL3_w2tNTKqJbbR8yO73Tg1PLEIfsRnUj9mDs14F8KXtXPGE_dgBlq813wGW3wAsN4DlI2C5BSzHKwRYbgDLDWAPuYGr4WbgesgRrHwEK5-AlZc1n4KVD2B9ys5PPi4_LNx-MIib-2GMWxDFno4gL0ChverHmQhzNMO9HDT1VlIqQ6Wj41hoTQ22PIhl4IGMAhEUAv2h42fsoF7X8JxxCAAoJHAsQctCQxTpKPBkEQQ6mqtcv2D-sLfpxvZ_Sf8m3Je3uOcVu7fD92t20G47eIPmbqveGoj8Ar6Cr8A |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influences+of+mechanical+decompression+using+different+forces+on+knee+joint+space%2C+range+of+motion%2C+and+hamstring+flexibility+in+asymptomatic+subjects&rft.jtitle=Revista+Pesquisa+em+Fisioterapia&rft.au=Hussein%2C+Hisham+Mohamed&rft.au=Ibrahim%2C+Ahmed+Abdelmoniem&rft.au=Fadulelmulla%2C+Ibtisam+Abdallah&rft.au=Ansari%2C+Aisha&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.issn=2238-2704&rft.eissn=2238-2704&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=e5768&rft_id=info:doi/10.17267%2F2238-2704rpf.2024.e5768&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_17267_2238_2704rpf_2024_e5768 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2238-2704&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2238-2704&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2238-2704&client=summon |