Augmented Reality Body and Face Filters for Digitally Manipulated Visual Narratives: Physical Appearance Ideals, Perceived Social Validation, and Aesthetic and Affective Technologies
This paper provides a systematic literature review of studies investigating flawless fashionable ideals, digitally-enhanced augmented reality-based perception of beauty, and individual expressions and representations of visual identity. Throughout June 2022, we performed a quantitative literature re...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of research in gender studies Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 160 - 175 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Addleton Academic Publishers
2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper provides a systematic literature review of studies investigating flawless fashionable ideals, digitally-enhanced augmented reality-based perception of beauty, and individual expressions and representations of visual identity. Throughout June 2022, we performed a quantitative literature review of the Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases, with search terms including “augmented reality body and face filters for digitally manipulated visual narratives” + “physical appearance ideals,” “perceived social validation,” and “aesthetic and affective technologies.” As we inspected research published between 2013 and 2022, only 169 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria. By eliminating controversial findings, outcomes unsubstantiated by replication, too imprecise material, or having similar titles, we decided upon 32, generally empirical, sources. Data visualization tools: Dimensions (bibliometric mapping) and VOSviewer (layout algorithms). Reporting quality assessment tool: PRISMA. Methodological quality assessment tools include: AMSTAR, Distiller SR, MMAT, and ROBIS. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2164-0262 2378-3524 |
DOI: | 10.22381/JRGS122202210 |