Influences of mechanical decompression using different forces on knee joint space, range of motion, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic subjects

INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is not conclusive. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of different distraction force magnitudes on knee joint space, active range of motion (ROM),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Vol. 14; p. e5768
Main Authors Hussein, Hisham Mohamed, Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdelmoniem, Fadulelmulla, Ibtisam Abdallah, Ansari, Aisha, Ali, Mohammad Shahid, Aljaluod, Taif Saad, Farrag, Ahmed Taha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.10.2024
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2238-2704
2238-2704
DOI10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5768

Cover

Loading…
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is not conclusive. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of different distraction force magnitudes on knee joint space, active range of motion (ROM), hamstring flexibility, and self-reported discomfort in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five asymptomatic participants were recruited in this study. The dominant knee was distracted for 30 minutes in a 30° flexion position using three force magnitudes (10%, 20%, and 30% body weight (BW)). The traction forces were randomized with one week in between knee distractions. Joint space, range of motion (ROM), and hamstring flexibility were assessed before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the distraction. The self-reported discomfort was assessed immediately after the distraction only. RESULTS: Medial joint space, ROM, and discomfort showed a significant difference between different force magnitudes post-distraction. The 20% and 30% BW force magnitudes significantly, but equally, increased joint space and ROM post distraction. The discomfort level was directly related to distraction force magnitude and the least comforting was the 30% BW force. Follow-up data was not significantly different than that for post-distraction. Hamstring muscle flexibility showed a significant. Yet, small increase after the 30% BW distraction force. CONCLUSION:  Continued mechanical distraction of the knee joint using force magnitudes of 20% and 30% of body weight was effective in increasing medial joint space, active knee ROM, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals. 20% force magnitude was more comfortable than the 30% percent.
AbstractList INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is not conclusive. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of different distraction force magnitudes on knee joint space, active range of motion (ROM), hamstring flexibility, and self-reported discomfort in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five asymptomatic participants were recruited in this study. The dominant knee was distracted for 30 minutes in a 30° flexion position using three force magnitudes (10%, 20%, and 30% body weight (BW)). The traction forces were randomized with one week in between knee distractions. Joint space, range of motion (ROM), and hamstring flexibility were assessed before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the distraction. The self-reported discomfort was assessed immediately after the distraction only. RESULTS: Medial joint space, ROM, and discomfort showed a significant difference between different force magnitudes post-distraction. The 20% and 30% BW force magnitudes significantly, but equally, increased joint space and ROM post distraction. The discomfort level was directly related to distraction force magnitude and the least comforting was the 30% BW force. Follow-up data was not significantly different than that for post-distraction. Hamstring muscle flexibility showed a significant. Yet, small increase after the 30% BW distraction force. CONCLUSION:  Continued mechanical distraction of the knee joint using force magnitudes of 20% and 30% of body weight was effective in increasing medial joint space, active knee ROM, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals. 20% force magnitude was more comfortable than the 30% percent.
Author Farrag, Ahmed Taha
Aljaluod, Taif Saad
Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdelmoniem
Hussein, Hisham Mohamed
Fadulelmulla, Ibtisam Abdallah
Ali, Mohammad Shahid
Ansari, Aisha
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hisham Mohamed
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2184-6147
  surname: Hussein
  fullname: Hussein, Hisham Mohamed
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ahmed Abdelmoniem
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2103-1995
  surname: Ibrahim
  fullname: Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdelmoniem
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ibtisam Abdallah
  orcidid: 0009-0009-8314-6470
  surname: Fadulelmulla
  fullname: Fadulelmulla, Ibtisam Abdallah
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Aisha
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8900-6374
  surname: Ansari
  fullname: Ansari, Aisha
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mohammad Shahid
  orcidid: 0009-0001-2266-1067
  surname: Ali
  fullname: Ali, Mohammad Shahid
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Taif Saad
  orcidid: 0009-0002-9589-2381
  surname: Aljaluod
  fullname: Aljaluod, Taif Saad
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Ahmed Taha
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4954-2479
  surname: Farrag
  fullname: Farrag, Ahmed Taha
BookMark eNpNkNtKAzEQhoNUsNa-wzxAW5PsIcmlFE9Q8Eavl2x20qbuJkuyBfsiPq_tWsSrGebn_2C-WzLxwSMhwOiKCV6Ke84zueSC5rG3K055vsJClPKKTP-Syb_9hsxT2lNKmSwzIdSUfL962x7QG0wQLHRodto7o1to0ISuj5iSCx4OyfktNM5ajOgHsCGOFQ-fHhH2wZ2OqdcGFxC13-JIC8OpuwDtG9jpLg3xDLEtfrnatW44gvOg07Hrh9DpwRlIh3qPZkh35NrqNuH8Mmfk4-nxff2y3Lw9v64fNkvDSnX6SSpqJZoG64JxpjQvDRcZNWh5mRV1rXOOVilurRKSUlR5QTGXBS8arliZzYj85ZoYUopoqz66TsdjxWg1Kq7O8qqL4uqsuBoVZz_m53XE
Cites_doi 10.9734/ARRB/2015/12068
10.2519/jospt.2021.0304
10.1016/j.joca.2005.03.002
10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.015
10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.12.001
10.1177/02692155221091508
10.1589/jpts.30.852
10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0099.R3
10.1093/ptj/pzaa231
10.4103/0974-8520.68192
10.1136/ard.2010.142364
10.1055/s-0038-1669447
10.16965/ijpr.2017.171
10.12674/ptk.2019.26.1.060
10.1177/0269215512459062
10.1016/j.knee.2016.05.001
10.3390/healthcare11121749
10.1136/bjsm.37.1.59
10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.010
10.1186/s43161-020-00005-9
10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.5.317
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5768
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Physical Therapy
EISSN 2238-2704
ExternalDocumentID 10_17267_2238_2704rpf_2024_e5768
GroupedDBID 5VS
AAYXX
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
CITATION
DIK
EIHBH
GROUPED_DOAJ
KQ8
M~E
OK1
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1698-2890f8ecdeb51219a26c2730cef2635bba42ef992ff97800e9450e48525d29163
ISSN 2238-2704
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 04:29:08 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1698-2890f8ecdeb51219a26c2730cef2635bba42ef992ff97800e9450e48525d29163
ORCID 0000-0003-2184-6147
0000-0002-2103-1995
0000-0002-8900-6374
0009-0009-8314-6470
0009-0001-2266-1067
0009-0002-9589-2381
0000-0003-4954-2479
OpenAccessLink https://journals.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/fisioterapia/article/download/5768/5233
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_17267_2238_2704rpf_2024_e5768
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
PublicationYear 2024
References 86129
86127
86128
86125
86126
86123
86124
86121
86122
86120
86118
86119
86116
86138
86117
86114
86136
86115
86137
86134
86135
86132
86133
86130
86131
References_xml – ident: 86130
  doi: 10.9734/ARRB/2015/12068
– ident: 86132
– ident: 86134
– ident: 86121
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304
– ident: 86116
  doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.03.002
– ident: 86117
  doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.015
– ident: 86123
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.12.001
– ident: 86124
  doi: 10.1177/02692155221091508
– ident: 86125
  doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.852
– ident: 86119
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0099.R3
– ident: 86114
– ident: 86115
  doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa231
– ident: 86131
  doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.68192
– ident: 86137
  doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.142364
– ident: 86120
  doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669447
– ident: 86133
  doi: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.171
– ident: 86127
  doi: 10.12674/ptk.2019.26.1.060
– ident: 86122
  doi: 10.1177/0269215512459062
– ident: 86138
  doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.05.001
– ident: 86126
  doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121749
– ident: 86128
  doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.59
– ident: 86136
  doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.010
– ident: 86129
  doi: 10.1186/s43161-020-00005-9
– ident: 86135
  doi: 10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.5.317
– ident: 86118
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9
SSID ssj0001863779
Score 2.270041
Snippet INTRODUCTION: Knee joint decompression is one of the promising methods for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Yet, the most appropriate decompression force is...
SourceID crossref
SourceType Index Database
StartPage e5768
Title Influences of mechanical decompression using different forces on knee joint space, range of motion, and hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic subjects
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb5tAEF656aWXvqu-tYfeCClsFgxHVDVyKrXKwZFyQyzMyrQBuwYOyQ_p3-xf6MwuYFK5apvLyhrMgHY-DTOz82DsXaxy8HNRuKgIC1cKmLsxOkKullKDyOd-oajA-fOXcHEuP10EF7PZz0nWUteqo_x6b13JbaSKNJQrVcn-h2RHpkjA3yhfXFHCuP6TjE-HCSONPSanKl577AKUKm5TXGunM_GAYRRKS5mF5pba-VYDOF_XJRJRs9h4-pbKDQw_M-BnSO9cZRWN-KC8S-qhaXJqTc1g1lxVm3ZtW782naLATjO1een4AW1Q5wya713ZZA5UzgmVtFPx86bMdshqmn705oJmQleocHDtq68IvujZr-z052SFdCdRBVzibpd9_Nk0lSy6SySiZ23M4lPV4iMr-isdGYzB76RuMltkn9CzpsEPIcc0ul5HonETUUmdjUnAHtqg5OVESwM5WXu_H3MR0hH2yGK7oTavQh6Nt9xs2f3bp3RMcCTXinilxCntOaXEKTWc7rC7Av0afxIDMEHBKKQGkDQQcXiDPvuMmL3_w2tNTKqJbbR8yO73Tg1PLEIfsRnUj9mDs14F8KXtXPGE_dgBlq813wGW3wAsN4DlI2C5BSzHKwRYbgDLDWAPuYGr4WbgesgRrHwEK5-AlZc1n4KVD2B9ys5PPi4_LNx-MIib-2GMWxDFno4gL0ChverHmQhzNMO9HDT1VlIqQ6Wj41hoTQ22PIhl4IGMAhEUAv2h42fsoF7X8JxxCAAoJHAsQctCQxTpKPBkEQQ6mqtcv2D-sLfpxvZ_Sf8m3Je3uOcVu7fD92t20G47eIPmbqveGoj8Ar6Cr8A
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influences+of+mechanical+decompression+using+different+forces+on+knee+joint+space%2C+range+of+motion%2C+and+hamstring+flexibility+in+asymptomatic+subjects&rft.jtitle=Revista+Pesquisa+em+Fisioterapia&rft.au=Hussein%2C+Hisham+Mohamed&rft.au=Ibrahim%2C+Ahmed+Abdelmoniem&rft.au=Fadulelmulla%2C+Ibtisam+Abdallah&rft.au=Ansari%2C+Aisha&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.issn=2238-2704&rft.eissn=2238-2704&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=e5768&rft_id=info:doi/10.17267%2F2238-2704rpf.2024.e5768&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_17267_2238_2704rpf_2024_e5768
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2238-2704&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2238-2704&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2238-2704&client=summon